World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 73 1271 1133 653 569 129 20554

Orla M. Conneely publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Orla M. Conneely between 1982 and 2020, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Orla M. Conneely published across 39 years, from 1982 to 2020, averaging 3.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 1997. 2 of the 152 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1982 to 2020. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 1997. 1982: 1 publication 1983: 1 publication 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 8 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 5 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 5 publications 1992: 10 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 8 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 11 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 3 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 4 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 1 publication 2018: 2 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 1 publication
1982 2020

152 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Orla M. Conneely: publications per year, 1982 to 2020
Year Publications
1982 1
1983 1
1984 1
1985 0
1986 3
1987 8
1988 1
1989 5
1990 1
1991 5
1992 10
1993 3
1994 1
1995 8
1996 5
1997 11
1998 5
1999 8
2000 9
2001 9
2002 11
2003 8
2004 2
2005 3
2006 4
2007 3
2008 4
2009 1
2010 3
2011 2
2012 1
2013 4
2014 2
2015 3
2016 1
2017 1
2018 2
2019 1
2020 1
Total 152
Download as CSV

Orla M. Conneely publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Orla M. Conneely sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 127–136 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 129 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158 129
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Orla M. Conneely D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Orla M. Conneely sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 72–73 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 73 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83 73
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Orla M. Conneely is affiliated with Baylor College of Medicine in the United States. Their research spans multiple areas within the broader field of biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with a particular focus on molecular biology.

The scientist's work covers several main topics, including:

  • Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
  • RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
  • Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors Research

Conneely has contributed to research published in venues such as Scientific Reports, among others. Notably, a recent paper includes:

  • Targeting Oncogenic Super Enhancers in MYC-Dependent AML Using a Small Molecule Activator of NR4A Nuclear Receptors (2020, Scientific Reports)

The publication reflects an interest in regulatory mechanisms in cancer biology, specifically acute myeloid leukemia, and explores molecular activators with therapeutic potential.

Collaborative work forms a key element of Conneely's research, involving frequent coauthors including S. Greg Call, Ryan P. Duren, Anil K. Panigrahi, Loc T. Nguyen, and Pablo R. Freire.

Their research profile is characterized by integration of molecular biology techniques aimed at understanding and modulating key biological processes such as protein degradation pathways and gene delivery mechanisms. This intersection supports investigation into epigenetic regulators, including histone deacetylase inhibitors, demonstrating the scientist's focus on molecular targets relevant to disease pathways and potential interventions.

Best Publications

  • Mice lacking progesterone receptor exhibit pleiotropic reproductive abnormalities.

    J. P. Lydon;F. J. Demayo;C. R. Funk;S. K. Mani

  • Nurr1 is essential for the induction of the dopaminergic phenotype and the survival of ventral mesencephalic late dopaminergic precursor neurons.

    Odila Saucedo-Cardenas;Juan D. Quintana-Hau;Wei-Dong Le;Marten P. Smidt

  • Subgroup of Reproductive Functions of Progesterone Mediated by Progesterone Receptor-B Isoform

    Biserka Mulac-Jericevic;Robert A. Mullinax;Francesco J. DeMayo;John P. Lydon

  • Dopaminergic and ligand-independent activation of steroid hormone receptors.

    Ronan F. Power;Shaila K. Mani;Juan Codina;Orla M. Conneely

  • Defective mammary gland morphogenesis in mice lacking the progesterone receptor B isoform

    Biserka Mulac-Jericevic;John P. Lydon;Francesco J. DeMayo;Orla M. Conneely

  • Multifunctional roles of lactoferrin: a critical overview.

    Unknown

  • Identification of a new brain-specific transcription factor, NURR1.

    S W Law;O M Conneely;F J DeMayo;B W O'Malley

  • Reproductive functions of progesterone receptors.

    Orla M Conneely;Biserka Mulac-Jericevic;Francesco DeMayo;John P Lydon

  • Abrogation of nuclear receptors Nr4a3 andNr4a1 leads to development of acute myeloid leukemia

    Shannon E Mullican;Shuo Zhang;Marina Konopleva;Vivian Ruvolo

  • Lactoferrin and host defense.

    Unknown

  • Reproductive phenotpes of the progesterone receptor null mutant mouse.

    John P. Lydon;Francesco J. DeMayo;Orla M. Conneely;Bert W. O'Malley

  • Reproductive tissue selective actions of progesterone receptors

    Unknown

  • Modulation of the ligand-independent activation of the human estrogen receptor by hormone and antihormone.

    Carolyn L. Smith;Orla M. Conneely;Bert W. O'Malley

  • Progesterone-dependent regulation of female reproductive activity by two distinct progesterone receptor isoforms.

    Orla M. Conneely;Biserka Mulac-Jericevic;John P. Lydon

  • Molecular Cloning of the Chicken Progesterone Receptor

    Orla M. Conneely;William P. Sullivan;David O. Toft;Mariel Birnbaumer

  • Reproductive functions of the progesterone receptor isoforms: lessons from knock-out mice

    Orla M. Conneely;Biserka Mulac-Jericevic;John P. Lydon;Francesco J. De Mayo

  • Progesterone receptors in reproduction: functional impact of the A and B isoforms

    Orla M Conneely;John P Lydon

  • The A and B forms of the chicken progesterone receptor arise by alternate initiation of translation of a unique mRNA.

    Orla M. Conneely;Beth Lynn Maxwell;David O. Toft;William T. Schrader

  • Dopamine activation of an orphan of the steroid receptor superfamily.

    Ronan F. Power;John P. Lydon;Orla M. Conneely;Bert W. O'Malley

  • The chicken progesterone receptor A and B isoforms are products of an alternate translation initiation event.

    O. M. Conneely;D. M. Kettelberger;Ming-Jer Tsai;W. T. Schrader

Frequent Co-Authors

Bert W. O'Malley
Bert W. O'Malley Baylor College of Medicine
John P. Lydon
John P. Lydon Baylor College of Medicine
William T. Schrader
William T. Schrader Baylor College of Medicine
Gregory S. May
Gregory S. May The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Francesco J. DeMayo
Francesco J. DeMayo National Institutes of Health
Rebecca J. Dearman
Rebecca J. Dearman University of Manchester
Marie Cumberbatch
Marie Cumberbatch AstraZeneca (United Kingdom)
Daniel Medina
Daniel Medina Baylor College of Medicine
Ian Kimber
Ian Kimber University of Manchester
Alan D. W. Dobson
Alan D. W. Dobson University College Cork

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Molecular Biology can open doors to a variety of rewarding allied health careers in the USA. Many students consider transitioning into specialized fields, especially when flexible, accredited online programs are available. For those interested in working directly with patients to diagnose and treat communication disorders, there are accredited speech pathology programs available online that adhere to ASHA standards and provide a clear route to licensure.

If your background is not in speech-language pathology, speech language pathology bridge programs online can help make the transition smoother and faster for non-SLP majors. Similarly, those considering a nursing career can look into online bsn programs for non nurses to efficiently earn a bachelor’s degree and enter the healthcare workforce.

Career prospects in areas like psychiatric nursing are also strong. Prospective students may wish to explore job outcomes, such as psychiatric nurse practitioner salary by state, to understand earning potential across the country. With so many online pathways, a background in Molecular Biology can serve as a valuable launchpad for multiple high-impact careers in healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Orla M. Conneely

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles