World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
91
Citations
46480
World Ranking
11535
National Ranking
355

David Cohen publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Cohen sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 621 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

David Cohen D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Cohen sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 91 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2005 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians

Overview

David Cohen is affiliated with Sorbonne University in France and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, with a primary focus on cardiology and cardiovascular medicine. Their research has further encompassed surgery, epidemiology, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, as well as pulmonary and respiratory medicine.

The scholar's work covers a variety of topics within cardiovascular and related fields. Key areas of study include:

  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management
  • Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
  • Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes

Among the frequent publication venues where their work appears are:

  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
  • Circulation
  • Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions
  • Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes

David Cohen has collaborated frequently with a number of researchers in the field, including:

  • Michael J. Mack
  • Martin B. Leon
  • Suzanne V. Arnold
  • Vinod H. Thourani
  • Samir Kapadia

Recent publications authored or co-authored by David Cohen include:

  • Valve Academic Research Consortium 3: Updated Endpoint Definitions for Aortic Valve Clinical Research (2021), Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • STS-ACC TVT Registry of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (2020), Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Five-Year Outcomes of Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement (2020), New England Journal of Medicine
  • Valve Academic Research Consortium 3: updated endpoint definitions for aortic valve clinical research (2020), European Heart Journal
  • Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients at Five Years (2023), New England Journal of Medicine

David Cohen has been recognized as a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2005 and holds membership in the Association of American Physicians.

Best Publications

  • Biological insights from 108 schizophrenia-associated genetic loci

    Stephan Ripke;Stephan Ripke;Benjamin M. Neale;Benjamin M. Neale;Aiden Corvin;James T. R. Walters

  • Updated Standardized Endpoint Definitions for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

    A. Pieter Kappetein;Stuart J. Head;Philippe Généreux;Nicolo Piazza

  • Analysis of shared heritability in common disorders of the brain

    Verneri Anttila;Verneri Anttila;Brendan Bulik-Sullivan;Brendan Bulik-Sullivan;Hilary K. Finucane;Raymond K. Walters;Raymond K. Walters

  • Modeling Linkage Disequilibrium Increases Accuracy of Polygenic Risk Scores

    Bjarni J. Vilhjálmsson;Jian Yang;Hilary K. Finucane;Alexander Gusev

  • Genomic Relationships, Novel Loci, and Pleiotropic Mechanisms across Eight Psychiatric Disorders

    Phil H. Lee;Verneri Anttila;Hyejung Won;Yen-Chen A. Feng

  • Contribution of copy number variants to schizophrenia from a genome-wide study of 41,321 subjects

    Christian R Marshall;Daniel P Howrigan;Daniel P Howrigan;Daniele Merico;Bhooma Thiruvahindrapuram

  • Instruction, Capacity, and Improvement

    David K. Cohen;Deborah Loewenberg Ball

  • Comparative efficacy and tolerability of antidepressants for major depressive disorder in children and adolescents: a network meta-analysis.

    Andrea Cipriani;Xinyu Zhou;Cinzia Del Giovane;Sarah E Hetrick

  • Genomic Dissection of Bipolar Disorder and Schizophrenia, Including 28 Subphenotypes

    Douglas M. Ruderfer;Stephan Ripke;Stephan Ripke;Stephan Ripke;Andrew McQuillin;James Boocock

  • An open trial assessment of "The Number Race", an adaptive computer game for remediation of dyscalculia

    Anna J Wilson;Susannah K Revkin;David Cohen;Laurent Cohen

  • Epilepsy in Autism is Associated with Intellectual Disability and Gender: Evidence from a Meta-Analysis

    Claire Amiet;Isabelle Gourfinkel-An;Anissa Bouzamondo;Sylvie Tordjman

  • Specific genetic disorders and autism: clinical contribution towards their identification.

    David Cohen;Nadège Pichard;Sylvie Tordjman;Clarisse Baumann

  • Why synchrony matters during mother-child interactions: a systematic review.

    Chloë Leclère;Sylvie Viaux;Marie Avril;Catherine Achard

  • Durability of Treatment Effect Using a Drug-Coated Balloon for Femoropopliteal Lesions: 24-Month Results of IN.PACT SFA.

    John R. Laird;Peter A. Schneider;Gunnar Tepe;Marianne Brodmann

  • Penumbral imaging and functional outcome in patients with anterior circulation ischaemic stroke treated with endovascular thrombectomy versus medical therapy: a meta-analysis of individual patient-level data

    Bruce C V Campbell;Charles B L M Majoie;Gregory W Albers;Bijoy K Menon

  • Motherese in Interaction: At the Cross-Road of Emotion and Cognition? (A Systematic Review)

    Catherine Saint-Georges;Catherine Saint-Georges;Mohamed Chetouani;Raquel Cassel;Raquel Cassel;Fabio Apicella

  • Gene × Environment interactions in autism spectrum disorders: role of epigenetic mechanisms.

    Sylvie Tordjman;Sylvie Tordjman;Eszter Somogyi;Nathalie Coulon;Solenn Kermarrec;Solenn Kermarrec

  • Health-Status Outcomes with Invasive or Conservative Care in Coronary Disease

    John A. Spertus;Philip G. Jones;David J. Maron;Sean M. O’Brien

  • Pre-, peri- and neonatal risk factors for autism

    Vincent Guinchat;Poul Thorsen;Claudine Laurent;Christine Cans

  • Principles underlying the design of "The Number Race", an adaptive computer game for remediation of dyscalculia

    Anna J Wilson;Stanislas Dehaene;Stanislas Dehaene;Philippe Pinel;Susannah K Revkin

Frequent Co-Authors

Mohamed Chetouani
Mohamed Chetouani Sorbonne University
Matthew R. Reynolds
Matthew R. Reynolds Tufts University
Sylvie Tordjman
Sylvie Tordjman University of Rennes
John A. Spertus
John A. Spertus University of Missouri–Kansas City
Martin B. Leon
Martin B. Leon Columbia University Medical Center
Neal S. Kleiman
Neal S. Kleiman Houston Methodist
Donald E. Cutlip
Donald E. Cutlip Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Filippo Muratori
Filippo Muratori University of Pisa
Susheel Kodali
Susheel Kodali Columbia University Medical Center
Michael J. Pencina
Michael J. Pencina Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Medicine doesn’t have to follow a traditional path. Many students are choosing flexible online options to start or advance their healthcare careers. Today, there are affordable and reputable programs designed to suit a variety of backgrounds and ambitions.

Nursing is a popular entry point. For those aiming for academic or leadership roles, online nursing PhD programs offer in-depth training and research opportunities. Meanwhile, current registered nurses may want to build on their existing credentials with cheap RN to BSN programs, which are designed with flexibility and affordability in mind.

Individuals without a nursing background but interested in becoming nurse practitioners can consider direct entry nurse practitioner programs for non-nurses online. These accelerated options help motivated students enter advanced practice roles quickly.

For students seeking a more straightforward entry into the field, direct admit nursing programs can be a strategic choice. These programs usually have fewer admission barriers and allow immediate focus on nursing studies.

Best Scientists Citing David Cohen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles