World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Marc Denecker

Marc Denecker

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
40
Citations
5537
World Ranking
9412
National Ranking
90

Marc Denecker publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marc Denecker sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 252 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Marc Denecker D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marc Denecker sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marc Denecker is affiliated with KU Leuven in Belgium and conducts research primarily in the field of Computer Science. Their work spans several subfields, including Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Information Systems, Management Information Systems, and Computer Networks and Communications.

The scientist's research topics focus on areas such as Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge; Semantic Web and Ontologies; Logic, Programming, and Type Systems; Business Process Modeling and Analysis; Advanced Algebra and Logic; Green IT and Sustainability; and Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development.

Marc Denecker has contributed to multiple research articles published in diverse venues. Recent papers include:

  • A Proposal of a Situational Approach for Enterprise Architecture Frameworks: Application to TOGAF, 2022, Procedia Computer Science
  • Analyzing Semantics of Aggregate Answer Set Programming Using Approximation Fixpoint Theory, 2022, Theory and Practice of Logic Programming
  • On Nested Justification Systems, 2022, Theory and Practice of Logic Programming
  • Interactive configurator with FO(.) and IDP-Z3, 2022, Lirias (KU Leuven)
  • T-AGILE: A Guide to Teleworking in Agile Project Management, 2023, Procedia Computer Science

Marc Denecker frequently publishes in the following venues:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Procedia Computer Science
  • Theory and Practice of Logic Programming
  • Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

The scientist has collaborated extensively with co-authors such as Bart Bogaerts, Elena Kornyshova, Maurice Bruynooghe, Pierre Carbonnelle, and Linde Vanbesien, reflecting a pattern of recurring professional partnerships.

Marc Denecker has also authored a book published by the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, titled Taxonomy and Evolution of the Scientific Domain of Smart Life, released in 2024.

Best Publications

  • Abduction in Logic Programming

    Marc Denecker;Antonis C. Kakas

  • Representing incomplete knowledge in abductive logic programming

    Marc Denecker;Danny de Schreye

  • Well-founded and stable semantics of logic programs with aggregates

    Nikolay Pelov;Marc Denecker;Maurice Bruynooghe

  • A logic of nonmonotone inductive definitions

    Marc Denecker;Eugenia Ternovska

  • Approximations, stable operators, well-founded fixpoints and applications in nonmonotonic reasoning

    Marc Denecker;Victor Marek;Miroslaw Truszczyński

  • Cp-logic: A language of causal probabilistic events and its relation to logic programming

    Joost Vennekens;Marc Denecker;Maurice Bruynooghe

  • The Second Answer Set Programming Competition

    Marc Denecker;Joost Vennekens;Stephen Bond;Martin Gebser

  • Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, {IJCAI} 2016

    Joachim Jansen;Bart Bogaerts;Jo Devriendt;Gerda Janssens

  • SLDNFA: An abductive procedure for abductive logic programs

    Marc Denecker;Danny de Schreye

  • Extending Classical Logic with Inductive Definitions

    Marc Denecker

  • SLDNFA: an abductive procedure for normal abductive programs

    Marc Denecker;Danny De Schreye

  • Uniform semantic treatment of default and autoepistemic logics

    Marc Denecker;Victor W. Marek;Mirosław Truszczyński

  • Temporal reasoning with abductive event calculus

    Marc Denecker;Lode Missiaen;Maurice Bruynooghe

  • A-system: problem solving through abduction

    Antonis C. Kakas;Bert Van Nuffelen;Marc Denecker

  • Inductive situation calculus

    Marc Denecker;Eugenia Ternovska

  • Ultimate approximation and its application in nonmonotonic knowledge representation systems

    Marc Denecker;Victor W. Marek;Mirosław Truszczyński

  • Logic programming revisited: logic programs as inductive definitions

    Maurice Bruynooghe;Victor Marek;Marc Denecker

  • The IDP system: A model expansion system for an extension of classical logic

    Johan Wittocx;Maarten Mariën;Marc Denecker

  • Predicate Logic as a Modelling Language: The IDP System

    Broes De Cat;Bart Bogaerts;Maurice Bruynooghe;Gerda Janssens

  • Ultimate Well-Founded and Stable Semantics for Logic Programs with Aggregates

    Marc Denecker;Nikolay Pelov;Maurice Bruynooghe

  • The Well-Founded Semantics Is the Principle of Inductive Definition

    Marc Denecker

Frequent Co-Authors

Miroslaw Truszczynski
Miroslaw Truszczynski University of Kentucky
Jan Van den Bussche
Jan Van den Bussche Hasselt University
Luc De Raedt
Luc De Raedt KU Leuven
Jan Ramon
Jan Ramon French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA
Peter J. Stuckey
Peter J. Stuckey Monash University
Antonis C. Kakas
Antonis C. Kakas University of Cyprus
Kathleen Marchal
Kathleen Marchal Ghent University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education options can be a smart way to expand your career prospects in Computer Science and related fields. Many students now consider options beyond traditional campus-based degrees, with a growing number of reputable, flexible programs available across the USA.

For those interested in foundational sciences, a best online physics degree can provide critical knowledge for tech and engineering roles. Data science has also emerged as a top choice, with data science degrees offering in-demand skills in analytics, machine learning, and big data.

Advancing your technical expertise further may lead you to an online master's in electrical engineering degree. This pathway can open doors to cutting-edge industries such as robotics, AI, and telecommunications.

If you’re seeking faster entry into tech careers, consider 3-month certificate programs that pay well. These certifications can boost your credentials quickly and are ideal for those wanting specialized roles or career pivots.

Best Scientists Citing Marc Denecker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles