World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
85
Citations
31067
World Ranking
268
National Ranking
49

Medicine

D-Index
86
Citations
31260
World Ranking
13995
National Ranking
1293

Overview

Elizabeth Murray was affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Their research output spanned multiple fields, primarily focusing on medicine, health professions, and psychology with 53, 45, and 41 publications respectively in these main fields of study.

The subfields where their work was concentrated included general health professions, clinical psychology, applied psychology, endocrinology, diabetes and metabolism, as well as sociology and political science. Their research topics frequently covered mobile health and mHealth applications, digital mental health interventions, obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorders, diabetes management and education, health policy implementation science, health literacy and information accessibility, and autism spectrum disorder research.

Among the recent notable papers authored or co-authored by Elizabeth Murray were:

  • Translational framework for implementation evaluation and research: a normalisation process theory coding manual for qualitative research and instrument development (2022, Implementation Science)
  • Home and Online Management and Evaluation of Blood Pressure (HOME BP) using a digital intervention in poorly controlled hypertension: randomised controlled trial (2021, BMJ)
  • The Supportive Care Needs of Cancer Patients: a Systematic Review (2021, Journal of Cancer Education)
  • Impact of fatigue as the primary determinant of functional limitations among patients with post-COVID-19 syndrome: a cross-sectional observational study (2023, BMJ Open)
  • Economic Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions: Methodological Issues and Recommendations for Practice (2022, PharmacoEconomics)

Frequent coauthors with whom Elizabeth Murray collaborated included Fiona Hamilton, Jamie Ross, Chris Hollis, Charlotte L Hall, and Per Andrén. These partnerships were significant across various projects and publications.

The venues where Elizabeth Murray most frequently published their work included BMJ Open, Journal of Medical Internet Research, Trials, Digital Health, and Health Technology Assessment. BMJ Open was the most frequent venue with five publications, followed by the Journal of Medical Internet Research with four.

Best Publications

  • Designing and evaluating complex interventions to improve health care

    Neil C Campbell;Elizabeth Murray;Janet Darbyshire;Jon Emery

  • Normalisation process theory: A framework for developing, evaluating and implementing complex interventions

    Elizabeth Murray;Shaun Treweek;Catherine Pope;Anne MacFarlane

  • Development of a theory of implementation and integration: Normalization Process Theory

    Carl R May;Frances Mair;Tracy Finch;Anne E. MacFarlane

  • Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (StaRI) Statement

    Hilary Pinnock;Melanie Barwick;Christopher R. Carpenter;Sandra Eldridge

  • Factors that influence the implementation of e-health: a systematic review of systematic reviews (an update)

    Jamie Ross;Fiona Stevenson;Rosa Lau;Elizabeth Murray

  • Interactive Health Communication Applications for people with chronic disease

    Elizabeth Murray;Joanne Burns;Sharon See Tai;Rosalind Lai

  • Understanding the implementation of complex interventions in health care: the normalization process model.

    Carl James May;Tracy Finch;Frances S. Mair;Luciana Ballini

  • Mechanisms of major biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

    Andrew M. Davidoff;Theodore N. Pappas;Elizabeth A. Murray;David J. Hilleren

  • Evaluating Digital Health Interventions: Key Questions and Approaches.

    Elizabeth Murray;Eric B. Hekler;Gerhard Andersson;Linda M. Collins

  • Using Normalization Process Theory in feasibility studies and process evaluations of complex healthcare interventions: a systematic review

    Carl May;Amanda Cummings;Melissa Girling;Michael Bracher

  • The impact of health information on the internet on the physician-patient relationship: patient perceptions.

    Elizabeth Murray;Bernard Lo;Lance Pollack;Karen Donelan

  • Factors that promote or inhibit the implementation of e-health systems: an explanatory systematic review.

    Frances S Mair;Carl May;Catherine O’Donnell;Tracy Finch

  • The Impact of Health Information on the Internet on Health Care and the Physician-Patient Relationship: National U.S. Survey among 1.050 U.S. Physicians

    Elizabeth Murray;Bernard Lo;Lance Pollack;Karen Donelan

  • Achieving change in primary care—causes of the evidence to practice gap: systematic reviews of reviews

    Rosa Lau;Fiona Stevenson;Bie Nio Ong;Krysia Dziedzic

  • A randomised controlled trial and cost-effectiveness study of systematic screening (targeted and total population screening) versus routine practice for the detection of atrial fibrillation in people aged 65 and over. The SAFE study.

    Fdr Hobbs;DA Fitzmaurice;Jonathan Mant;E Murray

  • Computer-based diabetes self-management interventions for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus

    Kingshuk Pal;Sophie V Eastwood;Susan Michie;Andrew J Farmer

  • Why is it difficult to implement e-health initiatives? A qualitative study

    Elizabeth Murray;Joanne Burns;Carl James May;Tracy Finch

  • Self-management support interventions to reduce health care utilisation without compromising outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Maria Panagioti;Gerry Richardson;Nicola Small;Elizabeth Murray

  • Improving the normalization of complex interventions: part 2 - validation of the NoMAD instrument for assessing implementation work based on normalization process theory (NPT)

    Tracy L. Finch;Melissa Girling;Carl R. May;Frances S. Mair

  • Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (StaRI): explanation and elaboration document.

    Hilary Pinnock;Melanie Barwick;Christopher R Carpenter;Sandra Eldridge

  • The Effectiveness of Prompts to Promote Engagement With Digital Interventions: A Systematic Review.

    Ghadah Alkhaldi;Fiona L Hamilton;Rosa Lau;Rosie Webster

  • Can stand-alone computer-based interventions reduce alcohol consumption? A systematic review.

    Zarnie Khadjesari;Elizabeth Murray;Catherine Hewitt;Suzanne Hartley

Frequent Co-Authors

Fiona Stevenson
Fiona Stevenson University College London
Carl May
Carl May London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Susan Michie
Susan Michie University College London
Irwin Nazareth
Irwin Nazareth University College London
Lucy Yardley
Lucy Yardley University of Bristol
Christine Godfrey
Christine Godfrey University of York
Jim McCambridge
Jim McCambridge University of York
Anne Kennedy
Anne Kennedy University of Southampton
Charles Abraham
Charles Abraham University of Exeter
Sonia Johnson
Sonia Johnson University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Social Sciences and Humanities opens up a variety of flexible options for students and working professionals. Affordable programs are in high demand, such as the most affordable online psychology degree, which provides a cost-effective route to careers in mental health, counseling, and research.

Many students also consider graduate studies to further specialize. The masters in social work is a popular choice for those seeking rewarding roles in social services or public policy and offers a range of online options with accessible entry requirements.

For those interested in advanced clinical practice, online psyd programs can prepare graduates for licensure and specialized careers in psychology. Likewise, accelerated mft programs allow learners to fast-track their path to becoming marriage and family therapists.

These online degree options offer flexibility, affordability, and clear pathways to meaningful careers within the Social Sciences and Humanities fields.

Best Scientists Citing Elizabeth Murray