World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
54
Citations
11793
World Ranking
4560
National Ranking
2133

Karem A. Sakallah publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Karem A. Sakallah sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 210 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Karem A. Sakallah D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Karem A. Sakallah sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2012 - ACM Fellow For algorithms for Boolean Satisfiability that advanced the state-of-the-art of hardware verification.
  • 1998 - IEEE Fellow For contributions to the modeling, analysis, and optimization of digital system timing.

Overview

Karem A. Sakallah is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their scholarly work centers predominantly on computer science, with a focus on computational theory and mathematics, artificial intelligence, computer networks and communications, software, and safety, risk, reliability, and quality.

Their main research topics include formal methods in verification, distributed systems and fault tolerance, logic, programming and type systems, software testing and debugging techniques, security and verification in computing, Petri nets in system modeling, and safety systems engineering in autonomy.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Sakallah include Aman Goel, Denis Bueno, Y. Luo, Stephan Merz, and Arlen Cox.

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Sakallah are:

  • Towards an Automatic Proof of Lamport's Paxos, 2021, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Regularity and quantification: a new approach to verify distributed protocols, 2022, Innovations in Systems and Software Engineering
  • EUFicient Reachability for Software with Arrays, 2020, reposiTUm (TU Wien)
  • Proceedings 8th International Workshop on Verification and Program Transformation and 7th Workshop on Horn Clauses for Verification and Synthesis, 2020, Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science
  • On Symmetry and Quantification: A New Approach to Verify Distributed Protocols, 2021, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

These publications have appeared in various venues including arXiv (Cornell University), Innovations in Systems and Software Engineering, reposiTUm (TU Wien), Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science, and Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research).

Sakallah has been recognized as an ACM Fellow in 2012 for contributions related to algorithms for Boolean satisfiability advancing hardware verification. The IEEE Fellow honor was awarded in 1998 for work on modeling, analysis, and optimization of digital system timing.

Best Publications

  • GRASP: a search algorithm for propositional satisfiability

    J.P. Marques-Silva;K.A. Sakallah

  • GRASP—a new search algorithm for satisfiability

    João P. Marques Silva;Karem A. Sakallah

  • Algorithms for Computing Minimal Unsatisfiable Subsets of Constraints

    Mark H. Liffiton;Karem A. Sakallah

  • SATIRE: a new incremental satisfiability engine

    Jesse Whittemore;Joonyoung Kim;Karem Sakallah

  • Efficient symmetry breaking for Boolean satisfiability

    F.A. Aloul;K.A. Sakallah;I.L. Markov

  • Generic ILP versus specialized 0-1 ILP: an update

    Fadi A. Aloul;Arathi Ramani;Igor L. Markov;Karem A. Sakallah

  • A comparative study of two Boolean formulations of FPGA detailed routing constraints

    G.-J. Nam;F. Aloul;K.A. Sakallah;R.A. Rutenbar

  • Analysis and design of latch-controlled synchronous digital circuits

    K.A. Sakallah;T.N. Mudge;O.A. Olukotun

  • Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2007)

    João Marques-Silva;Karem A. Sakallah

  • Exploiting structure in symmetry detection for CNF

    Paul T. Darga;Mark H. Liffiton;Karem A. Sakallah;Igor L. Markov

  • Boolean satisfiability in electronic design automation

    João P. Marques-Silva;Karem A. Sakallah

  • CheckT/sub c/ and minT/sub c/: timing verification and optimal clocking of synchronous digital circuits

    K.A. Sakallah;T.N. Mudge;O.A. Olukotun

  • Congestion driven quadratic placement

    Phiroze N. Parakh;Richard B. Brown;Karem A. Sakallah

  • PBS: A Backtrack-Search Pseudo-Boolean Solver and Optimizer

    Fadi A. Aloul;Arathi Ramani;Igor L. Markov;Karem A. Sakallah

  • On finding all minimally unsatisfiable subformulas

    Mark H. Liffiton;Karem A. Sakallah

  • Solving difficult instances of Boolean satisfiability in the presence of symmetry

    F.A. Aloul;A. Ramani;I.L. Markov;K.A. Sakallah

  • Solving difficult SAT instances in the presence of symmetry

    Fadi A. Aloul;Arathi Ramani;Igor L. Markov;Karem A. Sakallah

  • AMUSE: a minimally-unsatisfiable subformula extractor

    Yoonna Oh;Maher N. Mneimneh;Zaher S. Andraus;Karem A. Sakallah

  • Pueblo: A Hybrid Pseudo-Boolean SAT Solver

    Hossein M. Sheini;Karem A. Sakallah

  • Faster symmetry discovery using sparsity of symmetries

    Paul T. Darga;Karem A. Sakallah;Igor L. Markov

  • Theory and applications of satisfiability testing - SAT 2007 : 10th International Conference, Lisbon, Portugal, May 28-31, 2007 : proceedings

    João Marques-Silva;Karem A. Sakallah

Frequent Co-Authors

Igor L. Markov
Igor L. Markov Synopsys (United States)
Joao Marques-Silva
Joao Marques-Silva Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats
Trevor Mudge
Trevor Mudge University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Richard B. Brown
Richard B. Brown University of Utah
Rob A. Rutenbar
Rob A. Rutenbar University of Pittsburgh
Edward S. Davidson
Edward S. Davidson University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Jong-Gwan Yook
Jong-Gwan Yook Yonsei University
Linda P. B. Katehi
Linda P. B. Katehi Texas A&M University
Martha E. Pollack
Martha E. Pollack Cornell University
John P. Hayes
John P. Hayes University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a Computer Science degree in the USA, you may also want to explore related fields that offer flexible learning and strong career potential. Many students now opt for online degree programs to save on tuition and fit their studies around other commitments. For those interested in the physical sciences, earning a physics degree online can open up paths in research, education, or engineering.

Data science continues to grow in demand. Pursuing a data scientist degree online is a strategic move, with programs available at various price points. Similarly, technology-driven students can explore electrical engineering online tuition costs to find affordable options in a field closely related to computer science.

For those seeking to quickly enhance their credentials, there are also 3-month certificate programs that pay well. These fast-tracked certificates can lead to lucrative positions in areas like cybersecurity, programming, and IT support, providing rapid entry into the tech workforce.

Best Scientists Citing Karem A. Sakallah

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles