World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Richard B. Devereux

Richard B. Devereux

Award Badge
Best Scientists
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Best Scientists

D-Index
177
Citations
183784
World Ranking
661
National Ranking
415

Medicine

D-Index
179
Citations
187087
World Ranking
372
National Ranking
235

Richard B. Devereux publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard B. Devereux sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,305 publications — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Richard B. Devereux D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard B. Devereux sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 179 D-Index — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Best Scientists Award

Overview

Richard B. Devereux is affiliated with Cornell University in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of Medicine, particularly focusing on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Their research spans multiple subfields, including Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Epidemiology.

Their scholarly output includes numerous papers concentrated on cardiovascular health, with particular attention to cardiac imaging, valve diseases, structural anomalies, and heart failure management. Main topics addressed in their work include:

  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair
  • Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
  • Heart Failure Treatment and Management

Richard B. Devereux has published regularly in several prominent venues, with frequent publications in:

  • JACC. Cardiovascular Imaging
  • Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • European Heart Journal
  • European Journal of Internal Medicine

Recent notable papers include:

  • Global Longitudinal Strain and Cardiac Events in Patients With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Related Myocarditis, 2020, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Left Atrial Strain Impairment Precedes Geometric Remodeling as a Marker of Post-Myocardial Infarction Diastolic Dysfunction, 2020, JACC. Cardiovascular Imaging
  • Global Circumferential and Radial Strain Among Patients With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Myocarditis, 2022, JACC. Cardiovascular Imaging
  • Ischemia-Mediated Dysfunction in Subpapillary Myocardium as a Marker of Functional Mitral Regurgitation, 2021, JACC. Cardiovascular Imaging
  • The current best drug treatment for hypertensive heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, 2023, European Journal of Internal Medicine

They have worked alongside several frequent coauthors, indicating sustained collaborations with:

  • Jonathan W. Weinsaft
  • Jiwon Kim
  • Jason G. Umans
  • Lisa Q. Rong
  • Shelley A. Cole

Best Publications

  • Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology.

    Roberto M. Lang;Michelle Bierig;Richard B. Devereux;Frank A. Flachskampf

  • Recommendations for quantitation of the left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography. American Society of Echocardiography Committee on Standards, Subcommittee on Quantitation of Two-Dimensional Echocardiograms.

    N. B. Schiller;P. M. Shah;M. Crawford;A. DeMaria

  • Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy: Comparison to necropsy findings

    Richard B. Devereux;Richard B. Devereux;Daniel R. Alonso;Daniel R. Alonso;Elizabeth M. Lutas;Elizabeth M. Lutas;Geoffrey J. Gottlieb;Geoffrey J. Gottlieb

  • Echocardiographic determination of left ventricular mass in man. Anatomic validation of the method.

    R B Devereux;N Reichek

  • Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension study (LIFE): a randomised trial against atenolol.

    Björn Dahlöf;Richard B Devereux;Sverre E Kjeldsen;Stevo Julius

  • Recommendations for chamber quantification

    Roberto M. Lang;Michelle Bierig;Richard B Devereux;Frank A Flachskampf

  • Relation of Left Ventricular Mass and Geometry to Morbidity and Mortality in Uncomplicated Essential Hypertension

    Michael J. Koren;Richard B. Devereux;Paul N. Casale;Daniel D. Savage

  • Patterns of left ventricular hypertrophy and geometric remodeling in essential hypertension

    Antonello Ganau;Richard B. Devereux;Mary J. Roman;Giovanni de Simone

  • The revised Ghent nosology for the Marfan syndrome

    Bart L Loeys;Harry C Dietz;Alan C Braverman;Bert L Callewaert

  • Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with diabetes in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension study (LIFE): a randomised trial against atenolol.

    Lars H Lindholm;Hans Ibsen;Björn Dahlöf;Richard B Devereux

  • Left ventricular mass and body size in normotensive children and adults: assessment of allometric relations and impact of overweight.

    Giovanni de Simone;Stephen R. Daniels;Stephen R. Daniels;Richard B. Devereux;Richard A. Meyer;Richard A. Meyer

  • Prevalence and correlates of accelerated atherosclerosis in systemic lupus erythematosus

    Mary J Roman;Beth-Ann Shanker;Adrienne Davis;Michael D Lockshin

  • Central pressure more strongly relates to vascular disease and outcome than does brachial pressure: the Strong Heart Study.

    Mary J. Roman;Richard B. Devereux;Jorge R. Kizer;Elisa T. Lee

  • Two-dimensional echocardiographic aortic root dimensions in normal children and adults.

    Mary J. Roman;Richard B. Devereux;Randi Kramer-Fox;John O'Loughlin

  • Value of Echocardiographic Measurement of Left Ventricular Mass in Predicting Cardiovascular Morbid Events in Hypertensive Men

    Paul N. Casale;Richard B. Devereux;Mark Milner;Gerardo Zullo

  • American Society of Echocardiography Recommendations for Use of Echocardiography in Clinical Trials A Report from the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and The Task Force on Echocardiography in Clinical Trials

    John S. Gottdiener;James Bednarz;Richard Devereux;Julius Gardin

  • Relationship of High and Low Ankle Brachial Index to All-Cause and Cardiovascular Disease Mortality The Strong Heart Study

    Helaine E. Resnick;Robert S. Lindsay;Mary Mc Grae McDermott;Richard B. Devereux

  • Impact of Diabetes on Cardiac Structure and Function The Strong Heart Study

    Richard B. Devereux;Mary J. Roman;Mary Paranicas;Michael J. O’Grady

  • Angiotensin II receptor blockade reduces new-onset atrial fibrillation and subsequent stroke compared to atenolol: The Losartan Intervention For End point reduction in hypertension (LIFE) study

    Kristian Wachtell;Mika Lehto;Eva Gerdts;Michael H. Olsen

  • Prognostic value of multidetector coronary computed tomographic angiography for prediction of all-cause mortality.

    James K. Min;Leslee J. Shaw;Richard B. Devereux;Peter M. Okin

Frequent Co-Authors

Mary J. Roman
Mary J. Roman Cornell University
Björn Dahlöf
Björn Dahlöf Sahlgrenska University Hospital
Peter M. Okin
Peter M. Okin Cornell University
Kristian Wachtell
Kristian Wachtell Cornell University
Barbara V. Howard
Barbara V. Howard MedStar Health
Sverre E. Kjeldsen
Sverre E. Kjeldsen University of Oslo
Elisa T. Lee
Elisa T. Lee University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
Giovanni de Simone
Giovanni de Simone University of Naples Federico II
Markku S. Nieminen
Markku S. Nieminen University of Helsinki
Richard R. Fabsitz
Richard R. Fabsitz George Mason University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are considering a career in medicine but are open to broader healthcare roles, exploring online nursing degrees can offer numerous opportunities. Many students look for accessible entry points, such as programs highlighted in this list of the easiest nursing schools to get into. These options can help you begin a rewarding healthcare career quickly and efficiently.

For those who are already registered nurses and want to advance, seeking what is the cheapest rn to bsn program online can be a cost-effective way to earn a bachelor’s degree in nursing. If you hold a non-nursing bachelor’s degree, you might consider online direct entry msn programs for non-nurses to rapidly transition into the nursing field at an advanced level.

Additionally, experienced nurses seeking leadership, research, or teaching roles should explore online phd programs in nursing. These advanced degrees offer flexibility and affordability for busy professionals. Whether you’re just starting out or looking to specialize, online pathways make further education in healthcare more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Richard B. Devereux

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles