World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 79 1526 1365 177 163 288 21356

Fruhling Rijsdijk publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Fruhling Rijsdijk between 1999 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Fruhling Rijsdijk published across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025, averaging 11.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2009. 11 of the 312 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2009. 1999: 2 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 14 publications 2008: 19 publications 2009: 21 publications 2010: 15 publications 2011: 18 publications 2012: 17 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 16 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 6 publications
1999 2025

312 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Fruhling Rijsdijk: publications per year, 1999 to 2025
Year Publications
1999 2
2000 4
2001 6
2002 8
2003 9
2004 6
2005 7
2006 10
2007 14
2008 19
2009 21
2010 15
2011 18
2012 17
2013 12
2014 13
2015 16
2016 16
2017 15
2018 11
2019 12
2020 15
2021 13
2022 14
2023 8
2024 5
2025 6
Total 312
Download as CSV

Fruhling Rijsdijk publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fruhling Rijsdijk sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 281–290 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 288 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139 288
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Fruhling Rijsdijk D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fruhling Rijsdijk sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 78–79 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137 79
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Fruhling Rijsdijk is affiliated with King's College London in the United Kingdom and has a research focus that spans psychology and medicine. Their work frequently intersects with clinical psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, psychiatry and mental health, genetics, and public health.

Their research covers various topics, including:

  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Suicide and Self-Harm Studies

Rijsdijk has contributed to multiple papers published in reputable venues. Some notable recent publications include:

  • Genetic and environmental variation in educational attainment: an individual-based analysis of 28 twin cohorts, 2020, Scientific Reports
  • Twins and Causal Inference: Leveraging Nature's Experiment, 2020, Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine
  • Research Review: How to interpret associations between polygenic scores, environmental risks, and phenotypes, 2022, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
  • A genetically informed Registered Report on adverse childhood experiences and mental health, 2022, Nature Human Behaviour
  • Genetic sensitivity analysis: Adjusting for genetic confounding in epidemiological associations, 2021, PLoS Genetics

They have frequently published in several key academic journals, including:

  • Behavior Genetics
  • Psychological Medicine
  • Journal of Affective Disorders
  • Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
  • Archives of Sexual Behavior

Throughout their career, Rijsdijk has collaborated with various scholars. Their most frequent co-authors include:

  • Helena M. S. Zavos
  • Athula Sumathipala
  • Olakunle Oginni
  • Sisira Siribaddana
  • Jean-Baptiste Pingault

Rijsdijk's research reflects a multidisciplinary approach combining genetics, psychological theory, and epidemiological methods. Their contributions to twin studies, genetic confounding, and environmental influences on behavior have been published across diverse scientific domains.

Best Publications

  • The Heritability of Bipolar Affective Disorder and the Genetic Relationship to Unipolar Depression

    Peter McGuffin;Fruhling Rijsdijk;Martin Andrew;Pak Sham

  • Heritability of autism spectrum disorders: a meta‐analysis of twin studies

    Beata Tick;Patrick Bolton;Francesca Happé;Michael Rutter

  • Analytic approaches to twin data using structural equation models

    Frühling V. Rijsdijk;Pak C. Sham

  • Proteome-based plasma biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease

    A Hye;Steven Lynham;Madhav Thambisetty;M Causevic

  • A Twin Study of Genetic Relationships Between Psychotic Symptoms

    Alastair G Cardno;Frühling V Rijsdijk;Pak C Sham;Robin M Murray

  • Heritability of Autism Spectrum Disorder in a UK Population-Based Twin Sample

    Emma Colvert;Beata Tick;Fiona McEwen;Catherine Stewart;Catherine Stewart

  • Temporal and Reciprocal Relationship Between IADL/ADL Disability and Depressive Symptoms in Late Life

    J Ormel;Fruhling Rijsdijk;M Sullivan;E van Sonderen

  • Using genetic data to strengthen causal inference in observational research.

    Jean Baptiste Pingault;Jean Baptiste Pingault;Paul F. O’Reilly;Tabea Schoeler;George B. Ploubidis

  • An estimate of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis heritability using twin data

    A Al-Chalabi;F Fang;M F Hanby;P N Leigh

  • Strong genetic effects on cross-situational antisocial behaviour among 5-year-old children according to mothers, teachers, examiner-observers, and twins' self-reports

    Louise Arseneault;Terrie E. Moffitt;Terrie E. Moffitt;Avshalom Caspi;Avshalom Caspi;Alan Taylor

  • Relationships Between Parental Negativity and Childhood Antisocial Behavior over Time: A Bidirectional Effects Model in a Longitudinal Genetically Informative Design

    Henrik Larsson;Essi Viding;Fruhling V. Rijsdijk;Robert Plomin

  • Substantial genetic overlap between neurocognition and schizophrenia: genetic modeling in twin samples

    Timothea Toulopoulou;Timothea Toulopoulou;Marco Picchioni;Fruhling Rijsdijk;Mei Hua-Hall;Mei Hua-Hall

  • The Intergenerational Transmission of Anxiety: A Children-of-Twins Study.

    Thalia C. Eley;Tom A. McAdams;Fruhling V. Rijsdijk;Paul Lichtenstein

  • Etiology of Different Developmental Trajectories of Callous-Unemotional Traits.

    Nathalie M. G. Fontaine;Fruehling V. Rijsdijk;Eamon J. P. McCrory;Essi Viding;Essi Viding

  • The direction of longitudinal associations between sleep problems and depression symptoms: a study of twins aged 8 and 10 years.

    Alice M. Gregory;Früuhling V. Rijsdijk;Jennifer Y. F. Lau;Ronald E. Dahl

  • The Structure of Genetic and Environmental Risk Factors for Dimensional Representations of DSM-5 Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders

    Benedetta Monzani;Fruhling Rijsdijk;Juliette Harris;David Mataix-Cols;David Mataix-Cols

  • Heritability and Reliability of P300, P50 and Duration Mismatch Negativity

    Mei Hua Hall;Katja Schulze;Frühling Rijsdijk;Marco Picchioni

  • Separation of cognitive impairments in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder into 2 familial factors.

    Jonna Kuntsi;Alexis C. Wood;Alexis C. Wood;Fruehling Rijsdijk;Katherine A. Johnson;Katherine A. Johnson

  • Genetic etiology in cases of recovered and persistent stuttering in an unselected, longitudinal sample of young twins

    Katharina Dworzynski;Anna Remington;Frühling Rijsdijk;Peter Howell

  • A quantitative genetic analysis of schizotypal personality traits.

    Y. M. Linney;R. M. Murray;E. R. Peters;A. M. MacDONALD

Frequent Co-Authors

Thalia C. Eley
Thalia C. Eley King's College London
Robin M. Murray
Robin M. Murray King's College London
Pak C. Sham
Pak C. Sham University of Hong Kong
Philip Asherson
Philip Asherson King's College London
Jonna Kuntsi
Jonna Kuntsi King's College London
Marco Picchioni
Marco Picchioni King's College London
Alice M. Gregory
Alice M. Gregory Goldsmiths University of London
Matthew Hotopf
Matthew Hotopf King's College London
Jean-Baptiste Pingault
Jean-Baptiste Pingault University College London
Robert Plomin
Robert Plomin King's College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a psychology degree in the USA opens doors to various rewarding careers, especially in the rapidly growing field of substance abuse counseling. Students can pursue online degrees that focus on addiction studies, mental health counseling, or rehabilitation services. These programs often provide the foundational knowledge and practical skills needed to support individuals struggling with addiction.

Aspiring substance abuse counselors should be aware of state-specific certification requirements. For example, becoming a substance abuse counselor in San Diego involves specialized coursework and supervised clinical hours. Meanwhile, San Francisco substance abuse counselor certification requirements include passing relevant exams and adhering to continuing education standards.

Requirements can also vary in other cities. If you’re interested in substance abuse counselor requirements in San Jose or want to understand Santa Ana substance abuse counselor certification requirements, it’s essential to research local guidelines carefully. An online psychology degree can be a flexible first step toward fulfilling these credentials and launching a meaningful career in mental health.

Best Scientists Citing Fruhling Rijsdijk

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles