World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Marisa Salanova

Marisa Salanova

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
73
Citations
58706
World Ranking
1911
National Ranking
16

Marisa Salanova publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marisa Salanova sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 188 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Marisa Salanova D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marisa Salanova sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 73 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marisa Salanova is affiliated with Jaume I University in Spain and has produced extensive research primarily in the field of Psychology. Their work spans various subfields, including Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, General Health Professions, and Applied Psychology.

The main topics explored in their research involve Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior, Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction, Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports, Workplace Health and Well-being, Stress and Burnout Research, Resilience and Mental Health, and COVID-19 and Mental Health.

Recent publications include:

  • "Coaching-Based Leadership Intervention Program: A Controlled Trial Study," 2020, Frontiers in Psychology
  • "How to survive COVID-19? Notes from organisational resilience (¿Cómo sobrevivir al COVID-19? Apuntes desde la resiliencia organizacional)," 2020, International Journal of Social Psychology Revista de Psicología Social
  • "Learning goal orientation and psychological capital among students: A pathway to academic satisfaction and performance," 2021, Psychology in the Schools
  • "Positive Psychology Micro-Coaching Intervention: Effects on Psychological Capital and Goal-Related Self-Efficacy," 2021, Frontiers in Psychology
  • "We Trust You! A Multilevel-Multireferent Model Based on Organizational Trust to Explain Performance," 2021, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Frequent co-authors in their publications include:

  • Susana Llorens
  • Josefina Peláez Zuberbühler
  • Isabel M. Martínez
  • Cristián Coo
  • Isabella Meneghel

The venues where Marisa Salanova most often publishes include:

  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • Current Psychology
  • Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology
  • The Spanish Journal of Psychology

In addition to articles, Marisa Salanova has contributed to book literature, with a publication titled Organizational Stress and Well-Being (2023) by Cambridge University Press.

Best Publications

  • The Measurement of Engagement and Burnout: A Two Sample Confirmatory Factor Analytic Approach

    Wilmar B. Schaufeli;Marisa Salanova;Vicente González-romá;Arnold B. Bakker

  • The Measurement of Work Engagement With a Short Questionnaire: A Cross-National Study.

    Wilmar B. Schaufeli;Arnold B. Bakker;Marisa Salanova

  • Burnout and Engagement in University Students A Cross-National Study

    Wilmar B. Schaufeli;Isabel M. Martínez;Alexandra Marques Pinto;Marisa Salanova

  • Linking Organizational Resources and Work Engagement to Employee Performance and Customer Loyalty: The Mediation of Service Climate.

    Marisa Salanova;Sonia Agut;José María Peiró

  • A cross-national study of work engagement as a mediator between job resources and proactive behaviour

    Marisa Salanova;Wilmar Schaufeli

  • Does a positive gain spiral of resources, efficacy beliefs and engagement exist?

    Susana Llorens;Wilmar B. Schaufeli;Arnold Bakker;Marisa Salanova

  • Desde el "burnout" al "engagement": ¿una nueva perspectiva?

    Marisa Salanova;Wilmar B. Schaufeli;Susana Llorens;Jose M. Peiro

  • Efficacy or inefficacy, that's the question: Burnout and work engagement, and their relationships with efficacy beliefs

    Wilmar B Schaufeli;Marisa Salanova

  • FLOW AT WORK: EVIDENCE FOR AN UPWARD SPIRAL OF PERSONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL RESOURCES*

    Marisa Salanova;Arnold B. Bakker;Susana Llorens

  • How obstacles and facilitators predict academic performance: the mediating role of study burnout and engagement.

    Marisa Salanova;Wilmar Schaufeli;Isabel Martinez;Edgar Breso

  • Testing the robustness of the job demands-resources model.

    Susana Llorens;Arnold B. Bakker;Wilmar Schaufeli;Marisa Salanova

  • Linking transformational leadership to nurses' extra-role performance: the mediating role of self-efficacy and work engagement

    Marisa Salanova;Laura Lorente;Maria José Chambel;Isabel M. Martínez

  • An ultra-short measure for work engagement: The UWES-3 validation across five countries.

    Wilmar B. Schaufeli;Wilmar B. Schaufeli;Akihito Shimazu;Jari Hakanen;Jari Hakanen;Marisa Salanova

  • Perceived collective efficacy, subjective well-being and task performance among electronic work groups an experimental study

    Marisa Salanova;Susana Llorens;Eva Cifre;Isabel M. Martínez

  • El engagement en el trabajo: cuando el trabajo se convierte en pasión

    M Salanova;Wilmar Schaufeli

  • “Yes, I can, I feel good, and I just do it!” On gain cycles and spirals of efficacy beliefs, affect, and engagement.

    Marisa Salanova;Susana Llorens;Wilmar B. Schaufeli

  • The dark side of technologies: technostress among users of information and communication technologies.

    Marisa Salanova;Susana Llorens;Eva Cifre

  • Can a self-efficacy-based intervention decrease burnout, increase engagement, and enhance performance? A quasi-experimental study

    Edgar Bresó;Wilmar B. Schaufeli;Marisa Salanova

  • Self-efficacy specificity and burnout among information technology workers: An extension of the job demand-control model

    Marisa Salanova;José M. Peiró;Wilmar B. Schaufeli

  • The gain spiral of resources and work engagement: Sustaining a positive worklife

    Marisa Salanova;Wilmar B. Schaufeli;Despoina Xanthopoulou;Arnold B. Bakker

Frequent Co-Authors

Arnold B. Bakker
Arnold B. Bakker Erasmus University Rotterdam
José M. Peiró
José M. Peiró University of Valencia
Jari J. Hakanen
Jari J. Hakanen Finnish Institute of Occupational Health
Hans De Witte
Hans De Witte KU Leuven
Akihito Shimazu
Akihito Shimazu Keio University
Ruut Veenhoven
Ruut Veenhoven Erasmus University Rotterdam
Maria José Chambel
Maria José Chambel University of Lisbon
Toon W. Taris
Toon W. Taris Utrecht University
Despoina Xanthopoulou
Despoina Xanthopoulou Aristotle University of Thessaloniki

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree online is an increasingly popular choice for students seeking flexibility and a broad array of career opportunities. In the USA, there is a wide range of online psychology programs that cater to different learning needs and career interests.

Prospective students can explore the easiest online psychology degrees in San Antonio, which highlight convenient pathways for students living in or near Texas. Additionally, those considering programs across state lines might look into the easiest online psychology degrees in the South and see how different universities in the region compare.

For Texas residents specifically, the Texas easiest psychology degrees online provide a targeted list of programs with user-friendly online learning formats. Meanwhile, those based in the Midwest can benefit from the easiest online psychology degrees in Wisconsin.

Whether you are seeking a bachelor’s or master’s program, online psychology degrees open doors to diverse career paths including clinical work, counseling, research, and education. Exploring these related degree options can help you find the right fit for your goals and location.

Best Scientists Citing Marisa Salanova

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles