World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Michael E. R. Nicholls

Michael E. R. Nicholls

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 43 7287 6796 431 420 176 7226
Neuroscience 43 7400 6824 218 206 175 7205

Michael E. R. Nicholls publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Michael E. R. Nicholls between 1991 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Michael E. R. Nicholls published across 35 years, from 1991 to 2025, averaging 5.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2014. 5 of the 197 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2014. 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 2 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 17 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 4 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 16 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 4 publications
1991 2025

197 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Michael E. R. Nicholls: publications per year, 1991 to 2025
Year Publications
1991 1
1992 0
1993 1
1994 2
1995 0
1996 3
1997 3
1998 6
1999 6
2000 4
2001 3
2002 5
2003 6
2004 6
2005 7
2006 4
2007 2
2008 8
2009 6
2010 12
2011 12
2012 10
2013 7
2014 17
2015 6
2016 10
2017 9
2018 7
2019 1
2020 4
2021 7
2022 1
2023 16
2024 1
2025 4
Total 197
Download as CSV

Michael E. R. Nicholls publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael E. R. Nicholls sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 171–180 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 176 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450 176
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Michael E. R. Nicholls D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael E. R. Nicholls sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617 43
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Michael E. R. Nicholls is affiliated with Flinders University in Australia. Their research spans the fields of Neuroscience and Psychology, with a particular focus on Cognitive Neuroscience and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Additional subfields include Social Psychology, Automotive Engineering, and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics.

The main topics of Nicholls' work include:

  • Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience
  • Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction
  • Face Recognition and Perception
  • Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
  • Spatial Cognition and Navigation
  • Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders

The researcher has published multiple papers across various journals. Recent papers include:

  • "The dissociable influence of social context on judgements of facial attractiveness and trustworthiness," 2021, British Journal of Psychology
  • "The effect of cognitive load on horizontal and vertical spatial asymmetries," 2021, Laterality Asymmetries of Body Brain and Cognition
  • "The cheerleader effect is robust to experimental manipulations of presentation time," 2020, Journal of Cognitive Psychology
  • "The "cheerleader effect" in facial and bodily attractiveness: A result of memory bias and not perceptual encoding," 2020, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
  • "One-handed motor activity does not interfere with naming lateralized pictures of tools," 2020, Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance

Nicholls frequently collaborates with several co-authors, including:

  • O. Scott Gwinn
  • Nicole A. Thomas
  • Megan L. Bartlett
  • Daniel J. Carragher
  • Oren Griffiths

The main publication venues for Nicholls' work are:

  • Laterality Asymmetries of Body Brain and Cognition
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance
  • British Journal of Psychology
  • Journal of Cognitive Psychology
  • Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Best Publications

  • The cost of expecting events in the wrong sensory modality.

    Charles Spence;Michael E. R. Nicholls;J. O. N. Driver

  • Cross-modal links in exogenous covert spatial orienting between touch, audition, and vision.

    Charles Spence;Michael E. R. Nicholls;Nicole Gillespie;Jon Driver

  • The Flinders Handedness survey (FLANDERS): A brief measure of skilled hand preference

    Michael E.R. Nicholls;Nicole A. Thomas;Tobias Loetscher;Gina M. Grimshaw

  • Free-viewing perceptual asymmetries for the judgement of brightness, numerosity and size.

    Michael E.R Nicholls;John L Bradshaw;Jason B Mattingley

  • Can free-viewing perceptual asymmetries be explained by scanning, pre-motor or attentional biases?

    Michael E. R. Nicholls;Georgina R. Roberts

  • Eye position predicts what number you have in mind

    Tobias Loetscher;Tobias Loetscher;Christopher J. Bockisch;Michael E.R. Nicholls;Peter Brugger

  • Inhibition of return is supramodal: a demonstration between all possible pairings of vision, touch, and audition.

    Charles Spence;Donna Lloyd;Francis McGlone;Mike E.R. Nicholls

  • Emoticons in mind: an event-related potential study.

    Owen Churches;Mike Nicholls;Myra Thiessen;Mark Kohler

  • Nature's Experiment?: Handedness and Early Childhood Development

    David W. Johnston;Michael E. R. Nicholls;Manisha Shah;Michael A. Shields

  • The greyscales task: a perceptual measure of attentional bias following unilateral hemispheric damage

    Jason B Mattingley;Nadja Berberovic;Louise A Corben;Melissa J Slavin

  • Size Matters: Non-Numerical Magnitude Affects the Spatial Coding of Response

    Ping Ren;Michael E. R. Nicholls;Yuan-ye Ma;Yuan-ye Ma;Lin Chen

  • Temporal processing asymmetries between the cerebral hemispheres: evidence and implications.

    Michael E.R. Nicholls

  • Satisfaction Guaranteed: The Effect of Spatial Biases on Responses to Likert Scales

    Michael Elmo Richard Nicholls;Catherine Orr;Matia Okubo;Andrea Loftus

  • A Japanese version of the FLANDERS handedness questionnaire

    Matia Okubo;Hikaru Suzuki;Michael E. R. Nicholls

  • Detecting hemifacial asymmetries in emotional expression with three-dimensional computerized image analysis.

    Michael E. R. Nicholls;Brooke E. Ellis;John G. Clement;Mineo Yoshino

  • Left to right: representational biases for numbers and the effect of visuomotor adaptation.

    Andrea M Loftus;Michael E R Nicholls;Jason B Mattingley;John Lockyer Bradshaw

  • The effect of left and right poses on the expression of facial emotion.

    Michael E.R. Nicholls;Bradley J. Wolfgang;Danielle Clode;Annukka K. Lindell

  • The relationship between hand preference, hand performance, and general cognitive ability.

    Michael E.R. Nicholls;Heidi L. Chapman;Tobias Loetscher;Gina M. Grimshaw

  • Hemispheric asymmetries for the temporal resolution of brief auditory stimuli.

    Suzanne Brown;Michael E. R. Nicholls

  • Corporeal awareness and proprioceptive sense of the phantom.

    Melita J. Giummarra;Nellie. Georgiou-Karistianis;Michael E. R. Nicholls;Stephen J. Gibson

  • Cerebral lateralization and cognitive functioning in patients with congenital adrenal hyperplasia.

    Wendy M. Kelso;Michael E. R. Nicholls;Garry L. Warne;Margaret Zacharin

Frequent Co-Authors

John L. Bradshaw
John L. Bradshaw Monash University
Jason B. Mattingley
Jason B. Mattingley University of Queensland
Peter Brugger
Peter Brugger University of Zurich
Michael A. Shields
Michael A. Shields Monash University
Charles Spence
Charles Spence University of Oxford
Anne Castles
Anne Castles Macquarie University
Amanda G. Wood
Amanda G. Wood Deakin University
Con Stough
Con Stough Swinburne University of Technology
Giorgio Vallortigara
Giorgio Vallortigara University of Trento

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in neuroscience opens doors to various educational pathways, many of which can be pursued online. Students seeking a flexible approach may explore accelerated programs online, designed to enable faster degree completion. These programs are ideal for those who wish to enter the workforce or further studies efficiently.

Neuroscience majors often intersect with some of the top degrees in the world, especially in areas like biotechnology, medicine, and data science. Pursuing such pathways can lead to rewarding careers, both intellectually and financially.

It’s worth noting that neuroscience and related disciplines frequently appear among the most lucrative majors. Graduates can move into roles such as research scientists, clinical specialists, or work within the growing technology-healthcare intersection.

Those considering affordability and accessibility should explore online colleges that accept fafsa. This allows eligible students to receive federal financial aid while completing their degrees online, making education more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Michael E. R. Nicholls

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles