World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
36
Citations
6916
World Ranking
11104
National Ranking
96

Wolfgang Faber publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wolfgang Faber sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 172 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Wolfgang Faber D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wolfgang Faber sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Wolfgang Faber is a researcher affiliated with the University of Klagenfurt in Austria. Their work primarily falls within the field of Computer Science, with a strong focus on Artificial Intelligence. This research encompasses various topics related to logic, reasoning, and knowledge, as well as multi-agent systems, negotiation, and semantic web technologies.

Their research contributions include publications in prominent venues, specifically:

  • Theory and Practice of Logic Programming
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science
  • Artificial Intelligence

Wolfgang Faber's recent papers demonstrate involvement in areas such as answer set programming and automated reasoning. Selected recent works include:

  • "Paracoherent answer set computation," 2021, Artificial Intelligence
  • "An Efficient Solver for ASP(Q)," 2023, Theory and Practice of Logic Programming
  • "Aggregate Semantics for Propositional Answer Set Programs," 2022, Theory and Practice of Logic Programming
  • "Weak and Strong Reversibility of Non-deterministic Actions: Universality and Uniformity," 2024, Proceedings of the International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling
  • "Evaluating Epistemic Logic Programs via Answer Set Programming with Quantifiers," 2023, Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Their collaborative network includes frequent co-authors such as Michael Morak, Haya Majid Qureshi, Lukáš Chrpa, Francesco Ricca, and Giovanni Amendola.

The primary research themes connected to Wolfgang Faber's work cover:

  • Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
  • Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
  • Semantic Web and Ontologies
  • Logic, Programming, and Type Systems
  • AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
  • Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services
  • Business Process Modeling and Analysis

Best Publications

  • The DLV system for knowledge representation and reasoning

    Nicola Leone;Gerald Pfeifer;Wolfgang Faber;Thomas Eiter

  • Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning

    James P. Delgrande;Wolfgang Faber

  • Recursive Aggregates in Disjunctive Logic Programs: Semantics and Complexity

    Wolfgang Faber;Nicola Leone;Gerald Pfeifer

  • Semantics and complexity of recursive aggregates in answer set programming

    Wolfgang Faber;Gerald Pfeifer;Nicola Leone

  • Declarative problem-solving using the DLV system

    Thomas Eiter;Wolfgang Faber;Nicola Leone;Gerald Pfeifer

  • A logic programming approach to knowledge-state planning, II: the DLV k system

    Thomas Eiter;Wolfgang Faber;Nicola Leone;Gerald Pfeifer

  • ASP-Core-2 Input Language Format

    Francesco Calimeri;Wolfgang Faber;Martin Gebser;Giovambattista Ianni

  • The INFOMIX system for advanced integration of incomplete and inconsistent data

    Nicola Leone;Gianluigi Greco;Giovambattista Ianni;Vincenzino Lio

  • Aggregate functions in disjunctive logic programming: semantics, complexity, and implementation in DLV

    Tina Dell'Armi;Wolfgang Faber;Giuseppe Ielpa;Nicola Leone

  • The Diagnosis Frontend of the dlv system

    Thomas Eiter;Wolfgang Faber;Nicola Leone;Gerald Pfeifer

  • DLV - A System for Declarative Problem Solving

    Thomas Eiter;Wolfgang Faber;Christoph Koch;Nicola Leone

  • ASP-Core-2 Input Language Format

    Francesco Calimeri;Wolfgang Faber;Martin Gebser;Giovambattista Ianni

  • WASP: A Native ASP Solver Based on Constraint Learning

    Mario Alviano;Carmine Dodaro;Wolfgang Faber;Nicola Leone

  • Disjunctive logic programs with inheritance

    Francesco Buccafurri;Wolfgang Faber;Nicola Leone

  • Disjunctive logic programs with inheritance

    Francesco Buccafurri;Wolfgang Faber;Nicola Leone

  • Design and implementation of aggregate functions in the dlv system

    Wolfgang Faber;Gerald Pfeifer;Nicola Leone;Tina Dell'armi

  • Planning under Incomplete Knowledge

    Thomas Eiter;Wolfgang Faber;Nicola Leone;Gerald Pfeifer

  • A logic programming approach to knowledge-state planning: Semantics and complexity

    Thomas Eiter;Wolfgang Faber;Nicola Leone;Gerald Pfeifer

  • Answer set planning under action costs

    Thomas Eiter;Wolfgang Faber;Nicola Leone;Gerald Pfeifer

  • The disjunctive datalog system DLV

    Mario Alviano;Wolfgang Faber;Nicola Leone;Simona Perri

  • The DLV System

    Nicola Leone;Gerald Pfeifer;Wolfgang Faber;Francesco Calimeri

Frequent Co-Authors

Nicola Leone
Nicola Leone University of Calabria
Francesco Ricca
Francesco Ricca University of Calabria
Axel Polleres
Axel Polleres Vienna University of Economics and Business
Georg Gottlob
Georg Gottlob University of Calabria
Domenico Lembo
Domenico Lembo Sapienza University of Rome
Martin Gebser
Martin Gebser University of Klagenfurt
Christoph Koch
Christoph Koch École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Miroslaw Truszczynski
Miroslaw Truszczynski University of Kentucky

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

With the increasing demand for tech professionals, exploring related online degrees and different career pathways is crucial when considering studying Computer Science in the USA. Many students and professionals are now turning to short degrees that pay well to quickly acquire in-demand skills and jumpstart their careers.

For those interested in specializing further, pursuing the best online masters in artificial intelligence can open doors to advanced roles in tech and research. This option is ideal for individuals aiming to delve deep into AI, machine learning, and data science fields.

Choosing the right academic path is important. To make an informed decision, explore a list of in-demand and emerging college majors that align with your interests and career goals.

For those seeking flexible postgraduate options, there are also masters degrees available that balance academic rigor with accessible coursework, making it easier to continue your education while working or managing other commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Wolfgang Faber

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles