World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Daniel Stockemer

Daniel Stockemer

D-Index & Metrics

Political Science

D-Index
39
Citations
4979
World Ranking
551
National Ranking
24

Daniel Stockemer publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel Stockemer sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36 publications 333+

This scientist: 240 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

Daniel Stockemer D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel Stockemer sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

Overview

Daniel Stockemer is affiliated with the University of Ottawa in Canada. Their research spans the social sciences, with a focus on sociology, political science, and international relations. Their work also covers gender studies, communication, and emerging areas linked to artificial intelligence. The main thematic concentrations of their research include gender politics and representation, electoral systems and political participation, populism and right-wing movements, misinformation and its impacts, social policy and reform studies, migration, refugees and integration, as well as media influence and politics.

Stockemer has published extensively in academic journals and has contributed to the field through multiple recent papers. Notable publications include: "Age Inequalities in Political Representation: A Review Article" (2023) in Government and Opposition; "'Birds of a feather'? Assessing the prevalence of anti-immigration attitudes among the far right electorate" (2020) in the Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies; and "Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Explaining Youths' Relative Absence in Legislatures" (2020) published in PS Political Science & Politics. These papers have garnered citations reflecting scholarly engagement with their research.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Stockemer include:

  • Jean-Nicolas Bordeleau
  • Aksel Sundström
  • Kofi Arhin
  • Theresa Reidy
  • Michael J. Wigginton

Stockemer's research has appeared prominently in several key publication venues, including:

  • Social Science Quarterly
  • European Political Science
  • PS Political Science & Politics
  • Electoral Studies
  • Representation

In addition to journal articles, Stockemer has authored and contributed to books published by different houses. These include titles published by Springer International Publishing, such as "Anti-Immigrant Attitudes" (2023) and "Quantitative Methods for the Social Sciences" (2023). A book published by the University of Michigan Press titled "Youth without Representation" (2022) is also part of their scholarship. Future works include "Conspiracy Theories and their Believers", set to be published by Cambridge University Press in 2025.

Best Publications

  • Quantitative Methods for the Social Sciences

    Daniel Stockemer

  • Age and political participation in Germany, France and the UK: A comparative analysis

    Daniela F Melo;Daniel Stockemer

  • What Affects Voter Turnout? A Review Article/Meta-Analysis of Aggregate Research

    Daniel Stockemer

  • The ‘new’ discourse of the Front National under Marine Le Pen: A slight change with a big impact

    Daniel Stockemer;Mauro Barisione

  • Women's Parliamentary Representation in Africa: The Impact of Democracy and Corruption on the Number of Female Deputies in National Parliaments

    Daniel Stockemer

  • The Lingering Effect of Scandals in Congressional Elections: Incumbents, Challengers, and Voters

    Rodrigo Praino;Daniel Stockemer;Vincent G. Moscardelli

  • Structural Data on Immigration or Immigration Perceptions? What Accounts for the Electoral Success of the Radical Right in Europe?

    Daniel Stockemer

  • Regime legitimation, elite cohesion and the durability of autocratic regime types:

    Steffen Kailitz;Daniel Stockemer

  • Income inequality, development and electoral turnout – New evidence on a burgeoning debate

    Daniel Stockemer;Lyle Scruggs

  • Citizens' support for the European Union and participation in European Parliament elections

    Daniel Stockemer

  • What drives unconventional political participation? A two level study

    Daniel Stockemer

  • Individual Predictors of the Radical Right-Wing Vote in Europe: A Meta-Analysis of Articles in Peer-Reviewed Journals (1995–2016)

    Daniel Stockemer;Tobias Lentz;Danielle Mayer

  • Regional variation in voter turnout in Europe: The impact of corruption perceptions

    Aksel Sundström;Daniel Stockemer

  • The “Refugee Crisis,” Immigration Attitudes, and Euroscepticism:

    Daniel Stockemer;Arne Niemann;Doris Unger;Johanna Speyer

  • Age representation in parliaments: Can institutions pave the way for the young?

    Daniel Stockemer;Aksel Sundström

  • Age Inequalities in Political Representation: A Review Article

    Unknown

  • The Radical Right in Western Europe: A Meta-Analysis of Structural Factors:

    Abdelkarim Amengay;Daniel Stockemer

  • Quantitative Methods for the Social Sciences: A Practical Introduction with Examples in SPSS and Stata

    Daniel Stockemer

  • Women's Representation around the World: The Importance of Women's Participation in the Workforce

    Daniel Stockemer;Maeve Byrne

  • The voters of the FN under Jean-Marie Le Pen and Marine Le Pen: Continuity or change?

    Daniel Stockemer;Abdelkarim Amengay

  • The success of radical right-wing parties in Western European regions – new challenging findings

    Daniel Stockemer

  • What determines women’s political representation at the local level? A fine-grained analysis of the European regions

    Aksel Sundström;Daniel Stockemer

  • Publishing in English or another language: An inclusive study of scholar’s language publication preferences in the natural, social and interdisciplinary sciences

    Daniel Stockemer;Michael J. Wigginton

  • Bribes and Ballots: The Impact of Corruption on Voter Turnout in 75 Democracies

    Daniel Stockemer

  • The Front National in France

    Stockemer;Daniel Stockemer

Frequent Co-Authors

Aksel Sundström
Aksel Sundström University of Gothenburg
Arne Niemann
Arne Niemann Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
Lyle Scruggs
Lyle Scruggs University of Connecticut
André Blais
André Blais University of Montreal
Daphne Halikiopoulou
Daphne Halikiopoulou University of York

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Political Science in the USA opens up numerous academic and career possibilities. Many students interested in politics, history, or public policy also explore degree programs in related disciplines. For example, online MA history courses offer a rich foundation for careers in research, education, or government, providing strong analytical and critical thinking skills.

Those aiming for quick career advancement may consider the fastest online master's degree programs, allowing you to gain advanced qualifications in less time. For individuals seeking practical skills or looking to switch careers rapidly, there are also fastest certifications to get that lead to well-paying roles in areas like project management, data analysis, or public administration.

Affordability is another key consideration for students. Numerous cheapest regionally accredited online colleges offer flexible pathways to earn your degree and minimize student debt, making it easier to pursue your academic and career goals in Political Science or related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel Stockemer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles