World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
52
Citations
10312
World Ranking
5108
National Ranking
153

Frank Neumann publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank Neumann sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 341 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Frank Neumann D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank Neumann sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Algorithm
  • Artificial intelligence
  • Algebra

His main research concerns Mathematical optimization, Holocene, Evolutionary algorithm, Climate change and Palynology. In his study, Point and Combinatorics is strongly linked to Algorithm, which falls under the umbrella field of Mathematical optimization. His study focuses on the intersection of Holocene and fields such as Shore with connections in the field of Transect.

Frank Neumann has included themes like Function, Evolutionary computation, Time complexity and Heuristic in his Evolutionary algorithm study. His Climate change study combines topics in areas such as Climatology, Quaternary and Fire regime. The concepts of his Palynology study are interwoven with issues in Mediterranean climate, Sea surface temperature and Vegetation.

His most cited work include:

  • Automatic tracking of individual fluorescence particles: application to the study of chromosome dynamics (358 citations)
  • Predictability of biomass burning in response to climate changes (291 citations)
  • Predictability of biomass burning in response to climate changes (291 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His primary areas of study are Mathematical optimization, Evolutionary algorithm, Evolutionary computation, Optimization problem and Multi-objective optimization. His Point research extends to Mathematical optimization, which is thematically connected. His Evolutionary algorithm research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Algorithm, Theoretical computer science, Heuristics and Vertex cover.

The study incorporates disciplines such as Time complexity and Search algorithm in addition to Heuristics. To a larger extent, Frank Neumann studies Artificial intelligence with the aim of understanding Evolutionary computation. His Combinatorial optimization research incorporates themes from Minimum spanning tree and Spanning tree.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Mathematical optimization (44.59%)
  • Evolutionary algorithm (41.61%)
  • Evolutionary computation (15.29%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2018-2021)?

  • Evolutionary algorithm (41.61%)
  • Mathematical optimization (44.59%)
  • Evolutionary computation (15.29%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Frank Neumann mainly investigates Evolutionary algorithm, Mathematical optimization, Evolutionary computation, Constraint and Knapsack problem. His Evolutionary algorithm study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Theoretical computer science, Local search, Travelling salesman problem, Heuristics and Graph. Many of his studies on Mathematical optimization involve topics that are commonly interrelated, such as Key.

His studies in Evolutionary computation integrate themes in fields like Discrete optimization and Spanning tree. His Constraint research integrates issues from Function, Upper and lower bounds, Chernoff bound and Theory of computation. The various areas that he examines in his Knapsack problem study include Range, Structure, Crossover and Multi-objective optimization.

Between 2018 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Automated Algorithm Selection: Survey and Perspectives (101 citations)
  • Theory of evolutionary computation : recent developments in discrete optimization (27 citations)
  • Robust Fitting in Computer Vision: Easy or Hard? (25 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Artificial intelligence
  • Algorithm
  • Mathematical optimization

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Evolutionary algorithm, Mathematical optimization, Constraint, Knapsack problem and Evolutionary computation. His Evolutionary algorithm research incorporates elements of Dynamic problem, Travelling salesman problem, Theoretical computer science and Heuristics. Frank Neumann is studying Optimization problem, which is a component of Mathematical optimization.

His Optimization problem study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Point, Theory of computation and Ant colony optimization algorithms. His Constraint study incorporates themes from Function, Submodular set function, Chernoff bound and Greedy algorithm. His Knapsack problem research focuses on Range and how it connects with Polynomial-time approximation scheme, Traveling purchaser problem, Stochastic optimization and Dynamic programming.

Best Publications

  • Bioinspired Computation in Combinatorial Optimization: Algorithms and Their Computational Complexity

    Frank Neumann;Carsten Witt

  • Automated Algorithm Selection: Survey and Perspectives

    Pascal Kerschke;Holger H. Hoos;Frank Neumann;Heike Trautmann

  • Randomized local search, evolutionary algorithms, and the minimum spanning tree problem

    Frank Neumann;Ingo Wegener

  • Runtime Analysis of a Simple Ant Colony Optimization Algorithm

    Frank Neumann;Carsten Witt

  • Bioinspired Computation in Combinatorial Optimization

    Frank Neumann;Carsten Witt

  • Minimum spanning trees made easier via multi-objective optimization

    Frank Neumann;Ingo Wegener

  • Optimal fixed and adaptive mutation rates for the leadingones problem

    Süntje Böttcher;Benjamin Doerr;Frank Neumann

  • Approximating covering problems by randomized search heuristics using multi-objective models*

    Tobias Friedrich;Jun He;Nils Hebbinghaus;Frank Neumann

  • Do additional objectives make a problem harder

    Dimo Brockhoff;Tobias Friedrich;Nils Hebbinghaus;Christian Klein

  • On the Effects of Adding Objectives to Plateau Functions

    D. Brockhoff;T. Friedrich;N. Hebbinghaus;C. Klein

  • Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference 2016

    Tobias Friedrich;Frank Neumann;Andrew M. Sutton

  • Expected Runtimes of a Simple Evolutionary Algorithm for the Multi-objective Minimum Spanning Tree Problem

    Frank Neumann

  • Theory of Evolutionary Computation: Recent Developments in Discrete Optimization

    Unknown

  • A comprehensive benchmark set and heuristics for the traveling thief problem

    Sergey Polyakovskiy;Mohammad Reza Bonyadi;Markus Wagner;Zbigniew Michalewicz

  • A fast and effective local search algorithm for optimizing the placement of wind turbines

    Markus Wagner;Jareth Day;Frank Neumann

  • Analyzing Hypervolume Indicator Based Algorithms

    Dimo Brockhoff;Tobias Friedrich;Frank Neumann

  • Theory of evolutionary computation : recent developments in discrete optimization

    Benjamin Doerr;Frank Neumann

  • Ant Colony Optimization and the Minimum Spanning Tree Problem

    Frank Neumann;Carsten Witt

  • Fixed-Parameter Evolutionary Algorithms and the Vertex Cover Problem

    Stefan Kratsch;Frank Neumann

  • Maximizing submodular functions under matroid constraints by evolutionary algorithms

    Tobias Friedrich;Frank Neumann

  • Predicting the energy output of wind farms based on weather data: Important variables and their correlation

    Ekaterina Vladislavleva;Tobias Friedrich;Frank Neumann;Markus Wagner

  • Part E: Evolutionary Computation

    Frank Neumann;Carsten Witt;Peter Merz;Carlos A. Coello Coello

  • Proceedings of the 2016 on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion

    Tobias Friedrich;Frank Neumann;Andrew M. Sutton

Frequent Co-Authors

Tobias Friedrich
Tobias Friedrich Hasso Plattner Institute
Markus Wagner
Markus Wagner Monash University
Carsten Witt
Carsten Witt Technical University of Denmark
Benjamin Doerr
Benjamin Doerr École Polytechnique
Louis Scott
Louis Scott University of the Free State
Dirk Sudholt
Dirk Sudholt University of Sheffield
Mordechai Stein
Mordechai Stein Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Heike Trautmann
Heike Trautmann University of Münster
Thomas Litt
Thomas Litt University of Bonn
Per Kristian Lehre
Per Kristian Lehre University of Birmingham

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees is a smart way to start or advance your career in computer science, especially if you need flexibility or have unique educational needs. One practical option is considering 1 year associate degree programs online, which can quickly provide foundational skills and open up entry-level tech job opportunities.

Affordability is another important factor. Many cheap online colleges offer high-quality computer science programs without a hefty price tag. This makes education accessible for more students, regardless of their financial background.

If your academic record isn’t perfect, there are still options. Several online schools that accept low gpa can help you begin or continue your tech education without strict admissions requirements.

It’s also valuable to look beyond computer science. For example, earning an environmental science degree can help you blend technology with environmental stewardship, opening diverse career pathways in data analysis, green technologies, and research.

Best Scientists Citing Frank Neumann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles