World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 58 3655 3553 164 159 392 12501

Torsten Schaub publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Torsten Schaub between 1981 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Torsten Schaub published across 46 years, from 1981 to 2026, averaging 9.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 2015. 11 of the 436 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1981 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 2015. 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 0 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 2 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 5 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 8 publications 1997: 14 publications 1998: 8 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 10 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 15 publications 2004: 14 publications 2005: 14 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 18 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 18 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 20 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 21 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 25 publications 2016: 18 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 25 publications 2019: 18 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 20 publications 2025: 10 publications 2026: 1 publication
1981 2026

436 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Torsten Schaub: publications per year, 1981 to 2026
Year Publications
1981 1
1982 0
1983 1
1984 0
1985 1
1986 0
1987 0
1988 1
1989 0
1990 1
1991 2
1992 1
1993 5
1994 6
1995 5
1996 8
1997 14
1998 8
1999 5
2000 10
2001 7
2002 11
2003 15
2004 14
2005 14
2006 9
2007 18
2008 13
2009 18
2010 12
2011 20
2012 11
2013 21
2014 9
2015 25
2016 18
2017 12
2018 25
2019 18
2020 11
2021 12
2022 8
2023 15
2024 20
2025 10
2026 1
Total 436
Download as CSV

Torsten Schaub publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Torsten Schaub sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 392–401 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 392 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128 392
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Torsten Schaub D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Torsten Schaub sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 58–59 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400 58
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Torsten Schaub is affiliated with the University of Potsdam in Germany and specializes in computer science with a significant focus on artificial intelligence. Their scholarly work spans several subfields including computational theory and mathematics, computer networks and communications, information systems, and management science and operations research.

The core themes of Schaub's research encompass areas such as logic, reasoning, and knowledge; multi-agent systems and negotiation; logic, programming, and type systems; formal methods in verification; AI-based problem solving and planning; constraint satisfaction and optimization; and the semantic web and ontologies.

Frequent publication venues for Schaub include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Theory and Practice of Logic Programming
  • Proceedings of the International Symposium on Combinatorial Search
  • Algorithms
  • publish.UP (University of Potsdam)

Recent papers authored by or involving Schaub cover diverse topics within logic programming and answer set programming. Notable papers include:

  • "Verifying Tight Logic Programs with anthem and vampire" (2020, Theory and Practice of Logic Programming)
  • "Train Scheduling with Hybrid Answer Set Programming" (2020, Theory and Practice of Logic Programming)
  • "Linear-Time Temporal Answer Set Programming" (2021, Theory and Practice of Logic Programming)
  • "Answer Set Planning: A Survey" (2022, Theory and Practice of Logic Programming)
  • "Generalized Target Assignment and Path Finding Using Answer Set Programming" (2021, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Combinatorial Search)

Collaborations feature several frequent co-authors who have worked extensively with Schaub, including Pedro Cabalar, Jorge Fandinno, Philipp Wanko, Martín Diéguez, and Javier Romero. These partnerships reflect a collective engagement in the advancement of logic programming and AI-related research topics.

Best Publications

  • Conflict-driven answer set solving: From theory to practice

    Martin Gebser;Benjamin Kaufmann;Torsten Schaub

  • Answer Set Solving in Practice

    Martin Gebser;Roland Kaminski;Benjamin Kaufmann;Torsten Schaub

  • Potassco: The Potsdam Answer Set Solving Collection

    Martin Gebser;Benjamin Kaufmann;Roland Kaminski;Max Ostrowski

  • Conflict-driven answer set solving

    Martin Gebser;Benjamin Kaufmann;André Neumann;Torsten Schaub

  • Clasp: a conflict-driven answer set solver

    Martin Gebser;Benjamin Kaufmann;André Neumann;Torsten Schaub

  • Clingo = ASP + Control: Preliminary Report

    Martin Gebser;Roland Kaminski;Benjamin Kaufmann;Torsten Schaub

  • GrinGo: a new grounder for answer set programming

    Martin Gebser;Torsten Schaub;Sven Thiele

  • Multi-shot ASP solving with clingo

    Martin Gebser;Roland Kaminski;Benjamin Kaufmann;Torsten Schaub

  • Theory Solving Made Easy with Clingo 5

    Martin Gebser;Roland Kaminski;Benjamin Kaufmann;Max Ostrowski

  • Advances in gringo series 3

    Martin Gebser;Roland Kaminski;Arne König;Torsten Schaub

  • A framework for compiling preferences in logic programs

    James P. Delgrande;Torsten Schaub;Hans Tompits

  • A Classification and Survey of Preference Handling Approaches in Nonmonotonic Reasoning

    James Patrick Delgrande;Torsten Schaub;Hans Tompits;Kewen Wang

  • Engineering an Incremental ASP Solver

    Martin Gebser;Roland Kaminski;Benjamin Kaufmann;Max Ostrowski

  • ASP-Core-2 Input Language Format

    Francesco Calimeri;Wolfgang Faber;Martin Gebser;Giovambattista Ianni

  • Alternative approaches to default logic

    James P. Delgrande;Torsten Schaub;W. Ken Jackson

  • Constraint Answer Set Solving

    Martin Gebser;Max Ostrowski;Torsten Schaub

  • Detecting inconsistencies in large biological networks with answer set programming

    Martin Gebser;Torsten Schaub;Sven Thiele;Philippe Veber

  • AutoFolio: an automatically configured algorithm selector

    Marius Lindauer;Holger H. Hoos;Frank Hutter;Torsten Schaub

  • Inconsistency Tolerance

    Leopoldo Bertossi;Anthony Hunter;Torsten Schaub

  • International conference on logic programming

    Martin Gebser;Roland Kaminski;Benjamin Kaufmann;Torsten Schaub

  • Belief change based on global minimisation

    James P. Delgrande;Jérôme Lang;Torsten Schaub

  • Answer Set Programming

    Torsten Schaub

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin Gebser
Martin Gebser University of Klagenfurt
Holger H. Hoos
Holger H. Hoos RWTH Aachen University
Manuel V. Hermenegildo
Manuel V. Hermenegildo Madrid Institute for Advanced Studies
Vladimir Lifschitz
Vladimir Lifschitz The University of Texas at Austin
Katsumi Inoue
Katsumi Inoue National Institute of Informatics
Gerhard Brewka
Gerhard Brewka Leipzig University
Joachim Selbig
Joachim Selbig Max Planck Society
Miroslaw Truszczynski
Miroslaw Truszczynski University of Kentucky

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online programs can open new opportunities for students pursuing Computer Science in the USA. Degrees such as data science and electrical engineering are especially relevant. Many students are searching for the cheapest data science degree options to minimize student debt while acquiring in-demand skills.

For those interested in engineering, choosing one of the best accredited online electrical engineering programs ensures a recognized qualification and increased job prospects. Many employers also value industry certifications. Earning certifications for jobs that require less time and investment can help candidates quickly qualify for well-paying roles in tech.

If you are aiming for higher credentials, you might consider programs that let you earn your degree faster. Enrolling in the shortest masters degree programs allows you to advance your career in less time, combining affordability and speed with career-focused learning.

Best Scientists Citing Torsten Schaub

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles