World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Hans Tompits

Hans Tompits

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
33
Citations
5574
World Ranking
12547
National Ranking
110

Hans Tompits publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hans Tompits sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 165 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Hans Tompits D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hans Tompits sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Hans Tompits is affiliated with TU Wien in Austria and has contributed extensively to research at the intersection of computer science and engineering. Their work spans multiple fields, including Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Automotive Engineering, Signal Processing, and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. The research output reflects a strong focus on logic, reasoning, and knowledge representation alongside programming and type systems.

Their research topics include:

  • Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
  • Logic, Programming, and Type Systems
  • Advanced Algebra and Logic
  • Music and Audio Processing
  • Music Technology and Sound Studies
  • Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
  • Transportation and Mobility Innovations

Hans Tompits has published numerous papers featuring collaborations with several frequent co-authors. These include Tobias Kain, Julian-Steffen Müller, Maximilian Wesche, Hendrik Decke, and Felix Schön. There are recurrent publications in venues such as the Proceedings of the 30th European Safety and Reliability Conference and 15th Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management Conference, Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science, ACM Transactions on Computational Logic, Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl), and Axioms.

Recent notable publications are:

  • Sequent-Type Calculi for Systems of Nonmonotonic Paraconsistent Logics, 2020, Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science
  • FDIRO: A General Approach for a Fail-Operational System Design, 2020, Proceedings of the 30th European Safety and Reliability Conference and 15th Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management Conference
  • Beyond Uniform Equivalence between Answer-set Programs, 2020, ACM Transactions on Computational Logic
  • Towards a Reliable and Context-Based System Architecture for Autonomous Vehicles, 2020, Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl)
  • Sequent-Type Calculi for Three-Valued and Disjunctive Default Logic, 2020, Axioms

Hans Tompits' research contributions reflect a detailed engagement with formal logic systems and their applications within computational contexts. Their work on autonomous vehicles and fail-operational systems illustrates cross-disciplinary integration between computer science and engineering principles.

Best Publications

  • Combining answer set programming with description logics for the Semantic Web

    Thomas Eiter;Giovambattista Ianni;Thomas Lukasiewicz;Roman Schindlauer

  • Combining answer set programming with description logics for the semantic web

    Thomas Eiter;Thomas Lukasiewicz;Roman Schindlauer;Hans Tompits

  • A uniform integration of higher-order reasoning and external evaluations in answer-set programming

    Thomas Eiter;Giovambattista Ianni;Roman Schindlauer;Hans Tompits

  • Effective Integration of Declarative Rules with External Evaluations for Semantic-Web Reasoning

    Thomas Eiter;Giovambattista Ianni;Roman Schindlauer;Hans Tompits

  • Solving Advanced Reasoning Tasks Using Quantified Boolean Formulas

    Uwe Egly;Thomas Eiter;Hans Tompits;Stefan Woltran

  • A framework for compiling preferences in logic programs

    James P. Delgrande;Torsten Schaub;Hans Tompits

  • A Classification and Survey of Preference Handling Approaches in Nonmonotonic Reasoning

    James Patrick Delgrande;Torsten Schaub;Hans Tompits;Kewen Wang

  • On properties of update sequences based on causal rejection

    Thomas Eiter;Michael Fink;Giuliana Sabbatini;Hans Tompits

  • Reasoning with Rules and Ontologies

    Thomas Eiter;Giovambattista Ianni;Axel Polleres;Roman Schindlauer

  • Simplifying Logic Programs Under Uniform and Strong Equivalence

    Thomas Eiter;Michael Fink;Hans Tompits;Stefan Woltran

  • Well-Founded Semantics for Description Logic Programs in the Semantic Web

    Thomas Eiter;Thomas Lukasiewicz;Thomas Lukasiewicz;Roman Schindlauer;Hans Tompits

  • A meta-programming technique for debugging answer-set programs

    Martin Gebser;Jörg Pührer;Torsten Schaub;Hans Tompits

  • Encodings for Equilibrium Logic and Logic Programs with Nested Expressions

    David Pearce;Hans Tompits;Stefan Woltran

  • Modularity aspects of disjunctive stable models

    Tomi Janhunen;Emilia Oikarinen;Hans Tompits;Stefan Woltran

  • On solution correspondences in answer-set programming

    Thomas Eiter;Hans Tompits;Stefan Woltran

  • Debugging ASP programs by means of ASP

    Martin Brain;Martin Gebser;Jorg Puhrer;Torsten Schaub

  • Embedding nonground logic programs into autoepistemic logic for knowledge-base combination

    Jos De Bruijn;Thomas Eiter;Axel Polleres;Hans Tompits

  • Considerations on Updates of Logic Programs

    Thomas Eiter;Michael Fink;Giuliana Sabbatini;Hans Tompits

  • Catching the ouroboros: On debugging non-ground answer-set programs

    Johannes Oetsch;JÖrg PÜhrer;Hans Tompits

  • Embedding non-ground logic programs into autoepistemic logic for knowledge-base combination

    Jos De Bruijn;Thomas Eiter;Axel Polleres;Hans Tompits

Frequent Co-Authors

Torsten Schaub
Torsten Schaub University of Potsdam
Martin Gebser
Martin Gebser University of Klagenfurt
Axel Polleres
Axel Polleres Vienna University of Economics and Business
Armin Biere
Armin Biere University of Freiburg
Thomas Lukasiewicz
Thomas Lukasiewicz University of Oxford
Ilkka Niemelä
Ilkka Niemelä Aalto University
Wolfgang Faber
Wolfgang Faber University of Klagenfurt

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens doors to flexible and affordable online degrees. Many students are now choosing distance learning for its convenience and cost-effectiveness.

For those who want to advance quickly, there are accelerated associates degree online options that allow you to complete your studies in as little as six months. These fast-track programs are ideal if you're eager to gain foundational knowledge and start your career sooner.

Graduate students may be interested in pursuing the cheapest ed.d online program to fast-track their credentials, or look for universities offering the cheapest doctoral programs for maximum cost savings. Both choices provide an affordable pathway to the highest levels of academic achievement.

Beyond computer science, if you're thinking of expanding your skill set, several business schools online offer flexible options for degree completion. Pairing business skills with tech expertise can make you highly competitive in today's job market.

Best Scientists Citing Hans Tompits

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles