World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 85 268 49 297 31067
Medicine 86 13994 1290 304 31260

Elizabeth Murray publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Elizabeth Murray between 1992 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Elizabeth Murray published across 34 years, from 1992 to 2025, averaging 9.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 34 publications in 2015. 3 of the 336 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 34. Peak 34 publications in 2015. 1992: 1 publication 1993: 3 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 23 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 20 publications 2015: 34 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 19 publications 2021: 22 publications 2022: 18 publications 2023: 13 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 3 publications
1992 2025

336 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Elizabeth Murray: publications per year, 1992 to 2025
Year Publications
1992 1
1993 3
1994 2
1995 4
1996 0
1997 5
1998 4
1999 6
2000 3
2001 6
2002 6
2003 5
2004 3
2005 5
2006 10
2007 12
2008 7
2009 5
2010 11
2011 23
2012 10
2013 13
2014 20
2015 34
2016 16
2017 15
2018 16
2019 16
2020 19
2021 22
2022 18
2023 13
2024 0
2025 3
Total 336
Download as CSV

Elizabeth Murray publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elizabeth Murray sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 294–303 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 297 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106 297
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Elizabeth Murray D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elizabeth Murray sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 85 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 85 D-Index — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15 85
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Elizabeth Murray was affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Their research output spanned multiple fields, primarily focusing on medicine, health professions, and psychology with 53, 45, and 41 publications respectively in these main fields of study.

The subfields where their work was concentrated included general health professions, clinical psychology, applied psychology, endocrinology, diabetes and metabolism, as well as sociology and political science. Their research topics frequently covered mobile health and mHealth applications, digital mental health interventions, obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorders, diabetes management and education, health policy implementation science, health literacy and information accessibility, and autism spectrum disorder research.

Among the recent notable papers authored or co-authored by Elizabeth Murray were:

  • Translational framework for implementation evaluation and research: a normalisation process theory coding manual for qualitative research and instrument development (2022, Implementation Science)
  • Home and Online Management and Evaluation of Blood Pressure (HOME BP) using a digital intervention in poorly controlled hypertension: randomised controlled trial (2021, BMJ)
  • The Supportive Care Needs of Cancer Patients: a Systematic Review (2021, Journal of Cancer Education)
  • Impact of fatigue as the primary determinant of functional limitations among patients with post-COVID-19 syndrome: a cross-sectional observational study (2023, BMJ Open)
  • Economic Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions: Methodological Issues and Recommendations for Practice (2022, PharmacoEconomics)

Frequent coauthors with whom Elizabeth Murray collaborated included Fiona Hamilton, Jamie Ross, Chris Hollis, Charlotte L Hall, and Per Andrén. These partnerships were significant across various projects and publications.

The venues where Elizabeth Murray most frequently published their work included BMJ Open, Journal of Medical Internet Research, Trials, Digital Health, and Health Technology Assessment. BMJ Open was the most frequent venue with five publications, followed by the Journal of Medical Internet Research with four.

Best Publications

  • Designing and evaluating complex interventions to improve health care

    Neil C Campbell;Elizabeth Murray;Janet Darbyshire;Jon Emery

  • Normalisation process theory: A framework for developing, evaluating and implementing complex interventions

    Elizabeth Murray;Shaun Treweek;Catherine Pope;Anne MacFarlane

  • Development of a theory of implementation and integration: Normalization Process Theory

    Carl R May;Frances Mair;Tracy Finch;Anne E. MacFarlane

  • Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (StaRI) Statement

    Hilary Pinnock;Melanie Barwick;Christopher R. Carpenter;Sandra Eldridge

  • Factors that influence the implementation of e-health: a systematic review of systematic reviews (an update)

    Jamie Ross;Fiona Stevenson;Rosa Lau;Elizabeth Murray

  • Interactive Health Communication Applications for people with chronic disease

    Elizabeth Murray;Joanne Burns;Sharon See Tai;Rosalind Lai

  • Understanding the implementation of complex interventions in health care: the normalization process model.

    Carl James May;Tracy Finch;Frances S. Mair;Luciana Ballini

  • Mechanisms of major biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

    Andrew M. Davidoff;Theodore N. Pappas;Elizabeth A. Murray;David J. Hilleren

  • Evaluating Digital Health Interventions: Key Questions and Approaches.

    Elizabeth Murray;Eric B. Hekler;Gerhard Andersson;Linda M. Collins

  • Using Normalization Process Theory in feasibility studies and process evaluations of complex healthcare interventions: a systematic review

    Carl May;Amanda Cummings;Melissa Girling;Michael Bracher

  • The impact of health information on the internet on the physician-patient relationship: patient perceptions.

    Elizabeth Murray;Bernard Lo;Lance Pollack;Karen Donelan

  • Factors that promote or inhibit the implementation of e-health systems: an explanatory systematic review.

    Frances S Mair;Carl May;Catherine O’Donnell;Tracy Finch

  • The Impact of Health Information on the Internet on Health Care and the Physician-Patient Relationship: National U.S. Survey among 1.050 U.S. Physicians

    Elizabeth Murray;Bernard Lo;Lance Pollack;Karen Donelan

  • Achieving change in primary care—causes of the evidence to practice gap: systematic reviews of reviews

    Rosa Lau;Fiona Stevenson;Bie Nio Ong;Krysia Dziedzic

  • A randomised controlled trial and cost-effectiveness study of systematic screening (targeted and total population screening) versus routine practice for the detection of atrial fibrillation in people aged 65 and over. The SAFE study.

    Fdr Hobbs;DA Fitzmaurice;Jonathan Mant;E Murray

  • Computer-based diabetes self-management interventions for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus

    Kingshuk Pal;Sophie V Eastwood;Susan Michie;Andrew J Farmer

  • Why is it difficult to implement e-health initiatives? A qualitative study

    Elizabeth Murray;Joanne Burns;Carl James May;Tracy Finch

  • Self-management support interventions to reduce health care utilisation without compromising outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Maria Panagioti;Gerry Richardson;Nicola Small;Elizabeth Murray

  • Improving the normalization of complex interventions: part 2 - validation of the NoMAD instrument for assessing implementation work based on normalization process theory (NPT)

    Tracy L. Finch;Melissa Girling;Carl R. May;Frances S. Mair

  • Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (StaRI): explanation and elaboration document.

    Hilary Pinnock;Melanie Barwick;Christopher R Carpenter;Sandra Eldridge

  • The Effectiveness of Prompts to Promote Engagement With Digital Interventions: A Systematic Review.

    Ghadah Alkhaldi;Fiona L Hamilton;Rosa Lau;Rosie Webster

  • Can stand-alone computer-based interventions reduce alcohol consumption? A systematic review.

    Zarnie Khadjesari;Elizabeth Murray;Catherine Hewitt;Suzanne Hartley

Frequent Co-Authors

Fiona Stevenson
Fiona Stevenson University College London
Carl May
Carl May London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Susan Michie
Susan Michie University College London
Irwin Nazareth
Irwin Nazareth University College London
Lucy Yardley
Lucy Yardley University of Bristol
Christine Godfrey
Christine Godfrey University of York
Jim McCambridge
Jim McCambridge University of York
Anne Kennedy
Anne Kennedy University of Southampton
Charles Abraham
Charles Abraham University of Exeter
Sonia Johnson
Sonia Johnson University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Social Sciences and Humanities opens up a variety of flexible options for students and working professionals. Affordable programs are in high demand, such as the most affordable online psychology degree, which provides a cost-effective route to careers in mental health, counseling, and research.

Many students also consider graduate studies to further specialize. The masters in social work is a popular choice for those seeking rewarding roles in social services or public policy and offers a range of online options with accessible entry requirements.

For those interested in advanced clinical practice, online psyd programs can prepare graduates for licensure and specialized careers in psychology. Likewise, accelerated mft programs allow learners to fast-track their path to becoming marriage and family therapists.

These online degree options offer flexibility, affordability, and clear pathways to meaningful careers within the Social Sciences and Humanities fields.

Best Scientists Citing Elizabeth Murray

Recently Published Articles