World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Neuroscience
Ireland
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
71
Citations
18398
World Ranking
2410
National Ranking
7

Sven Vanneste publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sven Vanneste sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 304 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Sven Vanneste D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sven Vanneste sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 71 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Neuroscience in Ireland Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Neuroscience in Ireland Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Neuroscience in Ireland Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Neuroscience in Ireland Leader Award

Overview

Sven Vanneste is affiliated with Trinity College Dublin in Ireland and specializes in neuroscience and medicine. Their research spans multiple subfields, including cognitive neuroscience, neurology, sensory systems, experimental and cognitive psychology, and anesthesiology and pain medicine. The scientist's work frequently appears in well-known academic venues.

Their most cited recent publications include:

  • The anatomy of pain and suffering in the brain and its clinical implications, 2021, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • Pain and the Triple Network Model, 2022, Frontiers in Neurology
  • Bimodal neuromodulation combining sound and tongue stimulation reduces tinnitus symptoms in a large randomized clinical study, 2020, Science Translational Medicine
  • Tinnitus and the Triple Network Model: A Perspective, 2022, Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology
  • The peripheral effect of direct current stimulation on brain circuits involving memory, 2020, Science Advances

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Sven Vanneste include:

  • Dirk De Ridder
  • Anusha Mohan
  • Berthold Langguth
  • Divya Bharatkumar Adhia
  • Sook Ling Leong

The scientist's work is published regularly in venues such as:

  • Brain Stimulation
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • Scientific Reports
  • Hearing Research
  • Frontiers in Neurology

Main research topics explored by Sven Vanneste include:

  • Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Vestibular and auditory disorders
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Pain Management and Treatment

The interaction of neural mechanisms underlying pain perception and auditory disorders features prominently in their work. They have contributed to understanding pain via brain network models and explored interventions such as neuromodulation techniques.

Their research output includes integration of experimental and clinical neuroscience approaches, covering brain stimulation modalities and sensory system investigations. The combination of clinical perspectives with neuroscience techniques reflects their interdisciplinary focus.

Best Publications

  • Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)

    Jean Pascal Lefaucheur;Andrea Antal;Samar S. Ayache;David H. Benninger

  • An integrative model of auditory phantom perception: tinnitus as a unified percept of interacting separable subnetworks.

    Dirk De Ridder;Sven Vanneste;Nathan Weisz;Alain Londero

  • The neural correlates of tinnitus-related distress

    Sven Vanneste;Mark Plazier;Elsa van der Loo;Paul Van de Heyning

  • Burst spinal cord stimulation: toward paresthesia-free pain suppression.

    Dirk De Ridder;Sven Vanneste;Mark Plazier;Elsa van der Loo

  • Burst spinal cord stimulation for limb and back pain.

    Dirk De Ridder;Mark Plazier;Niels Kamerling;Tomas Menovsky

  • Tinnitus: perspectives from human neuroimaging

    Ana Belén Elgoyhen;Berthold Langguth;Dirk De Ridder;Sven Vanneste

  • Tinnitus Intensity Dependent Gamma Oscillations of the Contralateral Auditory Cortex

    Elsa van der Loo;Steffen Gais;Marco Congedo;Sven Vanneste

  • Tinnitus and tinnitus disorder: Theoretical and operational definitions (an international multidisciplinary proposal)

    Dirk De Ridder;Winfried Schlee;Sven Vanneste;Alain Londero

  • Thalamocortical Dysrhythmia: A Theoretical Update in Tinnitus

    Dirk De Ridder;Sven Vanneste;Berthold Langguth;Rodolfo Llinas

  • Tinnitus and anxiety disorders: A review

    T Pattyn;F Van Den Eede;S Vanneste;L Cassiers

  • The Bayesian brain: Phantom percepts resolve sensory uncertainty

    Dirk De Ridder;Sven Vanneste;Walter Freeman

  • Editorial: Towards an Understanding of Tinnitus Heterogeneity.

    Christopher R. Cederroth;Silvano Gallus;Deborah A. Hall;Tobias Kleinjung

  • Thalamocortical dysrhythmia detected by machine learning

    Sven Vanneste;Jae Jin Song;Dirk De Ridder

  • The auditory and non-auditory brain areas involved in tinnitus. An emergent property of multiple parallel overlapping subnetworks.

    Sven Vanneste;Dirk De Ridder

  • You can judge a book by its cover: the sequel.: A kernel of truth in predictive cheating detection

    Jan Verplaetse;Sven Vanneste;Johan Braeckman

  • Burst and tonic spinal cord stimulation: Different and common brain mechanisms

    Dirk De Ridder;Sven Vanneste

  • The anatomy of pain and suffering in the brain and its clinical implications.

    Dirk De Ridder;Divya Adhia;Sven Vanneste

  • Methodological aspects of clinical trials in tinnitus: A proposal for an international standard

    Michael Landgrebe;Andréia Azevedo;David Baguley;Carol Bauer

  • The neural network of phantom sound changes over time : a comparison between recent-onset and chronic tinnitus patients

    Sven Vanneste;Paul van de Heyning;Dirk De Ridder

  • Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation Evaluated in Patients With Failed Back Surgery Syndrome and Painful Diabetic Neuropathy

    Cecile C. de Vos;Cecile C. de Vos;Marjanne J. Bom;Sven Vanneste;Mathieu W.P.M. Lenders

  • Safety and Efficacy of Vagus Nerve Stimulation Paired With Tones for the Treatment of Tinnitus: A Case Series

    Dirk De Ridder Md;MA Sven Vanneste Msc;Michael P. Kilgard

Frequent Co-Authors

Dirk De Ridder
Dirk De Ridder University of Otago
Paul Van de Heyning
Paul Van de Heyning University of Antwerp
Berthold Langguth
Berthold Langguth University of Regensburg
John Hart
John Hart University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Winfried Schlee
Winfried Schlee University of Regensburg
Michael P. Kilgard
Michael P. Kilgard The University of Texas at Dallas
Ana Belén Elgoyhen
Ana Belén Elgoyhen University of Buenos Aires
Marco Congedo
Marco Congedo Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Ian H. Robertson
Ian H. Robertson Trinity College Dublin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Sven Vanneste

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles