World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
74
Citations
23430
World Ranking
5515
National Ranking
399

Martin Parniske publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Parniske sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 168 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Martin Parniske D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Parniske sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Martin Parniske is affiliated with Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München in Germany. Their research predominantly spans the fields of Agricultural and Biological Sciences as well as Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology. Within these areas, their work focuses extensively on Plant Science, Molecular Biology, Agronomy and Crop Science, Ecology, and Insect Science.

The scientist's research topics cover various aspects of plant biology and crop science, with particular attention to:

  • Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis
  • Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism
  • Nematode management and characterization studies
  • Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
  • Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
  • Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
  • Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases

Several recent publications illustrate the scope and focus of their work:

  • "Comparative phylogenomics and phylotranscriptomics provide insights into the genetic complexity of nitrogen-fixing root-nodule symbiosis" (2023), published in Plant Communications
  • "RPG interacts with E3-ligase CERBERUS to mediate rhizobial infection in Lotus japonicus" (2023), published in PLoS Genetics
  • "A novel cis-element enabled bacterial uptake by plant cells" (2022), published in bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • "A CCaMK/Cyclops response element in the promoter of Lotus japonicus calcium-binding protein 1 (CBP1) mediates transcriptional activation in root symbioses" (2022), published in New Phytologist
  • "A strawberry accession with elevated methyl anthranilate fruit concentration is naturally resistant to the pest fly Drosophila suzukii" (2020), published in PLoS ONE

Frequently collaborating with other researchers, Martin Parniske has coauthored multiple publications with individuals including Pierre-Marc Delaux, Xiaoyun Gong, Yu Zhang, Yuan Fu, and Wenfei Xian.

Their work appears across several publication venues, with the most frequent outlets being:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • The Plant Journal
  • Plant Communications
  • PLoS Genetics
  • Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Best Publications

  • Arbuscular mycorrhiza: the mother of plant root endosymbioses.

    Martin Parniske

  • A plant receptor-like kinase required for both bacterial and fungal symbiosis

    Silke Stracke;Catherine Kistner;Satoko Yoshida;Lonneke Mulder

  • INTERACTION OF ELICITOR-INDUCED DNA-BINDING PROTEINS WITH ELICITOR RESPONSE ELEMENTS IN THE PROMOTERS OF PARSLEY PR1 GENES

    P. J. Rushton;J. T. Torres;M. Parniske;P. Wernert

  • Novel Disease Resistance Specificities Result From Sequence Exchange Between Tandemly Repeated Genes at the Cf-4/9 Locus of Tomato

    Martin Parniske;Kim E Hammond-Kosack;Catherine Golstein;Colwyn M Thomas

  • Advances and current challenges in calcium signaling

    Jörg Kudla;Dirk Becker;Erwin Grill;Rainer Hedrich

  • Cell and developmental biology of arbuscular mycorrhiza symbiosis.

    Caroline Gutjahr;Martin Parniske

  • CYCLOPS, a mediator of symbiotic intracellular accommodation

    Koji Yano;Satoko Yoshida;Satoko Yoshida;Judith Müller;Sylvia Singh

  • Deregulation of a Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent kinase leads to spontaneous nodule development.

    Leïla Tirichine;Haruko Imaizumi-Anraku;Satoko Yoshida;Yasuhiro Murakami

  • Characterization of the tomato Cf-4 gene for resistance to Cladosporium fulvum identifies sequences that determine recognitional specificity in Cf-4 and Cf-9.

    Colwyn M. Thomas;David A. Jones;Martin Parniske;Kate Harrison

  • Plastid proteins crucial for symbiotic fungal and bacterial entry into plant roots

    Haruko Imaizumi-Anraku;Naoya Takeda;Myriam Charpentier;Myriam Charpentier;Jillian Perry

  • Phylogenomics reveals multiple losses of nitrogen-fixing root nodule symbiosis

    Maximilian Griesmann;Yue Chang;Xin Liu;Yue Song

  • A TILLING reverse genetics tool and a web-accessible collection of mutants of the legume Lotus japonicus.

    Jillian A. Perry;Trevor L. Wang;Tracey J. Welham;Sarah Gardner

  • Evolution of signal transduction in intracellular symbiosis

    Catherine Kistner;Martin Parniske

  • Pronounced Intraspecific Haplotype Divergence at the RPP5 Complex Disease Resistance Locus of Arabidopsis

    Laurent Noël;Tracey L. Moores;Erik A. van der Biezen;Martin Parniske

  • NUCLEOPORIN85 is required for calcium spiking, fungal and bacterial symbioses, and seed production in Lotus japonicus.

    Katsuharu Saito;Makoto Yoshikawa;Koji Yano;Hiroki Miwa

  • Intracellular accommodation of microbes by plants: a common developmental program for symbiosis and disease?

    Martin Parniske

  • Seven Lotus japonicus genes required for transcriptional reprogramming of the root during fungal and bacterial symbiosis.

    Catherine Kistner;Thilo Winzer;Andrea Pitzschke;Lonneke Mulder

  • CYCLOPS, a DNA-binding transcriptional activator, orchestrates symbiotic root nodule development

    Sylvia Singh;Katja Katzer;Jayne Lambert;Marion Cerri

  • SymRK defines a common genetic basis for plant root endosymbioses with arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi, rhizobia, and Frankia bacteria

    Hassen Gherbi;Katharina Markmann;Sergio Svistoonoff;Joan Estevan

  • Modes of expression and common structural features of the complete phenylalanine ammonia-lyase gene family in parsley

    Elke Logemann;Martin Parniske;Klaus Hahlbrock

Frequent Co-Authors

Shusei Sato
Shusei Sato Tohoku University
Trevor L. Wang
Trevor L. Wang John Innes Centre
Jens Stougaard
Jens Stougaard Aarhus University
Masayoshi Kawaguchi
Masayoshi Kawaguchi National Institute for Basic Biology
Satoko Yoshida
Satoko Yoshida Nara Institute of Science and Technology
J. Allan Downie
J. Allan Downie John Innes Centre
Satoshi Tabata
Satoshi Tabata Tokyo University of Science
Jonathan D. G. Jones
Jonathan D. G. Jones University of East Anglia
Caroline Gutjahr
Caroline Gutjahr Max Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Martin Parniske

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles