World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
85
Citations
31067
World Ranking
268
National Ranking
49

Medicine

D-Index
86
Citations
31260
World Ranking
13994
National Ranking
1290

Elizabeth Murray publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elizabeth Murray sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 297 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Elizabeth Murray D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elizabeth Murray sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 85 D-Index — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Elizabeth Murray was affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Their research output spanned multiple fields, primarily focusing on medicine, health professions, and psychology with 53, 45, and 41 publications respectively in these main fields of study.

The subfields where their work was concentrated included general health professions, clinical psychology, applied psychology, endocrinology, diabetes and metabolism, as well as sociology and political science. Their research topics frequently covered mobile health and mHealth applications, digital mental health interventions, obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorders, diabetes management and education, health policy implementation science, health literacy and information accessibility, and autism spectrum disorder research.

Among the recent notable papers authored or co-authored by Elizabeth Murray were:

  • Translational framework for implementation evaluation and research: a normalisation process theory coding manual for qualitative research and instrument development (2022, Implementation Science)
  • Home and Online Management and Evaluation of Blood Pressure (HOME BP) using a digital intervention in poorly controlled hypertension: randomised controlled trial (2021, BMJ)
  • The Supportive Care Needs of Cancer Patients: a Systematic Review (2021, Journal of Cancer Education)
  • Impact of fatigue as the primary determinant of functional limitations among patients with post-COVID-19 syndrome: a cross-sectional observational study (2023, BMJ Open)
  • Economic Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions: Methodological Issues and Recommendations for Practice (2022, PharmacoEconomics)

Frequent coauthors with whom Elizabeth Murray collaborated included Fiona Hamilton, Jamie Ross, Chris Hollis, Charlotte L Hall, and Per Andrén. These partnerships were significant across various projects and publications.

The venues where Elizabeth Murray most frequently published their work included BMJ Open, Journal of Medical Internet Research, Trials, Digital Health, and Health Technology Assessment. BMJ Open was the most frequent venue with five publications, followed by the Journal of Medical Internet Research with four.

Best Publications

  • Designing and evaluating complex interventions to improve health care

    Neil C Campbell;Elizabeth Murray;Janet Darbyshire;Jon Emery

  • Normalisation process theory: A framework for developing, evaluating and implementing complex interventions

    Elizabeth Murray;Shaun Treweek;Catherine Pope;Anne MacFarlane

  • Development of a theory of implementation and integration: Normalization Process Theory

    Carl R May;Frances Mair;Tracy Finch;Anne E. MacFarlane

  • Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (StaRI) Statement

    Hilary Pinnock;Melanie Barwick;Christopher R. Carpenter;Sandra Eldridge

  • Factors that influence the implementation of e-health: a systematic review of systematic reviews (an update)

    Jamie Ross;Fiona Stevenson;Rosa Lau;Elizabeth Murray

  • Interactive Health Communication Applications for people with chronic disease

    Elizabeth Murray;Joanne Burns;Sharon See Tai;Rosalind Lai

  • Understanding the implementation of complex interventions in health care: the normalization process model.

    Carl James May;Tracy Finch;Frances S. Mair;Luciana Ballini

  • Mechanisms of major biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

    Andrew M. Davidoff;Theodore N. Pappas;Elizabeth A. Murray;David J. Hilleren

  • Evaluating Digital Health Interventions: Key Questions and Approaches.

    Elizabeth Murray;Eric B. Hekler;Gerhard Andersson;Linda M. Collins

  • Using Normalization Process Theory in feasibility studies and process evaluations of complex healthcare interventions: a systematic review

    Carl May;Amanda Cummings;Melissa Girling;Michael Bracher

  • The impact of health information on the internet on the physician-patient relationship: patient perceptions.

    Elizabeth Murray;Bernard Lo;Lance Pollack;Karen Donelan

  • Factors that promote or inhibit the implementation of e-health systems: an explanatory systematic review.

    Frances S Mair;Carl May;Catherine O’Donnell;Tracy Finch

  • The Impact of Health Information on the Internet on Health Care and the Physician-Patient Relationship: National U.S. Survey among 1.050 U.S. Physicians

    Elizabeth Murray;Bernard Lo;Lance Pollack;Karen Donelan

  • Achieving change in primary care—causes of the evidence to practice gap: systematic reviews of reviews

    Rosa Lau;Fiona Stevenson;Bie Nio Ong;Krysia Dziedzic

  • A randomised controlled trial and cost-effectiveness study of systematic screening (targeted and total population screening) versus routine practice for the detection of atrial fibrillation in people aged 65 and over. The SAFE study.

    Fdr Hobbs;DA Fitzmaurice;Jonathan Mant;E Murray

  • Computer-based diabetes self-management interventions for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus

    Kingshuk Pal;Sophie V Eastwood;Susan Michie;Andrew J Farmer

  • Why is it difficult to implement e-health initiatives? A qualitative study

    Elizabeth Murray;Joanne Burns;Carl James May;Tracy Finch

  • Self-management support interventions to reduce health care utilisation without compromising outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Maria Panagioti;Gerry Richardson;Nicola Small;Elizabeth Murray

  • Improving the normalization of complex interventions: part 2 - validation of the NoMAD instrument for assessing implementation work based on normalization process theory (NPT)

    Tracy L. Finch;Melissa Girling;Carl R. May;Frances S. Mair

  • Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (StaRI): explanation and elaboration document.

    Hilary Pinnock;Melanie Barwick;Christopher R Carpenter;Sandra Eldridge

  • The Effectiveness of Prompts to Promote Engagement With Digital Interventions: A Systematic Review.

    Ghadah Alkhaldi;Fiona L Hamilton;Rosa Lau;Rosie Webster

  • Can stand-alone computer-based interventions reduce alcohol consumption? A systematic review.

    Zarnie Khadjesari;Elizabeth Murray;Catherine Hewitt;Suzanne Hartley

Frequent Co-Authors

Fiona Stevenson
Fiona Stevenson University College London
Carl May
Carl May London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Susan Michie
Susan Michie University College London
Irwin Nazareth
Irwin Nazareth University College London
Lucy Yardley
Lucy Yardley University of Bristol
Christine Godfrey
Christine Godfrey University of York
Jim McCambridge
Jim McCambridge University of York
Anne Kennedy
Anne Kennedy University of Southampton
Charles Abraham
Charles Abraham University of Exeter
Sonia Johnson
Sonia Johnson University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Social Sciences and Humanities opens up a variety of flexible options for students and working professionals. Affordable programs are in high demand, such as the most affordable online psychology degree, which provides a cost-effective route to careers in mental health, counseling, and research.

Many students also consider graduate studies to further specialize. The masters in social work is a popular choice for those seeking rewarding roles in social services or public policy and offers a range of online options with accessible entry requirements.

For those interested in advanced clinical practice, online psyd programs can prepare graduates for licensure and specialized careers in psychology. Likewise, accelerated mft programs allow learners to fast-track their path to becoming marriage and family therapists.

These online degree options offer flexibility, affordability, and clear pathways to meaningful careers within the Social Sciences and Humanities fields.

Best Scientists Citing Elizabeth Murray

Recently Published Articles