World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 91 11534 10845 356 339 621 46480

David Cohen publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by David Cohen between 1954 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. David Cohen published across 72 years, from 1954 to 2025, averaging 14.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 75 publications in 2023. 122 of the 1,071 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1954 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 75. Peak 75 publications in 2023. 1954: 1 publication 1955: 1 publication 1956: 0 publications 1957: 1 publication 1958: 0 publications 1959: 0 publications 1960: 0 publications 1961: 0 publications 1962: 2 publications 1963: 3 publications 1964: 2 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 2 publications 1969: 1 publication 1970: 1 publication 1971: 1 publication 1972: 1 publication 1973: 2 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 2 publications 1976: 1 publication 1977: 1 publication 1978: 1 publication 1979: 2 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 5 publications 1982: 5 publications 1983: 6 publications 1984: 4 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 6 publications 1988: 5 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 8 publications 1991: 16 publications 1992: 5 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 16 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 9 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 10 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 14 publications 2006: 16 publications 2007: 17 publications 2008: 21 publications 2009: 21 publications 2010: 46 publications 2011: 61 publications 2012: 55 publications 2013: 44 publications 2014: 40 publications 2015: 48 publications 2016: 39 publications 2017: 51 publications 2018: 41 publications 2019: 37 publications 2020: 35 publications 2021: 42 publications 2022: 60 publications 2023: 75 publications 2024: 56 publications 2025: 66 publications
1954 2025

1,071 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
David Cohen: publications per year, 1954 to 2025
Year Publications
1954 1
1955 1
1956 0
1957 1
1958 0
1959 0
1960 0
1961 0
1962 2
1963 3
1964 2
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 2
1969 1
1970 1
1971 1
1972 1
1973 2
1974 0
1975 2
1976 1
1977 1
1978 1
1979 2
1980 0
1981 5
1982 5
1983 6
1984 4
1985 2
1986 2
1987 6
1988 5
1989 4
1990 8
1991 16
1992 5
1993 5
1994 4
1995 16
1996 6
1997 2
1998 9
1999 6
2000 7
2001 8
2002 11
2003 10
2004 9
2005 14
2006 16
2007 17
2008 21
2009 21
2010 46
2011 61
2012 55
2013 44
2014 40
2015 48
2016 39
2017 51
2018 41
2019 37
2020 35
2021 42
2022 60
2023 75
2024 56
2025 66
Total 1,071
Download as CSV

David Cohen publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Cohen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 621–640 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 621 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386 621
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

David Cohen D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Cohen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 90–91 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 91 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922 91
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2005 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians

Overview

David Cohen is affiliated with Sorbonne University in France and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, with a primary focus on cardiology and cardiovascular medicine. Their research has further encompassed surgery, epidemiology, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, as well as pulmonary and respiratory medicine.

The scholar's work covers a variety of topics within cardiovascular and related fields. Key areas of study include:

  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management
  • Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
  • Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes

Among the frequent publication venues where their work appears are:

  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
  • Circulation
  • Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions
  • Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes

David Cohen has collaborated frequently with a number of researchers in the field, including:

  • Michael J. Mack
  • Martin B. Leon
  • Suzanne V. Arnold
  • Vinod H. Thourani
  • Samir Kapadia

Recent publications authored or co-authored by David Cohen include:

  • Valve Academic Research Consortium 3: Updated Endpoint Definitions for Aortic Valve Clinical Research (2021), Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • STS-ACC TVT Registry of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (2020), Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Five-Year Outcomes of Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement (2020), New England Journal of Medicine
  • Valve Academic Research Consortium 3: updated endpoint definitions for aortic valve clinical research (2020), European Heart Journal
  • Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients at Five Years (2023), New England Journal of Medicine

David Cohen has been recognized as a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2005 and holds membership in the Association of American Physicians.

Best Publications

  • Biological insights from 108 schizophrenia-associated genetic loci

    Stephan Ripke;Stephan Ripke;Benjamin M. Neale;Benjamin M. Neale;Aiden Corvin;James T. R. Walters

  • Updated Standardized Endpoint Definitions for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

    A. Pieter Kappetein;Stuart J. Head;Philippe Généreux;Nicolo Piazza

  • Analysis of shared heritability in common disorders of the brain

    Verneri Anttila;Verneri Anttila;Brendan Bulik-Sullivan;Brendan Bulik-Sullivan;Hilary K. Finucane;Raymond K. Walters;Raymond K. Walters

  • Modeling Linkage Disequilibrium Increases Accuracy of Polygenic Risk Scores

    Bjarni J. Vilhjálmsson;Jian Yang;Hilary K. Finucane;Alexander Gusev

  • Genomic Relationships, Novel Loci, and Pleiotropic Mechanisms across Eight Psychiatric Disorders

    Phil H. Lee;Verneri Anttila;Hyejung Won;Yen-Chen A. Feng

  • Contribution of copy number variants to schizophrenia from a genome-wide study of 41,321 subjects

    Christian R Marshall;Daniel P Howrigan;Daniel P Howrigan;Daniele Merico;Bhooma Thiruvahindrapuram

  • Instruction, Capacity, and Improvement

    David K. Cohen;Deborah Loewenberg Ball

  • Comparative efficacy and tolerability of antidepressants for major depressive disorder in children and adolescents: a network meta-analysis.

    Andrea Cipriani;Xinyu Zhou;Cinzia Del Giovane;Sarah E Hetrick

  • Genomic Dissection of Bipolar Disorder and Schizophrenia, Including 28 Subphenotypes

    Douglas M. Ruderfer;Stephan Ripke;Stephan Ripke;Stephan Ripke;Andrew McQuillin;James Boocock

  • An open trial assessment of "The Number Race", an adaptive computer game for remediation of dyscalculia

    Anna J Wilson;Susannah K Revkin;David Cohen;Laurent Cohen

  • Epilepsy in Autism is Associated with Intellectual Disability and Gender: Evidence from a Meta-Analysis

    Claire Amiet;Isabelle Gourfinkel-An;Anissa Bouzamondo;Sylvie Tordjman

  • Specific genetic disorders and autism: clinical contribution towards their identification.

    David Cohen;Nadège Pichard;Sylvie Tordjman;Clarisse Baumann

  • Why synchrony matters during mother-child interactions: a systematic review.

    Chloë Leclère;Sylvie Viaux;Marie Avril;Catherine Achard

  • Durability of Treatment Effect Using a Drug-Coated Balloon for Femoropopliteal Lesions: 24-Month Results of IN.PACT SFA.

    John R. Laird;Peter A. Schneider;Gunnar Tepe;Marianne Brodmann

  • Penumbral imaging and functional outcome in patients with anterior circulation ischaemic stroke treated with endovascular thrombectomy versus medical therapy: a meta-analysis of individual patient-level data

    Bruce C V Campbell;Charles B L M Majoie;Gregory W Albers;Bijoy K Menon

  • Motherese in Interaction: At the Cross-Road of Emotion and Cognition? (A Systematic Review)

    Catherine Saint-Georges;Catherine Saint-Georges;Mohamed Chetouani;Raquel Cassel;Raquel Cassel;Fabio Apicella

  • Gene × Environment interactions in autism spectrum disorders: role of epigenetic mechanisms.

    Sylvie Tordjman;Sylvie Tordjman;Eszter Somogyi;Nathalie Coulon;Solenn Kermarrec;Solenn Kermarrec

  • Health-Status Outcomes with Invasive or Conservative Care in Coronary Disease

    John A. Spertus;Philip G. Jones;David J. Maron;Sean M. O’Brien

  • Pre-, peri- and neonatal risk factors for autism

    Vincent Guinchat;Poul Thorsen;Claudine Laurent;Christine Cans

  • Principles underlying the design of "The Number Race", an adaptive computer game for remediation of dyscalculia

    Anna J Wilson;Stanislas Dehaene;Stanislas Dehaene;Philippe Pinel;Susannah K Revkin

Frequent Co-Authors

Mohamed Chetouani
Mohamed Chetouani Sorbonne University
Matthew R. Reynolds
Matthew R. Reynolds Tufts University
Sylvie Tordjman
Sylvie Tordjman University of Rennes
John A. Spertus
John A. Spertus University of Missouri–Kansas City
Martin B. Leon
Martin B. Leon Columbia University Medical Center
Neal S. Kleiman
Neal S. Kleiman Houston Methodist
Donald E. Cutlip
Donald E. Cutlip Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Filippo Muratori
Filippo Muratori University of Pisa
Susheel Kodali
Susheel Kodali Columbia University Medical Center
Michael J. Pencina
Michael J. Pencina Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Medicine doesn’t have to follow a traditional path. Many students are choosing flexible online options to start or advance their healthcare careers. Today, there are affordable and reputable programs designed to suit a variety of backgrounds and ambitions.

Nursing is a popular entry point. For those aiming for academic or leadership roles, online nursing PhD programs offer in-depth training and research opportunities. Meanwhile, current registered nurses may want to build on their existing credentials with cheap RN to BSN programs, which are designed with flexibility and affordability in mind.

Individuals without a nursing background but interested in becoming nurse practitioners can consider direct entry nurse practitioner programs for non-nurses online. These accelerated options help motivated students enter advanced practice roles quickly.

For students seeking a more straightforward entry into the field, direct admit nursing programs can be a strategic choice. These programs usually have fewer admission barriers and allow immediate focus on nursing studies.

Best Scientists Citing David Cohen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles