World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
62
Citations
23197
World Ranking
2838
National Ranking
128

Armin Biere publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Armin Biere sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 252 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Armin Biere D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Armin Biere sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Armin Biere is a researcher affiliated with the University of Freiburg in Germany, specializing primarily in computer science. Their work spans across various subfields including artificial intelligence, computational theory and mathematics, software, electrical and electronic engineering, and computer networks and communications.

The main research topics addressed by Armin Biere include:

  • Formal Methods in Verification
  • Logic, programming, and type systems
  • Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
  • Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
  • Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques
  • Constraint Satisfaction and Optimization
  • Radiation Effects in Electronics

Their publication record features numerous papers, with notable recent works such as:

  • Lingeling, Plingeling, PicoSAT and PrecoSAT at SAT Race 2010 (2021), published in University Library Linz repository (Johannes Kepler Universitat Linz)
  • The AIGER And-Inverter Graph (AIG) Format Version 20071012 (2021), published in University Library Linz repository (Johannes Kepler Universitat Linz)
  • AIGER 1.9 and beyond (2021), published in University Library Linz repository (Johannes Kepler Universitat Linz)
  • Lingeling and Friends at the SAT Competition 2011 (2021), published in University Library Linz repository (Johannes Kepler Universitat Linz)
  • Better Decision Heuristics in CDCL through Local Search and Target Phases (2022), published in Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research

In addition to journal and conference articles, Armin Biere has contributed to book publications. Two books were published by Springer Science+Business Media titled Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems in 2020.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Armin Biere include:

  • Mathias Fleury
  • Nils Froleyks
  • Daniela Kaufmann
  • Roberto Sebastiani
  • Keijo Heljanko

Publications by Armin Biere are often found in venues such as:

  • University Library Linz repository (Johannes Kepler Universitat Linz)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Formal Methods in System Design
  • Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research

Their work largely involves areas related to formal verification methods, software testing, logic, and constraint optimization, reflecting considerable breadth in theoretical and applied aspects of computer science.

Best Publications

  • Symbolic Model Checking without BDDs

    Armin Biere;Alessandro Cimatti;Edmund M. Clarke;Yunshan Zhu

  • Handbook of Satisfiability

    Armin Biere;Marijn Heule;Hans van Maaren;Toby Walsh

  • Handbook of Satisfiability: Volume 185 Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications

    A. Biere;M. Heule;H. van Maaren;T. Walsh

  • Bounded Model Checking.

    Armin Biere

  • Bounded Model Checking Using Satisfiability Solving

    Edmund Clarke;Armin Biere;Richard Raimi;Yunshan Zhu

  • Symbolic model checking using SAT procedures instead of BDDs

    A. Biere;A. Cimatti;E. M. Clarke;M. Fujita

  • Bounded Model Checking

    Armin Biere;Alessandro Cimatti;Edmund M. Clarke;Ofer Strichman

  • Effective preprocessing in SAT through variable and clause elimination

    Niklas Eén;Armin Biere

  • Boolector: An Efficient SMT Solver for Bit-Vectors and Arrays

    Robert Brummayer;Armin Biere

  • A survey of recent advances in SAT-based formal verification

    Mukul R. Prasad;Armin Biere;Aarti Gupta

  • Resolve and expand

    Armin Biere

  • Lingeling, Plingeling and Treengeling Entering the SAT Competition 2013

    Armin Biere

  • High-Level Data Races

    Cyrille Artho;Klaus Havelund;Armin Biere

  • Inprocessing rules

    Matti Järvisalo;Marijn J. H. Heule;Armin Biere

  • Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing - SAT 2006

    Armin Biere;Carla P. Gomes

  • Liveness Checking as Safety Checking

    Armin Biere;Cyrille Artho;Viktor Schuppan

  • Linear Encodings of Bounded LTL Model Checking

    Armin Biere;Keijo Heljanko;Tommi A. Junttila;Timo Latvala

  • Verifiying Safety Properties of a Power PC Microprocessor Using Symbolic Model Checking without BDDs

    Armin Biere;Armin Biere;Edmund M. Clarke;Richard Raimi;Yunshan Zhu

  • Lingeling, Plingeling, PicoSAT and PrecoSAT at SAT Race 2010

    Armin Biere

  • Cube and conquer: guiding CDCL SAT solvers by lookaheads

    Marijn J. H. Heule;Oliver Kullmann;Siert Wieringa;Armin Biere

Frequent Co-Authors

Marijn J. H. Heule
Marijn J. H. Heule Carnegie Mellon University
Edmund M. Clarke
Edmund M. Clarke Carnegie Mellon University
Alessandro Cimatti
Alessandro Cimatti Fondazione Bruno Kessler
Carla P. Gomes
Carla P. Gomes Cornell University
Toby Walsh
Toby Walsh University of New South Wales
Andrei Voronkov
Andrei Voronkov University of Manchester
Roderick Bloem
Roderick Bloem Graz University of Technology
Klaus Havelund
Klaus Havelund Jet Propulsion Lab
Fahiem Bacchus
Fahiem Bacchus University of Toronto

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens the door to a variety of rewarding online degrees and certifications. Many choose to expand their skills in closely related fields, like Engineering or Information Technology. If you’re interested in specialized technology programs, top online electrical engineering schools offer flexible, reputable options to deepen your expertise.

Not everyone needs a traditional four-year degree to find high-paying technology jobs. For those looking for quicker options, there are certificate programs that pay well, ranging from tech support to cybersecurity certifications. These certificates can jumpstart your career or enhance your current role in the tech industry.

Time is a crucial factor for many working professionals. Pursuing the fastest online master's degree allows you to quickly gain advanced credentials while continuing to work. This route is ideal for career switchers or those seeking rapid advancement in roles such as data analyst, software developer, or IT manager.

Finally, consider investing in one of the most useful graduate degrees to enhance your long-term prospects. In-demand programs cover topics such as artificial intelligence, data science, and business analytics—a perfect complement to your computer science foundation.

Best Scientists Citing Armin Biere

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles