World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Alexandra J. Lansky

Alexandra J. Lansky

Award Badge
Best Female Scientists
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Best Female Scientists

D-Index
143
Citations
86413
World Ranking
207
National Ranking
129

Medicine

D-Index
145
Citations
88888
World Ranking
1375
National Ranking
801

Alexandra J. Lansky publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alexandra J. Lansky sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 942 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Alexandra J. Lansky D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alexandra J. Lansky sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 145 D-Index — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Best Female Scientists Award

Overview

Alexandra J. Lansky is affiliated with Yale University in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine with a strong focus on cardiology and cardiovascular medicine. Their research spans multiple subfields, including surgery, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, and epidemiology.

The primary topics explored in Lansky's work include:

  • Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Peripheral Artery Disease Management
  • Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Vascular Procedures and Complications
  • Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management

The scientist has published their work in several venues, with frequent contributions to:

  • Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • EuroIntervention
  • JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
  • European Heart Journal

Recent publications include:

  • An EAPCI Expert Consensus Document on Ischaemia with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries in Collaboration with European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Coronary Pathophysiology & Microcirculation Endorsed by Coronary Vasomotor Disorders International Study Group, 2020, European Heart Journal
  • An EAPCI Expert Consensus Document on Ischaemia with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries in Collaboration with European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Coronary Pathophysiology & Microcirculation Endorsed by Coronary Vasomotor Disorders International Study Group, 2021, EuroIntervention
  • Cardiac mortality in patients randomised to elective coronary revascularisation plus medical therapy or medical therapy alone: a systematic review and meta-analysis, 2021, European Heart Journal
  • Survival After Coronary Revascularization With Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons, 2020, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Intravascular Lithotripsy for Treatment of Calcified Lower Extremity Arterial Stenosis: Initial Analysis of the Disrupt PAD III Study, 2020, Journal of Endovascular Therapy

Lansky collaborates frequently with other researchers, with notable co-authors including:

  • Andreas Baumbach
  • Daniela Tîrziu
  • Helen Parise
  • Jeffrey W. Moses
  • Cody Pietras

Best Publications

  • Clinical End Points in Coronary Stent Trials A Case for Standardized Definitions

    Donald E. Cutlip;Stephan Windecker;Roxana Mehran;Ashley Boam

  • A Prospective Natural-History Study of Coronary Atherosclerosis

    Gregg W. Stone;Akiko Maehara;Alexandra J. Lansky;Bernard de Bruyne

  • A simple risk score for prediction of contrast-induced nephropathy after percutaneous coronary intervention: Development and initial validation

    Roxana Mehran;Eve D. Aymong;Eugenia Nikolsky;Zoran Lasic

  • A simple risk score for prediction of contrast-induced nephropathy after percutaneous coronary interventionDevelopment and initial validation

    R Mehran;E Aymong;E Nikolsky;Z Lasic

  • Strategies for Multivessel Revascularization in Patients with Diabetes

    Michael E. Farkouh;Michael Domanski;Lynn A. Sleeper;Flora S. Siami

  • Comparison of angioplasty with stenting, with or without abciximab, in acute myocardial infarction.

    Gregg W. Stone;Cindy L. Grines;David A. Cox;Eulogio Garcia

  • Angiographic Patterns of In-Stent Restenosis Classification and Implications for Long-Term Outcome

    Roxana Mehran;George Dangas;Andrea S. Abizaid;Gary S. Mintz

  • Diagnosis of Ischemia-Causing Coronary Stenoses by Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve Computed From Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiograms : Results From the Prospective Multicenter DISCOVER-FLOW (Diagnosis of Ischemia-Causing Stenoses Obtained Via Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve) Study

    Bonkwon Koo;Andrejs Erglis;Joon Hyung Doh;David V. Daniels

  • Coronary Angioplasty with or without Stent Implantation for Acute Myocardial Infarction

    Cindy L. Grines;David A. Cox;Gregg W. Stone;Eulogio Garcia

  • Stent Thrombosis in the Modern Era A Pooled Analysis of Multicenter Coronary Stent Clinical Trials

    Donald E. Cutlip;Donald S. Baim;Kalon K. L. Ho;Jeffrey J. Popma

  • The prognostic implications of further renal function deterioration within 48 h of interventional coronary procedures in patients with pre-existent chronic renal insufficiency.

    Luis Gruberg;Gary S Mintz;Roxana Mehran;George Dangas

  • Everolimus-Eluting versus Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents in Coronary Artery Disease

    Gregg W. Stone;Ali Rizvi;William Newman;Kourosh Mastali

  • Stent underexpansion and residual reference segment stenosis are related to stent thrombosis after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation: An intravascular ultrasound study

    Kenichi Fujii;Stéphane G. Carlier;Gary S. Mintz;Yi-ming Yang

  • Localized intracoronary gamma-radiation therapy to inhibit the recurrence of restenosis after stenting

    Martin B. Leon;Paul S. Teirstein;Jeffrey W. Moses;Prabhakar Tripuraneni

  • Contrast-Induced nephropathy after percutaneous coronary interventions in relation to chronic kidney disease and hemodynamic variables

    George Dangas;Ioannis Iakovou;Eugenia Nikolsky;Eve D. Aymong

  • Comparison of an Everolimus-Eluting Stent and a Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Randomized Trial

    Gregg W. Stone;Mark Midei;William Newman;Mark Sanz

  • Nitinol Stent Implantation Versus Balloon Angioplasty for Lesions in the Superficial Femoral Artery and Proximal Popliteal Artery Twelve-Month Results From the RESILIENT Randomized Trial

    John R. Laird;Barry T. Katzen;Dierk Scheinert;Johannes Lammer

  • A risk score to predict bleeding in patients with acute coronary syndromes.

    Roxana Mehran;Stuart J. Pocock;Eugenia Nikolsky;Tim Clayton

  • Intracoronary gamma-radiation therapy after angioplasty inhibits recurrence in patients with in-stent restenosis

    Ron Waksman;R. Larry White;Rosanna C. Chan;Bill G. Bass

  • Safety and Efficacy of Drug-Eluting and Bare Metal Stents Comprehensive Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials and Observational Studies

    Ajay J. Kirtane;Anuj Gupta;Srinivas Iyengar;Jeffrey W. Moses

Frequent Co-Authors

Roxana Mehran
Roxana Mehran Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Gregg W. Stone
Gregg W. Stone Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
George Dangas
George Dangas Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Martin B. Leon
Martin B. Leon Columbia University Medical Center
Gary S. Mintz
Gary S. Mintz Columbia University Medical Center
Jeffrey W. Moses
Jeffrey W. Moses Columbia University Medical Center
Giulio Guagliumi
Giulio Guagliumi ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital
David A. Cox
David A. Cox University of Alabama at Birmingham
Bruce R. Brodie
Bruce R. Brodie Moses H Cone Memorial Hospital
Akiko Maehara
Akiko Maehara Columbia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens up a range of alternative and complementary career paths—many of which can be started or accelerated through flexible online programs. If you’re interested in starting your healthcare journey quickly, understanding what is the fastest way to become an lpn can help you find practical, high-demand entry-level roles.

For those who wish to specialize, mental health remains a critical field. Comprehensive psych np online programs equip nurses for advanced practice roles, often with online options that accommodate working students.

Not every healthcare professional works directly with patients. Leadership and administration tracks—such as an affordable healthcare administration degree online—train graduates to oversee complex healthcare systems and improve health outcomes. If you’re aiming for senior positions, reviewing the most affordable mha online programs may offer an accessible and strategic path.

Online degrees provide flexibility for aspiring medical professionals at all stages. Whether you’re starting as an LPN or advancing into administrative leadership, there are a variety of reputable online pathways to support your career.

Best Scientists Citing Alexandra J. Lansky

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles