World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 57 4050 3735 33 31 134 11605

Taru Feldt publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Taru Feldt between 1970 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Taru Feldt published across 56 years, from 1970 to 2025, averaging 3 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2013. 13 of the 166 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1970 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2013. 1970: 1 publication 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 3 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 2 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 6 publications
1970 2025

166 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Taru Feldt: publications per year, 1970 to 2025
Year Publications
1970 1
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 1
1998 1
1999 1
2000 3
2001 0
2002 1
2003 2
2004 3
2005 6
2006 5
2007 6
2008 4
2009 5
2010 6
2011 10
2012 10
2013 13
2014 7
2015 7
2016 10
2017 9
2018 7
2019 8
2020 6
2021 8
2022 8
2023 5
2024 7
2025 6
Total 166
Download as CSV

Taru Feldt publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Taru Feldt sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 131–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 134 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644 134
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Taru Feldt D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Taru Feldt sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56–57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345 57
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Taru Feldt is affiliated with the University of Jyväskylä in Finland. Their research spans several interdisciplinary fields, including psychology, health professions, and business, management, and accounting. This diverse academic involvement reflects a broad approach to understanding organizational and workplace dynamics.

Their main areas of study include:

  • Psychology
  • Health Professions
  • Business, Management and Accounting

Within these fields, Taru Feldt explores various subfields. These include general health professions, organizational behavior and human resource management, social psychology, sociology and political science, and education. This highlights the scientist's focus on workplace environments and the human factors influencing them.

The central topics of their research have concentrated on job satisfaction and organizational behavior, healthcare professionals' stress and burnout, workplace health and well-being, emotional intelligence and performance, workaholism and burnout, workplace violence and bullying, and ethics in business and education.

The scientist has published prolifically, with contributions to numerous academic journals. The frequent publication venues for their work are:

  • Psykologia
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Työelämän tutkimus
  • Journal of Clinical Nursing
  • Journal of Advanced Nursing

Some of Taru Feldt's recent papers include:

  • "Illegitimate tasks in health care: Illegitimate task types and associations with occupational well-being," 2021, Journal of Clinical Nursing
  • "Intensified job demands in healthcare and their consequences for employee well-being and patient satisfaction: A multilevel approach," 2021, Journal of Advanced Nursing
  • "Profiling development of burnout over eight years: relation with job demands and resources," 2020, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology
  • "Teacher coping profiles in relation to teacher well-being: A mixed method approach," 2021, Teaching and Teacher Education
  • "Is work intensification bad for employees? A review of outcomes for employees over the last two decades," 2022, Work & Stress

Collaboration has been a significant element of their work. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Mari Herttalampi
  • Saija Mauno
  • Mari Huhtala
  • Elina Auvinen
  • Johanna Rantanen

Taru Feldt's research addresses critical aspects of occupational health, organizational dynamics, and employee well-being, combining an empirical approach across multiple related disciplines and collaborating extensively with other researchers in the field.

Best Publications

  • The Construct Validity of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale: Multisample and Longitudinal Evidence

    Piia Seppälä;Saija Mauno;Taru Feldt;Jari Hakanen

  • Types of work-family interface : well-being correlates of negative and positive spillover between work and family

    Ulla Kinnunen;Taru Feldt;Sabine Geurts;Lea Pulkkinen

  • Sense of coherence and health: evidence from two cross-lagged longitudinal samples.

    Mika Kivimäki;Taru Feldt;Jussi Vahtera;Jari-Erik Nurmi

  • Job demands–resources model in the context of recovery: Testing recovery experiences as mediators

    Ulla Kinnunen;Taru Feldt;Marjo Siltaloppi;Sabine Sonnentag

  • Recovery experiences as moderators between psychosocial work characteristics and occupational well-being

    Marjo Siltaloppi;Ulla Kinnunen;Taru Feldt

  • Testing the effort-reward imbalance model among Finnish managers: the role of perceived organizational support.

    Ulla Kinnunen;Taru Feldt;Anne Mäkikangas

  • Structural validity and temporal stability of the 13-item sense of coherence scale: Prospective evidence from the population-based HeSSup study

    Taru Feldt;Hanna Lintula;Sakari Suominen;Markku Koskenvuo

  • Long-term stability in the Big Five personality traits in adulthood.

    Johanna Rantanen;Riitta-Leena Metsäpelto;Taru Feldt;Lea Pulkkinen

  • A mediational model of sense of coherence in the work context: a one‐year follow‐up study

    Taru Feldt;Ulla Kinnunen;Saija Mauno

  • The role of sense of coherence in well-being at work: Analysis of main and moderator effects

    Taru Feldt

  • Does the Ethical Culture of Organisations Promote Managers' Occupational Well-Being? Investigating Indirect Links via Ethical Strain.

    Mari Huhtala;Taru Feldt;Anna-Maija Lämsä;Saija Mauno

  • Self-esteem, dispositional optimism, and health: Evidence from cross-lagged data on employees

    Anne Mäkikangas;Ulla Kinnunen;Taru Feldt

  • Economic stress and marital adjustment among couples: analyses at the dyadic level

    Ulla Kinnunen;Taru Feldt

  • Bergen Burnout Inventory: reliability and validity among Finnish and Estonian managers.

    Katariina Salmela-Aro;Johanna Rantanen;Katriina Hyvönen;Kati Tilleman

  • The longitudinal development of employee well-being: a systematic review

    Anne Mäkikangas;Ulla Kinnunen;Taru Feldt;Wilmar Schaufeli

  • Does Personality Matter? A Review of Individual Differences in Occupational Well-Being

    Anne Mäkikangas;Taru Feldt;Ulla Kinnunen;Saija Mauno

  • Young managers' drive to thrive : A personal work goal approach to burnout and work engagement

    Katriina Hyvönen;Taru Feldt;Katariina Salmela-Aro;Ulla Kinnunen

  • The stability of sense of coherence: comparing two age groups in a 5-year follow-up study

    Taru Feldt;Esko Leskinen;Ulla Kinnunen;Isto Ruoppila

  • Work–family conflict and psychological well-being: Stability and cross-lagged relations within one- and six-year follow-ups

    Johanna Rantanen;Ulla Kinnunen;Taru Feldt;Lea Pulkkinen

  • The Associations between Ethical Organizational Culture, Burnout, and Engagement: A Multilevel Study

    Mari Huhtala;Mari Huhtala;Asko Tolvanen;Saija Mauno;Saija Mauno;Taru Feldt

  • Change and stability of sense of coherence in adulthood: Longitudinal evidence from the Healthy Child study.

    Jari J. Hakanen;Taru Feldt;Esko Leskinen

Frequent Co-Authors

Ulla Kinnunen
Ulla Kinnunen Tampere University
Saija Mauno
Saija Mauno Tampere University
Asko Tolvanen
Asko Tolvanen University of Jyväskylä
Anne Mäkikangas
Anne Mäkikangas Tampere University
Lea Pulkkinen
Lea Pulkkinen University of Jyväskylä
Katja Kokko
Katja Kokko University of Jyväskylä
Kalevi Korpela
Kalevi Korpela Tampere University
Mika Kivimäki
Mika Kivimäki University College London
Jessica de Bloom
Jessica de Bloom Tampere University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens the door to multiple related online degrees and rewarding career pathways. One of the most popular options is a career in social work. Social workers play a critical role in supporting communities, families, and individuals across the U.S., and the path to this career will vary by state.

Each state sets unique educational requirements for aspiring social workers. For example, New Mexico social work education requirements emphasize specialized coursework and fieldwork. Those interested in practicing in New York should review the requirements to be a social worker in New York, as the state maintains specific licensing standards.

If you’re considering working in different regions, you’ll want to compare the North Carolina social work education requirements and learn how to become a social worker in North Dakota. These links provide essential details on degree prerequisites, supervised experience, and exam requirements for each state. Exploring these resources can help you map out your education and career plans following a psychology degree.

Best Scientists Citing Taru Feldt

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles