World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Neil B. Ruderman

Neil B. Ruderman

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
115
Citations
47745
World Ranking
4557
National Ranking
2475

Neil B. Ruderman publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Neil B. Ruderman sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 298 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Neil B. Ruderman D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Neil B. Ruderman sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 115 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians

Overview

Neil B. Ruderman is affiliated with Boston University in the United States. Their recent research contributions include publications in the field of metabolism, specifically within the journal Metabolism.

Recent papers authored by Ruderman include:

  • Editorial Board, 2021, Metabolism
  • Editorial Board, 2021, Metabolism

Frequent co-authors of Ruderman include:

  • Christos S. Mantzoros
  • Luigi Gnudi
  • Per-Olof J. Hasselgren
  • Young-Bum Boston
  • Giuseppe Matarese

Their publications have appeared primarily in the journal:

  • Metabolism

Neil B. Ruderman has been recognized as a Member of the Association of American Physicians.

Best Publications

  • Lipid-Induced Insulin Resistance in Human Muscle Is Associated With Changes in Diacylglycerol, Protein Kinase C, and IκB-α

    Samar I. Itani;Neil B. Ruderman;Frank Schmieder;Guenther Boden

  • SIRT3 regulates mitochondrial fatty-acid oxidation by reversible enzyme deacetylation

    Matthew D. Hirschey;Tadahiro Shimazu;Tadahiro Shimazu;Eric Goetzman;Enxuan Jing

  • Enhanced muscle fat oxidation and glucose transport by ACRP30 globular domain: Acetyl–CoA carboxylase inhibition and AMP-activated protein kinase activation

    Eva Tomas;Tsu-Shuen Tsao;Asish K. Saha;Heather E. Murrey

  • The metabolically obese, normal-weight individual revisited.

    N Ruderman;D Chisholm;X Pi-Sunyer;S Schneider

  • AMPK and SIRT1: a long-standing partnership?

    Neil B. Ruderman;X. Julia Xu;Lauren E Nelson;Jose M. Cacicedo

  • SIRT1 Modulation of the Acetylation Status, Cytosolic Localization, and Activity of LKB1 POSSIBLE ROLE IN AMP-ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASE ACTIVATION

    Fan Lan;Jose M. Cacicedo;Neil Ruderman;Yasuo Ido

  • Malonyl-CoA, fuel sensing, and insulin resistance

    Neil B. Ruderman;Asish K. Saha;Demetrios Vavvas;Lee A. Witters

  • AMPK, insulin resistance, and the metabolic syndrome.

    Neil B. Ruderman;David Carling;Marc Prentki;José M. Cacicedo

  • Mice Lacking Adiponectin Show Decreased Hepatic Insulin Sensitivity and Reduced Responsiveness to Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor γ Agonists

    Andrea R. Nawrocki;Michael W. Rajala;Eva Tomas;Utpal B. Pajvani

  • Activation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase by insulin.

    Neil B. Ruderman;Rosana Kapeller;Morris F. White;Lewis C. Cantley

  • The "metabolically-obese," normal-weight individual.

    N B Ruderman;S H Schneider;P Berchtold

  • Free Fatty Acids Produce Insulin Resistance and Activate the Proinflammatory Nuclear Factor-κB Pathway in Rat Liver

    Guenther Boden;Pengxiang She;Maria Mozzoli;Peter Cheung

  • Role of disulfide bonds in Acrp30/adiponectin structure and signaling specificity. Different oligomers activate different signal transduction pathways.

    Tsu-Shuen Tsao;Eva Tomas;Heather E. Murrey;Christopher Hug;Christopher Hug

  • Muscle Glucose Metabolism following Exercise in the Rat: INCREASED SENSITIVITY TO INSULIN

    Erik A. Richter;Lawrence P. Garetto;Michael N. Goodman;Neil B. Ruderman

  • Evaluation of the isolated perfused rat hindquarter for the study of muscle metabolism

    N. B. Ruderman;C. R. S. Houghton;R. Hems

  • Physical Inactivity Rapidly Induces Insulin Resistance and Microvascular Dysfunction in Healthy Volunteers

    Naomi M. Hamburg;Craig J. McMackin;Alex L. Huang;Sherene M. Shenouda

  • AMP-activated protein kinase is required for the lipid-lowering effect of metformin in insulin-resistant human HepG2 cells.

    Mengwei Zang;Adriana Zuccollo;Xiuyun Hou;Daisuke Nagata

  • AMP kinase and malonyl-CoA: targets for therapy of the metabolic syndrome

    Neil Ruderman;Marc Prentki

  • AMPK and the biochemistry of exercise: Implications for human health and disease

    Erik A. Richter;Neil B. Ruderman

  • Glucose and diabetic vascular disease.

    Neil B. Ruderman;Joseph R. Williamson;Michael Brownlee

Frequent Co-Authors

Asish K. Saha
Asish K. Saha Boston University
Marc Prentki
Marc Prentki University of Montreal
Edward W. Kraegen
Edward W. Kraegen Garvan Institute of Medical Research
Antonio Zorzano
Antonio Zorzano University of Barcelona
Erik A. Richter
Erik A. Richter University of Copenhagen
Zhijun Luo
Zhijun Luo Nanchang University
Gregory J. Cooney
Gregory J. Cooney University of Sydney
Michael F. Berger
Michael F. Berger Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Suad Efendic
Suad Efendic Karolinska Institute
Barbara E. Corkey
Barbara E. Corkey Boston University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative routes to a healthcare career is increasingly popular for students seeking flexibility and accessibility. For those interested in administrative roles, medical billing and coding online schools that accept financial aid offer a fast track to entering the medical field while minimizing upfront costs. These programs cater to learners needing remote options and financial support.

If you prefer a clinical path but want to bypass traditional entrance exams, there are now nursing programs without teas requirements, making it easier to start a nursing career without standardized test barriers. For those aiming to move quickly through their education, accelerated healthcare programs allow for rapid skill development and faster entry into the workforce.

Ambitious registered nurses interested in advancing their careers should consider adn to np bridge programs. These online pathways help nurses seamlessly progress from an associate degree to nurse practitioner roles, expanding both their skills and career options.

Best Scientists Citing Neil B. Ruderman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles