World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
81
Citations
30859
World Ranking
16458
National Ranking
549

Donald J. Chisholm publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Donald J. Chisholm sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 228 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Donald J. Chisholm D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Donald J. Chisholm sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 81 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Donald J. Chisholm is affiliated with the Garvan Institute of Medical Research in Australia. Their research contributions span multiple areas within medicine, with a particular focus on drug transport and resistance mechanisms, liver disease diagnosis and treatment, and pancreatitis pathology and treatment.

The scientist has published in several subfields including oncology, epidemiology, and surgery, reflecting a diverse approach to medical research.

Their notable recent publication includes:

  • Plasma Bile Acids More Closely Align With Insulin Resistance, Visceral and Hepatic Adiposity Than Total Adiposity (2020) in The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Frequent co-authors associated with their research are:

  • Ramy H. Bishay
  • Katherine Tonks
  • Jacob George
  • Dorit Samocha-Bonet
  • Gideon Meyerowitz-Katz

The main publication venue for their work is The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism.

Best Publications

  • A syndrome of peripheral lipodystrophy, hyperlipidaemia and insulin resistance in patients receiving HIV protease inhibitors.

    Andrew Carr;Katherine Samaras;Samantha Burton;Matthew Law

  • Diagnosis, prediction, and natural course of HIV-1 protease-inhibitor-associated lipodystrophy, hyperlipidaemia, and diabetes mellitus: acohort study

    Andrew Carr;Katherine Samaras;Anna Thorisdottir;Gilbert R Kaufmann

  • Influence of dietary fat composition on development of insulin resistance in rats. Relationship to muscle triglyceride and omega-3 fatty acids in muscle phospholipid.

    Leonard H Storlien;Arthur B Jenkins;Donald J Chisholm;Wendy S Pascoe

  • Pathogenesis of HIV-1-protease inhibitor-associated peripheral lipodystrophy, hyperlipidaemia, and insulin resistance.

    Andrew Carr;Katherine Samaras;Donald J Chisholm;David A Cooper

  • The metabolically obese, normal-weight individual revisited.

    N Ruderman;D Chisholm;X Pi-Sunyer;S Schneider

  • The Relation between Insulin Sensitivity and the Fatty-Acid Composition of Skeletal-Muscle Phospholipids

    Mark Borkman;Leonard H. Storlien;David A. Pan;Arthur B. Jenkins

  • The effects of high-intensity intermittent exercise training on fat loss and fasting insulin levels of young women

    E G Trapp;D J Chisholm;J Freund;S H Boutcher

  • Abdominal Fat and Insulin Resistance in Normal and Overweight Women: Direct Measurements Reveal a Strong Relationship in Subjects at Both Low and High Risk of NIDDM

    David G Carey;Arthur B Jenkins;Lesley V Campbell;Judith Freund

  • Fish oil prevents insulin resistance induced by high-fat feeding in rats

    Leonard H. Storlien;Edward W. Kraegen;Donald J. Chisholm;Glenn L. Ford

  • Development of muscle insulin resistance after liver insulin resistance in high-fat-fed rats.

    Edward W Kraegen;Peter W Clark;Arthur B Jenkins;Eugene A Daley

  • Fat feeding causes widespread in vivo insulin resistance, decreased energy expenditure, and obesity in rats

    L. H. Storlien;D. E. James;K. M. Burleigh;D. J. Chisholm

  • Visceral fat: A key mediator of steatohepatitis in metabolic liver disease

    David van der Poorten;Kerry-Lee Milner;Jason Hui;Alexander Hodge

  • Dose-response curves for in vivo insulin sensitivity in individual tissues in rats.

    E. W. Kraegen;D. E. James;A. B. Jenkins;D. J. Chisholm

  • Mechanisms of Liver and Muscle Insulin Resistance Induced by Chronic High-Fat Feeding

    Nicholas D Oakes;Gregory J Cooney;Souad Camilleri;Donald J Chisholm

  • Alterations in the expression and cellular localization of protein kinase C isozymes epsilon and theta are associated with insulin resistance in skeletal muscle of the high-fat-fed rat.

    Carsten Schmitz-Peiffer;Carol L Browne;Nicholas D Oakes;Allan Watkinson

  • Physiological Importance of Deficiency in Early Prandial Insulin Secretion in Non-Insulin-Dependent Diabetes

    David G Bruce;Donald J Chisholm;Leonard H Storlien;Edward W Kraegen

  • Exercise increases adiponectin levels and insulin sensitivity in humans.

    Adamandia D. Kriketos;Seng Khee Gan;Ann M. Poynten;Stuart M. Furler

  • Long-chain acyl-CoA esters as indicators of lipid metabolism and insulin sensitivity in rat and human muscle

    Bronwyn A. Ellis;Ann Poynten;Andrew J. Lowy;Stuart M. Furler

  • A New Antidiabetic Agent, BRL 49653, Reduces Lipid Availability and Improves Insulin Action and Glucoregulation in the Rat

    N D Oakes;C J Kennedy;A B Jenkins;D R Laybutt

  • OPEN-LOOP CONTROLLED INFUSION OF DIABETICS

    Kraegen Edward William;Lazarus Leslie;Bell David John;Chisholm Donald

Frequent Co-Authors

Edward W. Kraegen
Edward W. Kraegen Garvan Institute of Medical Research
David E. James
David E. James University of Sydney
Ken K. Y. Ho
Ken K. Y. Ho University of Pittsburgh
Andrew Carr
Andrew Carr University of Oxford
David A. Cooper
David A. Cooper University of New South Wales
Jacob George
Jacob George University of Sydney
Aimin Xu
Aimin Xu University of Hong Kong
David M. Findlay
David M. Findlay University of Adelaide
Michael J. McKenna
Michael J. McKenna Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary
Gregory J. Cooney
Gregory J. Cooney University of Sydney

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in medicine but want alternative routes into healthcare, online degrees offer flexible and rewarding pathways. There’s a growing demand for skilled professionals in health administration, billing, nursing, and more. Choosing the right online program can fast-track your entry into these roles.

For those looking at behind-the-scenes work, medical billing and coding schools online with financial aid provide accessible options with financial support. These programs prepare you for essential healthcare support roles you can do remotely.

Nursing remains a popular pathway. If standardized tests are a concern, consider nursing schools that don't require teas test. These schools make entry easier so you can focus on learning and practical experience.

For those interested in leadership, earning a health administration degree online can lead to management roles across the healthcare sector.

Already a registered nurse? Advance your qualifications with adn to msn bridge programs so you can take on advanced clinical or leadership positions.

Best Scientists Citing Donald J. Chisholm

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles