World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
47
Citations
23410
World Ranking
6013
National Ranking
46

Jari J. Hakanen publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jari J. Hakanen sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 114 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Jari J. Hakanen D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jari J. Hakanen sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jari J. Hakanen is affiliated with the Finnish Institute of Occupational Health in Finland. Their research primarily focuses on health professions and psychology, with significant work in general health professions, social psychology, organizational behavior and human resource management, sociology and political science, and experimental and cognitive psychology.

Their scientific output includes studies and publications spanning several interconnected topics, including:

  • Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Healthcare professionals' stress and burnout
  • Workaholism, burnout, and well-being
  • Stress and Burnout Research
  • Employment and Welfare Studies
  • Mind wandering and attention

Jari J. Hakanen has published extensively in various academic journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • BRQ Business Research Quarterly
  • Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment & Health
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • Journal of Business and Psychology
  • Occupational Medicine

Some of the noteworthy recent papers associated with topics closely related to their work are:

  • "Harmonized definition of occupational burnout: A systematic review, semantic analysis, and Delphi consensus in 29 countries," 2020, Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment & Health
  • "The double-edged sword of job crafting: The effects of job crafting on changes in job demands and employee well-being," 2021, Human Resource Management
  • "Measurement Invariance of the Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT) Across Seven Cross-National Representative Samples," 2020, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • "Is Burnout a Depressive Condition? A 14-Sample Meta-Analytic and Bifactor Analytic Study," 2021, Clinical Psychological Science
  • "Fostering task and adaptive performance through employee well-being: The role of servant leadership," 2020, BRQ Business Research Quarterly

Collaborations have been a substantial part of their research, with frequent co-authors including:

  • Janne Kaltiainen
  • Lotta K. Harju
  • Wilmar B. Schaufeli
  • Akihito Shimazu
  • Piia Seppälä

Best Publications

  • Burnout and Work Engagement among Teachers.

    Jari J. Hakanen;Arnold B. Bakker;Wilmar B. Schaufeli

  • Job Resources Boost Work Engagement, Particularly When Job Demands Are High

    Arnold B. Bakker;Jari J. Hakanen;Evangelia Demerouti;Despoina Xanthopoulou

  • The Job Demands-Resources model: A three-year cross-lagged study of burnout, depression, commitment, and work engagement

    Jari J. Hakanen;Wilmar B. Schaufeli;Kirsi Ahola

  • Do burnout and work engagement predict depressive symptoms and life satisfaction? A three-wave seven-year prospective study.

    Jari J. Hakanen;Wilmar B. Schaufeli

  • Positive gain spirals at work: From job resources to work engagement, personal initiative and work-unit innovativeness

    Jari J. Hakanen;Riku Perhoniemi;Salla Toppinen-Tanner

  • The Construct Validity of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale: Multisample and Longitudinal Evidence

    Piia Seppälä;Saija Mauno;Taru Feldt;Jari Hakanen

  • How dentists cope with their job demands and stay engaged: the moderating role of job resources

    Jari J. Hakanen;Arnold B. Bakker;Evangelia Demerouti

  • An ultra-short measure for work engagement: The UWES-3 validation across five countries.

    Wilmar B. Schaufeli;Wilmar B. Schaufeli;Akihito Shimazu;Jari Hakanen;Jari Hakanen;Marisa Salanova

  • Job strain, burnout, and depressive symptoms: a prospective study among dentists.

    Kirsi Ahola;Jari Hakanen

  • Työuupumuksesta työn imuun : työhyvinvointitutkimuksen ytimessä ja reuna-alueilla

    Jari Hakanen

  • Relationship between burnout and depressive symptoms: A study using the person-centred approach

    Kirsi Ahola;Jari Hakanen;Riku Perhoniemi;Pertti Mutanen

  • Can job crafting reduce job boredom and increase work engagement? A three-year cross-lagged panel study

    Lotta K. Harju;Lotta K. Harju;Jari J. Hakanen;Jari J. Hakanen;Wilmar B. Schaufeli;Wilmar B. Schaufeli

  • Different types of employee well-being across time and their relationships with job crafting.

    Jari J. Hakanen;Maria C. W. Peeters;Wilmar B. Schaufeli

  • Are job and personal resources associated with work ability 10 years later? The mediating role of work engagement

    Auli Airila;Jari J. Hakanen;Wilmar B. Schaufeli;Ritva Luukkonen

  • Enrichment processes and gain spirals at work and at home: A 3‐year cross‐lagged panel study

    Jari J. Hakanen;Maria C. W. Peeters;Riku Perhoniemi

  • Psychological contract and its motivational and health‐enhancing properties

    Marjo‐Riitta Parzefall;Jari Hakanen

  • The consequences of job crafting: A three-wave study

    Katharina Vogt;Jari Juhani Hakanen;Rebecca Brauchli;Gregor J. Jenny

  • Harmonized definition of occupational burnout: A systematic review, semantic analysis, and Delphi consensus in 29 countries

    Irina Guseva Canu;Sandy Carla Marca;Francesca Dell'Oro;Francesca Dell'Oro;Ádám Balázs

  • Change and stability of sense of coherence in adulthood: Longitudinal evidence from the Healthy Child study.

    Jari J. Hakanen;Taru Feldt;Esko Leskinen

  • Is work engagement related to work ability beyond working conditions and lifestyle factors

    Auli Airila;Jari Hakanen;Anne Punakallio;Sirpa Lusa

Frequent Co-Authors

Arnold B. Bakker
Arnold B. Bakker Erasmus University Rotterdam
Kirsi Ahola
Kirsi Ahola Finnish Institute of Occupational Health
Hans De Witte
Hans De Witte KU Leuven
Maria C. W. Peeters
Maria C. W. Peeters Utrecht University
Marisa Salanova
Marisa Salanova Jaume I University
Hugo Westerlund
Hugo Westerlund Stockholm University
Asko Tolvanen
Asko Tolvanen University of Jyväskylä
Taru Feldt
Taru Feldt University of Jyväskylä
Evangelia Demerouti
Evangelia Demerouti Eindhoven University of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing an online degree in psychology opens various career pathways, especially in social work, counseling, and mental health services. These roles are crucial in supporting individuals and communities, and they require a blend of theoretical knowledge and practical skills.

Requirements for entering the social work profession can vary by state. For instance, becoming a social worker in New Hampshire typically involves completing a CSWE-accredited program and obtaining relevant licenses. Similarly, New Jersey social work education requirements focus on accredited degrees and supervised experience.

Other states, like New Mexico social work education requirements, emphasize both academic credentials and state-specific licensing exams. For those interested in building a practice in a metropolitan area, becoming a social worker in New York requires understanding additional local guidelines.

Exploring these online degree pathways can help you meet diverse state requirements, preparing you for a rewarding career that makes a positive impact on society.

Best Scientists Citing Jari J. Hakanen

Trending Scientists