World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 44 6808 6342 3690 3351 151 14909

Beatrice Beebe publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Beatrice Beebe between 1974 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Beatrice Beebe published across 52 years, from 1974 to 2025, averaging 3.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2019. 6 of the 174 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1974 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2019. 1974: 1 publication 1975: 1 publication 1976: 0 publications 1977: 1 publication 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 0 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 2 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 2 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 3 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 6 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 16 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 22 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 2 publications
1974 2025

174 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Beatrice Beebe: publications per year, 1974 to 2025
Year Publications
1974 1
1975 1
1976 0
1977 1
1978 0
1979 0
1980 1
1981 0
1982 2
1983 1
1984 2
1985 1
1986 2
1987 0
1988 3
1989 2
1990 0
1991 0
1992 4
1993 1
1994 3
1995 3
1996 6
1997 2
1998 4
1999 0
2000 3
2001 5
2002 6
2003 6
2004 4
2005 2
2006 1
2007 6
2008 3
2009 0
2010 4
2011 6
2012 3
2013 16
2014 3
2015 2
2016 6
2017 3
2018 6
2019 22
2020 6
2021 2
2022 7
2023 6
2024 4
2025 2
Total 174
Download as CSV

Beatrice Beebe publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Beatrice Beebe sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 151–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 151 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576 151
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Beatrice Beebe D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Beatrice Beebe sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558 44
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Beatrice Beebe is affiliated with Columbia University in the United States and has a research focus primarily within the fields of psychology and medicine. Their scholarly output reflects a substantial engagement with clinical and social psychology, as well as developmental and educational psychology, alongside specialized interest in health, toxicology, and mutagenesis.

Beebe's research topics encompass a range of areas related to child development, mental health, and environmental health impacts. Key themes include:

  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Infant Health and Development
  • Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Noise Effects and Management

Their recent scholarly contributions include the following papers:

  • Pandemic beyond the virus: maternal COVID-related postnatal stress is associated with infant temperament, 2022, published in Pediatric Research
  • Infant research and adult treatment revisited: Cocreating self- and interactive regulation., 2020, published in Psychoanalytic Psychology
  • Intersubjectivity and the Emergence of Words, 2022, published in Frontiers in Psychology
  • Convergent neural correlates of prenatal exposure to air pollution and behavioral phenotypes of risk for internalizing and externalizing problems: Potential biological and cognitive pathways, 2022, published in Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • Urgent engagement in 9/11 pregnant widows and their infants: Transmission of trauma, 2020, published in Infancy

Beebe's frequent coauthors highlight collaborative work with:

  • Amy Margolis
  • Julie B. Herbstman
  • Sang H. Lee
  • William P. Fifer
  • Virginia Rauh

Their research appears regularly in specific academic venues, with multiple publications in:

  • Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
  • Infant Behavior and Development
  • Psychoanalytic Dialogues
  • Pediatric Research
  • Psychoanalytic Psychology

Best Publications

  • Infant Research and Adult Treatment: Co-constructing Interactions

    Beatrice Beebe;Frank M. Lachmann

  • Rhythms of Dialogue in Infancy: Coordinated Timing in Development.

    Joseph Jaffe;Beatrice Beebe;Stanley Feldstein;Cynthia L. Crown

  • The contribution of mother-infant mutual influence to the origins of self- and object representations.

    Beatrice Beebe;Frank M. Lachmann

  • The Origins of 12-Month Attachment: A Microanalysis of 4-Month Mother-Infant Interaction

    Beatrice Beebe;Joseph Jaffe;Sara Markese;Karen Buck

  • Representation and internalization in infancy: three principles of salience

    Beatrice Beebe;Frank M. Lachmann

  • Mother—infant interaction structures and presymbolic self‐ and object representations

    Beatrice Beebe;Frank Lachmann;Joseph Jaffe

  • Forms of Intersubjectivity in Infant Research and Adult Treatment

    Beatrice Beebe

  • Engagement-Disengagement and Early Object Experiences

    Beatrice Beebe;Daniel N. Stern

  • A dyadic systems view of communication.

    Beatrice Beebe;Joseph Jaffe;Frank M. Lachmann

  • Co-constructing inner and relational processes: Self- and mutual regulation in infant research and adult treatment.

    Beatrice Beebe;Frank M. Lachmann

  • The Origins of Attachment: Infant Research and Adult Treatment

    Beatrice Beebe;Frank M. Lachmann

  • VOCALIZING IN UNISON AND IN ALTERNATION: TWO MODES OF COMMUNICATION WITHIN THE MOTHER-INFANT DYAD*

    Daniel N. Stern;Joseph Jaffe;Beatrice Beebe;Stephen L. Bennett

  • Brief mother–infant treatment: Psychoanalytically informed video feedback

    Beatrice Beebe

  • Systems models in development and psychoanalysis: The case of vocal rhythm coordination and attachment

    Beatrice Beebe;Joseph Jaffe;Frank Lachmann;Stanley Feldstein

  • A Systems View of Mother-Infant Face-to-Face Communication.

    Beatrice Beebe;Daniel Messinger;Lorraine E. Bahrick;Amy Margolis

  • Six‐week postpartum maternal depressive symptoms and 4‐month mother–infant self‐ and interactive contingency

    Beatrice Beebe;Joseph Jaffe;Karen Buck;Henian Chen

  • On the Origins of Disorganized Attachment and Internal Working Models: Paper II. An Empirical Microanalysis of 4-Month Mother-Infant Interaction.

    Beatrice Beebe;Frank M. Lachmann;Sara Markese;Karen A. Buck

  • How does microanalysis of mother-infant communication inform maternal sensitivity and infant attachment?

    Beatrice Beebe;Miriam Steele

  • Mother-Infant Research Informs Mother-Infant Treatment

    Beatrice Beebe

  • MATERNAL ANXIETY SYMPTOMS AND MOTHER-INFANT SELF- AND INTERACTIVE CONTINGENCY

    Beatrice Beebe;Miriam Steele;Joseph Jaffe;Karen A. Buck

Frequent Co-Authors

Henian Chen
Henian Chen University of South Florida
Lorraine E. Bahrick
Lorraine E. Bahrick Florida International University
Howard Andrews
Howard Andrews Columbia University
Patricia Cohen
Patricia Cohen Columbia University
Miriam Steele
Miriam Steele New School
Sidney J. Blatt
Sidney J. Blatt Yale University
Michael M. Myers
Michael M. Myers Columbia University
Jerome C. Wakefield
Jerome C. Wakefield New York University
Daniel S. Messinger
Daniel S. Messinger University of Miami
Frederica P. Perera
Frederica P. Perera Columbia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens up a wide variety of online academic and career options, often beyond traditional psychology roles. Many students choose to major in counseling or related fields, as these areas offer meaningful work and excellent job prospects. When considering further education, affordability and program flexibility are crucial issues for many learners.

There is a growing demand for cost-effective programs. For those based in the western U.S., the cheapest counseling programs in Colorado are frequently sought after for their combination of low tuition and quality teaching. If you’re in the northeast, it’s helpful to explore affordable counseling programs in Connecticut to find budget-friendly options close to home.

Students in the Midwest can investigate the cheapest counseling degrees in Des Moines for quality programs at a lower cost. Meanwhile, those in the southeast might consider the cheapest counseling programs in Florida to access affordable pathways in a state known for its diverse student population.

Exploring these affordable options allows students to pursue tailored career pathways in mental health, social services, education, or research, while keeping their educational investment manageable.

Best Scientists Citing Beatrice Beebe

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles