World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
58
Citations
12501
World Ranking
3655
National Ranking
164

Torsten Schaub publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Torsten Schaub sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 392 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Torsten Schaub D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Torsten Schaub sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Torsten Schaub is affiliated with the University of Potsdam in Germany and specializes in computer science with a significant focus on artificial intelligence. Their scholarly work spans several subfields including computational theory and mathematics, computer networks and communications, information systems, and management science and operations research.

The core themes of Schaub's research encompass areas such as logic, reasoning, and knowledge; multi-agent systems and negotiation; logic, programming, and type systems; formal methods in verification; AI-based problem solving and planning; constraint satisfaction and optimization; and the semantic web and ontologies.

Frequent publication venues for Schaub include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Theory and Practice of Logic Programming
  • Proceedings of the International Symposium on Combinatorial Search
  • Algorithms
  • publish.UP (University of Potsdam)

Recent papers authored by or involving Schaub cover diverse topics within logic programming and answer set programming. Notable papers include:

  • "Verifying Tight Logic Programs with anthem and vampire" (2020, Theory and Practice of Logic Programming)
  • "Train Scheduling with Hybrid Answer Set Programming" (2020, Theory and Practice of Logic Programming)
  • "Linear-Time Temporal Answer Set Programming" (2021, Theory and Practice of Logic Programming)
  • "Answer Set Planning: A Survey" (2022, Theory and Practice of Logic Programming)
  • "Generalized Target Assignment and Path Finding Using Answer Set Programming" (2021, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Combinatorial Search)

Collaborations feature several frequent co-authors who have worked extensively with Schaub, including Pedro Cabalar, Jorge Fandinno, Philipp Wanko, Martín Diéguez, and Javier Romero. These partnerships reflect a collective engagement in the advancement of logic programming and AI-related research topics.

Best Publications

  • Conflict-driven answer set solving: From theory to practice

    Martin Gebser;Benjamin Kaufmann;Torsten Schaub

  • Answer Set Solving in Practice

    Martin Gebser;Roland Kaminski;Benjamin Kaufmann;Torsten Schaub

  • Potassco: The Potsdam Answer Set Solving Collection

    Martin Gebser;Benjamin Kaufmann;Roland Kaminski;Max Ostrowski

  • Conflict-driven answer set solving

    Martin Gebser;Benjamin Kaufmann;André Neumann;Torsten Schaub

  • Clasp: a conflict-driven answer set solver

    Martin Gebser;Benjamin Kaufmann;André Neumann;Torsten Schaub

  • Clingo = ASP + Control: Preliminary Report

    Martin Gebser;Roland Kaminski;Benjamin Kaufmann;Torsten Schaub

  • GrinGo: a new grounder for answer set programming

    Martin Gebser;Torsten Schaub;Sven Thiele

  • Multi-shot ASP solving with clingo

    Martin Gebser;Roland Kaminski;Benjamin Kaufmann;Torsten Schaub

  • Theory Solving Made Easy with Clingo 5

    Martin Gebser;Roland Kaminski;Benjamin Kaufmann;Max Ostrowski

  • Advances in gringo series 3

    Martin Gebser;Roland Kaminski;Arne König;Torsten Schaub

  • A framework for compiling preferences in logic programs

    James P. Delgrande;Torsten Schaub;Hans Tompits

  • A Classification and Survey of Preference Handling Approaches in Nonmonotonic Reasoning

    James Patrick Delgrande;Torsten Schaub;Hans Tompits;Kewen Wang

  • Engineering an Incremental ASP Solver

    Martin Gebser;Roland Kaminski;Benjamin Kaufmann;Max Ostrowski

  • ASP-Core-2 Input Language Format

    Francesco Calimeri;Wolfgang Faber;Martin Gebser;Giovambattista Ianni

  • Alternative approaches to default logic

    James P. Delgrande;Torsten Schaub;W. Ken Jackson

  • Constraint Answer Set Solving

    Martin Gebser;Max Ostrowski;Torsten Schaub

  • Detecting inconsistencies in large biological networks with answer set programming

    Martin Gebser;Torsten Schaub;Sven Thiele;Philippe Veber

  • AutoFolio: an automatically configured algorithm selector

    Marius Lindauer;Holger H. Hoos;Frank Hutter;Torsten Schaub

  • Inconsistency Tolerance

    Leopoldo Bertossi;Anthony Hunter;Torsten Schaub

  • International conference on logic programming

    Martin Gebser;Roland Kaminski;Benjamin Kaufmann;Torsten Schaub

  • Belief change based on global minimisation

    James P. Delgrande;Jérôme Lang;Torsten Schaub

  • Answer Set Programming

    Torsten Schaub

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin Gebser
Martin Gebser University of Klagenfurt
Holger H. Hoos
Holger H. Hoos RWTH Aachen University
Manuel V. Hermenegildo
Manuel V. Hermenegildo Madrid Institute for Advanced Studies
Vladimir Lifschitz
Vladimir Lifschitz The University of Texas at Austin
Katsumi Inoue
Katsumi Inoue National Institute of Informatics
Gerhard Brewka
Gerhard Brewka Leipzig University
Joachim Selbig
Joachim Selbig Max Planck Society
Miroslaw Truszczynski
Miroslaw Truszczynski University of Kentucky

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online programs can open new opportunities for students pursuing Computer Science in the USA. Degrees such as data science and electrical engineering are especially relevant. Many students are searching for the cheapest data science degree options to minimize student debt while acquiring in-demand skills.

For those interested in engineering, choosing one of the best accredited online electrical engineering programs ensures a recognized qualification and increased job prospects. Many employers also value industry certifications. Earning certifications for jobs that require less time and investment can help candidates quickly qualify for well-paying roles in tech.

If you are aiming for higher credentials, you might consider programs that let you earn your degree faster. Enrolling in the shortest masters degree programs allows you to advance your career in less time, combining affordability and speed with career-focused learning.

Best Scientists Citing Torsten Schaub

Trending Scientists