World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Medicine
Australia
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
155
Citations
96553
World Ranking
957
National Ranking
27

Thomas H. Marwick publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas H. Marwick sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,862 publications — 100th percentile

100% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Thomas H. Marwick D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas H. Marwick sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 155 D-Index — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Medicine in Australia Leader Award
  • 2014 - Fellow of the Australian Academy of Health and Medical Science

Overview

Thomas H. Marwick is affiliated with the Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute in Australia. Their academic work primarily focuses on medicine, with a significant concentration in cardiology and cardiovascular medicine.

The scientist's research spans several subfields, including:

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Surgery
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Biomedical Engineering

Main topics of study covered by Thomas H. Marwick include:

  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity and mitigation
  • Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes

The scientist has published extensively, with frequent appearances in these venues:

  • JACC. Cardiovascular Imaging (40 publications)
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (20 publications)
  • European Heart Journal (10 publications)
  • Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography (9 publications)
  • European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging (8 publications)

Frequent collaborators of Thomas H. Marwick include:

  • Quan Huynh (39 coauthored papers)
  • Leah Wright (33 coauthored papers)
  • Paaladinesh Thavendiranathan (18 coauthored papers)
  • Kazuaki Negishi (17 coauthored papers)
  • M. Carrington (17 coauthored papers)

Notable recent papers include:

  • Strain-Guided Management of Potentially Cardiotoxic Cancer Therapy, 2020, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Role of cardiovascular imaging in cancer patients receiving cardiotoxic therapies: a position statement on behalf of the Heart Failure Association (HFA), the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) and the Cardio-Oncology Council of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), 2020, European Journal of Heart Failure
  • Reduction of dietary sodium to less than 100 mmol in heart failure (SODIUM-HF): an international, open-label, randomised, controlled trial, 2022, The Lancet
  • Prevention of Pathological Atrial Remodeling and Atrial Fibrillation, 2021, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Right ventricular longitudinal strain in the clinical routine: a state-of-the-art review, 2022, European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging

Thomas H. Marwick was awarded the title Fellow of the Australian Academy of Health and Medical Science in 2014.

Best Publications

  • Current and evolving echocardiographic techniques for the quantitative evaluation of cardiac mechanics: ASE/EAE consensus statement on methodology and indications endorsed by the Japanese society of echocardiography

    Victor Mor-Avi;Roberto M. Lang;Luigi P. Badano;Marek Belohlavek

  • Expert Consensus for Multimodality Imaging Evaluation of Adult Patients during and after Cancer Therapy: A Report from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging.

    Juan Carlos Plana;Maurizio Galderisi;Ana Barac;Michael S. Ewer

  • Definitions for a common standard for 2D speckle tracking echocardiography: consensus document of the EACVI/ASE/Industry Task Force to standardize deformation imaging

    Jens Uwe Voigt;Gianni Pedrizzetti;Gianni Pedrizzetti;Peter Lysyansky;Tom H. Marwick

  • ACC/AHA guidelines for exercise testing : Executive summary : A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Exercise Testing)

    Raymond J. Gibbons;Gary J. Balady;John W. Beasley;Faafp

  • Left ventricular dyssynchrony predicts response and prognosis after cardiac resynchronization therapy

    Jeroen J. Bax;Gabe B. Bleeker;Thomas H. Marwick;Sander G. Molhoek

  • Diabetic Cardiomyopathy: Evidence, Mechanisms, and Therapeutic Implications

    Zhi You Fang;Johannes B. Prins;Thomas H. Marwick

  • Standardization of left atrial, right ventricular, and right atrial deformation imaging using two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography: a consensus document of the EACVI/ASE/Industry Task Force to standardize deformation imaging.

    Luigi P. Badano;Theodore J. Kolias;Denisa Muraru;Theodore P. Abraham

  • EAE/ASE Recommendations for Image Acquisition and Display Using Three-Dimensional Echocardiography

    Roberto M. Lang;Luigi P. Badano;Wendy Tsang;David H. Adams

  • Use of myocardial strain imaging by echocardiography for the early detection of cardiotoxicity in patients during and after cancer chemotherapy: a systematic review.

    Paaladinesh Thavendiranathan;Frédéric Poulin;Ki-Dong Lim;Juan Carlos Plana

  • Prognostic implications of global LV dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of global longitudinal strain and ejection fraction

    Kashif Kalam;Petr Otahal;Thomas H Marwick

  • Prediction of all-cause mortality from global longitudinal speckle strain: comparison with ejection fraction and wall motion scoring.

    Tony Stanton;Rodel Leano;Thomas H. Marwick

  • Relative ‘apical sparing’ of longitudinal strain using two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography is both sensitive and specific for the diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis

    Dermot Phelan;Patrick Collier;Paaladinesh Thavendiranathan;Zoran B Popović

  • Normal ranges of left ventricular strain: a meta-analysis.

    Teerapat Yingchoncharoen;Shikhar Agarwal;Zoran B. Popović;Thomas H. Marwick

  • Alterations of Left Ventricular Myocardial Characteristics Associated With Obesity

    Chiew Y. Wong;Trisha O’Moore-Sullivan;Rodel Leano;Nuala Byrne

  • Measurement of strain and strain rate by echocardiography: ready for prime time?

    Thomas H. Marwick

  • Reproducibility of echocardiographic techniques for sequential assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes: application to patients undergoing cancer chemotherapy.

    Paaladinesh Thavendiranathan;Andrew D. Grant;Tomoko Negishi;Juan Carlos Plana

  • Recommendations on the use of echocardiography in adult hypertension: a report from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) and the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE)

    Thomas H. Marwick;Thierry C. Gillebert;Gerard Aurigemma;Julio Chirinos

  • Reproducibility and accuracy of echocardiographic measurements of left ventricular parameters using real-time three-dimensional echocardiography

    Carly Jenkins;Kristen Bricknell;Lizelle Hanekom;Thomas H. Marwick

  • Analysis of interinstitutional observer agreement in interpretation of dobutamine stress echocardiograms

    Rainer Hoffmann;Harald Lethen;Thomas Marwick;Mariarosaria Arnese

  • Impaired chronotropic response to exercise stress testing as a predictor of mortality.

    Michael S. Lauer;Gary S. Francis;Peter M. Okin;Fredric J. Pashkow

Frequent Co-Authors

James D. Thomas
James D. Thomas Northwestern University
Zoran B. Popović
Zoran B. Popović Cleveland Clinic
Jeff S. Coombes
Jeff S. Coombes University of Queensland
Michael S. Lauer
Michael S. Lauer National Institutes of Health
Simon Stewart
Simon Stewart Torrens University Australia
Brian P. Griffin
Brian P. Griffin Cleveland Clinic
Paaladinesh Thavendiranathan
Paaladinesh Thavendiranathan University Health Network
Jagat Narula
Jagat Narula Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
David S. Celermajer
David S. Celermajer Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
Milind Y. Desai
Milind Y. Desai Cleveland Clinic

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in healthcare but looking for alternative pathways beyond traditional medical school? There are a variety of accredited online degrees and training programs that can help you start a rewarding career in medicine or healthcare fields. For instance, some easy nursing schools to get into provide aspiring nurses with accessible options for entering the healthcare workforce.

If you prefer administrative roles, a career in medical billing and coding can be both flexible and in-demand. You might be wondering, can you get financial aid for medical billing and coding? Many accredited online programs do, in fact, offer financial assistance to qualifying students.

For those progressing in their nursing careers, there are lpn to rn programs without teas test requirements, making advancement more attainable for qualified candidates.

Additionally, if leadership or management is your goal, consider an online healthcare management degree. Accelerated online options can help you shape healthcare policy or oversee clinical operations, all while studying on your own schedule.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas H. Marwick

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles