World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
138
Citations
90978
World Ranking
1801
National Ranking
1029

Jae K. Oh publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jae K. Oh sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 773 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Jae K. Oh D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jae K. Oh sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 138 D-Index — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jae K. Oh is affiliated with the Mayo Clinic in the United States and has a significant publication record in the field of Medicine, particularly focusing on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Their research spans multiple subfields including Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Epidemiology, Surgery, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

Their principal research topics cover various aspects of heart and vascular health, including:

  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management
  • Pericarditis and Cardiac Tamponade
  • Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair
  • Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches

Jae K. Oh has contributed frequently to leading cardiovascular journals, with multiple publications in:

  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography
  • JACC. Cardiovascular Imaging
  • Circulation
  • JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions

Among notable recent papers authored or coauthored by Jae K. Oh are:

  • Multimodality imaging in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: an expert consensus document of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging, 2021, European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging
  • Electrocardiogram screening for aortic valve stenosis using artificial intelligence, 2021, European Heart Journal
  • Recommended Standards for the Performance of Transesophageal Echocardiographic Screening for Structural Heart Intervention: From the American Society of Echocardiography, 2021, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography
  • 3-Year Outcomes After Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients With Aortic Stenosis, 2023, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Self-expanding Transcatheter vs Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Intermediate-Risk Patients, 2022, JAMA Cardiology

The scientist frequently collaborates with other authors including:

  • Garvan C. Kane
  • William R. Miranda
  • Saki Ito
  • Sorin V. Pislaru
  • Paul A. Friedman

Best Publications

  • Recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography

    Sherif F. Nagueh;Christopher P. Appleton;Thierry C. Gillebert;Paolo N. Marino

  • Recommendations for the Evaluation of Left Ventricular Diastolic Function by Echocardiography: An Update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging

    Sherif F. Nagueh;Otto A. Smiseth;Christopher P. Appleton;Benjamin F. Rd Byrd

  • Recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography

    Sherif F. Nagueh;Christopher P Appleton;Thierry C. Gillebert;Paolo N. Marino

  • Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a self-expanding valve in low-risk patients

    Jeffrey J Popma;G Michael Deeb;Steven J Yakubov;Mubashir Mumtaz

  • Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement with a Self-Expanding Prosthesis

    David H. Adams;Jeffrey J. Popma;Michael J. Reardon;Steven J. Yakubov

  • New index of combined systolic and diastolic myocardial performance: a simple and reproducible measure of cardiac function--a study in normals and dilated cardiomyopathy

    C Tei;L H Ling;D O Hodge;K R Bailey

  • Left Atrial Size: Physiologic Determinants and Clinical Applications

    Walter P. Abhayaratna;James B. Seward;Christopher P. Appleton;Pamela S. Douglas

  • American Society of Echocardiography Recommendations for Use of Echocardiography in Clinical Trials A Report from the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and The Task Force on Echocardiography in Clinical Trials

    John S. Gottdiener;James Bednarz;Richard Devereux;Julius Gardin

  • Effect of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibition on exercise capacity and clinical status in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: A randomized clinical trial

    Margaret M. Redfield;Horng H. Chen;Barry A. Borlaug;Marc J. Semigran

  • Transcatheter aortic valve replacement using a self-expanding bioprosthesis in patients with severe aortic stenosis at extreme risk for surgery.

    Jeffrey J. Popma;David H. Adams;Michael J. Reardon;Steven J. Yakubov

  • Transesophageal echocardiography: technique, anatomic correlations, implementation, and clinical applications.

    James B. Seward;Bijoy K. Khandheria;Jae K. Oh;Martin D. Abel

  • Coronary-Artery Bypass Surgery in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy

    Eric J. Velazquez;Kerry L. Lee;Robert H. Jones;Hussein R. Al-Khalidi

  • The noninvasive assessment of left ventricular diastolic function with two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography

    Jae K. Oh;Christopher P. Appleton;Liv K. Hatle;Rick A. Nishimura

  • Coronary Bypass Surgery with or without Surgical Ventricular Reconstruction

    Robert H. Jones;Eric J. Velazquez;Robert E. Michler;George Sopko

  • Left atrial volume: a powerful predictor of survival after acute myocardial infarction

    Jacob E. Møller;Graham S. Hillis;Jae K. Oh;James B. Seward

  • Aortic Diameter ≥5.5 cm Is Not a Good Predictor of Type A Aortic Dissection Observations From the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD)

    Linda A. Pape;Thomas T. Tsai;Eric M. Isselbacher;Jae K. Oh

  • Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction as a predictor of the first diagnosed nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in 840 elderly men and women

    Teresa S.M Tsang;Bernard J Gersh;Christopher P Appleton;A.Jamil Tajik

  • American Society of Echocardiography clinical recommendations for multimodality cardiovascular imaging of patients with pericardial disease: endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance and Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography.

    Allan L. Klein;Suhny Abbara;Deborah A. Agler;Christopher P. Appleton

  • Constrictive Pericarditis in the Modern Era Evolving Clinical Spectrum and Impact on Outcome After Pericardiectomy

    Lieng H. Ling;Jae K. Oh;Hartzell V. Schaff;Gordon K. Danielson

  • Tissue Doppler imaging - A new prognosticator for cardiovascular diseases

    Cheuk Man Yu;John E. Sanderson;Thomas H. Marwick;Jae K. Oh

Frequent Co-Authors

James B. Seward
James B. Seward Mayo Clinic
A. Jamil Tajik
A. Jamil Tajik Mayo Clinic
Eric J. Velazquez
Eric J. Velazquez Yale University
Jeffrey J. Popma
Jeffrey J. Popma Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Bernard J. Gersh
Bernard J. Gersh Mayo Clinic
Kerry L. Lee
Kerry L. Lee Duke University
Michael J. Reardon
Michael J. Reardon Houston Methodist

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine opens up a wide range of opportunities beyond traditional MD programs. Many students consider alternative and complementary paths, such as healthcare administration, nursing, or pharmacy, to build a rewarding future in the healthcare sector.

For those interested in leadership or management, earning an affordable healthcare administration degree online can provide essential skills and flexibility for working professionals. Advanced roles may require further credentials, like a Master’s, and students can compare the most affordable online mha programs to find one that matches their goals and budget.

If advancing in nursing is your aim, finding the cheapest dnp program allows for a cost-effective pathway to doctoral-level expertise. Similarly, aspiring pharmacists can explore the 3 year online pharmd options, which offer accelerated and accessible routes to becoming a licensed pharmacist.

These online pathways provide flexibility and affordability, making it easier for students from diverse backgrounds to achieve their healthcare career aspirations.

Best Scientists Citing Jae K. Oh

Trending Scientists