World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
James E. Tcheng

James E. Tcheng

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 94 10498 9854 5403 4990 396 31850

James E. Tcheng publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by James E. Tcheng between 1976 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. James E. Tcheng published across 50 years, from 1976 to 2025, averaging 8.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 39 publications in 2003. 8 of the 411 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1976 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 39. Peak 39 publications in 2003. 1976: 1 publication 1977: 0 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 5 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 8 publications 1992: 7 publications 1993: 6 publications 1994: 10 publications 1995: 17 publications 1996: 18 publications 1997: 12 publications 1998: 18 publications 1999: 15 publications 2000: 17 publications 2001: 19 publications 2002: 29 publications 2003: 39 publications 2004: 27 publications 2005: 17 publications 2006: 17 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 5 publications
1976 2025

411 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
James E. Tcheng: publications per year, 1976 to 2025
Year Publications
1976 1
1977 0
1978 1
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 5
1989 0
1990 2
1991 8
1992 7
1993 6
1994 10
1995 17
1996 18
1997 12
1998 18
1999 15
2000 17
2001 19
2002 29
2003 39
2004 27
2005 17
2006 17
2007 7
2008 4
2009 9
2010 5
2011 7
2012 8
2013 4
2014 9
2015 13
2016 6
2017 5
2018 9
2019 7
2020 7
2021 7
2022 5
2023 6
2024 3
2025 5
Total 411
Download as CSV

James E. Tcheng publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James E. Tcheng sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 381–400 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 396 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861 396
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

James E. Tcheng D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James E. Tcheng sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 94–95 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 94 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808 94
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2018 - Distinguished Service Award, American College of Cardiology (ACC)

Overview

James E. Tcheng is affiliated with Duke University in the United States and conducts research primarily in the field of Medicine, with a specific focus on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Biomedical Engineering, Surgery, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Economics and Econometrics.

Their recent scholarly contributions include:

  • Telehealth transformation: COVID-19 and the rise of virtual care, 2020, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
  • Systematic review of current natural language processing methods and applications in cardiology, 2021, Heart
  • Artificial Intelligence, Computational Simulations, and Extended Reality in Cardiovascular Interventions, 2023, JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
  • Determining the Suitability of Registries for Embedding Clinical Trials in the United States: A Project of the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative, 2020, Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science
  • Advancing the Real-World Evidence for Medical Devices through Coordinated Registry Networks, 2022, BMJ Surgery Interventions & Health Technologies

Their work covers several main topics, most notably:

  • Quality and Safety in Healthcare
  • Biomedical and Engineering Education
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Peripheral Artery Disease Management
  • Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics

Tcheng frequently publishes in venues such as:

  • BMJ Surgery Interventions & Health Technologies
  • Medical Devices Evidence and Research
  • International Journal of Translational Medical Research and Public Health
  • Journal of Vascular Surgery
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology

The scientist has collaborated on multiple occasions with coauthors including Jens Eldrup-Jørgensen, Joseph P. Drozda, Philip P. Goodney, Gregory Pappas, and Jove Graham.

In 2018, James E. Tcheng received the Distinguished Service Award from the American College of Cardiology (ACC).

Best Publications

  • Comparison of angioplasty with stenting, with or without abciximab, in acute myocardial infarction.

    Gregg W. Stone;Cindy L. Grines;David A. Cox;Eulogio Garcia

  • Telehealth transformation: COVID-19 and the rise of virtual care.

    Jedrek Wosik;Marat Fudim;Blake Cameron;Ziad Gellad;Ziad Gellad

  • 2014 ACC/AHA Key Data Elements and Definitions for Cardiovascular Endpoint Events in Clinical Trials: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Data Standards (Writing Committee to Develop Cardiovascular Endpoints Data Standards)

    Karen A. Hicks;James E. Tcheng;Biykem Bozkurt;Bernard R. Chaitman

  • Abciximab as adjunctive therapy to reperfusion in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.

    Giuseppe De Luca;Harry Suryapranata;Gregg W. Stone;David Antoniucci

  • 2017 Cardiovascular and Stroke Endpoint Definitions for Clinical Trials.

    Karen A. Hicks;Kenneth W. Mahaffey;Roxana Mehran;Steven E. Nissen

  • Prediction of mortality after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction: the CADILLAC risk score.

    Amir Halkin;Mandeep Singh;Eugenia Nikolsky;Cindy L. Grines

  • Impact of multivessel disease on reperfusion success and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction.

    Paul Sorajja;Bernard J Gersh;David A Cox;Michael G McLaughlin

  • Pharmacodynamics of chimeric glycoprotein IIb/IIIa integrin antiplatelet antibody Fab 7E3 in high-risk coronary angioplasty.

    J E Tcheng;S G Ellis;B S George;D J Kereiakes

  • Long-term Protection From Myocardial Ischemic Events in a Randomized Trial of Brief Integrin β3 Blockade With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

    Eric J. Topol;James J. Ferguson;Harlan F. Weisman;James E. Tcheng

  • Impact of Renal Insufficiency in Patients Undergoing Primary Angioplasty for Acute Myocardial Infarction

    H. Mehrdad Sadeghi;Gregg W. Stone;Cindy L. Grines;Roxana Mehran

  • Point-of-Care Measured Platelet Inhibition Correlates With a Reduced Risk of an Adverse Cardiac Event After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Results of the GOLD (AU-Assessing Ultegra) Multicenter Study

    Steven R. Steinhubl;J. David Talley;Gregory A. Braden;James E. Tcheng

  • Complementary Clinical Benefits of Coronary-Artery Stenting and Blockade of Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Receptors

    Lincoff Am;Califf Rm;Moliterno Dj;Ellis Sg

  • Clinical Outcomes of Therapeutic Agents That Block the Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Integrin in Ischemic Heart Disease

    David F. Kong;Robert M. Califf;Dave P. Miller;David J. Moliterno

  • Restenosis after coronary angioplasty: An overview

    Robert M. Califf;Donald F. Fortin;David J. Frid;William R. Harlan

  • Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of the Platelet Integrin Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Blocker Integrelin in Elective Coronary Intervention

    James E. Tcheng;Robert A. Harrington;Kandice Kottke-Marchant;Neal S. Kleiman

  • Results of prevention of REStenosis with tranilast and its outcomes (PRESTO) trial

    David R. Holmes;Michael Savage;J. M. LaBlanche;Lars Grip

  • Evaluation and Treatment of Patients With Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease: Consensus Definitions From Peripheral Academic Research Consortium (PARC)

    Manesh R. Patel;Michael S. Conte;Donald E. Cutlip;Nabil Dib

  • Outcome of patients sustaining acute ischemic mitral regurgitation during myocardial infarction.

    James E. Tcheng;John D. Jackman;Charlotte L. Nelson;Laura H. Gardner

  • Impact of anemia in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: analysis from the Controlled Abciximab and Device Investigation to Lower Late Angioplasty Complications (CADILLAC) Trial.

    Eugenia Nikolsky;Eve D. Aymong;Amir Halkin;Cindy L. Grines

  • Long-term protection from myocardial ischemic events in a randomized trial of brief integrin beta3 blockade with percutaneous coronary intervention. EPIC Investigator Group. Evaluation of Platelet IIb/IIIa Inhibition for Prevention of Ischemic Complication.

    Topol Ej;Ferguson Jj;Weisman Hf;Tcheng Je

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert M. Califf
Robert M. Califf Duke University
Gregg W. Stone
Gregg W. Stone Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Roxana Mehran
Roxana Mehran Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
David A. Cox
David A. Cox University of Alabama at Birmingham
Eulogio García
Eulogio García Hospital Clínico San Carlos
Alexandra J. Lansky
Alexandra J. Lansky Yale University
Eric J. Topol
Eric J. Topol Scripps Research Institute
Cindy L. Grines
Cindy L. Grines Wayne State University
Giulio Guagliumi
Giulio Guagliumi ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital
A. Michael Lincoff
A. Michael Lincoff Cleveland Clinic

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a medical career in the USA offers diverse pathways beyond traditional doctor training. Many students consider online medical coding classes with financial aid, which prepare graduates for in-demand roles in hospitals or clinics while offering flexible learning options and support to manage costs.

Nursing is another popular field. Some aspiring nurses want to avoid extensive entrance exams, making nursing schools that don't require teas or hesi a top choice. This opens doors for those ready to jump into clinical training without added testing barriers.

For those interested in the business side of healthcare, earning a health care administration degree online can lead to management positions. These programs are perfect for working professionals aiming to advance their careers at their own pace.

Registered nurses looking to grow can explore adn to np bridge programs, which fast-track the journey from an associate degree to a master’s level nurse practitioner role.

These online degree options provide accessible entry points into healthcare careers, allowing students to find the right balance between flexibility, cost, and professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing James E. Tcheng

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles