World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Neuroscience
Ireland
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 71 2410 2204 7 7 304 18398

Sven Vanneste publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Sven Vanneste between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Sven Vanneste published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 16.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 29 publications in 2015. 48 of the 373 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 29. Peak 29 publications in 2015. 2003: 1 publication 2004: 2 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 3 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 21 publications 2012: 22 publications 2013: 24 publications 2014: 22 publications 2015: 29 publications 2016: 28 publications 2017: 22 publications 2018: 26 publications 2019: 17 publications 2020: 18 publications 2021: 25 publications 2022: 25 publications 2023: 19 publications 2024: 29 publications 2025: 19 publications
2003 2025

373 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Sven Vanneste: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 1
2004 2
2005 2
2006 3
2007 4
2008 1
2009 3
2010 11
2011 21
2012 22
2013 24
2014 22
2015 29
2016 28
2017 22
2018 26
2019 17
2020 18
2021 25
2022 25
2023 19
2024 29
2025 19
Total 373
Download as CSV

Sven Vanneste publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sven Vanneste sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 298–307 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 304 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127 304
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Sven Vanneste D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sven Vanneste sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 70–71 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 71 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210 71
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Neuroscience in Ireland Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Neuroscience in Ireland Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Neuroscience in Ireland Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Neuroscience in Ireland Leader Award

Overview

Sven Vanneste is affiliated with Trinity College Dublin in Ireland and specializes in neuroscience and medicine. Their research spans multiple subfields, including cognitive neuroscience, neurology, sensory systems, experimental and cognitive psychology, and anesthesiology and pain medicine. The scientist's work frequently appears in well-known academic venues.

Their most cited recent publications include:

  • The anatomy of pain and suffering in the brain and its clinical implications, 2021, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • Pain and the Triple Network Model, 2022, Frontiers in Neurology
  • Bimodal neuromodulation combining sound and tongue stimulation reduces tinnitus symptoms in a large randomized clinical study, 2020, Science Translational Medicine
  • Tinnitus and the Triple Network Model: A Perspective, 2022, Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology
  • The peripheral effect of direct current stimulation on brain circuits involving memory, 2020, Science Advances

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Sven Vanneste include:

  • Dirk De Ridder
  • Anusha Mohan
  • Berthold Langguth
  • Divya Bharatkumar Adhia
  • Sook Ling Leong

The scientist's work is published regularly in venues such as:

  • Brain Stimulation
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • Scientific Reports
  • Hearing Research
  • Frontiers in Neurology

Main research topics explored by Sven Vanneste include:

  • Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Vestibular and auditory disorders
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Pain Management and Treatment

The interaction of neural mechanisms underlying pain perception and auditory disorders features prominently in their work. They have contributed to understanding pain via brain network models and explored interventions such as neuromodulation techniques.

Their research output includes integration of experimental and clinical neuroscience approaches, covering brain stimulation modalities and sensory system investigations. The combination of clinical perspectives with neuroscience techniques reflects their interdisciplinary focus.

Best Publications

  • Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)

    Jean Pascal Lefaucheur;Andrea Antal;Samar S. Ayache;David H. Benninger

  • An integrative model of auditory phantom perception: tinnitus as a unified percept of interacting separable subnetworks.

    Dirk De Ridder;Sven Vanneste;Nathan Weisz;Alain Londero

  • The neural correlates of tinnitus-related distress

    Sven Vanneste;Mark Plazier;Elsa van der Loo;Paul Van de Heyning

  • Burst spinal cord stimulation: toward paresthesia-free pain suppression.

    Dirk De Ridder;Sven Vanneste;Mark Plazier;Elsa van der Loo

  • Burst spinal cord stimulation for limb and back pain.

    Dirk De Ridder;Mark Plazier;Niels Kamerling;Tomas Menovsky

  • Tinnitus: perspectives from human neuroimaging

    Ana Belén Elgoyhen;Berthold Langguth;Dirk De Ridder;Sven Vanneste

  • Tinnitus Intensity Dependent Gamma Oscillations of the Contralateral Auditory Cortex

    Elsa van der Loo;Steffen Gais;Marco Congedo;Sven Vanneste

  • Thalamocortical Dysrhythmia: A Theoretical Update in Tinnitus

    Dirk De Ridder;Sven Vanneste;Berthold Langguth;Rodolfo Llinas

  • Tinnitus and anxiety disorders: A review

    T Pattyn;F Van Den Eede;S Vanneste;L Cassiers

  • The Bayesian brain: Phantom percepts resolve sensory uncertainty

    Dirk De Ridder;Sven Vanneste;Walter Freeman

  • Editorial: Towards an Understanding of Tinnitus Heterogeneity.

    Christopher R. Cederroth;Silvano Gallus;Deborah A. Hall;Tobias Kleinjung

  • Thalamocortical dysrhythmia detected by machine learning

    Sven Vanneste;Jae Jin Song;Dirk De Ridder

  • The auditory and non-auditory brain areas involved in tinnitus. An emergent property of multiple parallel overlapping subnetworks.

    Sven Vanneste;Dirk De Ridder

  • You can judge a book by its cover: the sequel.: A kernel of truth in predictive cheating detection

    Jan Verplaetse;Sven Vanneste;Johan Braeckman

  • Burst and tonic spinal cord stimulation: Different and common brain mechanisms

    Dirk De Ridder;Sven Vanneste

  • The anatomy of pain and suffering in the brain and its clinical implications.

    Dirk De Ridder;Divya Adhia;Sven Vanneste

  • Methodological aspects of clinical trials in tinnitus: A proposal for an international standard

    Michael Landgrebe;Andréia Azevedo;David Baguley;Carol Bauer

  • The neural network of phantom sound changes over time : a comparison between recent-onset and chronic tinnitus patients

    Sven Vanneste;Paul van de Heyning;Dirk De Ridder

  • Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation Evaluated in Patients With Failed Back Surgery Syndrome and Painful Diabetic Neuropathy

    Cecile C. de Vos;Cecile C. de Vos;Marjanne J. Bom;Sven Vanneste;Mathieu W.P.M. Lenders

  • Safety and Efficacy of Vagus Nerve Stimulation Paired With Tones for the Treatment of Tinnitus: A Case Series

    Dirk De Ridder Md;MA Sven Vanneste Msc;Michael P. Kilgard

Frequent Co-Authors

Dirk De Ridder
Dirk De Ridder University of Otago
Paul Van de Heyning
Paul Van de Heyning University of Antwerp
Berthold Langguth
Berthold Langguth University of Regensburg
John Hart
John Hart University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Winfried Schlee
Winfried Schlee University of Regensburg
Michael P. Kilgard
Michael P. Kilgard The University of Texas at Dallas
Ana Belén Elgoyhen
Ana Belén Elgoyhen University of Buenos Aires
Marco Congedo
Marco Congedo Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Ian H. Robertson
Ian H. Robertson Trinity College Dublin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Sven Vanneste

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles