World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 49 5721 5316 588 558 181 8595

Christine Godfrey publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Christine Godfrey between 1983 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Christine Godfrey published across 43 years, from 1983 to 2025, averaging 5.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2005. 1 of the 225 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1983 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2005. 1983: 2 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 4 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 3 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 11 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 18 publications 2006: 12 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 14 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 18 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 1 publication
1983 2025

225 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Christine Godfrey: publications per year, 1983 to 2025
Year Publications
1983 2
1984 0
1985 0
1986 4
1987 2
1988 3
1989 4
1990 1
1991 3
1992 2
1993 5
1994 4
1995 4
1996 6
1997 5
1998 3
1999 2
2000 4
2001 11
2002 9
2003 2
2004 9
2005 18
2006 12
2007 6
2008 7
2009 14
2010 14
2011 12
2012 14
2013 18
2014 11
2015 5
2016 2
2017 5
2018 1
2019 0
2020 0
2021 0
2022 0
2023 0
2024 0
2025 1
Total 225
Download as CSV

Christine Godfrey publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christine Godfrey sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 181–190 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 181 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397 181
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Christine Godfrey D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christine Godfrey sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48–49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487 49
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Christine Godfrey is affiliated with the University of York in the United Kingdom. Their research contributions are primarily documented through a recent publication focused on natural language processing and judgment scales.

Their notable paper is titled Likert or Not: LLM Absolute Relevance Judgments on Fine-Grained Ordinal Scales, published in 2025 in arXiv (Cornell University). This work addresses the challenges of absolute relevance judgments using large language models, particularly exploring the application of fine-grained ordinal scales in evaluation methodologies.

Christine Godfrey has collaborated with several researchers in their recent work. Frequent coauthors include:

  • Ping Nie
  • Natalia Ostapuk
  • David Ken
  • Shang Gao
  • Souheil Inati

Their publication record is focused on preprint servers with at least one paper appearing in arXiv (Cornell University). This suggests an engagement with open-access platforms for disseminating early research results.

While specific main fields of study and subfields are not listed, the available publication indicates an interest in evaluating language model performance and the methodological frameworks applied to relevance judgments.

Best Publications

  • Effectiveness of treatment for alcohol problems: findings of the randomised UK Alcohol Treatment Trial (UKATT)

    Nick Heather;Alex Copello;Christine Godfrey;Ray Hodgson

  • A summary of the review of the effectiveness of treatment for alcohol problems.

    Nick Heather;Duncan Raistrick;Christine Godfrey

  • The prevention of substance use, risk and harm in Australia - a review of the evidence

    Wendy Loxley;J. Toumbourou;Tim Stockwell;B. Haines

  • Methods for assessing the cost-effectiveness of public health interventions: key challenges and recommendations.

    Helen Weatherly;Michael Drummond;Karl Claxton;Richard Cookson

  • Effectiveness of screening and brief alcohol intervention in primary care (SIPS trial): pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial.

    Eileen Kaner;Martin Bland;Paul Cassidy;Simon Coulton

  • Review of the effectiveness of treatment for alcohol problems.

    Duncan Raistrick;Nick Heather;Christine Godfrey

  • Can stand-alone computer-based interventions reduce alcohol consumption? A systematic review.

    Zarnie Khadjesari;Elizabeth Murray;Catherine Hewitt;Suzanne Hartley

  • Methodological Challenges in Online Trials

    Elizabeth Murray;Zarnie Khadjesari;Ian R White;Eleftheria Kalaitzaki

  • Economic analysis of costs and consequences of the treatment of drug misuse: 2-year outcome data from the National Treatment Outcome Research Study (NTORS)

    Christine Godfrey;Duncan Stewart;Michael Gossop

  • Economics of smoking cessation

    Steve Parrott;Christine Godfrey

  • Cost effectiveness treatment of alcohol problems: findings of the randomised UK alcohol treatment trial (UKATT)

    Christine Godfrey;Simon Coulton

  • The economic and social costs of Class A drug use in England and Wales, 2000

    Christine Godfrey;Gail Eaton;Cynthia McDougall;Anthony Culyer

  • Guidance for commissioners on the cost effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions. Health Educational Authority.

    S Parrott;C Godfrey;M Raw;R West

  • Effectiveness and cost effectiveness of counselling in primary care

    Peter J Bower;Nancy Rowland

  • The relative efficacy of two levels of a primary care intervention for family members affected by the addiction problem of a close relative: a randomized trial

    Alex Copello;Lorna Templeton;Jim Orford;Richard Velleman

  • Attrition Revisited: Adherence and Retention in a Web-Based Alcohol Trial

    Elizabeth Murray;Ian R White;Mira Varagunam;Christine Godfrey

  • The effectiveness of alcohol screening and brief intervention in emergency departments: a multicentre pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial

    Colin Drummond;Paolo Deluca;Simon Coulton;Martin Bland

  • Use of nicotine replacement therapy and the risk of acute myocardial infarction, stroke, and death

    R Hubbard;S Lewis;C Smith;C Godfrey

  • Impact and costs of incentives to reduce attrition in online trials: two randomized controlled trials.

    Zarnie Khadjesari;Elizabeth Murray;Eleftheria Kalaitzaki;Ian R White

  • United Kingdom Alcohol Treatment Trial (UKATT): Hypotheses, design and methods

    Alex Copello;Christine Godfrey;Nick Heather;Ray Hodgson

  • The cost-effectiveness of the English smoking treatment services: evidence from practice

    Christine Godfrey;Steve Parrott;Tim Coleman;Elspeth Pound

  • On-line randomized controlled trial of an internet based psychologically enhanced intervention for people with hazardous alcohol consumption.

    Paul K. Wallace;Elizabeth Murray;Jim McCambridge;Zarnie Khadjesari

  • Opportunistic screening for alcohol use disorders in primary care: comparative study.

    Simon Coulton;Colin Drummond;Darren James;Christine Godfrey

Frequent Co-Authors

Colin Drummond
Colin Drummond King's College London
Eileen Kaner
Eileen Kaner Newcastle University
Paolo Deluca
Paolo Deluca King's College London
Elizabeth Murray
Elizabeth Murray University College London
Jim McCambridge
Jim McCambridge University of York
John Britton
John Britton University of Nottingham
Ian R. White
Ian R. White University College London
Sarah Lewis
Sarah Lewis University of Nottingham
Ann McNeill
Ann McNeill University of Adelaide
Jim Orford
Jim Orford University of Birmingham

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree opens the door to a wide range of online programs and diverse career paths, especially in fields like counseling and social work. Many students interested in psychology also explore social work as a closely related discipline, given its practical focus on supporting individuals and communities.

Affordability is a key issue when choosing an online degree. Fortunately, there are several cost-effective options available. For instance, if you reside in Kentucky, you may want to consider the cheapest online social work degrees in Kentucky. Likewise, students in Massachusetts have access to the most affordable online social work degree programs in Massachusetts.

If you are interested in earning a master’s in social work, you can explore the cheapest online msw degrees in the South or the affordable online social work master's degrees in Texas. These online pathways make it easier to advance your education and career without incurring excessive student debt.

Whether you want to become a licensed therapist, counselor, or social worker, these affordable programs can help you achieve your career goals in psychology and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Christine Godfrey

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles