World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Economics and Finance 66 572 517 15 13 185 16895
Medicine 70 20078 18823 730 697 213 19079

Marc A. Koopmanschap publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Marc A. Koopmanschap between 1989 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Marc A. Koopmanschap published across 36 years, from 1989 to 2024, averaging 6.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2013. 6 of the 231 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1989 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2013. 1989: 1 publication 1990: 4 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 9 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 11 publications 2005: 13 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 2 publications
1989 2024

231 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Marc A. Koopmanschap: publications per year, 1989 to 2024
Year Publications
1989 1
1990 4
1991 0
1992 4
1993 2
1994 4
1995 4
1996 3
1997 5
1998 9
1999 4
2000 7
2001 9
2002 11
2003 6
2004 11
2005 13
2006 7
2007 7
2008 6
2009 9
2010 12
2011 10
2012 13
2013 14
2014 6
2015 10
2016 7
2017 5
2018 4
2019 3
2020 6
2021 7
2022 2
2023 4
2024 2
Total 231
Download as CSV

Marc A. Koopmanschap publications per year - data summary

  • Marc A. Koopmanschap, a Economics and Finance scholar from Erasmus University Rotterdam, has 231 publications recorded across 36 years, from 1989 to 2024.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1989 and the most recent to 2024.
  • The most productive year is 2013, with 14 publications.
  • The least productive year with any output is 1989, with 1 publication.
  • 1 of the 36 years in the span carries no publications at all (1991).
  • The rate of publication averages 6.4 papers per year over the whole span, or 6.6 per year counting only the 35 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2020-2024) hold 21 publications, 9% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1989-2000: 47 publications (3.9 per year); 2001-2012: 114 publications (9.5 per year); 2013-2024: 70 publications (5.8 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Marc A. Koopmanschap publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Economics and Finance in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marc A. Koopmanschap sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 42–46 to 521+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 111. Most scientists, 111, have 137–141 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 182–186 publications, is where this scientist sits. 42–46 publications: 1 scientist 47–51 publications: 12 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 23 scientists 62–66 publications: 32 scientists 67–71 publications: 36 scientists 72–76 publications: 56 scientists 77–81 publications: 57 scientists 82–86 publications: 70 scientists 87–91 publications: 86 scientists 92–96 publications: 72 scientists 97–101 publications: 106 scientists 102–106 publications: 97 scientists 107–111 publications: 96 scientists 112–116 publications: 101 scientists 117–121 publications: 103 scientists 122–126 publications: 102 scientists 127–131 publications: 108 scientists 132–136 publications: 107 scientists 137–141 publications: 111 scientists 142–146 publications: 94 scientists 147–151 publications: 96 scientists 152–156 publications: 100 scientists 157–161 publications: 74 scientists 162–166 publications: 68 scientists 167–171 publications: 91 scientists 172–176 publications: 76 scientists 177–181 publications: 75 scientists 182–186 publications: 61 scientists 187–191 publications: 66 scientists 192–196 publications: 68 scientists 197–201 publications: 71 scientists 202–206 publications: 60 scientists 207–211 publications: 56 scientists 212–216 publications: 44 scientists 217–221 publications: 51 scientists 222–226 publications: 65 scientists 227–231 publications: 48 scientists 232–236 publications: 59 scientists 237–241 publications: 37 scientists 242–246 publications: 37 scientists 247–251 publications: 41 scientists 252–256 publications: 43 scientists 257–261 publications: 33 scientists 262–266 publications: 34 scientists 267–271 publications: 39 scientists 272–276 publications: 25 scientists 277–281 publications: 29 scientists 282–286 publications: 29 scientists 287–291 publications: 26 scientists 292–296 publications: 31 scientists 297–301 publications: 31 scientists 302–306 publications: 24 scientists 307–311 publications: 28 scientists 312–316 publications: 24 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 14 scientists 327–331 publications: 25 scientists 332–336 publications: 18 scientists 337–341 publications: 16 scientists 342–346 publications: 18 scientists 347–351 publications: 15 scientists 352–356 publications: 17 scientists 357–361 publications: 19 scientists 362–366 publications: 16 scientists 367–371 publications: 17 scientists 372–376 publications: 7 scientists 377–381 publications: 18 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 19 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 13 scientists 407–411 publications: 13 scientists 412–416 publications: 5 scientists 417–421 publications: 10 scientists 422–426 publications: 6 scientists 427–431 publications: 12 scientists 432–436 publications: 9 scientists 437–441 publications: 9 scientists 442–446 publications: 10 scientists 447–451 publications: 12 scientists 452–456 publications: 8 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 5 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 7 scientists 487–491 publications: 8 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 4 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 7 scientists 517–520 publications: 7 scientists 521+ publications: 99 scientists
42–46 publications 521+

This scientist: 185 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Economics and Finance scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,760 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
42–46 1
47–51 12
52–56 7
57–61 23
62–66 32
67–71 36
72–76 56
77–81 57
82–86 70
87–91 86
92–96 72
97–101 106
102–106 97
107–111 96
112–116 101
117–121 103
122–126 102
127–131 108
132–136 107
137–141 111
142–146 94
147–151 96
152–156 100
157–161 74
162–166 68
167–171 91
172–176 76
177–181 75
182–186 61 185
187–191 66
192–196 68
197–201 71
202–206 60
207–211 56
212–216 44
217–221 51
222–226 65
227–231 48
232–236 59
237–241 37
242–246 37
247–251 41
252–256 43
257–261 33
262–266 34
267–271 39
272–276 25
277–281 29
282–286 29
287–291 26
292–296 31
297–301 31
302–306 24
307–311 28
312–316 24
317–321 13
322–326 14
327–331 25
332–336 18
337–341 16
342–346 18
347–351 15
352–356 17
357–361 19
362–366 16
367–371 17
372–376 7
377–381 18
382–386 13
387–391 19
392–396 9
397–401 10
402–406 13
407–411 13
412–416 5
417–421 10
422–426 6
427–431 12
432–436 9
437–441 9
442–446 10
447–451 12
452–456 8
457–461 4
462–466 7
467–471 4
472–476 5
477–481 6
482–486 7
487–491 8
492–496 5
497–501 4
502–506 4
507–511 5
512–516 7
517–520 7
521+ 99
Download as CSV

Marc A. Koopmanschap publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 3,760 Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 97 ranges running from 42–46 to 521+ publications.
  • Marc A. Koopmanschap, a Economics and Finance scholar from Erasmus University Rotterdam, records 185 publications - the 56th percentile of the discipline.
  • 56% of ranked Economics and Finance scientists score the same or lower than Marc A. Koopmanschap, and about 44% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 167–171 publications range, and Marc A. Koopmanschap ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 137–141 publications, holding 111 scientists (3% of the field).
  • 48% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 162–166 publications), so the distribution leans towards the lower end of the scale.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 521 publications or more, 99 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Marc A. Koopmanschap D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marc A. Koopmanschap sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 72 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 101+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 178. Most scientists, 178, have 33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 66 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 126 scientists 31 D-Index: 147 scientists 32 D-Index: 157 scientists 33 D-Index: 178 scientists 34 D-Index: 171 scientists 35 D-Index: 141 scientists 36 D-Index: 132 scientists 37 D-Index: 129 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 120 scientists 40 D-Index: 117 scientists 41 D-Index: 113 scientists 42 D-Index: 114 scientists 43 D-Index: 97 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 86 scientists 46 D-Index: 78 scientists 47 D-Index: 83 scientists 48 D-Index: 62 scientists 49 D-Index: 74 scientists 50 D-Index: 50 scientists 51 D-Index: 66 scientists 52 D-Index: 69 scientists 53 D-Index: 55 scientists 54 D-Index: 67 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 62 scientists 57 D-Index: 45 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 47 scientists 60 D-Index: 46 scientists 61 D-Index: 36 scientists 62 D-Index: 37 scientists 63 D-Index: 56 scientists 64 D-Index: 50 scientists 65 D-Index: 32 scientists 66 D-Index: 28 scientists 67 D-Index: 30 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 25 scientists 70 D-Index: 22 scientists 71 D-Index: 21 scientists 72 D-Index: 26 scientists 73 D-Index: 24 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 12 scientists 76 D-Index: 14 scientists 77 D-Index: 15 scientists 78 D-Index: 15 scientists 79 D-Index: 17 scientists 80 D-Index: 17 scientists 81 D-Index: 11 scientists 82 D-Index: 10 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 11 scientists 85 D-Index: 5 scientists 86 D-Index: 9 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 9 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 6 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 8 scientists 93 D-Index: 10 scientists 94 D-Index: 11 scientists 95 D-Index: 6 scientists 96 D-Index: 4 scientists 97 D-Index: 4 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100 D-Index: 8 scientists 101+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 101+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Economics and Finance scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,760 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 126
31 147
32 157
33 178
34 171
35 141
36 132
37 129
38 130
39 120
40 117
41 113
42 114
43 97
44 115
45 86
46 78
47 83
48 62
49 74
50 50
51 66
52 69
53 55
54 67
55 61
56 62
57 45
58 34
59 47
60 46
61 36
62 37
63 56
64 50
65 32
66 28 66
67 30
68 24
69 25
70 22
71 21
72 26
73 24
74 23
75 12
76 14
77 15
78 15
79 17
80 17
81 11
82 10
83 16
84 11
85 5
86 9
87 13
88 9
89 7
90 6
91 4
92 8
93 10
94 11
95 6
96 4
97 4
98 6
99 6
100 8
101+ 100
Download as CSV

Marc A. Koopmanschap D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 3,760 Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 72 ranges running from 30 to 101+ D-Index.
  • Marc A. Koopmanschap, a Economics and Finance scholar from Erasmus University Rotterdam, records 66 D-Index - the 85th percentile of the discipline.
  • 85% of ranked Economics and Finance scientists score the same or lower than Marc A. Koopmanschap, and about 15% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 44 D-Index range, and Marc A. Koopmanschap ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 33 D-Index, holding 178 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 59% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 47 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more, 100 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Overview

Marc A. Koopmanschap is affiliated with Erasmus University Rotterdam in the Netherlands and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, with a focus on surgery and related subfields. Their research spans a total of 32 publications in medicine, including nine in surgery and several in sub-disciplines such as orthopedics and sports medicine, general health professions, pharmacology, and physiology.

The scientist's work covers multiple topics primarily centered on musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation, knee injuries and reconstruction techniques, total knee arthroplasty outcomes, and sports injuries and prevention. Additional areas of research include pain mechanisms and treatments, ophthalmology, and orthopedic surgery and rehabilitation.

Marc A. Koopmanschap has published in various academic venues, with notable frequent publications in journals such as Trials, Arthritis & Rheumatology, and BMJ Open. Other publication venues include the British Journal of Sports Medicine and BMC Health Services Research.

Recent papers authored by Koopmanschap include:

  • ACL reconstruction for all is not cost-effective after acute ACL rupture (2021, British Journal of Sports Medicine)
  • Socioeconomic differences in healthcare expenditure and utilization in The Netherlands (2021, BMC Health Services Research)
  • Health Economic Aspects of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell Therapies for Hematological Cancers: Present and Future (2021, HemaSphere)
  • Cost-effectiveness of arthroscopic partial meniscectomy versus physical therapy for traumatic meniscal tears in patients aged under 45 years (2023, The Bone & Joint Journal)
  • Health expenditure of employees versus self-employed individuals; a 5 year study (2020, Health Economics)

Co-authorship collaborations are prominent in Koopmanschap's research history. Frequent collaborators include:

  • D. Schiphof
  • Patrick Bindels
  • Max Reijman
  • Sita Bierma-Zeinstra
  • Johan Polder

In summary, Koopmanschap's career is closely tied to medicine with an emphasis on surgery, contributing to knowledge particularly in musculoskeletal and orthopedic conditions, healthcare economics, and treatment cost-effectiveness. Their work is published in journals recognized within clinical and health services research communities.

Best Publications

  • The friction cost method for measuring indirect costs of disease.

    Marc A. Koopmanschap;Frans F.H. Rutten;B.Martin van Ineveld;Leona van Roijen

  • Health-related quality of life and treatment satisfaction in Dutch patients with type 2 diabetes

    W. Ken Redekop;Marc A. Koopmanschap;Ronald P. Stolk;Guy E.H.M. Rutten

  • Economic valuation of informal care. An overview of methods and applications

    Bernard van den Berg;Werner B. F. Brouwer;Marc A. Koopmanschap

  • Epidemiology of Adverse Drug Reactions in Europe: A Review of Recent Observational Studies

    Jacoline C. Bouvy;Jacoline C. Bouvy;Marie L. De Bruin;Marc A. Koopmanschap

  • Standardisation of costs: the Dutch Manual for Costing in economic evaluations.

    Jan B. Oostenbrink;Marc A. Koopmanschap;Frans F. H. Rutten

  • Demographic and epidemiological determinants of healthcare costs in Netherlands: cost of illness study

    Willem Jan Meerding;Luc Bonneux;Johan J Polder;Marc A Koopmanschap

  • The iMTA Productivity Cost Questionnaire: A Standardized Instrument for Measuring and Valuing Health-Related Productivity Losses

    Clazien Bouwmans;Marieke Krol;Hans Severens;Marc Koopmanschap

  • A practical guide for calculating indirect costs of disease.

    Marc A. Koopmanschap;Frans F. H. Rutten

  • Towards a new approach for estimating indirect costs of disease

    Marc A. Koopmanschap;B.Martin van Ineveld

  • Labor and Health Status in Economic Evaluation of Health Care: The Health and Labor Questionnaire

    L. Van Roijen;M.-L. Essink-Bot;M. A. Koopmanschap;G. Bonsel

  • The effect of population aging on health expenditure growth: a critical review

    Claudine de Meijer;Bram Wouterse;Johan Polder;Marc Koopmanschap

  • Health problems lead to considerable productivity loss at work among workers with high physical load jobs

    W.J. Meerding;W. IJzelenberg;M.A. Koopmanschap;J.L. Severens

  • The economic costs of disease related malnutrition.

    Karen Freijer;Siok Swan Tan;Marc A. Koopmanschap;Judith M.M. Meijers

  • Productivity losses without absence: Measurement validation and empirical evidence

    W.B.F. Brouwer;M.A. Koopmanschap;F.F.H. Rutten

  • An Overview of Methods and Applications to Value Informal Care in Economic Evaluations of Healthcare

    Marc A. Koopmanschap;N. Job A. van Exel;Bernard van den Berg;Werner B. F. Brouwer

  • Process utility from providing informal care: the benefit of caring.

    Werner B.F. Brouwer;N. Job A. van Exel;Bernard van den Berg;Geertruidis A.M. van den Bos

  • Economic valuation of informal care: lessons from the application of the opportunity costs and proxy good methods

    Bernard van den Berg;Werner Brouwer;Job van Exel;Marc Koopmanschap

  • Productivity Costs Measurement Through Quality of Life? A Response to the Recommendation of the Washington Panel

    Werner B. F. Brouwer;Marc A. Koopmanschap;Frans F. H. Rutten

  • Instruments for assessing the burden of informal caregiving for stroke patients in clinical practice: a comparison of CSI, CRA, SCQ and self-rated burden

    N Job A van Exel;Wilma J M Scholte op Reimer;Werner B F Brouwer;Bernard van den Berg

  • Handbook of Health Economics

    Frans Rutten;Han Bleichrodt;Werner Brouwer;Marc Koopmanschap

  • International comparison of cost of illness

    Heijink R;Koopmanschap Ma;Polder Jj;Vtv

Frequent Co-Authors

Werner B. F. Brouwer
Werner B. F. Brouwer Erasmus University Rotterdam
Frans F. H. Rutten
Frans F. H. Rutten University Medical Center Utrecht
Job van Exel
Job van Exel Erasmus University Rotterdam
Louis W. Niessen
Louis W. Niessen Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine
Bart W. Koes
Bart W. Koes Erasmus University Rotterdam
Eddy van Doorslaer
Eddy van Doorslaer Erasmus University Rotterdam
Alex Burdorf
Alex Burdorf Erasmus University Rotterdam
Sita M. A. Bierma-Zeinstra
Sita M. A. Bierma-Zeinstra Erasmus University Rotterdam
Jan A.N. Verhaar
Jan A.N. Verhaar Erasmus University Rotterdam
Huub Schellekens
Huub Schellekens Utrecht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The landscape of Social Sciences and Humanities has expanded with flexible online degrees tailored to diverse career goals. Students can now accelerate their educational journey with programs such as an accelerated msw program online, ideal for those aiming to make an impact in social work quickly and efficiently.

Psychology continues to be a popular path, and earning an accelerated psychology bachelor's degree can help students fast-track their entry into roles in counseling, human resources, or research.

For individuals committed to counseling, finding cacrep-accredited programs is crucial. Accreditation assures employers and clients of the academic rigor and real-world relevance of your credentials.

Those interested in supporting families can explore marriage and family therapy online programs accredited, which provide a pathway to meaningful work in family counseling, therapy, and mediation.

With these online education options, students can balance personal commitments, reduce costs, and prepare for fulfilling careers in today’s evolving social sciences and humanities fields.

Best Scientists Citing Marc A. Koopmanschap

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles