World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
Netherlands
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
82
Citations
38740
World Ranking
935
National Ranking
33

Holger H. Hoos publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Holger H. Hoos sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 330 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Holger H. Hoos D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Holger H. Hoos sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in Netherlands Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in Netherlands Leader Award
  • 2020 - ACM Fellow For contributions to automated algorithm selection and configuration for optimization and machine learning
  • 2015 - Fellow of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) For significant contributions to the field of automated reasoning and the development of widely used methods for algorithm selection and configuration

Overview

Holger H. Hoos is affiliated with RWTH Aachen University in Germany and has a research focus within Computer Science, with a specialized concentration in Artificial Intelligence. Their work encompasses subfields including Management Science and Operations Research, Computer Networks and Communications, Computational Theory and Mathematics, and Information Systems.

Their research topics cover several areas such as Machine Learning and Data Classification, Machine Learning and Algorithms, Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning, Data Stream Mining Techniques, Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research, Big Data and Business Intelligence, and Constraint Satisfaction and Optimization.

Hoos has contributed to numerous recent publications, with notable papers including:

  • "A Research Agenda for Hybrid Intelligence: Augmenting Human Intellect With Collaborative, Adaptive, Responsible, and Explainable Artificial Intelligence" (2020, Computer)
  • "Automated machine learning: past, present and future" (2024, Artificial Intelligence Review)
  • "Predicting the 9-year course of mood and anxiety disorders with automated machine learning: A comparison between auto-sklearn, naïve Bayes classifier, and traditional logistic regression" (2021, Psychiatry Research)
  • "Artificial intelligence to advance Earth observation:: A review of models, recent trends, and pathways forward" (2023, arXiv (Cornell University))
  • "Automating data science" (2022, Communications of the ACM)

The venues in which Hoos frequently publishes include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University) with 15 publications
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) with 11 publications
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence with 4 publications
  • Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research with 3 publications
  • International Transactions in Operational Research with 3 publications

Coauthors who have collaborated frequently with Hoos include:

  • Koen van der Blom (14 coauthored papers)
  • Alex Serban (13 coauthored papers)
  • Joost Visser (13 coauthored papers)
  • Jan N. van Rijn (11 coauthored papers)
  • Mitra Baratchi (8 coauthored papers)

Hoos is recognized within the scientific community through awards such as:

  • ACM Fellow awarded in 2020 for contributions to automated algorithm selection and configuration for optimization and machine learning
  • Fellow of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) awarded in 2015 for significant contributions to automated reasoning and the development of widely used methods for algorithm selection and configuration

Best Publications

  • MAX-MIN Ant system

    Thomas Stützle;Holger H. Hoos

  • Sequential model-based optimization for general algorithm configuration

    Frank Hutter;Holger H. Hoos;Kevin Leyton-Brown

  • A survey on semi-supervised learning

    Jesper E. van Engelen;Holger H. Hoos;Holger H. Hoos

  • Stochastic Local Search: Foundations & Applications

    Holger Hoos;Thomas Sttzle

  • Auto-WEKA: combined selection and hyperparameter optimization of classification algorithms

    Chris Thornton;Frank Hutter;Holger H. Hoos;Kevin Leyton-Brown

  • CP-nets: a tool for representing and reasoning with conditional ceteris paribus preference statements

    Craig Boutilier;Ronen I. Brafman;Carmel Domshlak;Holger H. Hoos

  • MAX-MIN Ant System and local search for the traveling salesman problem

    T. Stutzle;H. Hoos

  • SATzilla: portfolio-based algorithm selection for SAT

    Lin Xu;Frank Hutter;Holger H. Hoos;Kevin Leyton-Brown

  • ParamILS: An Automatic Algorithm Configuration Framework

    Frank Hutter;Thomas Stuetzle;Kevin Leyton-Brown;Holger H. Hoos

  • Improvements on the Ant-System: Introducing the MAX-MIN Ant System

    Thomas Stützle;Holger H. Hoos

  • Auto-WEKA 2.0: automatic model selection and hyperparameter optimization in WEKA

    Lars Kotthoff;Chris Thornton;Holger H. Hoos;Frank Hutter

  • Critical assessment of automated flow cytometry data analysis techniques

    Nima Aghaeepour;Greg Finak

  • Algorithm runtime prediction: methods & evaluation

    Frank Hutter;Lin Xu;Holger H. Hoos;Kevin Leyton-Brown

  • Performance prediction and automated tuning of randomized and parametric algorithms

    Frank Hutter;Youssef Hamadi;Holger H. Hoos;Kevin Leyton-Brown

  • SATLIB: An Online Resource for Research on SAT

    Holger H. Hoos;Thomas Stützle;I. Gent;H. Van Maaren

  • Automated Algorithm Selection: Survey and Perspectives

    Pascal Kerschke;Holger H. Hoos;Frank Neumann;Heike Trautmann

  • An Efficient Approach for Assessing Hyperparameter Importance

    Frank Hutter;Holger Hoos;Kevin Leyton-Brown

  • An ant colony optimisation algorithm for the 2D and 3D hydrophobic polar protein folding problem

    Alena Shmygelska;Holger H Hoos

  • RNA STRAND: The RNA Secondary Structure and Statistical Analysis Database

    Mirela Andronescu;Vera Bereg;Holger H Hoos;Anne Condon

  • Reasoning with conditional ceteris paribus preference statements

    Craig Boutilier;Ronen I. Brafman;Holger H. Hoos;David Poole

Frequent Co-Authors

Kevin Leyton-Brown
Kevin Leyton-Brown University of British Columbia
Frank Hutter
Frank Hutter University of Freiburg
Thomas Stützle
Thomas Stützle Université Libre de Bruxelles
Torsten Schaub
Torsten Schaub University of Potsdam
Anne Condon
Anne Condon University of British Columbia
Craig Boutilier
Craig Boutilier Google (United States)
Alan J. Hu
Alan J. Hu University of British Columbia
Mauro Birattari
Mauro Birattari Université Libre de Bruxelles
Ronen I. Brafman
Ronen I. Brafman Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
David Poole
David Poole University of British Columbia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens multiple online educational options, from entry-level to advanced studies. For those beginning their journey, earning an associate's degree online can provide a practical and affordable foundation. Many learners prefer this route to quickly gain industry-ready skills or transfer credits to a bachelor’s program.

Accreditation is a key factor when choosing an online program. Opting for online degree programs accredited by recognized bodies ensures your qualification is respected by employers and other educational institutions.

If you’re seeking a specialization, creative roles like game development are increasingly accessible via remote study. Programs such as a online game development degree allow you to build technical and artistic skills for the growing gaming industry.

Advanced learners interested in education or research should consider cost-effectiveness when pursuing a doctorate. Understanding how much does a doctorate in education cost can inform your decision about continuing to the highest academic level.

Best Scientists Citing Holger H. Hoos

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles