World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
94
Citations
43939
World Ranking
10298
National Ranking
366

Giulio Guagliumi publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Giulio Guagliumi sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 386 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Giulio Guagliumi D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Giulio Guagliumi sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 94 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Giulio Guagliumi is affiliated with ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital in Italy, contributing extensively to the field of medicine with a focus on cardiology and surgical applications. Their research output includes 172 publications primarily in Medicine, with notable specialization in Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Infectious Diseases.

The scientist's work covers multiple main topics relating to cardiovascular health and diagnostic technologies. Key areas include Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics, Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics, Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments, COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies, Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases, COVID-19 and healthcare impacts, and Optical Coherence Tomography Applications.

Giulio Guagliumi has published frequently in prominent journals. The most common publication venues are:

  • EuroIntervention
  • European Heart Journal
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Nature Reviews Cardiology
  • Circulation

Several recent noteworthy papers by Giulio Guagliumi include:

  • "Optical coherence tomography in coronary atherosclerosis assessment and intervention," 2022, Nature Reviews Cardiology
  • "Microthrombi as a Major Cause of Cardiac Injury in COVID-19," 2021, Circulation
  • "Pathological Evidence for SARS-CoV-2 as a Cause of Myocarditis," 2021, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • "Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided versus Angiography-Guided PCI," 2023, New England Journal of Medicine
  • "Optical coherence tomography-guided coronary stent implantation compared to angiography: a multicentre randomised trial in PCI - design and rationale of ILUMIEN IV: OPTIMAL PCI," 2021, EuroIntervention

Collaboration is an essential aspect of Giulio Guagliumi's research, with frequent coauthors including:

  • Dario Pellegrini (19 joint works)
  • Hiram G. Bezerra (11 joint works)
  • Maurizio Tespili (10 joint works)
  • Alfonso Ielasi (10 joint works)
  • Gregg W. Stone (9 joint works)

The scope of Giulio Guagliumi's research aligns closely with developments in cardiac imaging techniques and interventions, particularly using optical coherence tomography. Their work also contributes to the understanding of COVID-19-related cardiac complications, reflecting interdisciplinary engagement across cardiology, infectious diseases, and imaging sciences.

Best Publications

  • A Randomized Comparison of a Sirolimus-Eluting Stent with a Standard Stent for Coronary Revascularization

    Marie-Claude Morice;Patrick Serruys;J. Eduardo Sousa;Jean Fajadet

  • Consensus standards for acquisition, measurement, and reporting of intravascular optical coherence tomography studies: a report from the International Working Group for Intravascular Optical Coherence Tomography Standardization and Validation.

    Guillermo J. Tearney;Evelyn Regar;Takashi Akasaka;Tom Adriaenssens

  • Bivalirudin during Primary PCI in Acute Myocardial Infarction

    Gregg W. Stone;Bernhard Witzenbichler;Giulio Guagliumi;Jan Z. Peruga

  • Localized Hypersensitivity and Late Coronary Thrombosis Secondary to a Sirolimus-Eluting Stent: Should We Be Cautious?

    Renu Virmani;Giulio Guagliumi;Andrew Farb;Giuseppe Musumeci

  • Comparison of angioplasty with stenting, with or without abciximab, in acute myocardial infarction.

    Gregg W. Stone;Cindy L. Grines;David A. Cox;Eulogio Garcia

  • Randomized study to assess the effectiveness of slow- and moderate-release polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stents for coronary artery lesions

    Antonio Colombo;Janusz Drzewiecki;Adrian Banning;Eberhard Grube

  • Expert review document on methodology, terminology, and clinical applications of optical coherence tomography: Physical principles, methodology of image acquisition, and clinical application for assessment of coronary arteries and atherosclerosis

    Francesco Prati;Evelyn Regar;Gary S. Mintz;Eloisa Arbustini

  • Intracoronary Optical Coherence Tomography: A Comprehensive Review: Clinical and Research Applications

    Hiram G. Bezerra;Marco A. Costa;Giulio Guagliumi;Andrew M. Rollins

  • A risk score to predict bleeding in patients with acute coronary syndromes.

    Roxana Mehran;Stuart J. Pocock;Eugenia Nikolsky;Tim Clayton

  • Clinical use of intracoronary imaging. Part 1: guidance and optimization of coronary interventions. An expert consensus document of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions.

    Lorenz Räber;Gary S Mintz;Konstantinos C Koskinas;Thomas W Johnson

  • Optical coherence tomography compared with intravascular ultrasound and with angiography to guide coronary stent implantation (ILUMIEN III: OPTIMIZE PCI): a randomised controlled trial

    Ziad A Ali;Akiko Maehara;Philippe Généreux;Richard A Shlofmitz

  • Sirolimus- vs paclitaxel-eluting stents in de novo coronary artery lesions: the REALITY trial: a randomized controlled trial.

    Marie Claude Morice;Antonio Colombo;Bernhard Meier;Patrick Serruys

  • Heparin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor versus bivalirudin monotherapy and paclitaxel-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in acute myocardial infarction (HORIZONS-AMI): final 3-year results from a multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

    Gregg W Stone;Bernhard Witzenbichler;Giulio Guagliumi;Jan Z Peruga

  • Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease: 10-year follow-up of the multicentre randomised controlled SYNTAX trial.

    Daniel J F M Thuijs;A Pieter Kappetein;Patrick W Serruys;Friedrich-Wilhelm Mohr

  • Paclitaxel-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in acute myocardial infarction.

    Gregg W. Stone;Alexandra J. Lansky;Stuart J. Pocock;Bernard J. Gersh

  • Intravascular ultrasound findings in the multicenter, randomized, double-blind RAVEL (RAndomized study with the sirolimus-eluting VElocity balloon-expandable stent in the treatment of patients with de novo native coronary artery Lesions) trial.

    Patrick W. Serruys;Muzaffer Degertekin;Kengo Tanabe;Alexandre Abizaid

  • Bivalirudin in patients undergoing primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction (HORIZONS-AMI): 1-year results of a randomised controlled trial

    Roxana Mehran;Alexandra J Lansky;Bernhard Witzenbichler;Giulio Guagliumi

  • Clinical Efficacy of Polymer-Based Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents in the Treatment of Complex, Long Coronary Artery Lesions From a Multicenter, Randomized Trial Support for the Use of Drug-Eluting Stents in Contemporary Clinical Practice

    Keith D. Dawkins;Eberhard Grube;Giulio Guagliumi;Adrian P. Banning

  • Reperfusion therapy for ST elevation acute myocardial infarction 2010/2011: current status in 37 ESC countries.

    Steen D. Kristensen;Kristina G. Laut;Jean Fajadet;Zuzana Kaifoszova

  • Safety of Coronary Sirolimus-Eluting Stents in Daily Clinical Practice One-Year Follow-Up of the e-Cypher Registry

    Philip Urban;Anthony H. Gershlick;Giulio Guagliumi;Philippe Guyon

Frequent Co-Authors

Gregg W. Stone
Gregg W. Stone Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Roxana Mehran
Roxana Mehran Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Alexandra J. Lansky
Alexandra J. Lansky Yale University
Bruce R. Brodie
Bruce R. Brodie Moses H Cone Memorial Hospital
George Dangas
George Dangas Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Dariusz Dudek
Dariusz Dudek Jagiellonian University
James E. Tcheng
James E. Tcheng Duke University
Eulogio García
Eulogio García Hospital Clínico San Carlos
Gary S. Mintz
Gary S. Mintz Columbia University Medical Center
David A. Cox
David A. Cox University of Alabama at Birmingham

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Medicine doesn’t always mean following the traditional path of becoming a physician. There are many rewarding online degrees that can lead to high-demand roles in healthcare. For example, if you’re looking for flexibility and affordability, you might consider a nursing degree online. These programs allow you to balance studies with work or family obligations while preparing for a wide range of nursing careers.

If you’re already a registered nurse and want to advance, there are cheap rn to bsn programs that help you earn a Bachelor of Science in Nursing efficiently and affordably. Those interested in academic or leadership roles might explore doctorate in nursing education online programs to qualify for teaching, research, or executive positions.

For non-nurses seeking a fast track into advanced practice, online direct entry msn programs for non-nurses offer accelerated options to earn a Master’s in Nursing without prior nursing experience. These flexible online pathways provide diverse career opportunities and make entering the healthcare field more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Giulio Guagliumi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles