World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Medicine
Canada
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
135
Citations
91006
World Ranking
2023
National Ranking
74

Steven Gallinger publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven Gallinger sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 862 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Steven Gallinger D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven Gallinger sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 135 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Medicine in Canada Leader Award

Overview

Steven Gallinger is affiliated with the Ontario Institute for Cancer Research in Canada. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, with a focus on oncology and related disciplines. The scientist's subfields include Oncology, Cancer Research, Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

The main topics covered in their work reflect a concentration on pancreatic and hepatic oncology research, cancer genomics and diagnostics, and genetic factors in colorectal cancer. Additional research interests include cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder cancer studies, cancer immunotherapy and biomarkers, colorectal cancer screening and detection, and the application of radiomics and machine learning in medical imaging.

Steven Gallinger has contributed extensively to several scientific journals. Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Cancer Research
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Clinical Cancer Research
  • Nature Genetics
  • Gastroenterology

Among their recent published papers are:

  • Transcription phenotypes of pancreatic cancer are driven by genomic events during tumor evolution, 2020, Nature Genetics
  • Recipient and Donor Outcomes After Living-Donor Liver Transplant for Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases, 2022, JAMA Surgery
  • Mortality by age, gene and gender in carriers of pathogenic mismatch repair gene variants receiving surveillance for early cancer diagnosis and treatment: a report from the prospective Lynch syndrome database, 2023, EClinicalMedicine
  • Pattern of Invasion in Human Pancreatic Cancer Organoids Is Associated with Loss of SMAD4 and Clinical Outcome, 2020, Cancer Research
  • Eflornithine plus Sulindac for Prevention of Progression in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis, 2020, New England Journal of Medicine

Steven Gallinger works collaboratively with several frequent co-authors in their research efforts, including:

  • Jennifer J. Knox
  • Grainne M. O'Kane
  • Julie M. Wilson
  • Gun Ho Jang
  • Robert C. Grant

Best Publications

  • Erlotinib Plus Gemcitabine Compared With Gemcitabine Alone in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Phase III Trial of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group

    Malcolm J. Moore;David Goldstein;John Hamm;Arie Figer

  • A human colon cancer cell capable of initiating tumour growth in immunodeficient mice

    Catherine A. O’Brien;Aaron Pollett;Steven Gallinger;John E. Dick;John E. Dick

  • Tumor Microsatellite-Instability Status as a Predictor of Benefit from Fluorouracil-Based Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Colon Cancer

    Christine M. Ribic;Daniel J. Sargent;Malcolm J. Moore;Malcolm J. Moore;Stephen N. Thibodeau

  • Pancreatic cancer genomes reveal aberrations in axon guidance pathway genes

    Andrew V. Biankin;Andrew V. Biankin;Andrew V. Biankin;Nicola Waddell;Karin S. Kassahn;Marie Claude Gingras

  • International network of cancer genome projects

    Thomas J. Hudson;Thomas J. Hudson;Warwick Anderson;Axel Aretz;Anna D. Barker

  • Defective Mismatch Repair As a Predictive Marker for Lack of Efficacy of Fluorouracil-Based Adjuvant Therapy in Colon Cancer

    Daniel J. Sargent;Silvia Marsoni;Genevieve Monges;Stephen N. Thibodeau

  • Tumor microsatellite instability and clinical outcome in young patients with colorectal cancer.

    Robert Gryfe;Hyeja Kim;Eugene T.K. Hsieh;Melyssa D. Aronson

  • Adjuvant chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus folinic acid vs gemcitabine following pancreatic cancer resection: a randomized controlled trial

    John P. Neoptolemos;Deborah D. Stocken;Claudio Bassi;Paula Ghaneh

  • Discovery of cross-reactive probes and polymorphic CpGs in the Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation450 microarray

    Yi-an Chen;Mathieu Lemire;Sanaa Choufani;Darci T. Butcher

  • Genome-wide association study identifies eight risk loci and implicates metabo-psychiatric origins for anorexia nervosa

    Hunna J. Watson;Hunna J. Watson;Hunna J. Watson;Zeynep Yilmaz;Laura M. Thornton;Christopher Hübel;Christopher Hübel

  • Convergence of Genes and Cellular Pathways Dysregulated in Autism Spectrum Disorders

    Dalila Pinto;Elsa Delaby;Elsa Delaby;Elsa Delaby;Daniele Merico;Mafalda Barbosa

  • MADR2 maps to 18q21 and encodes a TGFβ-regulated MAD-related protein that is functionally mutated in colorectal carcinoma

    Kolja Eppert;Stephen W Scherer;Hilmi Ozcelik;Rosa Pirone

  • Genome-wide association scan identifies a colorectal cancer susceptibility locus on chromosome 8q24

    Brent W. Zanke;Celia M.T. Greenwood;Celia M.T. Greenwood;Jagadish Rangrej;Rafal Kustra;Rafal Kustra

  • Variable Clonal Repopulation Dynamics Influence Chemotherapy Response in Colorectal Cancer

    Antonija Kreso;Antonija Kreso;Catherine A. O'Brien;Catherine A. O'Brien;Peter van Galen;Olga I. Gan

  • Organoid profiling identifies common responders to chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer

    Hervé Tiriac;Pascal Belleau;Dannielle D Engle;Dennis Plenker

  • Sensitive tumour detection and classification using plasma cell-free DNA methylomes

    Shu Yi Shen;Rajat Singhania;Gordon Fehringer;Ankur Chakravarthy

  • Ductal pancreatic cancer modeling and drug screening using human pluripotent stem cell– and patient-derived tumor organoids

    Ling Huang;Audrey Holtzinger;Ishaan Jagan;Michael Begora

  • Genome-wide association scan identifies a colorectal cancer susceptibility locus on 11q23 and replicates risk loci at 8q24 and 18q21.

    Albert Tenesa;Susan M Farrington;James G D Prendergast;Mary E Porteous

  • Hereditary diffuse gastric cancer syndrome: CDH1 mutations and beyond

    Samantha Hansford;Pardeep Kaurah;Hector Li-Chang;Michelle Woo

  • Convergence of genes and cellular pathways dysregulated in autism spectrum disorders

    Dalila Pinto;Elsa Delaby;Daniele Merico;Mafalda Barbosa

Frequent Co-Authors

Polly A. Newcomb
Polly A. Newcomb Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Mark A. Jenkins
Mark A. Jenkins University of Melbourne
John D. Potter
John D. Potter Massey University
John L. Hopper
John L. Hopper University of Melbourne
Loic Le Marchand
Loic Le Marchand University of Hawaii at Manoa
Daniel D. Buchanan
Daniel D. Buchanan University of Melbourne
Graham G. Giles
Graham G. Giles University of Melbourne
Jenny Chang-Claude
Jenny Chang-Claude German Cancer Research Center
Ulrike Peters
Ulrike Peters University of Washington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a medical career in the USA doesn’t always follow a single track. Many students are exploring flexible online degree options that lead to rewarding opportunities in healthcare. For instance, those interested in administrative roles can consider a healthcare administration degree online, which allows you to quickly build leadership skills for hospital or clinic management.

If you prefer patient care but want to avoid lengthy and complex entry exams, several nursing programs without teas are available. These programs let you step into the nursing field faster and with less stress during the application process.

Administrative and support positions also offer a viable route. Studying online medical billing and coding with financial aid can set you up for entry-level positions in hospitals and medical centers, all without leaving home.

Finally, current nurses wishing to advance can explore rn to np programs online. These bridge programs help registered nurses quickly transition to nurse practitioner roles, opening up even more career options.

Best Scientists Citing Steven Gallinger

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles