| Discipline name | D-Index | World Ranking | Current World Ranking | National Ranking | Current National Ranking | Publications | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 48 | 5972 | 5555 | 610 | 578 | 172 | 8273 |
The chart shows the history of publications by Jean-Baptiste Pingault between 2010 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jean-Baptiste Pingault published across 16 years, from 2010 to 2025, averaging 12.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 30 publications in 2021. 35 of the 207 publications appeared in the last two years.
207 publications in total across all disciplines
| Year | Publications |
|---|---|
| 2010 | 2 |
| 2011 | 2 |
| 2012 | 3 |
| 2013 | 6 |
| 2014 | 7 |
| 2015 | 9 |
| 2016 | 10 |
| 2017 | 9 |
| 2018 | 13 |
| 2019 | 14 |
| 2020 | 12 |
| 2021 | 30 |
| 2022 | 29 |
| 2023 | 26 |
| 2024 | 20 |
| 2025 | 15 |
| Total | 207 |
The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jean-Baptiste Pingault sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 172 publications — 59th percentile
59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.
| Publications | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 31–40 | 6 | |
| 41–50 | 52 | |
| 51–60 | 138 | |
| 61–70 | 299 | |
| 71–80 | 461 | |
| 81–90 | 605 | |
| 91–100 | 713 | |
| 101–110 | 736 | |
| 111–120 | 686 | |
| 121–130 | 670 | |
| 131–140 | 644 | |
| 141–150 | 597 | |
| 151–160 | 576 | |
| 161–170 | 477 | |
| 171–180 | 450 | 172 |
| 181–190 | 397 | |
| 191–200 | 343 | |
| 201–210 | 328 | |
| 211–220 | 313 | |
| 221–230 | 283 | |
| 231–240 | 226 | |
| 241–250 | 196 | |
| 251–260 | 201 | |
| 261–270 | 171 | |
| 271–280 | 151 | |
| 281–290 | 139 | |
| 291–300 | 113 | |
| 301–310 | 102 | |
| 311–320 | 100 | |
| 321–330 | 76 | |
| 331–340 | 92 | |
| 341–350 | 85 | |
| 351–360 | 69 | |
| 361–370 | 71 | |
| 371–380 | 63 | |
| 381–390 | 58 | |
| 391–400 | 57 | |
| 401–410 | 43 | |
| 411–420 | 33 | |
| 421–430 | 50 | |
| 431–440 | 41 | |
| 441–450 | 32 | |
| 451–460 | 27 | |
| 461–470 | 28 | |
| 471–480 | 25 | |
| 481–490 | 28 | |
| 491–500 | 20 | |
| 501–510 | 23 | |
| 511–520 | 26 | |
| 521–530 | 17 | |
| 531–540 | 21 | |
| 541–550 | 14 | |
| 551–560 | 16 | |
| 561–570 | 10 | |
| 571–580 | 22 | |
| 581–590 | 9 | |
| 591–600 | 14 | |
| 601–610 | 9 | |
| 611–620 | 11 | |
| 621–630 | 4 | |
| 631–640 | 7 | |
| 641–650 | 5 | |
| 651–660 | 10 | |
| 661–670 | 8 | |
| 671–680 | 8 | |
| 681–690 | 4 | |
| 691–700 | 3 | |
| 701–704 | 4 | |
| 705+ | 100 |
The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jean-Baptiste Pingault sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 48 D-Index — 49th percentile
49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.
| D-Index | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 30–31 | 398 | |
| 32–33 | 702 | |
| 34–35 | 671 | |
| 36–37 | 659 | |
| 38–39 | 641 | |
| 40–41 | 671 | |
| 42–43 | 617 | |
| 44–45 | 558 | |
| 46–47 | 495 | |
| 48–49 | 487 | 48 |
| 50–51 | 445 | |
| 52–53 | 390 | |
| 54–55 | 408 | |
| 56–57 | 345 | |
| 58–59 | 325 | |
| 60–61 | 321 | |
| 62–63 | 248 | |
| 64–65 | 290 | |
| 66–67 | 218 | |
| 68–69 | 219 | |
| 70–71 | 215 | |
| 72–73 | 183 | |
| 74–75 | 169 | |
| 76–77 | 132 | |
| 78–79 | 137 | |
| 80–81 | 120 | |
| 82–83 | 112 | |
| 84–85 | 86 | |
| 86–87 | 101 | |
| 88–89 | 83 | |
| 90–91 | 77 | |
| 92–93 | 70 | |
| 94–95 | 78 | |
| 96–97 | 58 | |
| 98–99 | 53 | |
| 100–101 | 57 | |
| 102–103 | 48 | |
| 104–105 | 53 | |
| 106–107 | 46 | |
| 108–109 | 24 | |
| 110–111 | 35 | |
| 112–113 | 27 | |
| 114–115 | 32 | |
| 116–117 | 31 | |
| 118–119 | 22 | |
| 120–121 | 16 | |
| 122–123 | 24 | |
| 124–125 | 18 | |
| 126–127 | 11 | |
| 128–129 | 19 | |
| 130–131 | 10 | |
| 132–133 | 16 | |
| 134–135 | 10 | |
| 136–137 | 12 | |
| 138–139 | 8 | |
| 140–141 | 5 | |
| 142–143 | 12 | |
| 144+ | 98 |
Jean-Baptiste Pingault is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Their research spans the fields of Psychology and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a focus on Genetics, Clinical Psychology, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, among other subfields.
Their work covers a variety of topics, including Genetic Associations and Epidemiology, Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development, Cognitive Abilities and Testing, Birth, Development, and Health, Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging, Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet, and Child Abuse and Trauma.
Recent papers authored or co-authored by Jean-Baptiste Pingault include the following:
Jean-Baptiste Pingault frequently collaborates with several researchers, including:
Their research has been published in multiple venues, with a notable number of publications in:
The range and volume of publications demonstrate a sustained engagement with subjects that intersect genetics, psychology, and developmental health. The scientist's work includes systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and empirical studies contributing to understanding genetic influences and psychosocial development across the lifespan.
Jean Baptiste Pingault;Jean Baptiste Pingault;Paul F. O’Reilly;Tabea Schoeler;George B. Ploubidis
Eva Krapohl;Kaili Rimfeld;Nicholas G. Shakeshaft;Maciej Trzaskowski
Saskia Selzam;Stuart J. Ritchie;Jean-Baptiste Pingault;Chandra A. Reynolds
Cédric Galéra;Sylvana M. Côté;Manuel P. Bouvard;Jean-Baptiste Pingault
Jean-Baptiste Pingault;Richard E. Tremblay;Frank Vitaro;René Carbonneau
Tabea Schoeler;Lauren Duncan;Charlotte M. Cecil;George B. Ploubidis
Unknown
Timothy Singham;Essi Viding;Tabea Schoeler;Louise Arseneault
Charlotte Am Cecil;Laura J. Lysenko;Sara R. Jaffee;Jean-Baptiste Pingault
Andrea G. Allegrini;Rosa Cheesman;Kaili Rimfeld;Saskia Selzam
Eva Krapohl;Jack Euesden;Delilah Zabaneh;J-b Pingault;J-b Pingault
Esther Walton;Jean-Baptiste Pingault;Charlotte Am Cecil;Tom R. Gaunt
Jean-Baptiste Pingault;Jean-Baptiste Pingault;Essi Viding;Essi Viding;Cédric Galéra;Corina U. Greven;Corina U. Greven
A G Allegrini;S Selzam;K Rimfeld;S von Stumm
Jean-Baptiste Pingault;Sylvana M. Côté;Sylvana M. Côté;Cédric Galéra;Christophe Genolini
Unknown
Natalie Castellanos-Ryan;Jean-Baptiste Pingault;Sophie Parent;Frank Vitaro
Tabea Schoeler;Natalia Petros;Marta Di Forti;Jean-Baptiste Pingault
C. Genolini;J. B. Pingault;T. Driss;S. CôTé
Tabea Schoeler;Shing Wan Choi;Frank Dudbridge;Jessie Baldwin
Jean-Baptiste Pingault;Sylvana M. Côté;Eric Lacourse;Cédric Galéra
Tabea Schoeler;Delphine Theobald;Jean-Baptiste Pingault;David P. Farrington
Charlotte Cecil;Esther Walton;Esther Walton;Rebecca Georgina Smith;Essi Viding
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.
Exploring online psychology degrees opens a diverse range of career pathways, from clinical roles to counseling and academic research. As the demand for mental health professionals continues to grow, many students look towards flexible online programs to start or advance their careers in the field.
A crucial consideration for aspiring psychologists and counselors is understanding the licensure requirements, which can vary by location. For example, those interested in practicing in Ohio should review the Columbus licensed therapist requirements. In Texas, requirements change between regions, so it’s important to refer to both the licensed therapist requirements in Corpus Christi and the steps for becoming a licensed therapist in Dallas.
Beyond Texas and Ohio, regulations also differ in Colorado. Prospective professionals should consult the Denver licensed therapist requirements to ensure they meet all educational and supervised clinical hour standards. Careful research will help you tailor your degree path to your career goals and desired state of practice.
Missouri University of Science and Technology
Joint Genome Institute
Agricultural Research Service
Université Libre de Bruxelles
University of Oklahoma
University of South Carolina
University of Melbourne
National Physical Laboratory
Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Max Planck Society
Pompeu Fabra University
Nankai University
Organisation For Economic Co-Operation and Development
King Juan Carlos University
Paul Sabatier University