World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 50 2727 2492 469 424 160 11602

Maria Panagioti publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Maria Panagioti between 2009 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Maria Panagioti published across 18 years, from 2009 to 2026, averaging 11.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 2023. 16 of the 209 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2009 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 2023. 2009: 1 publication 2010: 0 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 17 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 21 publications 2020: 22 publications 2021: 22 publications 2022: 15 publications 2023: 25 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 15 publications 2026: 1 publication
2009 2026

209 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Maria Panagioti: publications per year, 2009 to 2026
Year Publications
2009 1
2010 0
2011 2
2012 4
2013 2
2014 13
2015 12
2016 9
2017 17
2018 15
2019 21
2020 22
2021 22
2022 15
2023 25
2024 13
2025 15
2026 1
Total 209
Download as CSV

Maria Panagioti publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maria Panagioti sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 154–163 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 160 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411 160
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Maria Panagioti D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maria Panagioti sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187 50
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Maria Panagioti is a researcher affiliated with the University of Manchester in the United Kingdom. Their work spans fields including Medicine, Psychology, and Health Professions, with a focus on subfields such as General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Social Psychology, and Psychiatry and Mental Health.

The scientist's research interests cover a range of topics primarily centered on healthcare professionals' stress and burnout, mental health treatment and access, suicide and self-harm studies, geriatric care and nursing homes, hearing loss and rehabilitation, noise effects and management, and hearing, cochlea, tinnitus, and genetics.

Maria Panagioti's recent scholarly articles include:

  • Associations of physician burnout with career engagement and quality of patient care: systematic review and meta-analysis, 2022, BMJ
  • Meta-ethnography in healthcare research: a guide to using a meta-ethnographic approach for literature synthesis, 2021, BMC Health Services Research
  • Factors Associated With Burnout and Stress in Trainee Physicians, 2020, JAMA Network Open
  • Preventable medication harm across health care settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis, 2020, BMC Medicine
  • Are stressful life events prospectively associated with increased suicidal ideation and behaviour? A systematic review and meta-analysis, 2020, Journal of Affective Disorders

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Maria Panagioti include Alexander Hodkinson, Evangelos Kontopantelis, Nusrat Husain, Natasha Tyler, and Darren M. Ashcroft. These collaborations reflect substantial joint research activities in related fields.

Common venues for Panagioti's publications demonstrate a focus on journals associated with medicine and health, including JAMA Network Open, Health Expectations, Health and Social Care Delivery Research, BMJ, and BMC Medicine. The scientist has consistently published multiple articles in these outlets, indicating a robust presence in clinical and public health scholarship.

Best Publications

  • Controlled Interventions to Reduce Burnout in Physicians A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

    Maria Panagioti;Efharis Panagopoulou;Peter Bower;George Lewith

  • Association Between Physician Burnout and Patient Safety, Professionalism, and Patient Satisfaction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

    Maria Panagioti;Keith Geraghty;Judith Johnson;Anli Zhou

  • Prevalence, severity, and nature of preventable patient harm across medical care settings: systematic review and meta-analysis

    Maria Panagioti;Kanza Khan;Richard N Keers;Aseel Abuzour

  • Childhood maltreatment and adult suicidality: a comprehensive systematic review with meta-analysis

    Ioannis Angelakis;Emma Louise Gillespie;Maria Panagioti

  • Post-traumatic stress disorder and suicidal behavior: A narrative review.

    Maria Panagioti;Patricia A. Gooding;Nicholas Tarrier

  • Self-management support interventions to reduce health care utilisation without compromising outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Maria Panagioti;Gerry Richardson;Nicola Small;Elizabeth Murray

  • A meta-analysis of the association between posttraumatic stress disorder and suicidality: the role of comorbid depression.

    Maria Panagioti;Patricia A. Gooding;Nicholas Tarrier;Nicholas Tarrier

  • Systematic meta-review of supported self-management for asthma: a healthcare perspective

    Hilary Pinnock;Hannah L. Parke;Maria Panagioti;Luke Daines

  • Overview of the prevalence, impact, and management of depression and anxiety in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

    Maria Panagioti;Charlotte Scott;Amy Blakemore;Peter A Coventry

  • How strongly related are health status and subjective well-being? Systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Kayonda Hubert Ngamaba;Maria Panagioti;Christopher J Armitage

  • Factors Associated With Burnout and Stress in Trainee Physicians: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

    Anli Yue Zhou;Maria Panagioti;Aneez Esmail;Raymond Agius

  • Effectiveness of Case Management for 'At Risk' Patients in Primary Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Jonathan Stokes;Maria Panagioti;Rahul Alam;Katherine Checkland

  • Suicidality in obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD): A systematic review and meta-analysis

    Ioannis Angelakis;Patricia Gooding;Nichoas Tarrier;Maria Panagioti

  • Preventable medication harm across health care settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Alexander Hodkinson;Natasha Tyler;Natasha Tyler;Darren M. Ashcroft;Darren M. Ashcroft;Richard N. Keers

  • Managing diagnostic uncertainty in primary care: A systematic critical review

    Rahul Alam;Sudeh Cheraghi-Sohi;Maria Panagioti;Aneez Esmail

  • Suicidality in body dysmorphic disorder (BDD): A systematic review with meta-analysis.

    Ioannis Angelakis;Patricia A. Gooding;Maria Panagioti

  • Income Inequality and Subjective Well-Being: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

    Kayonda Hubert Ngamaba;Maria Panagioti;Christopher J. Armitage

  • Perceived social support buffers the impact of PTSD symptoms on suicidal behavior: Implications into suicide resilience research

    M. Panagioti;Patricia A. Gooding;P. J. Taylor;N. Tarrier;N. Tarrier

  • Resilience to emotional distress in response to failure, error or mistakes: A systematic review

    Judith Johnson;Judith Johnson;Maria Panagioti;Jennifer Bass;Lauren Ramsey

  • The Effectiveness of Electronic Differential Diagnoses (DDX) Generators: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

    Nicholas Riches;Maria Panagioti;Rahul Alam;Sudeh Cheraghi-Sohi

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter Bower
Peter Bower University of Manchester
Patricia A. Gooding
Patricia A. Gooding University of Manchester
Nicholas Tarrier
Nicholas Tarrier University of Manchester
Harm W.J. van Marwijk
Harm W.J. van Marwijk Brighton and Sussex Medical School
Stephen Campbell
Stephen Campbell University of Manchester
Elizabeth Murray
Elizabeth Murray University College London
Anne Kennedy
Anne Kennedy University of Southampton
Peter A. Coventry
Peter A. Coventry University of York
Stanton Newman
Stanton Newman City, University of London
Anne Rogers
Anne Rogers University of Southampton

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Advancements in online education have opened new avenues for studying Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA. Professionals looking to deepen their expertise can consider a range of accredited programs that fit their schedule and budget.

For those interested in clinical psychology, accredited psyd programs prepare graduates for practitioner roles, ensuring both academic rigor and recognized qualifications. Students focused on family counseling or therapy can look at online masters mft programs, which are tailored for quick completion without compromising quality.

Budget-conscious learners have access to online masters degree psychology options, making a high-quality education more accessible. Aspiring leaders in education may also benefit from easiest edd programs, which offer streamlined pathways to a doctorate.

These flexible degrees are designed to help you achieve your career goals in education, counseling, or research—no matter where you are.

Best Scientists Citing Maria Panagioti

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles