World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Michael Wagner

Michael Wagner

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 114 4706 4415 255 246 833 51854

Michael Wagner publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Michael Wagner between 1967 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Michael Wagner published across 59 years, from 1967 to 2025, averaging 19.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 85 publications in 2021. 15 of the 1,133 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60 80
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1967 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 85. Peak 85 publications in 2021. 1967: 1 publication 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 1 publication 1972: 0 publications 1973: 1 publication 1974: 0 publications 1975: 1 publication 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 2 publications 1979: 2 publications 1980: 6 publications 1981: 4 publications 1982: 8 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 5 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 11 publications 1990: 8 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 8 publications 1994: 12 publications 1995: 11 publications 1996: 13 publications 1997: 10 publications 1998: 18 publications 1999: 17 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 19 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 17 publications 2004: 37 publications 2005: 21 publications 2006: 42 publications 2007: 33 publications 2008: 39 publications 2009: 29 publications 2010: 42 publications 2011: 34 publications 2012: 48 publications 2013: 61 publications 2014: 53 publications 2015: 45 publications 2016: 38 publications 2017: 66 publications 2018: 71 publications 2019: 80 publications 2020: 72 publications 2021: 85 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 6 publications
1967 2025

1,133 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Michael Wagner: publications per year, 1967 to 2025
Year Publications
1967 1
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 1
1972 0
1973 1
1974 0
1975 1
1976 0
1977 0
1978 2
1979 2
1980 6
1981 4
1982 8
1983 0
1984 5
1985 2
1986 3
1987 4
1988 4
1989 11
1990 8
1991 4
1992 2
1993 8
1994 12
1995 11
1996 13
1997 10
1998 18
1999 17
2000 9
2001 19
2002 11
2003 17
2004 37
2005 21
2006 42
2007 33
2008 39
2009 29
2010 42
2011 34
2012 48
2013 61
2014 53
2015 45
2016 38
2017 66
2018 71
2019 80
2020 72
2021 85
2022 3
2023 5
2024 9
2025 6
Total 1,133
Download as CSV

Michael Wagner publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Wagner sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 821–840 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 833 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186 833
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Michael Wagner D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Wagner sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 114–115 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 114 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393 114
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Michael Wagner is affiliated with TU Dresden in Germany and has contributed extensively to research in the fields of Engineering and Environmental Science. Their work spans multiple subfields including Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, Environmental Engineering, Molecular Biology, and Water Science and Technology.

Their research primarily focuses on topics such as:

  • Microbial Fuel Cells and Bioremediation
  • Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
  • Membrane Separation Technologies
  • Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
  • Electrochemical sensors and biosensors
  • Membrane-based Ion Separation Techniques
  • Perovskite Materials and Applications

Michael Wagner has published in several frequent venues, including:

  • Journal of Membrane Science
  • Energy & Environmental Science
  • npj Biofilms and Microbiomes
  • Biosensors
  • Separation and Purification Technology

Among their most recent papers are:

  • Exploring flow-biofilm-sediment interactions: Assessment of current status and future challenges (2020, Water Research)
  • Extracellular riboflavin induces anaerobic biofilm formation in Shewanella oneidensis (2021, Biotechnology for Biofuels)
  • Noninvasive monitoring of fouling in membrane processes by optical coherence tomography: A review (2023, Journal of Membrane Science)
  • From an extremophilic community to an electroautotrophic production strain: identifying a novel Knallgas bacterium as cathodic biofilm biocatalyst (2020, The ISME Journal)
  • Monitoring and quantification of bioelectrochemical Kyrpidia spormannii biofilm development in a novel flow cell setup (2020, Chemical Engineering Journal)

Frequent co-authors of Michael Wagner include:

  • Harald Horn
  • Johannes Gescher
  • Florencia Saravia
  • Andreas Netsch
  • Szilárd S. Bucs

Best Publications

  • A conceptual framework for research on subjective cognitive decline in preclinical Alzheimer's disease

    Frank Jessen;Frank Jessen;Rebecca E. Amariglio;Martin van Boxtel;Monique Breteler

  • A standardized boundary element method volume conductor model

    Manfred Fuchs;Jörn Kastner;Michael Wagner;Susan Hawes

  • Genomic Relationships, Novel Loci, and Pleiotropic Mechanisms across Eight Psychiatric Disorders

    Phil H. Lee;Verneri Anttila;Hyejung Won;Yen-Chen A. Feng

  • The characterisation of subjective cognitive decline

    Frank Jessen;Frank Jessen;Rebecca E Amariglio;Rachel F Buckley;Rachel F Buckley;Wiesje M van der Flier

  • Oxytocin Enhances Amygdala-Dependent, Socially Reinforced Learning and Emotional Empathy in Humans

    René Hurlemann;Alexandra Patin;Oezguer A. Onur;Michael X. Cohen

  • Psychische Störungen in der Allgemeinbevölkerung

    F. Jacobi;M. Höfler;J. Strehle;S. Mack

  • Study of 300,486 individuals identifies 148 independent genetic loci influencing general cognitive function

    Gail Davies;Max Lam;Sarah E. Harris;Joey W. Trampush

  • Prediction of dementia by subjective memory impairment: effects of severity and temporal association with cognitive impairment.

    Frank Jessen;Birgitt Wiese;Cadja Bachmann;Sandra Eifflaender-Gorfer

  • General principles for the clinical use of the LCP.

    Michael Wagner

  • Twelve-month prevalence, comorbidity and correlates of mental disorders in Germany: the Mental Health Module of the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Adults (DEGS1-MH)

    Frank Jacobi;Frank Jacobi;Michael Höfler;Jens Siegert;Simon Mack

  • Revealing the complex genetic architecture of obsessive-compulsive disorder using meta-analysis

    Paul D. Arnold;Kathleen D. Askland;Cristina Barlassina;Laura Bellodi

  • Linear and nonlinear current density reconstructions.

    Manfred Fuchs;Michael Wagner;Thomas Köhler;Hans-Aloys Wischmann

  • Erratum zu: Psychische Störungen in der Allgemeinbevölkerung. Studie zur Gesundheit Erwachsener in Deutschland und ihr Zusatzmodul „Psychische Gesundheit“ (DEGS1-MH)

    F. Jacobi;M. Höfler;J. Strehle;S. Mack

  • Implementation of subjective cognitive decline criteria in research studies.

    José L. Molinuevo;Laura A. Rabin;Laura A. Rabin;Rebecca Amariglio;Rachel Buckley;Rachel Buckley;Rachel Buckley

  • AD dementia risk in late MCI, in early MCI, and in subjective memory impairment

    Frank Jessen;Frank Jessen;Steffen Wolfsgruber;Steffen Wolfsgruber;Birgitt Wiese;Horst Bickel

  • Subjective Cognitive Decline in Older Adults: An Overview of Self-Report Measures Used Across 19 International Research Studies

    Laura A. Rabin;Laura A. Rabin;Laura A. Rabin;Colette M. Smart;Paul K. Crane;Rebecca E. Amariglio

  • Genome-wide association study of obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    S. E. Stewart;D. Yu;J. M. Scharf;B. M. Neale

  • Subcortical Correlates of Craving in Recently Abstinent Alcoholic Patients

    Frank Schneider;Ute Habel;Michael Wagner;Petra Franke

  • First clinical results of the Locking Compression Plate (LCP)

    Christoph Sommer;Emanuel Gautier;Matthias Müller;David L. Helfet

  • Reversal of Mitochondrial Transhydrogenase Causes Oxidative Stress in Heart Failure

    Alexander G. Nickel;Albrecht Von Hardenberg;Mathias Hohl;Joachim R. Löffler

Frequent Co-Authors

Wolfgang Maier
Wolfgang Maier University of Bonn
Frank Jessen
Frank Jessen University of Cologne
Oliver Peters
Oliver Peters German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases
Steffi G. Riedel-Heller
Steffi G. Riedel-Heller Leipzig University
Jens Wiltfang
Jens Wiltfang University of Göttingen
Michael T. Heneka
Michael T. Heneka University Hospital Bonn
Emrah Düzel
Emrah Düzel German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases
Josef Priller
Josef Priller Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Christoph Laske
Christoph Laske University of Tübingen
Katharina Buerger
Katharina Buerger Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens doors to multiple related career pathways—many of which can now be pursued through flexible online degrees. For students keen to specialize quickly, the shortest pmhnp program can lead to a career as a Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner in a fraction of the time compared to traditional routes.

Those interested in the business side of healthcare will find options like the cheapest online healthcare administration degree, which combines affordability with the skills needed to manage healthcare systems effectively. Aspiring leaders can take the next step with a master's in healthcare administration online, preparing for roles in hospital or clinic management.

If advancing your clinical practice is the goal, pursuing one of the cheapest dnp programs online can provide the credentials for higher leadership or specialized nursing roles, often while balancing work and study. Each of these online pathways offers a flexible, cost-effective alternative for aspiring healthcare professionals.

Best Scientists Citing Michael Wagner

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles