World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Aksel Sundström

Aksel Sundström

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Political Science 30 1189 1076 18 18 91 3748

Aksel Sundström publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Aksel Sundström between 2008 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Aksel Sundström published across 18 years, from 2008 to 2025, averaging 5.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2013. 8 of the 103 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2008 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2013. 2008: 1 publication 2009: 0 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 13 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 3 publications
2008 2025

103 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Aksel Sundström: publications per year, 2008 to 2025
Year Publications
2008 1
2009 0
2010 0
2011 4
2012 1
2013 13
2014 3
2015 11
2016 13
2017 7
2018 7
2019 10
2020 4
2021 12
2022 5
2023 4
2024 5
2025 3
Total 103
Download as CSV

Aksel Sundström publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Aksel Sundström sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
20 40 60 80
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 333+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 97. Most scientists, 97, have 333+ publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 91–95 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36–40 publications 333+

This scientist: 91 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 10
41–45 11
46–50 25
51–55 27
56–60 44
61–65 52
66–70 62
71–75 62
76–80 79
81–85 71
86–90 82
91–95 65 91
96–100 85
101–105 76
106–110 66
111–115 78
116–120 67
121–125 73
126–130 73
131–135 64
136–140 45
141–145 53
146–150 44
151–155 45
156–160 33
161–165 32
166–170 28
171–175 31
176–180 29
181–185 27
186–190 36
191–195 27
196–200 24
201–205 16
206–210 16
211–215 19
216–220 16
221–225 17
226–230 18
231–235 23
236–240 17
241–245 13
246–250 17
251–255 9
256–260 13
261–265 8
266–270 12
271–275 8
276–280 10
281–285 13
286–290 13
291–295 5
296–300 6
301–305 11
306–310 9
311–315 6
316–320 4
321–325 4
326–330 2
331–332 5
333+ 97
Download as CSV

Aksel Sundström D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Aksel Sundström sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 43 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 20 to 62+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 100. Most scientists, 100, have 62+ D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 30 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
20 76
21 79
22 84
23 68
24 88
25 82
26 76
27 75
28 99
29 96
30 96 30
31 81
32 86
33 81
34 84
35 72
36 58
37 53
38 48
39 40
40 40
41 32
42 26
43 25
44 33
45 33
46 17
47 21
48 22
49 18
50 19
51 19
52 15
53 14
54 10
55 13
56 9
57 11
58 12
59 10
60 5
61 7
62+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Aksel Sundström is affiliated with the University of Gothenburg in Sweden and specializes in social sciences, with a research focus spanning various subfields including gender studies, political science and international relations, sociology and political science, global and planetary change, and economics and econometrics.

Their research covers numerous topics, chiefly gender politics and representation, electoral systems and political participation, social policy and reform studies, political conflict and governance, fiscal policies and political economy, wildlife conservation and criminology analyses, and international development and aid.

Sundström has contributed to a range of recent publications, including:

  • V-Dem Codebook v11 (2021) in SSRN Electronic Journal
  • V-Dem Dataset v11.1 (2021) in SSRN Electronic Journal
  • V-Dem Codebook V10 (2020) in SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Explaining Youths' Relative Absence in Legislatures (2020) in PS Political Science & Politics
  • Age Inequalities in Political Representation: A Review Article (2023) in Government and Opposition

Sundström's publication record includes a book titled Youth without Representation (2022), published by the University of Michigan Press.

Frequent coauthors in Sundström's research include:

  • Daniel Stockemer
  • Michael Coppedge
  • John Gerring
  • Carl Henrik Knutsen
  • Staffan I. Lindberg

The main publication venues where Sundström's work frequently appears are:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Social Science Quarterly
  • World Development
  • PS Political Science & Politics
  • Government and Opposition

Best Publications

  • V-Dem Codebook V8

    Michael Coppedge;John Gerring;Carl Henrik Knutsen;Staffan I. Lindberg

  • Women’s Political Empowerment: A New Global Index, 1900-2012

    Aksel Sundström;Pamela Paxton;Yi Ting Wang;Yi Ting Wang;Staffan I. Lindberg

  • V-Dem Codebook v11

    Unknown

  • Energy saving in Swedish households. The (relative) importance of environmental attitudes

    Johan Martinsson;Lennart J. Lundqvist;Aksel Sundström

  • V-Dem Codebook V10

    Unknown

  • V-Dem Dataset v11.1

    Michael Coppedge;John Gerring;Carl Henrik Knutsen;Staffan I. Lindberg

  • Organizing the Audit Society: Does Good Auditing Generate Less Public Sector Corruption?:

    Maria Gustavson;Aksel Sundström

  • Corruption as an obstacle to women’s political representation: Evidence from local councils in 18 European countries

    Aksel Sundström;Lena Wängnerud

  • Corruption and regulatory compliance: Experimental findings from South African small-scale fisheries

    Aksel Sundström

  • Covenants with broken swords: Corruption and law enforcement in governance of the commons

    Aksel Sundström

  • Corruption in the commons: why bribery hampers enforcement of environmental regulations in South African fisheries

    Aksel Sundström

  • Regional variation in voter turnout in Europe: The impact of corruption perceptions

    Aksel Sundström;Daniel Stockemer

  • Age representation in parliaments: Can institutions pave the way for the young?

    Daniel Stockemer;Aksel Sundström

  • Age Inequalities in Political Representation: A Review Article

    Unknown

  • Youth without Representation

    Unknown

  • Regional environmental performance and governance quality: a nonparametric analysis

    George E. Halkos;Aksel Sundström;Nickolaos G. Tzeremes

  • Gender differences in environmental concern among Swedish citizens and politicians

    Aksel Sundström;Aaron M. McCright

  • Women's rights in democratic transitions: A global sequence analysis, 1900–2012

    Yi Ting Wang;Patrik Lindenfors;Aksel SundstrÖm;Fredrik Jansson

  • What determines women’s political representation at the local level? A fine-grained analysis of the European regions

    Aksel Sundström;Daniel Stockemer

  • Understanding illegality and corruption in forest governance.

    Aksel Sundström

  • Women and nuclear energy: Examining the gender divide in opposition to nuclear power among swedish citizens and politicians

    Aksel Sundström;Aaron M. McCright

  • Corruption and Violations of Conservation Rules: A Survey Experiment with Resource Users

    Aksel Sundström

  • Violence and the Costs of Honesty: Rethinking bureaucrats’ choice to take bribes

    Aksel Sundström

  • Coping with illegal fishing: An institutional account of success and failure in Namibia and South Africa

    Martin Sjöstedt;Aksel Sundström

  • Corruption and citizens’ satisfaction with democracy in Europe: what is the empirical linkage?

    Daniel Stockemer;Aksel Sundström

  • RESEARCH NOTE Gender differences in environmental concern among Swedish citizens and politicians

    Aksel Sundström;Aaron M. McCright

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniel Stockemer
Daniel Stockemer University of Ottawa
Staffan I. Lindberg
Staffan I. Lindberg University of Gothenburg
Jeffrey K. Staton
Jeffrey K. Staton Emory University
Pamela Paxton
Pamela Paxton The University of Texas at Austin
Jan Teorell
Jan Teorell Stockholm University
Aaron M. McCright
Aaron M. McCright Michigan State University
Bo Rothstein
Bo Rothstein University of Gothenburg
Sören Holmberg
Sören Holmberg University of Gothenburg
George Halkos
George Halkos University Of Thessaly
John Gerring
John Gerring The University of Texas at Austin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Political Science opens doors to a range of connected academic and professional paths. Many students combine their studies with related disciplines like History. For those seeking affordable further education, exploring the cheapest online masters in history can be a smart way to build complementary expertise without breaking the bank.

If you’re interested in entering the workforce quickly, consider the fastest masters degree options available online. These programs allow you to upskill or specialize in record time, giving you a competitive edge.

Not everyone needs a traditional degree for career advancement. Some choose easy certifications to get that pay well, which can lead to well-paying roles in government, non-profits, or private industry. Certifications can be a practical choice for those seeking immediate job opportunities or career transitions.

Budget-conscious learners should also explore the cheapest online school options. Cost-effective online programs allow you to earn your degree or certification at a fraction of the usual price, making your education more accessible and financially sustainable.

Best Scientists Citing Aksel Sundström

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles