World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Best Female Scientists
2025
Award Badge
Psychology
USA
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Best Female Scientists 135 286 271 179 169 608 59705
Psychology 137 131 113 82 69 569 61007
Medicine 129 2628 2451 1472 1352 479 51685

Tiffany Field publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Tiffany Field between 1977 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Tiffany Field published across 49 years, from 1977 to 2025, averaging 13.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 36 publications in 1996. 40 of the 666 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1977 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 36. Peak 36 publications in 1996. 1977: 3 publications 1978: 6 publications 1979: 9 publications 1980: 7 publications 1981: 15 publications 1982: 18 publications 1983: 7 publications 1984: 13 publications 1985: 9 publications 1986: 13 publications 1987: 10 publications 1988: 6 publications 1989: 8 publications 1990: 8 publications 1991: 7 publications 1992: 7 publications 1993: 9 publications 1994: 9 publications 1995: 13 publications 1996: 36 publications 1997: 24 publications 1998: 31 publications 1999: 16 publications 2000: 18 publications 2001: 27 publications 2002: 24 publications 2003: 10 publications 2004: 15 publications 2005: 14 publications 2006: 26 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 21 publications 2009: 18 publications 2010: 17 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 36 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 6 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 24 publications 2025: 16 publications
1977 2025

666 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Tiffany Field: publications per year, 1977 to 2025
Year Publications
1977 3
1978 6
1979 9
1980 7
1981 15
1982 18
1983 7
1984 13
1985 9
1986 13
1987 10
1988 6
1989 8
1990 8
1991 7
1992 7
1993 9
1994 9
1995 13
1996 36
1997 24
1998 31
1999 16
2000 18
2001 27
2002 24
2003 10
2004 15
2005 14
2006 26
2007 10
2008 21
2009 18
2010 17
2011 12
2012 13
2013 36
2014 9
2015 1
2016 6
2017 15
2018 14
2019 5
2020 9
2021 3
2022 12
2023 7
2024 24
2025 16
Total 666
Download as CSV

Tiffany Field publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tiffany Field sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 561–570 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 569 publications — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10 569
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Tiffany Field D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tiffany Field sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 136–137 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 137 D-Index — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12 137
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Psychology in United States Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Best Female Scientists Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Psychology in United States Leader Award

Overview

Tiffany Field is affiliated with the University of Miami in the United States. Their primary research focus lies within the field of psychology, with a substantial body of work in clinical psychology. Other significant subfields of study include social psychology, sociology and political science, education, and experimental and cognitive psychology.

Their research topics cover a broad range of issues related to mental health and human development. Notable areas include:

  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Resilience and Mental Health

Tiffany Field's recent papers exemplify these focus areas, with publications addressing psychological and social challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic and related mental health concerns. Some of the recent works are:

  • "Touch Deprivation and Exercise During the COVID-19 Lockdown April 2020" (2020), Medical Research Archives
  • "Young, Alone, and Young Alone During a COVID-19 Lockdown" (2020), JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY
  • "Romantic breakup distress in university students: A narrative review" (2020), International Journal of Psychological Research and Reviews
  • "Cell Phone Addiction in Adolescents: A Narrative Review" (2020), Open Access Journal of Addiction and Psychology
  • "Feeling Isolated and Lonely During Covid-19 Lockdown" (2020), Archives of Health Science

The venues where Tiffany Field frequently publishes reflect their research interests and include:

  • Journal of Psychology & Clinical Psychiatry
  • International Journal of Psychological Research and Reviews
  • American Journal of Psychiatric Research and Reviews
  • Medical Research Archives
  • Archives of Health Science

Their scholarly collaborations involve recurring co-authors with whom they have authored multiple publications. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Samantha Poling
  • Shantay Mines
  • Debra Bendell
  • Connie Veazey
  • Miguel Diego

This profile indicates a substantial contribution to psychological research, particularly in areas linked to mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic, developmental psychology, and the psychological impact of technology and relationships.

Best Publications

  • Postpartum depression effects on early interactions, parenting, and safety practices: a review.

    Tiffany Field

  • Infants of depressed mothers

    Tiffany Field

  • Discrimination and imitation of facial expression by neonates

    Tiffany M. Field;Robert Woodson;Reena Greenberg;Debra Cohen

  • Behavior-State Matching and Synchrony in Mother-Infant Interactions of Nondepressed versus Depressed Dyads.

    Tiffany Field;Brian T. Healy;Sheri Goldstein;Moshe Guthertz

  • Tactile/kinesthetic stimulation effects on preterm neonates.

    Tiffany M. Field;Saul M. Schanberg;Frank Scafidi;Charles R. Bauer

  • Prenatal depression effects on the fetus and newborn : a review

    Tiffany Field;Miguel Diego;Maria Hernandez-Reif

  • Social Perception in Infants

    Tiffany Field;Nathan A. Fox

  • CORTISOL DECREASES AND SEROTONIN AND DOPAMINE INCREASE FOLLOWING MASSAGE THERAPY

    Tiffany Field;Maria Hernandez-Reif;Miguel Diego;Saul Schanberg

  • Prenatal depression effects on early development: A review

    Tiffany Field

  • Touch for Socioemotional and Physical Well-Being: A Review.

    Tiffany Field;Tiffany Field

  • Early interactions between infants and their postpartum depressed mothers

    Tiffany M. Field

  • Infants of depressed mothers show "depressed" behavior even with nondepressed adults.

    Tiffany Field;Brian Healy;Sheri Goldstein;Susan Perry

  • Pregnancy problems, postpartum depression, and early mother–infant interactions.

    Tiffany Field;David Sandberg;Robert Garcia;Nitza Vega-Lahr

  • Massage therapy effects.

    Tiffany M. Field

  • Aromatherapy Positively Affects Mood, Eeg Patterns of Alertness and Math Computations

    Miguel A. Diego;Nancy Aaron Jones;Tiffany Field;Maria Hernandez-Reif

  • Prenatal depression effects on the fetus and the newborn

    Tiffany Field;Miguel Diego;John Dieter;Maria Hernandez-Reif

  • Mother-stranger face discrimination by the newborn

    Tiffany M. Field;Debra Cohen;Robert Garcia;Reena Greenberg

  • Pregnancy anxiety and comorbid depression and anger: effects on the fetus and neonate.

    Tiffany Field;Miguel Diego;Maria Hernandez-Reif;Saul Schanberg

  • Massage Therapy is Associated with Enhancement of the Immune System's Cytotoxic Capacity

    Gail Ironson;Tiffany Field;Frank Scafidi;Michiyo Hashimoto

  • Effects of Early Separation, Interactive Deficits, and Experimental Manipulations on Infant-Mother Face-to-Face Interaction.

    Tiffany Martini Field

Frequent Co-Authors

Miguel Diego
Miguel Diego University of Miami
Maria Hernandez-Reif
Maria Hernandez-Reif University of Alabama
Saul M. Schanberg
Saul M. Schanberg Duke University
Cynthia M. Kuhn
Cynthia M. Kuhn Duke University
Neil Schneiderman
Neil Schneiderman University of Miami
Bárbara Figueiredo
Bárbara Figueiredo University of Minho
Nathan A. Fox
Nathan A. Fox University of Maryland, College Park
Jay S. Skyler
Jay S. Skyler University of Miami
Jacqueline Nadel
Jacqueline Nadel Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Gail Ironson
Gail Ironson University of Miami

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Online psychology degrees offer flexibility and accessibility for students across the U.S., opening diverse career pathways. Students can select from a variety of programs, including bachelor's and master's degrees, and can specialize in areas like clinical psychology, counseling, or research.

When choosing an online program, it’s important to consider factors such as accreditation, tuition, faculty expertise, and student support services. Exploring the best online psychology program rankings in Illinois can help prospective students compare top options in the Midwest. Meanwhile, for those looking to study in New England, there are comprehensive listings of online psychology degrees in Massachusetts.

Graduate-level programs are available in states with large higher education networks. Those interested in the West Coast can consider the best online psychology master's degree rankings in California, while students seeking programs in the Southeast can explore online psychology master's degrees in Florida.

Earning an online psychology degree can lead to rewarding careers in counseling, human resources, social services, or further graduate study. Researching accredited programs tailored to your goals and location is essential to maximize your career potential.

Best Scientists Citing Tiffany Field

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles