World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Plant Science and Agronomy 44 3004 2793 184 163 97 8124

Caroline Gutjahr publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Caroline Gutjahr between 2005 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Caroline Gutjahr published across 21 years, from 2005 to 2025, averaging 5.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2021. 14 of the 120 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2021. 2005: 1 publication 2006: 1 publication 2007: 2 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 1 publication 2013: 4 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 19 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 18 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 9 publications
2005 2025

120 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Caroline Gutjahr: publications per year, 2005 to 2025
Year Publications
2005 1
2006 1
2007 2
2008 4
2009 3
2010 0
2011 1
2012 1
2013 4
2014 5
2015 4
2016 3
2017 6
2018 8
2019 8
2020 10
2021 19
2022 8
2023 18
2024 5
2025 9
Total 120
Download as CSV

Caroline Gutjahr publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Caroline Gutjahr sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 467+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 255. Most scientists, 255, have 111–115 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 96–100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36–40 publications 467+

This scientist: 97 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 2
41–45 7
46–50 40
51–55 58
56–60 60
61–65 107
66–70 130
71–75 153
76–80 191
81–85 199
86–90 206
91–95 218
96–100 226 97
101–105 227
106–110 247
111–115 255
116–120 253
121–125 233
126–130 219
131–135 201
136–140 194
141–145 176
146–150 157
151–155 147
156–160 151
161–165 159
166–170 137
171–175 128
176–180 126
181–185 98
186–190 114
191–195 100
196–200 90
201–205 71
206–210 98
211–215 70
216–220 86
221–225 61
226–230 58
231–235 53
236–240 64
241–245 39
246–250 46
251–255 51
256–260 36
261–265 44
266–270 35
271–275 30
276–280 33
281–285 35
286–290 36
291–295 26
296–300 26
301–305 31
306–310 30
311–315 21
316–320 29
321–325 14
326–330 15
331–335 15
336–340 17
341–345 15
346–350 12
351–355 17
356–360 18
361–365 12
366–370 11
371–375 6
376–380 6
381–385 11
386–390 9
391–395 10
396–400 8
401–405 4
406–410 9
411–415 11
416–420 4
421–425 7
426–430 4
431–435 3
436–440 5
441–445 8
446–450 6
451–455 7
456–460 5
461–465 6
466 2
467+ 99
Download as CSV

Caroline Gutjahr D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Caroline Gutjahr sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 80 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 109+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 200
31 236
32 253
33 283
34 288
35 240
36 246
37 243
38 247
39 229
40 232
41 230
42 228
43 219
44 193 44
45 164
46 158
47 143
48 131
49 127
50 122
51 122
52 110
53 102
54 98
55 79
56 85
57 88
58 91
59 62
60 61
61 59
62 54
63 61
64 59
65 58
66 41
67 49
68 39
69 32
70 40
71 47
72 38
73 28
74 29
75 28
76 22
77 21
78 25
79 26
80 19
81 16
82 12
83 16
84 14
85 11
86 17
87 13
88 10
89 12
90 18
91 16
92 16
93 17
94 12
95 8
96 9
97 9
98 11
99 12
100 5
101 8
102 4
103 11
104 5
105 9
106 7
107 4
108 8
109+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

What is she best known for?

The fields of study she is best known for:

  • Gene
  • Botany
  • Genetics

Her scientific interests lie mostly in Botany, Arbuscular mycorrhiza, Mutant, Oryza sativa and Strigolactone. Her Botany research incorporates themes from Karrikin, Signal transduction and Colonization. Her Lotus japonicus research extends to Arbuscular mycorrhiza, which is thematically connected.

Her Mutant research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Sequence analysis and Whole genome sequencing. In her study, Gene expression is inextricably linked to Medicago truncatula, which falls within the broad field of Oryza sativa. Her biological study deals with issues like Function, which deal with fields such as Gibberellin, Host and Auxin.

Her most cited work include:

  • Cell and developmental biology of arbuscular mycorrhiza symbiosis. (305 citations)
  • Strigolactone Signaling and Evolution. (228 citations)
  • Arbuscular Mycorrhiza–Specific Signaling in Rice Transcends the Common Symbiosis Signaling Pathway (198 citations)

What are the main themes of her work throughout her whole career to date?

Her primary areas of investigation include Botany, Arbuscular mycorrhiza, Lotus japonicus, Mutant and Cell biology. The various areas that Caroline Gutjahr examines in her Botany study include Medicago truncatula, Transcriptome, Oryza sativa and Colonization. The study incorporates disciplines such as Nutrient, Plant nutrition, Spore, Obligate and Fungus in addition to Arbuscular mycorrhiza.

Her work deals with themes such as Karrikin, Lotus, Butenolide and Starch, which intersect with Lotus japonicus. Her study in Mutant is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Gene expression, Auxin and Receptor complex. Her Cell biology research integrates issues from Downregulation and upregulation, Strigolactone, Meristem, Root hair and Plant cell.

She most often published in these fields:

  • Botany (62.96%)
  • Arbuscular mycorrhiza (39.51%)
  • Lotus japonicus (54.32%)

What were the highlights of her more recent work (between 2019-2021)?

  • Lotus japonicus (54.32%)
  • Mutant (48.15%)
  • Cell biology (44.44%)

In recent papers she was focusing on the following fields of study:

Her main research concerns Lotus japonicus, Mutant, Cell biology, Karrikin and Butenolide. Her Lotus japonicus research incorporates elements of Arbuscular mycorrhiza, Hydroponics and Plant nutrition. Her Arbuscular mycorrhiza research includes themes of Botany, Spore, Horticulture, Petri dish and Medicago truncatula.

Her biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Albugo laibachii and Lysozyme. Her work carried out in the field of Mutant brings together such families of science as Meristem and Receptor complex. Her study in the field of Ligand, Receptor, Arabidopsis thaliana and Genome also crosses realms of Hydrolase.

Between 2019 and 2021, her most popular works were:

  • Extensive signal integration by the phytohormone protein network (17 citations)
  • Extensive signal integration by the phytohormone protein network (17 citations)
  • The karrikin signaling regulator SMAX1 controls Lotus japonicus root and root hair development by suppressing ethylene biosynthesis. (9 citations)

In her most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Gene
  • Genetics
  • Botany

Her primary areas of study are Lotus japonicus, Karrikin, Arabidopsis, Phenotype and Receptor. Her Lotus japonicus study necessitates a more in-depth grasp of Mutant. Her Karrikin study frequently involves adjacent topics like Plant hormone.

Her studies in Phenotype integrate themes in fields like Signal transduction, Computational biology, Signalling and Interactome. In the field of Receptor, her study on Ligand overlaps with subjects such as Hydrolase. Caroline Gutjahr connects Genetic screen with Hormone receptor in her research.

Best Publications

  • Strigolactone Signaling and Evolution.

    Mark T. Waters;Caroline Gutjahr;Tom Bennett;David C. Nelson

  • Cell and developmental biology of arbuscular mycorrhiza symbiosis.

    Caroline Gutjahr;Martin Parniske

  • Systems Biology of Plant-Microbiome Interactions

    Patricia A. Rodriguez;Michael Rothballer;Soumitra Paul Chowdhury;Thomas Nussbaumer

  • Arbuscular Mycorrhiza–Specific Signaling in Rice Transcends the Common Symbiosis Signaling Pathway

    Caroline Gutjahr;Mari Banba;Vincent Croset;Kyungsook An

  • Lipid transfer from plants to arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi

    Andreas Keymer;Priya Pimprikar;Vera Wewer;Claudia Huber

  • Cereal mycorrhiza: an ancient symbiosis in modern agriculture.

    Ruairidh J.H. Sawers;Caroline Gutjahr;Uta Paszkowski

  • A CCaMK-CYCLOPS-DELLA Complex Activates Transcription of RAM1 to Regulate Arbuscule Branching.

    Priya Pimprikar;Samy Carbonnel;Michael Paries;Katja Katzer

  • Partner communication and role of nutrients in the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis

    Luisa Lanfranco;Valentina Fiorilli;Caroline Gutjahr

  • Rice perception of symbiotic arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi requires the karrikin receptor complex

    Caroline Gutjahr;Caroline Gutjahr;Enrico Gobbato;Jeongmin Choi;Michael Riemann

  • Auxin Perception Is Required for Arbuscule Development in Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Symbiosis

    Mohammad Etemadi;Caroline Gutjahr;Jean-Malo Couzigou;Mohamed Zouine

  • Glomus intraradices induces changes in root system architecture of rice independently of common symbiosis signaling.

    Caroline Gutjahr;Leonardo Casieri;Uta Paszkowski

  • Phytohormone signaling in arbuscular mycorhiza development.

    Caroline Gutjahr

  • Multiple control levels of root system remodeling in arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis

    Caroline Gutjahr;Uta Paszkowski

  • Weights in the balance: jasmonic acid and salicylic acid signaling in root-biotroph interactions.

    Caroline Gutjahr;Uta Paszkowski

  • Mutation identification by direct comparison of whole-genome sequencing data from mutant and wild-type individuals using k-mers

    Karl J V Nordström;Maria C Albani;Geo Velikkakam James;Caroline Gutjahr;Caroline Gutjahr

  • PHOSPHATE STARVATION RESPONSE transcription factors enable arbuscular mycorrhiza symbiosis

    Unknown

  • The half‐size ABC transporters STR1 and STR2 are indispensable for mycorrhizal arbuscule formation in rice

    Caroline Gutjahr;Dragica Radovanovic;Jessika Geoffroy;Quan Zhang

  • Extensive signal integration by the phytohormone protein network

    Melina Altmann;Stefan Altmann;Patricia A. Rodriguez;Benjamin Weller

  • Divergence of Evolutionary Ways Among Common sym Genes : CASTOR and CCaMK Show Functional Conservation Between Two Symbiosis Systems and Constitute the Root of a Common Signaling Pathway

    Mari Banba;Caroline Gutjahr;Akio Miyao;Hirohiko Hirochika

  • SMAX1/SMXL2 regulate root and root hair development downstream of KAI2-mediated signalling in Arabidopsis.

    José Antonio Villaécija-Aguilar;Maxime Hamon-Josse;Samy Carbonnel;Samy Carbonnel;Annika Kretschmar

  • Genetic Control of Lateral Root Formation in Cereals

    Peng Yu;Peng Yu;Caroline Gutjahr;Chunjian Li;Frank Hochholdinger

  • Transcriptional Regulation of Arbuscular Mycorrhiza Development.

    Priya Pimprikar;Priya Pimprikar;Caroline Gutjahr;Caroline Gutjahr

  • Cross-kingdom lipid transfer in arbuscular mycorrhiza symbiosis and beyond.

    Andreas Keymer;Caroline Gutjahr

  • Transcriptome diversity among rice root types during asymbiosis and interaction with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi.

    Caroline Gutjahr;Caroline Gutjahr;Ruairidh J.H. Sawers;Ruairidh J.H. Sawers;Guillaume Marti;Liliana Andrés-Hernández

Frequent Co-Authors

Uta Paszkowski
Uta Paszkowski University of Cambridge
Martin Parniske
Martin Parniske Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Trevor L. Wang
Trevor L. Wang John Innes Centre
Peter Dörmann
Peter Dörmann University of Bonn
Michael K. Udvardi
Michael K. Udvardi Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Gynheung An
Gynheung An Kyung Hee University
Frank Hochholdinger
Frank Hochholdinger University of Bonn
Chunjian Li
Chunjian Li China Agricultural University
Michael Riemann
Michael Riemann Research Institute of Organic Agriculture
Klaus F. X. Mayer
Klaus F. X. Mayer Technical University of Munich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Caroline Gutjahr

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles