World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
53
Citations
9531
World Ranking
16223
National Ranking
1281

Trevor L. Wang publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Trevor L. Wang sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 130 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Trevor L. Wang D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Trevor L. Wang sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Trevor L. Wang is affiliated with the John Innes Centre in the United Kingdom. The primary research focus falls within Agricultural and Biological Sciences, with specific concentration on Plant Science and Molecular Biology. Additional subfields include Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecology, and Nutrition and Dietetics.

Their research covers several key topics, notably:

  • Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis
  • Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism
  • Genetic and Environmental Crop Studies
  • Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics
  • Plant Molecular Biology Research
  • Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
  • Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance

Frequent publication venues for Trevor L. Wang include:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Nature Communications
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • PLoS Genetics
  • Journal of Experimental Botany

Recent scientific papers authored or co-authored by Trevor L. Wang include:

  • "A draft genome of grass pea (Lathyrus sativus), a resilient diploid legume" (2020), bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • "Lotus japonicus karrikin receptors display divergent ligand-binding specificities and organ-dependent redundancy" (2020), PLoS Genetics
  • "Genomics and biochemical analyses reveal a metabolon key to β-L-ODAP biosynthesis in Lathyrus sativus" (2023), Nature Communications
  • "Restriction of cytosolic sucrose hydrolysis profoundly alters development, metabolism, and gene expression in Arabidopsis roots" (2020), Journal of Experimental Botany
  • "RPG interacts with E3-ligase CERBERUS to mediate rhizobial infection in Lotus japonicus" (2023), PLoS Genetics

Trevor L. Wang collaborates regularly with a group of frequent co-authors, including:

  • Anne Edwards
  • Isaac Njaci
  • Abhimanyu Sarkar
  • Gemy Kaithakottil
  • Christopher Moore

The body of work from Trevor L. Wang reflects expertise in the genetic and molecular mechanisms underpinning legume biology, symbiotic nitrogen fixation, and plant metabolism, often contributing to both primary research articles and preprints in prominent scientific venues.

Best Publications

  • CYCLOPS, a mediator of symbiotic intracellular accommodation

    Koji Yano;Satoko Yoshida;Satoko Yoshida;Judith Müller;Sylvia Singh

  • A monoclonal antibody to (S)-abscisic acid: its characterisation and use in a radioimmunoassay for measuring abscisic acid in crude extracts of cereal and lupin leaves.

    S. A. Quarrie;P. N. Whitford;N. E. J. Appleford;T. L. Wang

  • Plastid proteins crucial for symbiotic fungal and bacterial entry into plant roots

    Haruko Imaizumi-Anraku;Naoya Takeda;Myriam Charpentier;Myriam Charpentier;Jillian Perry

  • A TILLING reverse genetics tool and a web-accessible collection of mutants of the legume Lotus japonicus.

    Jillian A. Perry;Trevor L. Wang;Tracey J. Welham;Sarah Gardner

  • A proposed framework for the description of plant metabolomics experiments and their results

    Helen Ann Jenkins;Nigel William Hardy;Manfred Beckmann;John Draper

  • Can we improve the nutritional quality of legume seeds

    Trevor L. Wang;Claire Domoney;Cliff L. Hedley;Rod Casey

  • Lotus japonicus Nodulation Requires Two GRAS Domain Regulators, One of Which Is Functionally Conserved in a Non-Legume

    Anne B. Heckmann;Fabien Lombardo;Hiroki Miwa;Jillian A. Perry

  • Lipid transfer from plants to arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi

    Andreas Keymer;Priya Pimprikar;Vera Wewer;Claudia Huber

  • Starch: as simple as A, B, C?

    Trevor L. Wang;Tanya Ya. Bogracheva;Cliff L. Hedley

  • NENA , a Lotus japonicus Homolog of Sec13 , Is Required for Rhizodermal Infection by Arbuscular Mycorrhiza Fungi and Rhizobia but Dispensable for Cortical Endosymbiotic Development

    Martin Groth;Naoya Takeda;Jillian Perry;Hisaki Uchida

  • Mutations in the gene encoding starch synthase II profoundly alter amylopectin structure in pea embryos.

    Josephine Craig;James R. Lloyd;Kim Tomlinson;Lorraine Barber

  • Multiple, Distinct Isoforms of Sucrose Synthase in Pea

    D.H. Paul Barratt;Lorraine Barber;Nicholas J. Kruger;Alison M. Smith

  • An analysis of seed development in Pisum sativum L.

    Fiona M. K. Corke;C. L. Hedley;T. L. Wang

  • TILLING in extremis

    Trevor L. Wang;Cristobal Uauy;Cristobal Uauy;Fran Robson;Brad Till

  • The Clavata2 genes of pea and Lotus japonicus affect autoregulation of nodulation

    Lene Krusell;Naoto Sato;Izumi Fukuhara;Bjørn E. V. Koch

  • Structural studies of starches with different water contents

    T. Y. Bogracheva;Y. L. Wang;T. L. Wang;C. L. Hedley

  • Mutations at therug4locus alter the carbon and nitrogen metabolism of pea plants through an effect on sucrose synthase

    Josephine Craig;Paul Barratt;Helma Tatge;Annabelle Dejardin

  • TILLING Mutants of Lotus japonicus Reveal That Nitrogen Assimilation and Fixation Can Occur in the Absence of Nodule-Enhanced Sucrose Synthase

    Irmtraud Horst;Tracey Welham;Simon Kelly;Takakazu Kaneko

  • A cytosolic invertase is required for normal growth and cell development in the model legume, Lotus japonicus

    Tracey Welham;Jodie Pike;Irmtraud Horst;Emmanouil Flemetakis

  • TILLING in Lotus japonicus Identified Large Allelic Series for Symbiosis Genes and Revealed a Bias in Functionally Defective Ethyl Methanesulfonate Alleles toward Glycine Replacements

    Jillian Perry;Andreas Brachmann;Tracey Welham;Andreas Binder

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin Parniske
Martin Parniske Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Shusei Sato
Shusei Sato Tohoku University
Alison M. Smith
Alison M. Smith John Innes Centre
Cathie Martin
Cathie Martin Norwich Research Park
Caroline Gutjahr
Caroline Gutjahr Max Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology
Claire Domoney
Claire Domoney John Innes Centre
J. Allan Downie
J. Allan Downie John Innes Centre
Masayoshi Kawaguchi
Masayoshi Kawaguchi National Institute for Basic Biology
Satoshi Tabata
Satoshi Tabata Tokyo University of Science

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Trevor L. Wang

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles