World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
108
Citations
44512
World Ranking
5990
National Ranking
3202

Psychology

D-Index
109
Citations
42095
World Ranking
415
National Ranking
264

Neil Schneiderman publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Neil Schneiderman sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 537 publications — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Neil Schneiderman D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Neil Schneiderman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 109 D-Index — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1994 - APA Award for Distinguished Scientific Contributions to Psychology, American Psychological Association
  • 1979 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Neil Schneiderman was affiliated with the University of Miami in the United States and focused their research primarily in the field of Medicine. Their work encompassed several subfields, including Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Physiology, and Psychiatry and Mental Health.

The scientist's research topics covered a range of areas related to health, with particular attention to cardiovascular health, nutritional studies, dementia and cognitive impairment, and diabetes management. Key topics of their work included:

  • Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
  • Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Diabetes Management and Education
  • Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Cardiac Health and Mental Health

Recent publications by Neil Schneiderman, spanning the year 2020, demonstrated contributions to diverse aspects of health research. These include:

  • Incidence of Hypertension Among US Hispanics/Latinos: The Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos, 2008 to 2017, 2020, Journal of the American Heart Association
  • Associations of Sleep-disordered Breathing and Insomnia with Incident Hypertension and Diabetes. The Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos, 2020, American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
  • Diabetes, Cognitive Decline, and Mild Cognitive Impairment Among Diverse Hispanics/Latinos: Study of Latinos-Investigation of Neurocognitive Aging Results (HCHS/SOL), 2020, Diabetes Care
  • Serum sphingolipids and incident diabetes in a US population with high diabetes burden: the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos (HCHS/SOL), 2020, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
  • Defining Abdominal Obesity as a Risk Factor for Coronary Heart Disease in the U.S.: Results From the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos (HCHS/SOL), 2020, Diabetes Care

The scientist published frequently in venues such as UNC Libraries, Circulation, Alzheimer's & Dementia, Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, and Diabetes Care. Their work included 73 publications in UNC Libraries and 17 in Circulation, among others.

Neil Schneiderman collaborated often with several researchers, including Martha L. Daviglus, Linda C. Gallo, Gregory A. Talavera, Carmen R. Isasi, and Jianwen Cai, reflecting a network of frequent co-authorship in their research outputs.

Throughout their career, Neil Schneiderman received recognition from professional organizations. Notably, they were awarded the APA Award for Distinguished Scientific Contributions to Psychology by the American Psychological Association in 1994, and were made a Fellow of the American Psychological Association in 1979.

Best Publications

  • Stress and Health: Psychological, Behavioral, and Biological Determinants

    Neil Schneiderman;Gail Ironson;Scott D. Siegel

  • Effects of treating depression and low perceived social support on clinical events after myocardial infarction: the Enhancing Recovery in Coronary Heart Disease Patients (ENRICHD) Randomized Trial.

    Lisa F Berkman;James Blumenthal;Matthew Burg;Robert M Carney

  • Prevalence of major cardiovascular risk factors and cardiovascular diseases among Hispanic/Latino individuals of diverse backgrounds in the United States.

    Martha L. Daviglus;Martha L. Daviglus;Gregory A. Talavera;M. Larissa Avilés-Santa;Matthew Allison

  • Design and Implementation of the Hispanic Community Health Study / Study of Latinos

    Paul D. Sorlie;Larissa M. Avilés-Santa;Sylvia Wassertheil-Smoller;Robert C. Kaplan

  • Cardiovascular reactivity and development of preclinical and clinical disease states

    Frank A. Treiber;Thomas Kamarck;Neil Schneiderman;David Sheffield

  • Marital Stress Worsens Prognosis in Women With Coronary Heart Disease: The Stockholm Female Coronary Risk Study

    Kristina Orth-Gomér;Sarah P. Wamala;Myriam Horsten;Karin Schenck-Gustafsson

  • The trans-ancestral genomic architecture of glycemic traits

    Ji Chen;Ji Chen;Cassandra N. Spracklen;Cassandra N. Spracklen;Gaëlle Marenne;Gaëlle Marenne;Arushi Varshney

  • Emotional disclosure through writing or speaking modulates latent Epstein-Barr virus antibody titers.

    Brian A. Esterling;Michael H. Antoni;Mary Ann Fletcher;Scott Margulies

  • Validation of the insulin sensitivity index (ISI0,120): comparison with other measures ☆

    Miriam Gutt;Catherine L. Davis;Susan B. Spitzer;Maria M. Llabre

  • Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms, Intrusive Thoughts, Loss, and Immune Function after Hurricane Andrew

    Gail Ironson;Christina Wynings;Neil Schneiderman;Andrew Baum

  • The Reliability and Specificity of Delta Versus Residualized Change as Measures of Cardiovascular Reactivity to Behavioral Challenges

    Maria M. Llabre;Susan B. Spitzer;Patrice G. Saab;Gail H. Ironson

  • Prevalence of Diabetes Among Hispanics/Latinos From Diverse Backgrounds: The Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos (HCHS/SOL)

    Neil Schneiderman;Maria Llabre;Catherine C. Cowie;Janice Barnhart

  • Social support, positive states of mind, and HIV treatment adherence in men and women living with HIV/AIDS.

    Jeffrey S. Gonzalez;Frank J. Penedo;Michael H. Antoni;Ron E. Durán

  • Psychosocial factors predict CD4 and viral load change in men and women with human immunodeficiency virus in the era of highly active antiretroviral treatment.

    Gail Ironson;Conall O'Cleirigh;Mary Ann Fletcher;Jean Philippe Laurenceau

  • Cognitive-behavioral stress management intervention buffers distress responses and immunologic changes following notification of HIV-1 seropositivity

    Michael H. Antoni;Lane Baggett;Gail Ironson;Arthur LaPerriere

  • Genetic Diversity and Association Studies in US Hispanic/Latino Populations: Applications in the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos

    Matthew P. Conomos;Cecelia A. Laurie;Adrienne M. Stilp;Stephanie M. Gogarten

  • Evaluation of enzyme immunoassay and radioimmunoassay methods for the measurement of plasma oxytocin

    Angela Szeto;Philip M. McCabe;Daniel A. Nation;Daniel A. Nation;Benjamin A. Tabak

  • Emotional repression, stress disclosure responses, and Epstein-Barr viral capsid antigen titers.

    Brian A. Esterling;Michael H. Antoni;Mahendra Kumar;Neil Schneiderman

  • Handbook of research methods in cardiovascular behavioral medicine

    Neil Schneiderman;Stephen M. Weiss;Peter G. Kaufmann

  • Stress Reduction Prolongs Life in Women With Coronary Disease The Stockholm Women’s Intervention Trial for Coronary Heart Disease (SWITCHD)

    Kristina Orth-Gomér;Neil Schneiderman;Hui Xin Wang;Christina Walldin

  • Changes in cognitive coping skills and social support during cognitive behavioral stress management intervention and distress outcomes in symptomatic human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-seropositive gay men.

    Susan K. Lutgendorf;Michael H. Antoni;Gail Ironson;Kathleen Starr

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael H. Antoni
Michael H. Antoni University of Miami
Gail Ironson
Gail Ironson University of Miami
Maria M. Llabre
Maria M. Llabre University of Miami
Martha L. Daviglus
Martha L. Daviglus University of Illinois at Chicago
Mary A Fletcher
Mary A Fletcher Nova Southeastern University
Frank J. Penedo
Frank J. Penedo University of Miami
Nancy G. Klimas
Nancy G. Klimas Nova Southeastern University
Robert C. Kaplan
Robert C. Kaplan Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Linda C. Gallo
Linda C. Gallo San Diego State University
Gregory A. Talavera
Gregory A. Talavera San Diego State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens diverse career opportunities, particularly in social work, counseling, and mental health services. Many students complement or expand their psychology studies by exploring related online degree programs in social work, which are designed to meet growing demand for qualified professionals across the country.

Understanding regional options can help you tailor your academic choices. For instance, some of the most popular social work degree programs in Arizona offer flexible online formats suited for working students. If you’re based in the Midwest, learning about the most popular social work degree programs in Duluth can help you find accredited schools near you.

It’s also worth considering rankings and outcomes. The best-ranked social work degree programs in North Carolina emphasize strong job placement, while the top-ranked social work degree programs in Pittsburgh are known for innovative online curricula and experienced faculty. Exploring these options can help you create a personalized academic and career pathway that builds on your background in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Neil Schneiderman

Recently Published Articles