World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Genetics 57 3366 3179 114 109 183 19393

Mark J. Cowley publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mark J. Cowley between 1979 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mark J. Cowley published across 48 years, from 1979 to 2026, averaging 8.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 128 publications in 2023. 24 of the 392 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1979 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 128. Peak 128 publications in 2023. 1979: 1 publication 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 16 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 19 publications 2018: 20 publications 2019: 33 publications 2020: 28 publications 2021: 23 publications 2022: 13 publications 2023: 128 publications 2024: 29 publications 2025: 23 publications 2026: 1 publication
1979 2026

392 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mark J. Cowley: publications per year, 1979 to 2026
Year Publications
1979 1
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 0
2003 0
2004 0
2005 0
2006 2
2007 2
2008 2
2009 5
2010 6
2011 7
2012 16
2013 11
2014 8
2015 8
2016 7
2017 19
2018 20
2019 33
2020 28
2021 23
2022 13
2023 128
2024 29
2025 23
2026 1
Total 392
Download as CSV

Mark J. Cowley publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark J. Cowley sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 67 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 45–54 to 703+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 217. Most scientists, 217, have 125–134 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 175–184 publications, is where this scientist sits. 45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45–54 publications 703+

This scientist: 183 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
45–54 6
55–64 10
65–74 35
75–84 84
85–94 102
95–104 151
105–114 175
115–124 203
125–134 217
135–144 205
145–154 193
155–164 188
165–174 170
175–184 178 183
185–194 164
195–204 173
205–214 159
215–224 134
225–234 143
235–244 105
245–254 114
255–264 92
265–274 88
275–284 87
285–294 80
295–304 62
305–314 75
315–324 67
325–334 60
335–344 52
345–354 40
355–364 48
365–374 47
375–384 46
385–394 31
395–404 27
405–414 40
415–424 30
425–434 43
435–444 29
445–454 14
455–464 28
465–474 21
475–484 21
485–494 22
495–504 17
505–514 12
515–524 11
525–534 8
535–544 8
545–554 14
555–564 4
565–574 11
575–584 5
585–594 11
595–604 12
605–614 7
615–624 6
625–634 10
635–644 9
645–654 10
655–664 6
665–674 6
675–684 6
685–694 4
695–702 6
703+ 100
Download as CSV

Mark J. Cowley D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark J. Cowley sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 160+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 191. Most scientists, 191, have 62–63 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56–57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 24
42–43 52
44–45 84
46–47 112
48–49 118
50–51 141
52–53 143
54–55 145
56–57 179 57
58–59 162
60–61 175
62–63 191
64–65 172
66–67 184
68–69 164
70–71 158
72–73 150
74–75 136
76–77 127
78–79 127
80–81 111
82–83 110
84–85 110
86–87 84
88–89 102
90–91 66
92–93 72
94–95 70
96–97 54
98–99 60
100–101 49
102–103 55
104–105 45
106–107 42
108–109 28
110–111 39
112–113 25
114–115 31
116–117 29
118–119 34
120–121 29
122–123 29
124–125 18
126–127 27
128–129 22
130–131 16
132–133 11
134–135 17
136–137 12
138–139 21
140–141 4
142–143 9
144–145 14
146–147 6
148–149 10
150–151 7
152–153 9
154–155 8
156–157 8
158–159 9
160+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Mark J. Cowley is affiliated with the Garvan Institute of Medical Research in Australia. Their research spans significant areas within biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and medicine, with a particular emphasis on molecular biology and cancer-related fields.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
  • Medicine

Within these domains, their subfields of study highlight a focus on:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Genetics
  • Cancer Research
  • Neurology
  • Oncology

Their research topics cover areas such as:

  • Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments
  • Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • RNA modifications and cancer
  • Mitochondrial Function and Pathology
  • Metabolism and Genetic Disorders

Mark J. Cowley has contributed to a variety of research articles. Selected recent papers include:

  • "Whole genome, transcriptome and methylome profiling enhances actionable target discovery in high-risk pediatric cancer" (2020, Nature Medicine)
  • "Infant High-Grade Gliomas Comprise Multiple Subgroups Characterized by Novel Targetable Gene Fusions and Favorable Outcomes" (2020, Cancer Discovery)
  • "HNF4A and GATA6 Loss Reveals Therapeutically Actionable Subtypes in Pancreatic Cancer" (2020, Cell Reports)
  • "Whole exome and genome sequencing in mendelian disorders: a diagnostic and health economic analysis" (2022, European Journal of Human Genetics)
  • "MTOR signaling orchestrates stress-induced mutagenesis, facilitating adaptive evolution in cancer" (2020, Science)

Frequent coauthors who collaborate with Mark J. Cowley include:

  • Chelsea Mayoh
  • Marie Wong
  • Loretta M. S. Lau
  • David S. Ziegler
  • Paul G. Ekert

The scientist's publications often appear in notable venues such as:

  • Cancer Research
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Neuro-Oncology
  • Human Mutation
  • npj Genomic Medicine

Best Publications

  • Genomic analyses identify molecular subtypes of pancreatic cancer

    Bailey P;Chang Dk;Nones K;Nones K;Johns Al

  • Whole genomes redefine the mutational landscape of pancreatic cancer.

    Nicola Waddell;Marina Pajic;Ann Marie Patch;David K. Chang

  • Pancreatic cancer genomes reveal aberrations in axon guidance pathway genes

    Andrew V. Biankin;Andrew V. Biankin;Andrew V. Biankin;Nicola Waddell;Karin S. Kassahn;Marie Claude Gingras

  • Whole-genome landscape of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours

    Aldo Scarpa;David K. Chang;Katia Nones;Katia Nones;Vincenzo Corbo

  • PINA v2.0: mining interactome modules

    Mark J. Cowley;Mark Pinese;Karin S. Kassahn;Nic Waddell

  • Infant high grade gliomas comprise multiple subgroups characterized by novel targetable gene fusions and favorable outcomes

    Matthew Clarke;Alan Mackay;Britta Ismer;Britta Ismer;Jessica Chiara Pickles

  • Whole genome, transcriptome and methylome profiling enhances actionable target discovery in high-risk pediatric cancer.

    Marie Wong;Marie Wong;Chelsea Mayoh;Loretta M.S. Lau;Loretta M.S. Lau;Dong Anh Khuong-Quang

  • Inheritance of coronary artery disease in men: an analysis of the role of the Y chromosome

    Fadi J. Charchar;Lisa D. S. Bloomer;Timothy A. Barnes;Mark J. Cowley

  • Genome‐wide DNA methylation patterns in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma reveal epigenetic deregulation of SLIT‐ROBO, ITGA2 and MET signaling

    Katia Nones;Nic Waddell;Sarah Song;Ann Marie Patch

  • Next-Generation Sequencing and Emerging Technologies.

    Kishore R. Kumar;Kishore R. Kumar;Kishore R. Kumar;Mark J. Cowley;Mark J. Cowley;Ryan L. Davis;Ryan L. Davis

  • Mutation allele burden remains unchanged in chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia responding to hypomethylating agents

    Jane Merlevede;Nathalie Droin;Tingting Qin;Kristen Meldi

  • Hypermutation In Pancreatic Cancer

    Jeremy L Humphris;Ann Marie Patch;Ann Marie Patch;Katia Nones;Katia Nones;Peter J Bailey;Peter J Bailey

  • Consolidation of the cancer genome into domains of repressive chromatin by long-range epigenetic silencing (LRES) reduces transcriptional plasticity

    Marcel W. Coolen;Clare Stirzaker;Jenny Z. Song;Aaron L. Statham

  • Whole-exome sequencing reanalysis at 12 months boosts diagnosis and is cost-effective when applied early in Mendelian disorders

    Lisa J Ewans;Lisa J Ewans;Deborah Schofield;Deborah Schofield;Deborah Schofield;Rupendra Shrestha;Ying Zhu

  • Histomolecular Phenotypes and Outcome in Adenocarcinoma of the Ampulla of Vater

    David K. Chang;Nigel B. Jamieson;Nigel B. Jamieson;Amber L. Johns;Christopher J. Scarlett;Christopher J. Scarlett

  • Whole Genome Sequencing Improves Outcomes of Genetic Testing in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

    Richard D. Bagnall;Jodie Ingles;Marcel E. Dinger;Mark J. Cowley

  • Differential regulation of the Let-7 family of microRNAs in CD4+ T cells alters IL-10 expression.

    Sanjay Swaminathan;Sanjay Swaminathan;Kazuo Suzuki;Nabila Seddiki;Nabila Seddiki;Warren Kaplan

  • Normalization and Statistical Analysis of Quantitative Proteomics Data Generated by Metabolic Labeling

    Lily Ting;Mark J. Cowley;Seah Lay Hoon;Michael Guilhaus

  • Cold adaptation in the marine bacterium, Sphingopyxis alaskensis, assessed using quantitative proteomics

    Lily Ting;Timothy J. Williams;Mark J. Cowley;Federico M. Lauro

  • The influence of genetic variation on gene expression

    Rohan B.H. Williams;Eva K.F. Chan;Mark J. Cowley;Peter F.R. Little

Frequent Co-Authors

Marcel E. Dinger
Marcel E. Dinger University of Sydney
Tony Roscioli
Tony Roscioli University of New South Wales
Andrew V. Biankin
Andrew V. Biankin University of Glasgow
Anthony J. Gill
Anthony J. Gill University of Sydney
Marina Pajic
Marina Pajic Garvan Institute of Medical Research
Sean M. Grimmond
Sean M. Grimmond University of Melbourne
David W. P. Thomas
David W. P. Thomas University of Nottingham
Paul G Ekert
Paul G Ekert University of New South Wales
James G. Kench
James G. Kench Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
Nicola Waddell
Nicola Waddell QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Genetics in the USA opens doors to a variety of online healthcare degree programs and career paths. Many students choose to blend their genetics background with nursing and healthcare professions to widen their career opportunities.

Nursing is a popular choice, and aspiring nurses can start by searching for the best online nursing prerequisites to gain foundational knowledge efficiently and affordably. After meeting prerequisites, students can consider advancing through one of the online np programs to become a nurse practitioner. This pathway combines genetics expertise with advanced clinical roles in patient care.

For those already holding an RN license, pursuing a bachelor’s degree is often the next step. You can find the rn to bsn cheapest options to boost your qualifications without a substantial financial burden. Meanwhile, experienced nurses who wish to reach leadership or specialized positions may look into the cheapest dnp program for doctoral-level education.

With the rise of affordable online healthcare degrees, combining genetics with nursing or advanced practice roles is more accessible than ever—offering flexibility and diverse career possibilities.

Best Scientists Citing Mark J. Cowley

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles