World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
61
Citations
13487
World Ranking
3393
National Ranking
364

Timothy C. Bates publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Timothy C. Bates sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 211 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Timothy C. Bates D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Timothy C. Bates sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Timothy C. Bates is affiliated with the University of Edinburgh in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on psychology, with a significant number of publications dedicated to social psychology, cognitive neuroscience, genetics, developmental and educational psychology, and general health professions.

The scientist's work covers several main topics, including:

  • Genetics and neurodevelopmental disorders
  • Reading and literacy development
  • Psychology of moral and emotional judgment
  • Social and intergroup psychology
  • Cultural differences and values
  • Behavioral health and interventions
  • Personality traits and psychology

Among their recent publications are the following papers:

  • "Big Five and HEXACO Personality Traits, Proenvironmental Attitudes, and Behaviors: A Meta-Analysis," 2020, Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • "Genome-wide analyses of individual differences in quantitatively assessed reading- and language-related skills in up to 34,000 people," 2022, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Testing the association of growth mindset and grades across a challenging transition: Is growth mindset associated with grades?" 2020, Intelligence
  • "Smart people know how the economy works: Cognitive ability, economic knowledge and financial literacy," 2022, Intelligence
  • "Remapping the foundations of morality: Well-fitting structural model of the Moral Foundations Questionnaire," 2021, PLoS ONE

Timothy C. Bates has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Michelle Luciano (15 joint works)
  • Nicholas G. Martin (11 joint works)
  • Simon E. Fisher (11 joint works)
  • Michael Zakharin (11 joint works)
  • Chien-An Lin (7 joint works)

The scientist's work has appeared predominantly in the following publication venues:

  • Personality and Individual Differences (10 publications)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (9 publications)
  • Intelligence (6 publications)
  • PLoS ONE (4 publications)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (4 publications)

Best Publications

  • OpenMx: An Open Source Extended Structural Equation Modeling Framework

    Steven Boker;Michael Neale;Hermine Maes;Michael Wilde

  • OpenMx 2.0: Extended Structural Equation and Statistical Modeling

    Michael C. Neale;Michael D. Hunter;Joshua N. Pritikin;Mahsa Zahery

  • Enduring Links From Childhood Mathematics and Reading Achievement to Adult Socioeconomic Status

    Stuart J. Ritchie;Timothy C. Bates

  • Happiness Is a Personal(ity) Thing The Genetics of Personality and Well-Being in a Representative Sample

    Alexander Weiss;Timothy C. Bates;Michelle Luciano

  • Genetics of Intelligence

    Ian J Deary;Frank M Spinath;Timothy C Bates

  • Oral creatine monohydrate supplementation improves brain performance: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial.

    Caroline Rae;Alison L. Digney;Sally R. McEwan;Timothy C. Bates

  • Large Cross-National Differences in Gene × Socioeconomic Status Interaction on Intelligence

    Elliot M. Tucker-Drob;Timothy C. Bates

  • Is Education Associated With Improvements in General Cognitive Ability, or in Specific Skills?

    Stuart J. Ritchie;Timothy C. Bates;Ian J. Deary

  • Big Five and HEXACO Personality Traits, Proenvironmental Attitudes, and Behaviors: A Meta-Analysis:

    Alistair Raymond Bryce Soutter;Timothy C. Bates;René Mõttus;René Mõttus

  • Confirmatory factor analysis of the three-factor structure of the schizotypal personality questionnaire and Chapman schizotypy scales.

    Viviana M. Wuthrich;Timothy C. Bates

  • The Nature of Nurture: Using a Virtual-Parent Design to Test Parenting Effects on Children's Educational Attainment in Genotyped Families.

    Timothy C. Bates;Brion S. Maher;Sarah E. Medland;Kerrie McAloney

  • Neural correlates of the ‘good life’: eudaimonic well-being is associated with insular cortex volume

    Gary J. Lewis;Ryota Kanai;Geraint Rees;Timothy C. Bates

  • From left to right: How the personality system allows basic traits to influence politics via characteristic moral adaptations

    Gary J. Lewis;Timothy C. Bates

  • Genome-wide analyses of individual differences in quantitatively assessed reading- and language-related skills in up to 34,000 people

    Unknown

  • Genetic Variance in a Component of the Language Acquisition Device: ROBO1 Polymorphisms Associated with Phonological Buffer Deficits

    Timothy C. Bates;Michelle Luciano;Sarah E. Medland;Grant W. Montgomery

  • Facial width-to-height ratio predicts achievement drive in US presidents

    G.J. Lewis;C.E. Lefevre;Timothy Bates

  • umx: Twin and Path-Based Structural Equation Modeling in R.

    Timothy C Bates;Hermine H Maes;Michael C Neale

  • You can't change your basic ability, but you work at things, and that's how we get hard things done: Testing the role of growth mindset on response to setbacks, educational attainment, and cognitive ability.

    Yue Li;Timothy C. Bates

  • Genome‐wide screening for DNA variants associated with reading and language traits

    Alessandro Gialluisi;Dianne F. Newbury;Erik G. Wilcutt;Richard K. Olson

  • No evidence for sexual dimorphism of facial width-to-height ratio in four large adult samples

    Carmen E. Lefevre;Gary J. Lewis;Timothy C. Bates;Milena Dzhelyova

  • The ongoing adaptive evolution of ASPM and Microcephalin is not explained by increased intelligence

    Nitzan Mekel-Bobrov;Danielle Posthuma;Sandra L. Gilbert;Penelope Lind

  • Music and spatial IQ

    Con Stough;Bridget Kerkin;Tim Bates;Gordon Mangan

  • Education is associated with higher later life IQ scores, but not with faster cognitive processing speed

    Stuart J Ritchie;Timothy C Bates;Geoff Der;John M Starr

Frequent Co-Authors

Nicholas G. Martin
Nicholas G. Martin QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute
Michelle Luciano
Michelle Luciano University of Edinburgh
Margaret J. Wright
Margaret J. Wright University of Queensland
Ian J. Deary
Ian J. Deary University of Edinburgh
John M. Starr
John M. Starr University of Edinburgh
Con Stough
Con Stough Swinburne University of Technology
Grant W. Montgomery
Grant W. Montgomery University of Queensland
Narelle K. Hansell
Narelle K. Hansell University of Queensland
Penelope A. Lind
Penelope A. Lind QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute
Alan J. Gow
Alan J. Gow Heriot-Watt University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology opens the door to numerous online education and career options, especially in areas like social work and mental health. Many universities now offer flexible online programs that prepare students for diverse professional roles, making it easier to balance studies with personal commitments.

The requirements to practice and become licensed as a social worker vary significantly by state. For instance, if you’re interested in working in the Midwest, understanding the Missouri social work education requirements is crucial. Similarly, those drawn to the Pacific Northwest can explore the steps for becoming a social worker in Montana.

Other states offer unique pathways and standards as well. To learn more about the process in the Great Plains, review the details on how to become a social worker in Nebraska. Meanwhile, for those considering a career in the West, discover the requirements to be a social worker in Nevada.

No matter your state, enrolling in an accredited online psychology or social work program is an excellent starting point for a rewarding, impactful career.

Best Scientists Citing Timothy C. Bates

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles