World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
46
Citations
8386
World Ranking
6431
National Ranking
376

Ted Nettelbeck publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ted Nettelbeck sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 186 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Ted Nettelbeck D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ted Nettelbeck sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ted Nettelbeck is affiliated with the University of Adelaide in Australia. Their academic profile shows involvement in research and scholarship without publicly listed specific publications, collaboration networks, or detailed topical breakdowns. This affiliation places them within a university environment known for diverse academic disciplines.

There is no available information on recent papers authored by Ted Nettelbeck, nor records of frequent co-authors or publication venues tied to their work. Furthermore, details regarding book publications, the main fields and subfields of study, and principal research topics have not been provided.

No awards or recognitions have been documented in the available data, and there is no indication that the scientist is deceased.

Best Publications

  • Emotional intelligence predicts life skills, but not as well as personality and cognitive abilities

    Veneta A. Bastian;Nicholas R. Burns;Ted Nettelbeck

  • Perceptual Indices of Performance: The Measurement of ‘Inspection Time’ and ‘Noise’ in the Visual System

    D Vickers;T Nettelbeck;R J Willson

  • Inspection time and intelligence.

    T. Nettelbeck

  • A meta-analysis of the effects of chemotherapy on cognition in patients with cancer

    Kristy D. Hodgson;Amanda D. Hutchinson;Carlene J. Wilson;Ted Nettelbeck

  • Emotional intelligence is

    Janette Warwick;Ted Nettelbeck

  • Mental retardation: Definition, classification, and systems of support

    Ted Nettelbeck

  • Inspection time and measured intelligence.

    T. Nettelbeck;M. Lally

  • Effects of an Awareness Program on Attitudes of Students without an Intellectual Disability towards Persons with an Intellectual Disability.

    Fiona Rillotta;Ted Nettelbeck

  • First year student expectations: Results from a university-wide student survey

    Geoffrey Crisp;Edward Palmer;Deborah Turnbull;Ted Nettelbeck

  • Dose-related effects of alcohol on cognitive functioning

    Matthew J. Dry;Nicholas R. Burns;Ted Nettelbeck;Aaron L. Farquharson

  • Inspection time: an index for intelligence?

    Nettelbeck T

  • Processing speed, working memory and reasoning ability from childhood to old age

    Ted Nettelbeck;Nicholas R. Burns

  • The abilities of a musical savant and his family

    Robyn L. Young;T. Nettelbeck

  • Aging, cognitive performance, and mental speed

    Ted Nettelbeck;Patrick M.A. Rabbitt

  • Primary school teachers' judgements of reading achievement

    Caroline Bates;Ted Nettelbeck

  • The Relationship Between IQ, Homework, Aspirations and Academic Achievement for Chinese, Vietnamese and Anglo-Celtic Australian School Children

    Justine Dandy;Ted Nettelbeck

  • Intelligence, Reaction Time, and Inspection Time.

    M. Lally;T Nettelbeck

  • Research Note: A Cross-Cultural Study of Parents' Academic Standards and Educational Aspirations for Their Children.

    Justine Dandy;Ted Nettelbeck

  • Measures of timed performance and intelligence

    T. Nettelbeck;N.H. Kirby

  • Openness to experience, intelligence, and successful ageing

    Tess Gregory;Ted Nettelbeck;Carlene Wilson;Carlene Wilson

  • Ellis' Handbook of mental deficiency, psychological theory and research

    Ted Nettelbeck;Carlene Wilson

Frequent Co-Authors

Carlene Wilson
Carlene Wilson Flinders University
Gary A. Wittert
Gary A. Wittert University of Adelaide
Michael C. Ridding
Michael C. Ridding University of South Australia
Neil Brewer
Neil Brewer Flinders University
Con Stough
Con Stough Swinburne University of Technology
Jane L. Mathias
Jane L. Mathias University of Adelaide
Michael R. H. White
Michael R. H. White University of Manchester
Patrick Rabbitt
Patrick Rabbitt University of Oxford
Timothy C. Bates
Timothy C. Bates University of Edinburgh
Peter M. Clifton
Peter M. Clifton University of South Australia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology opens a variety of career paths, especially with the growth of online education. Many students opt for online degrees in counseling, clinical psychology, or mental health services as a stepping stone toward professional licensure.

Becoming a licensed therapist requires meeting specific educational and clinical experience standards, which can vary by location. For example, check the Bakersfield licensed therapist education requirements to understand how California's process works. If you're considering Maryland, review the Baltimore licensed therapist requirements for local guidelines.

Similarly, states like Idaho have their own criteria, detailed in the Boise licensed therapist education requirements. On the East Coast, the Boston licensed therapist requirements outline the steps to practice in Massachusetts.

By starting with a relevant online degree and understanding regional licensure paths, you can create a focused and rewarding career in psychology wherever you live.

Best Scientists Citing Ted Nettelbeck

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles