World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jean-Baptiste Pingault

Jean-Baptiste Pingault

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 48 5972 5555 610 578 172 8273

Jean-Baptiste Pingault publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jean-Baptiste Pingault between 2010 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jean-Baptiste Pingault published across 16 years, from 2010 to 2025, averaging 12.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 30 publications in 2021. 35 of the 207 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2010 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 30. Peak 30 publications in 2021. 2010: 2 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 30 publications 2022: 29 publications 2023: 26 publications 2024: 20 publications 2025: 15 publications
2010 2025

207 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jean-Baptiste Pingault: publications per year, 2010 to 2025
Year Publications
2010 2
2011 2
2012 3
2013 6
2014 7
2015 9
2016 10
2017 9
2018 13
2019 14
2020 12
2021 30
2022 29
2023 26
2024 20
2025 15
Total 207
Download as CSV

Jean-Baptiste Pingault publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jean-Baptiste Pingault sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 171–180 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 172 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450 172
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Jean-Baptiste Pingault D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jean-Baptiste Pingault sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48–49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487 48
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jean-Baptiste Pingault is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Their research spans the fields of Psychology and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a focus on Genetics, Clinical Psychology, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, among other subfields.

Their work covers a variety of topics, including Genetic Associations and Epidemiology, Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development, Cognitive Abilities and Testing, Birth, Development, and Health, Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging, Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet, and Child Abuse and Trauma.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Jean-Baptiste Pingault include the following:

  • Participation bias in the UK Biobank distorts genetic associations and downstream analyses, 2023, Nature Human Behaviour
  • Childhood Maltreatment and Mental Health Problems: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Quasi-Experimental Studies, 2023, American Journal of Psychiatry
  • Protecting against researcher bias in secondary data analysis: challenges and potential solutions, 2022, European Journal of Epidemiology
  • Robust genetic nurture effects on education: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on 38,654 families across 8 cohorts, 2021, The American Journal of Human Genetics
  • Within-sibship GWAS improve estimates of direct genetic effects, 2021, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Jean-Baptiste Pingault frequently collaborates with several researchers, including:

  • Tabea Schoeler
  • Jessie R. Baldwin
  • Alexandra Havdahl
  • Andrea G. Allegrini
  • Kaili Rimfeld

Their research has been published in multiple venues, with a notable number of publications in:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • European Neuropsychopharmacology
  • Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
  • Molecular Psychiatry
  • Nature Human Behaviour

The range and volume of publications demonstrate a sustained engagement with subjects that intersect genetics, psychology, and developmental health. The scientist's work includes systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and empirical studies contributing to understanding genetic influences and psychosocial development across the lifespan.

Best Publications

  • Using genetic data to strengthen causal inference in observational research.

    Jean Baptiste Pingault;Jean Baptiste Pingault;Paul F. O’Reilly;Tabea Schoeler;George B. Ploubidis

  • The high heritability of educational achievement reflects many genetically influenced traits, not just intelligence.

    Eva Krapohl;Kaili Rimfeld;Nicholas G. Shakeshaft;Maciej Trzaskowski

  • Comparing within- and between-family polygenic score prediction

    Saskia Selzam;Stuart J. Ritchie;Jean-Baptiste Pingault;Chandra A. Reynolds

  • Early Risk Factors for Hyperactivity-Impulsivity and Inattention Trajectories From Age 17 Months to 8 Years

    Cédric Galéra;Sylvana M. Côté;Manuel P. Bouvard;Jean-Baptiste Pingault

  • Childhood Trajectories of Inattention and Hyperactivity and Prediction of Educational Attainment in Early Adulthood: A 16-Year Longitudinal Population-Based Study

    Jean-Baptiste Pingault;Richard E. Tremblay;Frank Vitaro;René Carbonneau

  • Quasi-experimental evidence on short- and long-term consequences of bullying victimization: A meta-analysis.

    Tabea Schoeler;Lauren Duncan;Charlotte M. Cecil;George B. Ploubidis

  • Childhood maltreatment and mental health problems: A systematic review and meta-analysis of quasi-experimental studies

    Unknown

  • Concurrent and Longitudinal Contribution of Exposure to Bullying in Childhood to Mental Health: The Role of Vulnerability and Resilience

    Timothy Singham;Essi Viding;Tabea Schoeler;Louise Arseneault

  • Environmental risk, Oxytocin Receptor Gene (OXTR) methylation and youth callous-unemotional traits a 13-year longitudinal study

    Charlotte Am Cecil;Laura J. Lysenko;Sara R. Jaffee;Jean-Baptiste Pingault

  • The p factor: genetic analyses support a general dimension of psychopathology in childhood and adolescence.

    Andrea G. Allegrini;Rosa Cheesman;Kaili Rimfeld;Saskia Selzam

  • Phenome-wide analysis of genome-wide polygenic scores

    Eva Krapohl;Jack Euesden;Delilah Zabaneh;J-b Pingault;J-b Pingault

  • Epigenetic profiling of ADHD symptoms trajectories: a prospective, methylome-wide study

    Esther Walton;Jean-Baptiste Pingault;Charlotte Am Cecil;Tom R. Gaunt

  • Genetic and Environmental Influences on the Developmental Course of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Symptoms From Childhood to Adolescence

    Jean-Baptiste Pingault;Jean-Baptiste Pingault;Essi Viding;Essi Viding;Cédric Galéra;Corina U. Greven;Corina U. Greven

  • Genomic prediction of cognitive traits in childhood and adolescence

    A G Allegrini;S Selzam;K Rimfeld;S von Stumm

  • Childhood trajectories of inattention, hyperactivity and oppositional behaviors and prediction of substance abuse/dependence: a 15-year longitudinal population-based study.

    Jean-Baptiste Pingault;Sylvana M. Côté;Sylvana M. Côté;Cédric Galéra;Christophe Genolini

  • Protecting against researcher bias in secondary data analysis: challenges and potential solutions

    Unknown

  • Adolescent cannabis use, change in neurocognitive function, and high-school graduation: A longitudinal study from early adolescence to young adulthood.

    Natalie Castellanos-Ryan;Jean-Baptiste Pingault;Sophie Parent;Frank Vitaro

  • Association Between Continued Cannabis Use and Risk of Relapse in First-Episode Psychosis: A Quasi-Experimental Investigation Within an Observational Study.

    Tabea Schoeler;Natalia Petros;Marta Di Forti;Jean-Baptiste Pingault

  • KmL3D: A non-parametric algorithm for clustering joint trajectories

    C. Genolini;J. B. Pingault;T. Driss;S. CôTé

  • Multi-Polygenic Score Approach to Identifying Individual Vulnerabilities Associated With the Risk of Exposure to Bullying.

    Tabea Schoeler;Shing Wan Choi;Frank Dudbridge;Jessie Baldwin

  • Childhood Hyperactivity, Physical Aggression and Criminality: A 19-Year Prospective Population-Based Study

    Jean-Baptiste Pingault;Sylvana M. Côté;Eric Lacourse;Cédric Galéra

  • Continuity of cannabis use and violent offending over the life course

    Tabea Schoeler;Delphine Theobald;Jean-Baptiste Pingault;David P. Farrington

  • DNA methylation and substance-use risk: a prospective, genome-wide study spanning gestation to adolescence.

    Charlotte Cecil;Esther Walton;Esther Walton;Rebecca Georgina Smith;Essi Viding

Frequent Co-Authors

Sylvana M. Côté
Sylvana M. Côté University of Montreal
Richard E. Tremblay
Richard E. Tremblay University of Montreal
Essi Viding
Essi Viding University College London
Robert Plomin
Robert Plomin King's College London
Fruhling Rijsdijk
Fruhling Rijsdijk King's College London
Michel Boivin
Michel Boivin Université Laval
Kaili Rimfeld
Kaili Rimfeld King's College London
Frank Vitaro
Frank Vitaro University of Montreal
Massimiliano Orri
Massimiliano Orri McGill University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees opens a diverse range of career pathways, from clinical roles to counseling and academic research. As the demand for mental health professionals continues to grow, many students look towards flexible online programs to start or advance their careers in the field.

A crucial consideration for aspiring psychologists and counselors is understanding the licensure requirements, which can vary by location. For example, those interested in practicing in Ohio should review the Columbus licensed therapist requirements. In Texas, requirements change between regions, so it’s important to refer to both the licensed therapist requirements in Corpus Christi and the steps for becoming a licensed therapist in Dallas.

Beyond Texas and Ohio, regulations also differ in Colorado. Prospective professionals should consult the Denver licensed therapist requirements to ensure they meet all educational and supervised clinical hour standards. Careful research will help you tailor your degree path to your career goals and desired state of practice.

Best Scientists Citing Jean-Baptiste Pingault

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles