World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 80 1452 1296 67 64 382 23119

Con Stough publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Con Stough between 1988 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Con Stough published across 38 years, from 1988 to 2025, averaging 10.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 35 publications in 2013. 4 of the 400 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 35. Peak 35 publications in 2013. 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 7 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 1 publication 1999: 7 publications 2000: 21 publications 2001: 22 publications 2002: 12 publications 2003: 14 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 15 publications 2006: 12 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 31 publications 2012: 27 publications 2013: 35 publications 2014: 25 publications 2015: 23 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 21 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 1 publication
1988 2025

400 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Con Stough: publications per year, 1988 to 2025
Year Publications
1988 1
1989 0
1990 1
1991 1
1992 0
1993 2
1994 6
1995 7
1996 2
1997 1
1998 1
1999 7
2000 21
2001 22
2002 12
2003 14
2004 9
2005 15
2006 12
2007 5
2008 11
2009 11
2010 11
2011 31
2012 27
2013 35
2014 25
2015 23
2016 10
2017 14
2018 10
2019 21
2020 12
2021 6
2022 4
2023 6
2024 3
2025 1
Total 400
Download as CSV

Con Stough publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Con Stough sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 381–390 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 382 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58 382
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Con Stough D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Con Stough sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 80–81 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120 80
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Con Stough is affiliated with Swinburne University of Technology in Australia. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Neuroscience, with numerous publications contributing to these areas.

The scientist's main subfields of study include Neurology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Molecular Biology, Complementary and Alternative Medicine, and Physiology. Their research topics cover a range of issues, notably:

  • Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Medicinal Plants and Neuroprotection
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Tryptophan and Brain Disorders
  • Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research

Con Stough has published several papers, including:

  • Assessing the efficacy of nutraceutical interventions on cognitive functioning in the elderly, 2024, Swinburne Research Bank (Swinburne University of Technology)
  • Neurotrophins as a reliable biomarker for brain function, structure and cognition: A systematic review and meta-analysis, 2020, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
  • Peripheral inflammation marker relationships to cognition in healthy older adults - A systematic review, 2022, Psychoneuroendocrinology
  • Is poor self-rated sleep quality associated with elevated systemic inflammation in healthy older adults?, 2020, Mechanisms of Ageing and Development
  • Is there a relationship between low-grade systemic inflammation and cognition in healthy people aged 60-75 years?, 2020, Behavioural Brain Research

Frequent co-authors include Karen Savage, Luke A. Downey, Andrew Pipingas, Karen Nolidin, and Andrew P. Keegan.

Key venues where Con Stough's work has appeared include:

  • Nutrients
  • OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University)
  • Swinburne Research Bank (Swinburne University of Technology)
  • Behavioural Brain Research
  • Phytotherapy Research

Best Publications

  • Emotional intelligence and effective leadership

    Benjamin R. Palmer;Melissa Walls;Zena Burgess;Con Stough

  • Examining the relationship between leadership and emotional intelligence in senior level managers

    Lisa Gardner;Con Stough

  • Occupational stress in universities: Staff perceptions of the causes, consequences and moderators of stress

    Nichole Gillespie;M. Walsh;Anthony H. Winefield;Jagdish Dua

  • Emotional intelligence and life satisfaction

    Benjamin R. Palmer;Catherine Donaldson;Con Stough

  • Herbal medicine for depression, anxiety and insomnia: A review of psychopharmacology and clinical evidence

    Jerome Sarris;Jerome Sarris;Alexander Panossian;Isaac Schweitzer;Con Stough

  • A psychometric evaluation of the Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test Version 2.0

    Benjamin R. Palmer;Gilles E. Gignac;Ramesh Manocha;Con Stough

  • The chronic effects of an extract of Bacopa monniera (Brahmi) on cognitive function in healthy human subjects

    Con Stough;Jenny Lloyd;J. Clarke;L. Downey

  • Occupational stress in Australian university staff: results from a national survey

    Anthony H. Winefield;Nichole Gillespie;Con Stough;Jagdish Dua

  • Intelligence and inspection time: Achievements, prospects, and problems.

    Ian J. Deary;Con Stough

  • A longitudinal test of the job demands-resources model among Australian university academics

    Carolyn M. Boyd;Arnold B. Bakker;Silvia Pignata;Anthony H. Winefield

  • Evaluation of cognitive performance in the heat by functional brain imaging and psychometric testing.

    Chris Hocking;Richard B Silberstein;Wai Man Lau;Con Stough

  • The effects of cannabis and alcohol on simulated driving: Influences of dose and experience

    Luke A. Downey;Rebecca King;Katherine Papafotiou;Phillip Swann

  • Examining the relationship between leadership, emotional intelligence and intuition in senior female managers

    Luke A. Downey;Vicki Papageorgiou;Con Stough

  • Deficits in emotional intelligence underlying adolescent sex offending.

    Nicole Moriarty;Con Stough;Patrick Tidmarsh;Darren Eger

  • The effect of electromagnetic fields emitted by mobile phones on human sleep.

    Sarah Patricia Loughran;Andrew W Wood;Julie M Barton;Rodney J Croft

  • Investigating the mediating effects of emotional intelligence and coping on problem behaviours in adolescents

    Luke A. Downey;Patrick J. Johnston;Karen Hansen;Jill Birney

  • The role of personality in the job demands-resources model A study of Australian academic staff

    Arnold B. Bakker;Carolyn M. Boyd;Maureen Dollard;Nicole Gillespie

  • Cocoa polyphenols enhance positive mood states but not cognitive performance: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial:

    Matthew P Pase;Andrew B Scholey;Andrew Pipingas;Marni Kras

  • Chronic MDMA (ecstasy) use, cognition and mood

    Kylie McCardle;Stefan Luebbers;James D. Carter;Rodney J. Croft

  • Evidence of an early information processing speed deficit in unipolar major depression.

    George Tsourtos;J. C. Thompson;Con K. Stough

Frequent Co-Authors

Luke A. Downey
Luke A. Downey Swinburne University of Technology
Andrew Scholey
Andrew Scholey Monash University
Andrew Pipingas
Andrew Pipingas Swinburne University of Technology
Richard B. Silberstein
Richard B. Silberstein Swinburne University of Technology
Pradeep J. Nathan
Pradeep J. Nathan University of Cambridge
Rodney J. Croft
Rodney J. Croft University of Wollongong
Keith Wesnes
Keith Wesnes University of Exeter
Timothy C. Bates
Timothy C. Bates University of Edinburgh
Kevin D. Croft
Kevin D. Croft University of Western Australia
Gilles E. Gignac
Gilles E. Gignac University of Western Australia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology in the USA opens doors to a variety of online programs and specialized career paths in mental health, counseling, research, and therapy. Many students choose online degrees for flexibility while preparing for licensure and professional roles.

A popular pathway is becoming a Licensed Professional Counselor (LPC). Licensure requirements vary significantly by state, covering education, supervised experience, and examinations. For instance, you can review Maine licensed professional counselor requirements to understand the necessary academic and practical steps.

Similarly, each state, such as Maryland, has its specific process. Learn more about the Maryland licensed professional counselor requirements and how they compare to others.

If you are interested in practicing in Massachusetts, familiarize yourself with the Massachusetts licensed professional counselor requirements to ensure you meet all necessary credentials.

For those considering a career in Michigan, consult the Michigan lpc licensure requirements for detailed information on state-specific guidelines.

Exploring these pathways early gives you a competitive edge and better preparation for a rewarding psychology career.

Best Scientists Citing Con Stough

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles