World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Best Scientists
2025
Award Badge
Best Female Scientists
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Best Female Scientists

D-Index
180
Citations
157284
World Ranking
44
National Ranking
30

Best Scientists

D-Index
180
Citations
157284
World Ranking
607
National Ranking
381

Medicine

D-Index
182
Citations
165827
World Ranking
334
National Ranking
211

Roxana Mehran publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roxana Mehran sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,951 publications — 100th percentile

100% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Roxana Mehran D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roxana Mehran sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 182 D-Index — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Best Female Scientists Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Best Scientists Award

Overview

Roxana Mehran is affiliated with the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in the United States. Their primary field of study is Medicine, with a significant focus on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Additional subfields include Surgery, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Epidemiology.

The main topics covered in Mehran's research include:

  • Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
  • Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
  • Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management

Mehran's recent papers feature a range of cardiovascular health subjects and clinical research standards. Selected works include:

  • The Lancet women and cardiovascular disease Commission: reducing the global burden by 2030, 2021, published in The Lancet
  • Valve Academic Research Consortium 3: Updated Endpoint Definitions for Aortic Valve Clinical Research, 2021, published in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Valve Academic Research Consortium 3: updated endpoint definitions for aortic valve clinical research, 2020, published in European Heart Journal
  • An EAPCI Expert Consensus Document on Ischaemia with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries in Collaboration with European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Coronary Pathophysiology & Microcirculation Endorsed by Coronary Vasomotor Disorders International Study Group, 2020, published in European Heart Journal
  • Characterization of Myocardial Injury in Patients With COVID-19, 2020, published in Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Mehran include:

  • George Dangas
  • Samantha Sartori
  • Samin K. Sharma
  • Davide Cao
  • Dominick J. Angiolillo

Publication venues with multiple works from Mehran reflect a consistent focus on cardiovascular medicine and related clinical interventions. Notable venues where Mehran has contributed extensively are:

  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • European Heart Journal
  • JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
  • The American Journal of Cardiology
  • Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions

Mehran has contributed to book publications as well, including a work published by RAND Corporation eBooks titled Research Funding for Women's Health: A Modeling Study of Societal Impact: Findings for Lung Cancer in 2022.

Best Publications

  • Clinical End Points in Coronary Stent Trials A Case for Standardized Definitions

    Donald E. Cutlip;Stephan Windecker;Roxana Mehran;Ashley Boam

  • Updated standardized endpoint definitions for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 consensus document.

    A. Pieter Kappetein;Stuart J. Head;Philippe Généreux;Nicolo Piazza

  • 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions

    Glenn N. Levine;Eric R. Bates;James C. Blankenship;Steven R. Bailey

  • From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient: a call for new definitions and risk assessment strategies: Part II.

    Morteza Naghavi;Peter Libby;Erling Falk;S. Ward Casscells;S. Ward Casscells

  • Standardized Bleeding Definitions for Cardiovascular Clinical Trials A Consensus Report From the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium

    Roxana Mehran;Sunil V. Rao;Deepak L. Bhatt;C. Michael Gibson

  • A Prospective Natural-History Study of Coronary Atherosclerosis

    Gregg W. Stone;Akiko Maehara;Alexandra J. Lansky;Bernard de Bruyne

  • A simple risk score for prediction of contrast-induced nephropathy after percutaneous coronary intervention: Development and initial validation

    Roxana Mehran;Eve D. Aymong;Eugenia Nikolsky;Zoran Lasic

  • 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

    Glenn N. Levine;Eric R. Bates;James C. Blankenship;Steven R. Bailey

  • Bivalirudin during Primary PCI in Acute Myocardial Infarction

    Gregg W. Stone;Bernhard Witzenbichler;Giulio Guagliumi;Jan Z. Peruga

  • Safety and efficacy of sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting coronary stents

    Gregg W. Stone;Jeffrey W. Moses;Stephen G. Ellis;Joachim Schofer

  • Clonal Hematopoiesis and risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease

    Siddhartha Jaiswal;Pradeep Natarajan;Pradeep Natarajan;Alexander J. Silver;Christopher J. Gibson

  • Updated Standardized Endpoint Definitions for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

    A. Pieter Kappetein;Stuart J. Head;Philippe Généreux;Nicolo Piazza

  • 2016 ACC/AHA Guideline Focused Update on Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines

    Glenn N. Levine;Eric R. Bates;John A. Bittl;Ralph G. Brindis

  • Bivalirudin for Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes

    Gregg W. Stone;Brent T. McLaurin;David A. Cox;Michel E. Bertrand

  • Angiographic Patterns of In-Stent Restenosis Classification and Implications for Long-Term Outcome

    Roxana Mehran;George Dangas;Andrea S. Abizaid;Gary S. Mintz

  • Prevention of Bleeding in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing PCI

    C Michael Gibson;Roxana Mehran;Christoph Bode;Jonathan Halperin

  • Standardized Endpoint Definitions for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Clinical Trials : A Consensus Report From the Valve Academic Research Consortium

    Martin B Leon;Nicolo Piazza;Eugenia Nikolsky;Eugene H. Blackstone

  • Genetic Risk, Adherence to a Healthy Lifestyle, and Coronary Disease

    Amit V. Khera;Connor A. Emdin;Isabel Drake;Pradeep Natarajan

  • Everolimus-Eluting Stents or Bypass Surgery for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease

    Gregg W. Stone;Joseph F. Sabik;Patrick W. Serruys;Charles A. Simonton

  • The prognostic implications of further renal function deterioration within 48 h of interventional coronary procedures in patients with pre-existent chronic renal insufficiency.

    Luis Gruberg;Gary S Mintz;Roxana Mehran;George Dangas

Frequent Co-Authors

Gregg W. Stone
Gregg W. Stone Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
George Dangas
George Dangas Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Alexandra J. Lansky
Alexandra J. Lansky Yale University
Martin B. Leon
Martin B. Leon Columbia University Medical Center
Samin K. Sharma
Samin K. Sharma Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Gary S. Mintz
Gary S. Mintz Columbia University Medical Center
Ajay J. Kirtane
Ajay J. Kirtane Columbia University
Philippe Généreux
Philippe Généreux Morristown Medical Center
Jeffrey W. Moses
Jeffrey W. Moses Columbia University Medical Center
Akiko Maehara
Akiko Maehara Columbia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

In addition to traditional medical degrees, there are several related online degree options that can expand your career potential in healthcare. For those interested in wellness and dietetics, pursuing nutrition degrees online allows you to explore science-based programs from accredited universities, preparing you for roles in clinical nutrition or public health.

If healthcare management is your passion, consider a cahme accredited online mha to build expertise in hospital administration and leadership. This qualification is valued by employers who seek skilled professionals for managing healthcare organizations.

For nurses, further educational advancement is possible without needing onsite practice. There are online rn to bsn programs without clinical requirements, designed for working RNs who want to increase their credentials flexibly and advance into leadership or specialized roles.

Finally, nurses aiming for the highest practice-based credential can look into dnp programs online. These Doctor of Nursing Practice programs help advance clinical expertise, research skills, and leadership capacities. Exploring these pathways can help you find the perfect fit as you build your healthcare career.

Best Scientists Citing Roxana Mehran

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles