World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
157
Citations
98532
World Ranking
883
National Ranking
501

Gary S. Mintz publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gary S. Mintz sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,615 publications — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Gary S. Mintz D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gary S. Mintz sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 157 D-Index — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gary S. Mintz is affiliated with Columbia University Medical Center in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medicine with a significant emphasis on surgery, cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, and biomedical engineering.

Their work spans several major topics including:

  • Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
  • Aortic aneurysm repair treatments
  • Peripheral Artery Disease Management

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Gary S. Mintz include:

  • Akiko Maehara
  • Ziad A. Ali
  • Mitsuaki Matsumura
  • Gregg W. Stone
  • Ron Waksman

They have published extensively in a range of academic journals. The most frequent publication venues are:

  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
  • Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine
  • EuroIntervention
  • European Heart Journal

Recent papers of note include:

  • "Identification of vulnerable plaques and patients by intracoronary near-infrared spectroscopy and ultrasound (PROSPECT II): a prospective natural history study" (2021, The Lancet)
  • "Optical coherence tomography in coronary atherosclerosis assessment and intervention" (2022, Nature Reviews Cardiology)
  • "Effect of Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation" (2020, JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions)
  • "Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Vulnerable Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaque" (2020, Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
  • "Preventive percutaneous coronary intervention versus optimal medical therapy alone for the treatment of vulnerable atherosclerotic coronary plaques (PREVENT): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial" (2024, The Lancet)

Best Publications

  • A Prospective Natural-History Study of Coronary Atherosclerosis

    Gregg W. Stone;Akiko Maehara;Alexandra J. Lansky;Bernard de Bruyne

  • American College of Cardiology Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Standards for Acquisition, Measurement and Reporting of Intravascular Ultrasound Studies (IVUS). A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents.

    Gary S Mintz;Steven E Nissen;William D Anderson;Steven R Bailey

  • A simple risk score for prediction of contrast-induced nephropathy after percutaneous coronary intervention: Development and initial validation

    Roxana Mehran;Eve D. Aymong;Eugenia Nikolsky;Zoran Lasic

  • Consensus standards for acquisition, measurement, and reporting of intravascular optical coherence tomography studies: a report from the International Working Group for Intravascular Optical Coherence Tomography Standardization and Validation.

    Guillermo J. Tearney;Evelyn Regar;Takashi Akasaka;Tom Adriaenssens

  • Patterns and Mechanisms of In-Stent Restenosis A Serial Intravascular Ultrasound Study

    Rainer Hoffmann;Gary S. Mintz;Gaston R. Dussaillant;Jeffrey J. Popma

  • Angiographic Patterns of In-Stent Restenosis Classification and Implications for Long-Term Outcome

    Roxana Mehran;George Dangas;Andrea S. Abizaid;Gary S. Mintz

  • Catheter-based radiotherapy to inhibit restenosis after coronary stenting

    Paul S. Teirstein;Vincent Massullo;Shirish Jani;Jeffrey J. Popma

  • Arterial Remodeling After Coronary Angioplasty A Serial Intravascular Ultrasound Study

    Gary S. Mintz;Jeffrey J. Popma;Augusto D. Pichard;Kenneth M. Kent

  • The prognostic implications of further renal function deterioration within 48 h of interventional coronary procedures in patients with pre-existent chronic renal insufficiency.

    Luis Gruberg;Gary S Mintz;Roxana Mehran;George Dangas

  • Stent underexpansion and residual reference segment stenosis are related to stent thrombosis after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation: An intravascular ultrasound study

    Kenichi Fujii;Stéphane G. Carlier;Gary S. Mintz;Yi-ming Yang

  • In-stent restenosis in the drug-eluting stent era.

    George D. Dangas;Bimmer E. Claessen;Adriano Caixeta;Elias A. Sanidas

  • Percutaneous recanalization of chronically occluded coronary arteries: a consensus document: part II.

    Gregg W. Stone;David E. Kandzari;Roxana Mehran;Antonio Colombo

  • Contrast-Induced nephropathy after percutaneous coronary interventions in relation to chronic kidney disease and hemodynamic variables

    George Dangas;Ioannis Iakovou;Eugenia Nikolsky;Eve D. Aymong

  • Atherosclerosis in angiographically “normal” coronary artery reference segments: An intravascular ultrasound study with clinical correlations

    Gary S. Mintz;Jack A. Painter;Augusto D. Pichard;Kenneth M. Kent

  • Patterns of Calcification in Coronary Artery Disease A Statistical Analysis of Intravascular Ultrasound and Coronary Angiography in 1155 Lesions

    Gary S. Mintz;Jeffrey J. Popma;Augusto D. Pichard;Kenneth M. Kent

  • Intracoronary gamma-radiation therapy after angioplasty inhibits recurrence in patients with in-stent restenosis

    Ron Waksman;R. Larry White;Rosanna C. Chan;Bill G. Bass

  • Incomplete neointimal coverage of sirolimus-eluting stents: angioscopic findings.

    Jun-ichi Kotani;Masaki Awata;Shinsuke Nanto;Masaaki Uematsu

  • Incidence, predictors, and prognostic implications of bleeding and blood transfusion following percutaneous coronary interventions

    Timothy D Kinnaird;Eugenio Stabile;Gary S Mintz;Cheol Whan Lee

  • A Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent for the Prevention of Coronary Restenosis

    Seung Jung Park;Won Heum Shim;David S. Ho;Albert E. Raizner

  • Increased restenosis in diabetes mellitus after coronary interventions is due to exaggerated intimal hyperplasia. A serial intravascular ultrasound study.

    Ran Kornowski;Gary S. Mintz;Kenneth M. Kent;Augusto D. Pichard

Frequent Co-Authors

Akiko Maehara
Akiko Maehara Columbia University
Gregg W. Stone
Gregg W. Stone Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Martin B. Leon
Martin B. Leon Columbia University Medical Center
Roxana Mehran
Roxana Mehran Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Neil J. Weissman
Neil J. Weissman MedStar Health
Jeffrey W. Moses
Jeffrey W. Moses Columbia University Medical Center
Alexandra J. Lansky
Alexandra J. Lansky Yale University
Lowell F. Satler
Lowell F. Satler MedStar Washington Hospital Center
Augusto D. Pichard
Augusto D. Pichard Georgetown University
Ajay J. Kirtane
Ajay J. Kirtane Columbia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in a medical career but seeking alternative or complementary pathways, there are several relevant online degrees and certifications available. Many students choose to pursue specialized programs that offer more flexibility and affordability compared to traditional medical degrees.

If you are considering work as a pharmacist, the 3 year online PharmD programs provide an accelerated and convenient route to professional licensure. For those interested in aligning technology with healthcare, health information technology programs online can open doors to careers in health data management and IT security in clinical settings.

There is also high demand for experts in medical documentation. Prospective students can compare the average cost of medical billing and coding program options to gain essential coding skills for employment in hospitals, clinics, or insurance companies. Additionally, nursing professionals may enhance their qualifications with one of the most affordable online nurse practitioner programs, offering a valuable path to advanced practice roles.

These online education options support a variety of career goals and make it easier for aspiring healthcare professionals to find opportunities that fit their schedules and budgets.

Best Scientists Citing Gary S. Mintz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles