World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Medicine
Netherlands
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
131
Citations
82207
World Ranking
2357
National Ranking
88

Maurits W. van Tulder publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maurits W. van Tulder sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 752 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Maurits W. van Tulder D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maurits W. van Tulder sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 131 D-Index — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Medicine in Netherlands Leader Award

Overview

Maurits W. van Tulder is affiliated with Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam in the Netherlands. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with a specific emphasis on pharmacology, surgery, economics and econometrics, pathology and forensic medicine, and general health professions. The scientist's work covers a broad area of study centered on musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation, health systems and economic evaluations, spine and intervertebral disc pathology, and clinical practice guidelines implementation.

Their scientific contributions include numerous papers published in notable venues. Frequent publication outlets include Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, BMJ Open, BMC Health Services Research, Brain and Spine, and PLoS ONE. The scientist has published extensively on topics related to low back pain, sciatica, pharmacological treatments, and surgical techniques.

Notable recent publications are:

  • Low back pain should be considered a health and research priority in Brazil: Lost productivity and healthcare costs between 2012 to 2016, 2020, PLoS ONE
  • Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy Versus Open Microdiscectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation, 2020, Spine
  • Full endoscopic versus open discectomy for sciatica: randomised controlled non-inferiority trial, 2022, BMJ
  • Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for acute low back pain, 2020, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
  • Pharmacological treatments for low back pain in adults: an overview of Cochrane Reviews, 2023, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Frequent collaborators in van Tulder's research include Johanna M. van Dongen, Judith E. Bosmans, Sidney M. Rubinstein, Raymond Ostelo, and Lisa Gregersen Oestergaard. These coauthors have contributed significantly to studies in related fields.

The main topics addressed in their research body are:

  • Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health systems, economic evaluations, quality of life
  • Spine and intervertebral disc pathology
  • Clinical practice guidelines implementation
  • Shoulder injury and treatment
  • Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment
  • Sports injuries and prevention

Van Tulder's interdisciplinary approach spans clinical, economic, and pharmacological perspectives on health conditions related to musculoskeletal disorders. This combination of expertise reflects in the variety of subfields covered, including pharmacology with 62 publications, surgery with 37 papers, and economics and econometrics with 34 contributions, among others.

Best Publications

  • What low back pain is and why we need to pay attention

    Jan Hartvigsen;Mark J Hancock;Alice Kongsted;Quinette Louw

  • Prevention and treatment of low back pain: evidence, challenges, and promising directions.

    Nadine E Foster;Johannes R Anema;Dan Cherkin;Roger Chou

  • Updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the cochrane collaboration back review group.

    Maurits van Tulder;Andrea Furlan;Claire Bombardier;Lex Bouter

  • European guidelines for the management of acute nonspecific low back pain in primary care

    Maurits van Tulder;Annette Becker;Trudy Bekkering;Alan Breen

  • 2009 updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Back Review Group

    Andrea D. Furlan;Victoria Pennick;Claire Bombardier;Maurits van Tulder

  • An updated overview of clinical guidelines for the management of non-specific low back pain in primary care

    Bart W. Koes;Maurits van Tulder;Chung-Wei Christine Lin;Luciana G Macedo

  • Diagnosis and treatment of low back pain

    B W Koes;M W van Tulder;S Thomas

  • Chapter 3. European guidelines for the management of acute nonspecific low back pain in primary care.

    Maurits van Tulder;Annette Becker;Trudy Bekkering;Alan Breen

  • Conservative treatment of acute and chronic nonspecific low back pain. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials of the most common interventions.

    M. W. Van Tulder;B. W. Koes;L. M. Bouter

  • Exercise therapy for treatment of non-specific low back pain.

    J A Hayden;M W Van Tulder;A Malmivaara;B W Koes

  • Low back pain: a call for action

    Rachelle Buchbinder;Maurits van Tulder;Birgitta Öberg;Lucíola Menezes Costa

  • Clinical practice guidelines for the management of non-specific low back pain in primary care: an updated overview

    Crystian B. Oliveira;Chris G. Maher;Rafael Z. Pinto;Adrian C. Traeger

  • Systematic Review: Strategies for Using Exercise Therapy To Improve Outcomes in Chronic Low Back Pain

    Jill A. Hayden;Maurits W. van Tulder;George Tomlinson

  • Behavioural treatment for chronic low-back pain

    Nicholas Henschke;Raymond W.J.G. Ostelo;Maurits W. van Tulder;Johan W.S. Vlaeyen

  • Exercise therapy for low‐back pain

    Maurits W. van Tulder;Antti Malmivaara;Rosmin Esmail;Bart W Koes

  • A Cost-Of-Illness Study of Back Pain in the Netherlands

    Maurits W. van Tulder;Bart W. Koes;Lex M. Bouter

  • Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for chronic low back pain: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis

    Steven J Kamper;Steven J Kamper;A T Apeldoorn;A Chiarotto;R J E M Smeets

  • A systematic review on the effectiveness of physical and rehabilitation interventions for chronic non-specific low back pain

    Marienke van Middelkoop;Sidney M Rubinstein;Ton Kuijpers;Arianne P Verhagen

  • Clinical guidelines for the management of low back pain in primary care: an international comparison.

    Bart W. Koes;Maurits W. Van Tulder;Raymond Ostelo;A. Kim Burton

  • Meta-Analysis: Exercise Therapy for Nonspecific Low Back Pain

    Jill A. Hayden;Maurits W. van Tulder;Antti V. Malmivaara;Bart W. Koes

Frequent Co-Authors

Bart W. Koes
Bart W. Koes Erasmus University Rotterdam
Raymond W. J. G. Ostelo
Raymond W. J. G. Ostelo Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Judith E. Bosmans
Judith E. Bosmans Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Christopher G. Maher
Christopher G. Maher University of Sydney
Henrica C.W. de Vet
Henrica C.W. de Vet University of Amsterdam
Lex M. Bouter
Lex M. Bouter Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Willem van Mechelen
Willem van Mechelen Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Arianne P. Verhagen
Arianne P. Verhagen University of Technology Sydney
Antti Malmivaara
Antti Malmivaara Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare
Harm W.J. van Marwijk
Harm W.J. van Marwijk Brighton and Sussex Medical School

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering studying medicine in the USA, it’s valuable to explore related online degrees that can advance your healthcare career or open new pathways. Many students and professionals are looking for flexible, affordable options to further their education while gaining practical skills.

One popular choice is pursuing an online master of health administration, which prepares graduates for leadership roles in hospitals and health organizations. These programs often offer both convenience and accessibility for busy professionals.

For those focused on budget-friendly study options, online mha programs affordable highlight accredited graduate programs that provide comprehensive health management training without high tuition costs.

Nursing professionals seeking advanced clinical roles can benefit from the best online bsn to dnp programs, allowing registered nurses to earn a doctoral degree and prepare for top-level practice.

If pharmacy interests you, consider starting or advancing your career through a pharmacy school online. Online pharmacy doctorates offer a flexible route to becoming a pharmacist or specialist in pharmaceutical care.

Best Scientists Citing Maurits W. van Tulder

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles