World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Patrick W. Serruys

Patrick W. Serruys

Award Badge
Best Scientists
2025
Award Badge
Medicine
Ireland
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Best Scientists

D-Index
237
Citations
277433
World Ranking
74
National Ranking
1

Medicine

D-Index
244
Citations
289372
World Ranking
42
National Ranking
1

Patrick W. Serruys publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick W. Serruys sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 3,746 publications — 100th percentile

100% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Patrick W. Serruys D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick W. Serruys sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 244 D-Index — 100th percentile

100% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Medicine in Ireland Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Best Scientists Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Medicine in Ireland Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Medicine in Ireland Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Medicine in Ireland Leader Award
  • 2006 - James B. Herrick Award for Outstanding Achievement in Clinical Cardiology, American Heart Association

Overview

Patrick W. Serruys is affiliated with the National University of Ireland, Galway in Ireland. Their research primarily falls within the field of Medicine, with a strong focus on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Epidemiology.

Their work extensively covers key topics including:

  • Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
  • Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes

Serruys has contributed a substantial number of publications to several frequent venues. These include:

  • EuroIntervention
  • JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • European Heart Journal
  • Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions

Among the recent papers authored or co-authored by Serruys are:

  • Association of hypertension and antihypertensive treatment with COVID-19 mortality: a retrospective observational study, 2020, European Heart Journal
  • Stent-Related Adverse Events >1 Year After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, 2020, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy or dual antiplatelet therapy after coronary revascularisation: individual patient level meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials, 2021, BMJ
  • Percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents versus coronary artery bypass grafting in left main coronary artery disease: an individual patient data meta-analysis, 2021, The Lancet
  • Effect of statin therapy on muscle symptoms: an individual participant data meta-analysis of large-scale, randomised, double-blind trials, 2022, The Lancet

Serruys collaborates frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Yoshinobu Onuma
  • Scot Garg
  • Hideyuki Kawashima
  • Masafumi Ono
  • Hironori Hara

The scientist was awarded the James B. Herrick Award for Outstanding Achievement in Clinical Cardiology by the American Heart Association in 2006.

Best Publications

  • A Comparison of Balloon-Expandable-Stent Implantation with Balloon Angioplasty in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease

    P. W. Serruys;P. de Jaegere;F. Kiemeneij;C. Macaya

  • Clinical End Points in Coronary Stent Trials A Case for Standardized Definitions

    Donald E. Cutlip;Stephan Windecker;Roxana Mehran;Ashley Boam

  • A Randomized Comparison of a Sirolimus-Eluting Stent with a Standard Stent for Coronary Revascularization

    Marie-Claude Morice;Patrick Serruys;J. Eduardo Sousa;Jean Fajadet

  • Updated standardized endpoint definitions for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 consensus document.

    A. Pieter Kappetein;Stuart J. Head;Philippe Généreux;Nicolo Piazza

  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention versus Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting for Severe Coronary Artery Disease

    Patrick W. Serruys;Marie-Claude Morice;A. Pieter Kappetein;Antonio Colombo

  • Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)

    William Wijns;Philippe Kolh;Nicolas Danchin;Volkmar Falk

  • From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient: a call for new definitions and risk assessment strategies: Part II.

    Morteza Naghavi;Peter Libby;Erling Falk;S. Ward Casscells;S. Ward Casscells

  • A Prospective Natural-History Study of Coronary Atherosclerosis

    Gregg W. Stone;Akiko Maehara;Alexandra J. Lansky;Bernard de Bruyne

  • Surgical or Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement in Intermediate-Risk Patients

    M. J. Reardon;N. M. Van Mieghem;J. J. Popma;N. S. Kleiman

  • The SYNTAX Score: an angiographic tool grading the complexity of coronary artery disease.

    Sianos G;Morel Ma;Kappetein Ap;Morice Mc

  • Consensus standards for acquisition, measurement, and reporting of intravascular optical coherence tomography studies: a report from the International Working Group for Intravascular Optical Coherence Tomography Standardization and Validation.

    Guillermo J. Tearney;Evelyn Regar;Takashi Akasaka;Tom Adriaenssens

  • Coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with three-vessel disease and left main coronary disease : 5-year follow-up of the randomised, clinical SYNTAX trial

    Friedrich W. Mohr;Marie Claude Morice;A. Pieter Kappetein;Ted E. Feldman

  • Early and late coronary stent thrombosis of sirolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents in routine clinical practice: data from a large two-institutional cohort study

    Joost Daemen;Peter Wenaweser;Keiichi Tsuchida;Linda Abrecht

  • Updated Standardized Endpoint Definitions for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

    A. Pieter Kappetein;Stuart J. Head;Philippe Généreux;Nicolo Piazza

  • Late thrombosis in drug-eluting coronary stents after discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy.

    Eugène P McFadden;Eugenio Stabile;Evelyn Regar;Edouard Cheneau

  • Comparison of Coronary-Artery Bypass Surgery and Stenting for the Treatment of Multivessel Disease

    Patrick W. Serruys;Felix Unger;J. Eduardo Sousa;Adib Jatene

  • Standardized Endpoint Definitions for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Clinical Trials : A Consensus Report From the Valve Academic Research Consortium

    Martin B Leon;Nicolo Piazza;Eugenia Nikolsky;Eugene H. Blackstone

  • High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography.

    Nico R. Mollet;Filippo Cademartiri;Carlos A.G. van Mieghem;Giuseppe Runza

  • Marked Inflammatory Sequelae to Implantation of Biodegradable and Nonbiodegradable Polymers in Porcine Coronary Arteries

    Willem J. van der Giessen;A. Michael Lincoff;Robert S. Schwartz;Heleen M.M. van Beusekom

  • Lack of Neointimal Proliferation After Implantation of Sirolimus-Coated Stents in Human Coronary Arteries: A Quantitative Coronary Angiography and Three-Dimensional Intravascular Ultrasound Study

    J. Eduardo Sousa;Marco A. Costa;Alexandre Abizaid;Andrea S. Abizaid

Frequent Co-Authors

Yoshinobu Onuma
Yoshinobu Onuma University of Galway
Hector M. Garcia-Garcia
Hector M. Garcia-Garcia MedStar Washington Hospital Center
Pim J. de Feyter
Pim J. de Feyter Erasmus University Rotterdam
Stephan Windecker
Stephan Windecker University of Bern
Gregg W. Stone
Gregg W. Stone Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Robert-Jan van Geuns
Robert-Jan van Geuns Radboud University
Evelyn Regar
Evelyn Regar University of Zurich
Ron T. van Domburg
Ron T. van Domburg Erasmus University Rotterdam
Peter de Jaegere
Peter de Jaegere Erasmus University Rotterdam
Marco Valgimigli
Marco Valgimigli University of Bern

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative healthcare pathways can open up rewarding careers beyond traditional medical school. For those interested in patient care, easiest nursing programs to get into offer accessible entry points to nursing, providing practical training with less competitive admissions.

If you prefer to work behind the scenes, health information roles like medical billing and coding are in high demand. Many schools now offer medical billing and coding financial aid, making these programs more affordable to a wider range of students.

Students looking to bypass standardized testing requirements should consider nursing schools that don't require teas. These programs eliminate traditional exam barriers, focusing instead on holistic admissions.

Furthermore, those interested in leadership or management can pursue an online healthcare administration degree. These accelerated programs blend business skills with healthcare knowledge, preparing graduates for administration roles in hospitals, clinics, and more.

Best Scientists Citing Patrick W. Serruys

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles