World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
72
Citations
31829
World Ranking
667
National Ranking
119

Harm W.J. van Marwijk publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Harm W.J. van Marwijk sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 322 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Harm W.J. van Marwijk D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Harm W.J. van Marwijk sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 72 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Harm W.J. van Marwijk is affiliated with Brighton and Sussex Medical School in the United Kingdom and has contributed extensively to research in medicine and health professions.

The scientist's work spans multiple main fields including:

  • Medicine
  • Health Professions

Subfields of particular focus include:

  • General Health Professions
  • Psychiatry and Mental Health
  • Epidemiology
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Sociology and Political Science

The main topics explored in Harm W.J. van Marwijk's research encompass:

  • Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Frailty in Older Adults

Recent publications highlight various areas of interest and include:

  • Interventions Using Wearable Physical Activity Trackers Among Adults With Cardiometabolic Conditions, 2021, JAMA Network Open
  • Barriers and Facilitators to the Adoption of Electronic Clinical Decision Support Systems: A Qualitative Interview Study with UK General Practitioners, 2021, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
  • Low-dose Naltrexone as a Treatment for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, 2020, BMJ Case Reports
  • Prevention of Dementia Using Mobile Phone Applications (PRODEMOS): Protocol for an International Randomised Controlled Trial, 2021, BMJ Open
  • What Are the Determinants of Older People Adopting Communicative E-health Services: A Meta-ethnography, 2024, BMC Health Services Research

Harm W.J. van Marwijk has frequently published in venues such as:

  • PsycTESTS Dataset
  • British Journal of General Practice
  • PLoS ONE
  • BMJ Open
  • JAMA Network Open

The scientist has collaborated extensively with several coauthors, including:

  • Elizabeth Ford
  • Jean Yves Le Reste
  • Patrice Nabbé
  • Morgane Guillou-Landréat
  • Radost Assenova

Best Publications

  • Pharmacological interventions for somatoform disorders in adults.

    Maria Kleinstäuber;Michael Witthöft;Andrés Steffanowski;Harm van Marwijk

  • Controlled Interventions to Reduce Burnout in Physicians A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

    Maria Panagioti;Efharis Panagopoulou;Peter Bower;George Lewith

  • Depression and the risk for cardiovascular diseases: systematic review and meta analysis

    Koen Van der Kooy;Hein van Hout;Harm Marwijk;Haan Marten

  • The Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety (NESDA): rationale, objectives and methods.

    B.W.J.H. Penninx;A.T.F. Beekman;J.H Smit;F.G. Zitman

  • Patients' preferences in the treatment of depressive disorder in primary care

    Digna J.F. van Schaik;Alexandra F.J. Klijn;Hein P.J. van Hout;Harm W.J. van Marwijk

  • The Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ): a validation study of a multidimensional self-report questionnaire to assess distress, depression, anxiety and somatization

    Berend Terluin;Harm W J van Marwijk;Herman J Adèr;Henrica C W de Vet

  • Two-year course of depressive and anxiety disorders: Results from the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety (NESDA)

    Brenda W.J.H. Penninx;Brenda W.J.H. Penninx;Brenda W.J.H. Penninx;Willem A. Nolen;Femke Lamers;Frans G. Zitman

  • The Association of Depression and Anxiety with Pain: A Study from NESDA

    Eric W. de Heer;Marloes M. J. G. Gerrits;Aartjan T. F. Beekman;Jack Dekker

  • Stepped-care prevention of anxiety and depression in late life: a randomized controlled trial.

    Petronella J. van't Veer-Tazelaar;Harm W. J. van Marwijk;Patricia van Oppen;Hein P. J. van Hout

  • Non‐pharmacological interventions for somatoform disorders and medically‐unexplained physical symptoms (MUPS) in adults

    Nikki van Dessel;Madelon den Boeft;Johannes C van der Wouden;Maria Kleinstäuber

  • A patient-doctor relationship questionnaire (PDRQ-9) in primary care: development and psychometric evaluation

    Christina M Van der Feltz-Cornelis;Patricia Van Oppen;Harm W.J Van Marwijk;Edwin De Beurs

  • The comorbidity burden of type 2 diabetes mellitus: patterns, clusters and predictions from a large English primary care cohort

    Magdalena Nowakowska;Salwa S. Zghebi;Darren M. Ashcroft;Darren M. Ashcroft;Iain Buchan;Iain Buchan

  • The European General Practice Research Network Presents a Comprehensive Definition of Multimorbidity in Family Medicine and Long Term Care, Following a Systematic Review of Relevant Literature

    Jean Yves Le Reste;Patrice Nabbe;Benedicte Manceau;Charilaos Lygidakis

  • Pain and the onset of depressive and anxiety disorders

    Marloes M.J.G. Gerrits;Patricia van Oppen;Harm W.J. van Marwijk;Brenda W.J.H. Penninx;Brenda W.J.H. Penninx;Brenda W.J.H. Penninx

  • Impact of pain on the course of depressive and anxiety disorders

    Marloes M. J. G. Gerrits;Nicole Vogelzangs;Patricia van Oppen;Harm W. J. van Marwijk

  • Effectiveness of psychological interventions in preventing recurrence of depressive disorder: Meta-analysis and meta-regression

    Karolien E.M. Biesheuvel-Leliefeld;Gemma D. Kok;Claudi L.H. Bockting;Pim Cuijpers;Pim Cuijpers

  • Incidence of depression and anxiety in the spouses of patients with dementia: a naturalistic cohort study of recorded morbidity with a 6-year follow-up.

    Karlijn J. Joling;Hein P.J. van Hout;Francois G. Schellevis;Henriette E. van der Horst

  • Longitudinal association between pain, and depression and anxiety over four years.

    Marloes M.J.G. Gerrits;Harm W.J. van Marwijk;Patricia van Oppen;Henriëtte van der Horst

  • An exploration of formal and informal mindfulness practice and associations with wellbeing

    Kelly Birtwell;Kate Williams;Harm van Marwijk;Christopher J. Armitage;Christopher J. Armitage

  • The prognosis of depression in older patients in general practice and the community. A systematic review.

    Els Licht-Strunk;Daniëlle A W M van der Windt;Harm W J van Marwijk;Marten de Haan

  • Anxiety and the risk of death in older men and women.

    Hein P. J. Van Hout;Aartjan T. F. Beekman;Edwin De Beurs;Hannie Comijs

  • Alprazolam for depression

    Harm van Marwijk;Gideon Allick;Froukje Wegman;Arjan Bax

  • The comorbidity burden of type 2 diabetes mellitus: patterns, clusters and predictions from a large English primary care cohort

    Magdalena Nowakowska;Salwa S. Zghebi;Darren M. Ashcroft;Iain Buchan

Frequent Co-Authors

Aartjan T.F. Beekman
Aartjan T.F. Beekman Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Judith E. Bosmans
Judith E. Bosmans Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Filip Smit
Filip Smit Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Pim Cuijpers
Pim Cuijpers Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Maurits W. van Tulder
Maurits W. van Tulder Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Anthony Mann
Anthony Mann King's College London
Maria Panagioti
Maria Panagioti University of Manchester
Joanna Murray
Joanna Murray King's College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in advancing their careers in Social Sciences and Humanities, a variety of online degree options in the USA offer flexible learning tailored to professional goals. Exploring accredited psyd programs can lead to clinical psychology roles, equipping students with hands-on training and essential credentials for licensure.

Many learners prefer specialized paths such as marriage and family therapy online programs accredited by reputable bodies. These programs prepare graduates for impactful work helping families and couples, with some offering expedited timelines or part-time study to suit different needs.

Cost is a common concern, but there are cheap psychology masters programs that deliver quality education without the high tuition fees. These options help make advanced study more accessible, opening doors to roles in counseling, research, and education.

For education professionals looking to move quickly into leadership, shortest edd online degree fast-track programs provide accelerated pathways. These degrees enable rapid career advancement while maintaining high academic standards.

No matter your focus, online programs in these fields allow you to balance educational ambitions with current work or personal commitments while preparing for impactful and meaningful careers.

Best Scientists Citing Harm W.J. van Marwijk

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles