World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Michael Felderer

Michael Felderer

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 39 9688 9410 481 469 386 7138

Michael Felderer publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Michael Felderer between 2004 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Michael Felderer published across 23 years, from 2004 to 2026, averaging 20 papers a year. Output peaked at 49 publications in 2023. 30 of the 461 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 49. Peak 49 publications in 2023. 2004: 1 publication 2005: 0 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 4 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 3 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 26 publications 2015: 20 publications 2016: 39 publications 2017: 42 publications 2018: 36 publications 2019: 42 publications 2020: 33 publications 2021: 33 publications 2022: 40 publications 2023: 49 publications 2024: 27 publications 2025: 25 publications 2026: 5 publications
2004 2026

461 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Michael Felderer: publications per year, 2004 to 2026
Year Publications
2004 1
2005 0
2006 0
2007 1
2008 4
2009 1
2010 3
2011 8
2012 11
2013 15
2014 26
2015 20
2016 39
2017 42
2018 36
2019 42
2020 33
2021 33
2022 40
2023 49
2024 27
2025 25
2026 5
Total 461
Download as CSV

Michael Felderer publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Felderer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 382–391 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 386 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158 386
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Michael Felderer D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Felderer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968 39
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Michael Felderer is affiliated with the University of Cologne in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on computer science, with a particular emphasis on software engineering and its various subfields.

The main fields of study for Felderer include:

  • Computer Science

Within this broad field, their work explores several subfields such as:

  • Information Systems
  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Software
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering

The primary research topics pursued by Felderer cover an array of areas within software engineering, including:

  • Software Engineering Research
  • Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
  • Software Reliability and Analysis Research
  • Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
  • Software System Performance and Reliability
  • Green IT and Sustainability
  • Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies

Felderer's recent publication record features several journal articles and conference papers addressing contemporary issues in software engineering and related technologies. Notable recent works include:

  • From monolithic systems to Microservices: An assessment framework, 2021, Information and Software Technology
  • Empirical Standards for Software Engineering Research, 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • What Makes Agile Software Development Agile?, 2021, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
  • The pipeline for the continuous development of artificial intelligence models-Current state of research and practice, 2023, Journal of Systems and Software
  • A taxonomy of attack mechanisms in the automotive domain, 2021, Computer Standards & Interfaces

Felderer has frequently collaborated with several co-authors, including:

  • Vahid Garousi
  • Benedikt Dornauer
  • Rudolf Ramler
  • Monika Steidl
  • Daniel Méndez

The venues where Felderer has published multiple papers include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Information and Software Technology
  • Journal of Systems and Software
  • IEEE Software

Best Publications

  • Guidelines for including grey literature and conducting multivocal literature reviews in software engineering

    Vahid Garousi;Michael Felderer;Michael Felderer;Mika V. Mäntylä

  • Naming the pain in requirements engineering

    D. Méndez Fernández;S. Wagner;M. Kalinowski;M. Felderer

  • The need for multivocal literature reviews in software engineering: complementing systematic literature reviews with grey literature

    Vahid Garousi;Michael Felderer;Mika V. Mäntylä

  • Hybrid software and system development in practice: waterfall, scrum, and beyond

    Marco Kuhrmann;Philipp Diebold;Jürgen Münch;Paolo Tell

  • Closing the Gap Between Software Engineering Education and Industrial Needs

    Vahid Garousi;Gorkem Giray;Eray Tuzun;Cagatay Catal

  • Security Testing: A Survey

    Michael Felderer;Matthias Büchler;Martin Johns;Achim D. Brucker

  • Status Quo in Requirements Engineering: A Theory and a Global Family of Surveys

    Stefan Wagner;Daniel Méndez Fernández;Michael Felderer;Antonio Vetrò

  • Guidelines for including the grey literature and conducting multivocal literature reviews in software engineering

    Vahid Garousi;Michael Felderer;Mika V. Mäntylä

  • Contemporary Empirical Methods in Software Engineering

    Unknown

  • Software test maturity assessment and test process improvement

    Vahid Garousi;Michael Felderer;Tuna Hacalolu

  • From monolithic systems to Microservices: An assessment framework

    Florian Auer;Valentina Lenarduzzi;Michael Felderer;Michael Felderer;Davide Taibi

  • Model-based security testing: a taxonomy and systematic classification

    Michael Felderer;Philipp Zech;Ruth Breu;Matthias Büchler

  • A taxonomy of risk-based testing

    Michael Felderer;Ina Schieferdecker

  • Hybrid Software Development Approaches in Practice: A European Perspective

    Marco Kuhrmann;Philipp Diebold;Jurgen Munch;Paolo Tell

  • Aligning software engineering education with industrial needs: A meta-analysis

    Vahid Garousi;Görkem Giray;Eray Tüzün;Cagatay Catal

  • Comparison of the FMEA and STPA safety analysis methods–a case study

    Sardar Muhammad Sulaman;Armin Beer;Michael Felderer;Michael Felderer;Martin Höst

  • Empirical Standards for Software Engineering Research

    Paul Ralph;Nauman bin Ali;Sebastian Baltes;Domenico Bianculli

  • The Pipeline for the Continuous Development of Artificial Intelligence Models - Current State of Research and Practice

    Unknown

  • Testing embedded software: A survey of the literature

    Vahid Garousi;Michael Felderer;Michael Felderer;Çağrı Murat Karapıçak;Uğur Yılmaz

  • What Makes Agile Software Development Agile

    Marco Kuhrmann;Paolo Tell;Regina Hebig;Jil Ann Christin Klunder

  • Integrating risk-based testing in industrial test processes

    Michael Felderer;Rudolf Ramler

  • Worlds Apart: Industrial and Academic Focus Areas in Software Testing

    Vahid Garousi;Michael Felderer

  • Naming the Pain in Requirements Engineering: Contemporary Problems, Causes, and Effects in Practice

    D. Méndez Fernández;S. Wagner;M. Kalinowski;M. Felderer

  • A Classification for Model-Based Security Testing

    Michael Felderer;Berthold Agreiter;Philipp Zech;Ruth Breu

Frequent Co-Authors

Stefan Wagner
Stefan Wagner University of Stuttgart
Dietmar Pfahl
Dietmar Pfahl University of Tartu
Mika V. Mäntylä
Mika V. Mäntylä University of Helsinki
Tayana Conte
Tayana Conte Federal University of Amazonas
Guenther Ruhe
Guenther Ruhe University of Calgary
Jürgen Münch
Jürgen Münch Reutlingen University
Elske Ammenwerth
Elske Ammenwerth UMIT Tirol - Private University for Health Sciences and Health Technology
Roel Wieringa
Roel Wieringa University of Twente
Casper Lassenius
Casper Lassenius Aalto University
Bernhard Rumpe
Bernhard Rumpe RWTH Aachen University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a variety of related online degrees and career opportunities. Many students pursue technical fields that complement computer science, such as physics, data science, and electrical engineering. For those interested in cost-effective study options, consider researching the online physics degrees available at affordable rates.

Data science is another booming discipline, closely linked with computer science in both skills and career prospects. You can review the data science degree programs that are most affordable in the USA to find a program that fits your budget and goals.

If you are interested in applied technology and innovation, check out the best online electrical engineering programs USA. These programs can lead to careers in robotics, telecommunications, and more.

For those seeking a faster route to employability, look into certifications that pay well. These can serve as stepping stones into high-demand tech roles, offering both skill development and solid earning potential.

Best Scientists Citing Michael Felderer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles