World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Plant Science and Agronomy
Japan
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Plant Science and Agronomy 64 985 904 27 27 182 14263

Masayoshi Kawaguchi publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Masayoshi Kawaguchi between 1990 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Masayoshi Kawaguchi published across 36 years, from 1990 to 2025, averaging 5.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2013. 5 of the 189 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2013. 1990: 1 publication 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 3 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 1 publication
1990 2025

189 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Masayoshi Kawaguchi: publications per year, 1990 to 2025
Year Publications
1990 1
1991 1
1992 0
1993 2
1994 0
1995 1
1996 3
1997 2
1998 3
1999 2
2000 9
2001 3
2002 5
2003 6
2004 4
2005 8
2006 10
2007 3
2008 3
2009 7
2010 7
2011 6
2012 6
2013 15
2014 15
2015 12
2016 7
2017 2
2018 5
2019 8
2020 11
2021 8
2022 6
2023 3
2024 4
2025 1
Total 189
Download as CSV

Masayoshi Kawaguchi publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Masayoshi Kawaguchi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 467+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 255. Most scientists, 255, have 111–115 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 181–185 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36–40 publications 467+

This scientist: 182 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 2
41–45 7
46–50 40
51–55 58
56–60 60
61–65 107
66–70 130
71–75 153
76–80 191
81–85 199
86–90 206
91–95 218
96–100 226
101–105 227
106–110 247
111–115 255
116–120 253
121–125 233
126–130 219
131–135 201
136–140 194
141–145 176
146–150 157
151–155 147
156–160 151
161–165 159
166–170 137
171–175 128
176–180 126
181–185 98 182
186–190 114
191–195 100
196–200 90
201–205 71
206–210 98
211–215 70
216–220 86
221–225 61
226–230 58
231–235 53
236–240 64
241–245 39
246–250 46
251–255 51
256–260 36
261–265 44
266–270 35
271–275 30
276–280 33
281–285 35
286–290 36
291–295 26
296–300 26
301–305 31
306–310 30
311–315 21
316–320 29
321–325 14
326–330 15
331–335 15
336–340 17
341–345 15
346–350 12
351–355 17
356–360 18
361–365 12
366–370 11
371–375 6
376–380 6
381–385 11
386–390 9
391–395 10
396–400 8
401–405 4
406–410 9
411–415 11
416–420 4
421–425 7
426–430 4
431–435 3
436–440 5
441–445 8
446–450 6
451–455 7
456–460 5
461–465 6
466 2
467+ 99
Download as CSV

Masayoshi Kawaguchi D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Masayoshi Kawaguchi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 80 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 109+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 64 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 200
31 236
32 253
33 283
34 288
35 240
36 246
37 243
38 247
39 229
40 232
41 230
42 228
43 219
44 193
45 164
46 158
47 143
48 131
49 127
50 122
51 122
52 110
53 102
54 98
55 79
56 85
57 88
58 91
59 62
60 61
61 59
62 54
63 61
64 59 64
65 58
66 41
67 49
68 39
69 32
70 40
71 47
72 38
73 28
74 29
75 28
76 22
77 21
78 25
79 26
80 19
81 16
82 12
83 16
84 14
85 11
86 17
87 13
88 10
89 12
90 18
91 16
92 16
93 17
94 12
95 8
96 9
97 9
98 11
99 12
100 5
101 8
102 4
103 11
104 5
105 9
106 7
107 4
108 8
109+ 99
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Plant Science and Agronomy in Japan Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Plant Science and Agronomy in Japan Leader Award

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Gene
  • Botany
  • Enzyme

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Lotus japonicus, Botany, Mutant, Root nodule and Cell biology. His Lotus japonicus research incorporates elements of Rhizobia, Plant Root Nodulation and Lotus. His Botany research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Evolutionary biology and Organogenesis, Gene.

His Mutant research incorporates themes from Phenotype and Rhizobiaceae. His Root nodule research includes elements of Biochemistry, Signal transduction, Cytokinin and Plant physiology. His studies deal with areas such as Primordium, Nicotiana benthamiana, Arabidopsis, Transcription factor and Meristem as well as Cell biology.

His most cited work include:

  • Genome of an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus provides insight into the oldest plant symbiosis (451 citations)
  • HAR1 mediates systemic regulation of symbiotic organ development (436 citations)
  • HAR1 mediates systemic regulation of symbiotic organ development (436 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His primary areas of investigation include Lotus japonicus, Botany, Mutant, Root nodule and Symbiosis. His research in Lotus japonicus intersects with topics in Rhizobia, Lotus and Cell biology. He has researched Botany in several fields, including Rhizophagus irregularis and Arbuscular mycorrhiza.

His work carried out in the field of Mutant brings together such families of science as Phenotype, Root hair and Bacteria. His Root nodule study combines topics in areas such as Transcription factor, Kinase and Shoot. Masayoshi Kawaguchi interconnects Ecology and Transcriptome in the investigation of issues within Symbiosis.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Lotus japonicus (88.18%)
  • Botany (81.77%)
  • Mutant (50.25%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2017-2021)?

  • Symbiosis (46.80%)
  • Lotus japonicus (88.18%)
  • Root nodule (52.22%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Masayoshi Kawaguchi focuses on Symbiosis, Lotus japonicus, Root nodule, Botany and Rhizophagus irregularis. His Symbiosis research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Nodule, Lateral root and Organogenesis, Gene. His Lotus japonicus study incorporates themes from Rhizobia and Nitrogen fixation.

The concepts of his Root nodule study are interwoven with issues in Transcription factor, Lotus, Root hair, Medicago truncatula and Cell biology. Masayoshi Kawaguchi combines topics linked to Plant biochemistry with his work on Botany. His Rhizophagus irregularis study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Hypha, Fungus and Spore.

Between 2017 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • A NIN-LIKE PROTEIN mediates nitrate-induced control of root nodule symbiosis in Lotus japonicus. (60 citations)
  • A NIN-LIKE PROTEIN mediates nitrate-induced control of root nodule symbiosis in Lotus japonicus. (60 citations)
  • A shared gene drives lateral root development and root nodule symbiosis pathways in Lotus. (37 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Gene
  • Botany
  • Enzyme

His scientific interests lie mostly in Symbiosis, Lotus japonicus, Cell biology, Rhizophagus irregularis and Root nodule. His work on Gene expands to the thematically related Symbiosis. His Lotus japonicus study improves the overall literature in Mutant.

He combines subjects such as Nodule, Microbiology, Bacteria, Golgi apparatus and Medicago truncatula with his study of Mutant. His work deals with themes such as Spore, Fungus, Botany, Hypha and Fatty acid, which intersect with Rhizophagus irregularis. Plant Root Nodulation, Transcription factor, Regulator, Mesorhizobium loti and Nitrogen fixation is closely connected to Rhizobium in his research, which is encompassed under the umbrella topic of Rhizobia.

Best Publications

  • Genome of an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus provides insight into the oldest plant symbiosis

    Emilie Tisserant;Mathilde Malbreil;Alan Kuo;Annegret Kohler

  • HAR1 mediates systemic regulation of symbiotic organ development

    Rieko Nishimura;Masaki Hayashi;Guo-Jiang Wu;Guo-Jiang Wu;Hiroshi Kouchi

  • CYCLOPS, a mediator of symbiotic intracellular accommodation

    Koji Yano;Satoko Yoshida;Satoko Yoshida;Judith Müller;Sylvia Singh

  • Deregulation of a Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent kinase leads to spontaneous nodule development.

    Leïla Tirichine;Haruko Imaizumi-Anraku;Satoko Yoshida;Yasuhiro Murakami

  • Plastid proteins crucial for symbiotic fungal and bacterial entry into plant roots

    Haruko Imaizumi-Anraku;Naoya Takeda;Myriam Charpentier;Myriam Charpentier;Jillian Perry

  • Nod Factor/Nitrate-Induced CLE Genes that Drive HAR1-Mediated Systemic Regulation of Nodulation

    Satoru Okamoto;Erika Ohnishi;Shusei Sato;Hirokazu Takahashi

  • NUCLEOPORIN85 is required for calcium spiking, fungal and bacterial symbioses, and seed production in Lotus japonicus.

    Katsuharu Saito;Makoto Yoshikawa;Koji Yano;Hiroki Miwa

  • Root-derived CLE glycopeptides control nodulation by direct binding to HAR1 receptor kinase

    Satoru Okamoto;Hidefumi Shinohara;Tomoko Mori;Yoshikatsu Matsubayashi

  • How many peas in a pod? Legume genes responsible for mutualistic symbioses underground.

    Hiroshi Kouchi;Haruko Imaizumi-Anraku;Makoto Hayashi;Tsuneo Hakoyama

  • The sulfate transporter SST1 is crucial for symbiotic nitrogen fixation in Lotus japonicus root nodules

    Lene Krusell;Katja Krause;Thomas Ott;Guilhem Desbrosses

  • NENA , a Lotus japonicus Homolog of Sec13 , Is Required for Rhizodermal Infection by Arbuscular Mycorrhiza Fungi and Rhizobia but Dispensable for Cortical Endosymbiotic Development

    Martin Groth;Naoya Takeda;Jillian Perry;Hisaki Uchida

  • Nodule Inception creates a long-distance negative feedback loop involved in homeostatic regulation of nodule organ production

    Takashi Soyano;Hideki Hirakawa;Shusei Sato;Makoto Hayashi

  • Shoot-derived cytokinins systemically regulate root nodulation

    Takema Sasaki;Takuya Suzaki;Takashi Soyano;Mikiko Kojima

  • Long-distance signaling to control root nodule number.

    Erika Oka-Kira;Masayoshi Kawaguchi

  • Root, Root Hair, and Symbiotic Mutants of the Model Legume Lotus japonicus

    Masayoshi Kawaguchi;Haruko Imaizumi-Anraku;Hiroyuki Koiwa;Sinobu Niwa

  • Positive and negative regulation of cortical cell division during root nodule development in Lotus japonicus is accompanied by auxin response

    Takuya Suzaki;Takuya Suzaki;Koji Yano;Momoyo Ito;Yosuke Umehara

  • Positional Cloning Identifies Lotus japonicus NSP2, A Putative Transcription Factor of the GRAS Family, Required for NIN and ENOD40 Gene Expression in Nodule Initiation

    Yasuhiro Murakami;Hiroki Miwa;Haruko Imaizumi-Anraku;Hiroshi Kouchi

  • A shared gene drives lateral root development and root nodule symbiosis pathways in Lotus.

    Takashi Soyano;Takashi Soyano;Yoshikazu Shimoda;Masayoshi Kawaguchi;Masayoshi Kawaguchi;Makoto Hayashi

  • A NIN-LIKE PROTEIN mediates nitrate-induced control of root nodule symbiosis in Lotus japonicus.

    Hanna Nishida;Hanna Nishida;Hanna Nishida;Sachiko Tanaka;Yoshihiro Handa;Momoyo Ito

  • Construction of a genetic linkage map of the model legume Lotus japonicus using an intraspecific F2 population.

    Masaki Hayashi;Akira Miyahara;Shusei Sato;Tomohiko Kato

  • Too much love, a root regulator associated with the long-distance control of nodulation in Lotus japonicus.

    Shimpei Magori;Erika Oka-Kira;Satoshi Shibata;Yosuke Umehara

  • Shoot-applied MeJA Suppresses Root Nodulation in Lotus japonicus

    Tomomi Nakagawa;Tomomi Nakagawa;Masayoshi Kawaguchi

  • Gibberellins Interfere with Symbiosis Signaling and Gene Expression and Alter Colonization by Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi in Lotus japonicus

    Naoya Takeda;Yoshihiro Handa;Syusaku Tsuzuki;Mikiko Kojima

  • Leguminous plants: inventors of root nodules to accommodate symbiotic bacteria.

    Takuya Suzaki;Emiko Yoro;Emiko Yoro;Masayoshi Kawaguchi;Masayoshi Kawaguchi

  • Strigolactone-Induced Putative Secreted Protein 1 Is Required for the Establishment of Symbiosis by the Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungus Rhizophagus irregularis

    Syusaku Tsuzuki;Syusaku Tsuzuki;Yoshihiro Handa;Naoya Takeda;Naoya Takeda;Masayoshi Kawaguchi;Masayoshi Kawaguchi

Frequent Co-Authors

Shusei Sato
Shusei Sato Tohoku University
Hiroshi Kouchi
Hiroshi Kouchi University of Tsukuba
Martin Parniske
Martin Parniske Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Satoshi Tabata
Satoshi Tabata Tokyo University of Science
Kyuya Harada
Kyuya Harada University of Tsukuba
Jens Stougaard
Jens Stougaard Aarhus University
Shuji Shigenobu
Shuji Shigenobu National Institute for Basic Biology
Yoshikatsu Murooka
Yoshikatsu Murooka Osaka University
Tatsuhiro Ezawa
Tatsuhiro Ezawa Hokkaido University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Masayoshi Kawaguchi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles